>IBM had to allow the recent MS-DOS source code dropOS/2 when? Hell, even AIX being open-source would be cool. That said, the holy grail is the clusterfuck for the ages known as Workplace OS.
>>100184297boomers really do fucking ruin everythingany closed source shit should legally get open sourced after 10 years
>>100184297>That said, the holy grail is the clusterfuck for the ages known as Workplace OS.To open WorkplaceOS you need approval from Apple and Metrowerks/Motorola/Freescale, as it contains code fragments from when it was TaligentOS.
IBM sold OS/2 to another company.
>>100184297I've tried OS/2 in 86Box and while it's interesting from a historical point, it's fucking useless. At least old Wangblows has interesting and soulful software
>>100184917Os/2 can also run windows and dos software
>>100186161So can Windows 98SEWhat is some good OS/2 exclusive software?
IBM shit is so ridiculously bloated that it would probably take freetards years to sift through all of the code.
ArcaOS open sourcing WHEN?
>>100186872Never, the devs are massive retards
