STOP PUTTING LOW QUALITY AUDIO TRACKS ON 720P TORRENTS MOTHERFUCKERS
>>103292329720p is low quality
>>103292329>AUDIO TRACKS>720PWhy are you even putting music in a video format? Just share mp3, ogg, flac, wav.
>>103292329>720pYou know, 1080p quality isn't that difficult to download anymore
>>103292329GOOD MORNING SAAR
>render video on video editor>quality is 192kbps mp3>because you don't need more>changing it to 320kbps is not easy or possible
assuming the original is higher quality, 720/1080p encode would be optimized for space. Makes sense to cut down on audio as well. Are you one of those retards that put FLAC audio in "small" hevc/av1 encodes?
>>103292329>720phows life back there in 2003 buddy?
>>103292341fuck you, people have been listening to high quality audio since the 80sthe goal of compressed 720p is to have light video files, not unwatchable video files and that's what you get with poor audioI've got a 2h AVC 720p movie of 700MB. The video is not great but it is watchable. The audio on the other hand is 34kbps and makes the movie unwatchable, many cases like these. The extracted audio track takes 29MB. If it had 128kbps audio the audio track would take less than 120MB and the entire movie would take 790MB, or a total of 850MB with 192kbps. Like I fucking care about saving 90MB or 150MB.processing power is not the issuesize is not the issuethe issue is niggers thinking that poor video should go with poor audiothe issue is niggers thinking that poor audio is equally bad as poor video, it's fucking not, it's 10 times worse>>103292725>Are you one of those retards that put FLAC audio in "small" hevc/av1 encodes?No, but I'd like to remind you that people in the 80s listened with 1400kbps music thanks to CDs and that in fucking 2024 we're at 34kbps audio on movies.This is fucking unacceptable.
test
>>103292887you should ask for a refund
>>103292329>downloads low quality shit>wtf why is this so low quality!?>frogposter
>>103292887I encode my own shit and I never use anything below AAC 96kbps (mono) or 128 (stereo)why AAC? because it just works on everything.
>>103292329If you're not downloading 1080p blu-ray remuxes in 2024, as a bare minimum, you're a moron.
>>103292925the real problem here is many small encodes were made by retards. Small files require good codecs. Variable bit rate and most important "software video encoding". imagine using your gpu to encode small shit.
>>103292887>128kbpsYou don't need more than 64kbps OPUS.
>>103292877Infinitely better than now.What a dumb question.
>>103293033>>103293210What part of AAC works on everything didn't you understand?
>>103293243opus is better
>>103293243>>103293280i don't think you were responding to me but OPUS has failed to play in many devices and my jellyfin server has to transcode audio everytime. even AC3 or DTS has more chances to work.blame shitty TVs
>>103293280Its not better at having more compatibility, are you fucking blind?
>>103293291>>103293310>more compatibilityrelevance? just use mpv
>>103293323Are you deaf, blind and retarded?First, mpchc mogs mpv any day of the week.Second, Jellyfin server is made to host movies and show so you can easily watch them in several devices, tv, ipad, phone, pc, laptop, etcYou can't just tell your family members and friends who barely know about tech "hurr just use a pc and this trannyware software to watch it".
>>103293323are you fucking stupid? videos don't work out of the box on all TVs or phones.>hur hurr use pcretard
>>103293355>>103293357Using obsolete codecs to support obsolete devices just doesn't seem very smart.
>>103293364Not being able to watch movies is less smartYou think youtube only host a single video encode? No, they make several codecs available so they work in every device.
>>103293056For me it depends on the content. I have The Wire as a remux because it's already AVC @~20mbps, so reencoding wouldn't really bring much benefit. I've got a jellyfin server that I share with family, so I'm sure as shit not wasting 60GB on a 4k remux for my boomer mom who doesn't give a shit, so an x265 encode at a reasonable crf or constrained bit rate will do me fine.
>>103293377mpv is literally free
>>103293662I see you're being retarded on purpose. good job troll-kun
>>103293768Ah, projection.
>>103293811ok install MPV on a TV.... TVs from 2013. or tv decoders or anything else or just better try to teach any boomer how to use mpv. Even VLC would be a better option but that's not the point here. h264/aac just work and it even has better compatibility than divx overall. the only thing that's better is mpeg2.waste a couple of GBs more is far easier than replace the whole ecosystem for everyone. you sound like one of those that want to implement linux everywhere
>>103293885plug computer into tvrun mpvsimple as
>>103293912listen retard. there's no>plug computer into tvthere's no computers only the device people are using at the moment.imagine having to connect a pc every time you want to watch a video. just kys
Last time I downloaded something in 720p was for my nokia 5800 in 2012.
>>103293951>zoomer doesn't know that you can plug things into TVssad
>>103292484this is a 720p board, sir
>>103292877Sigh, life was so much better before this horrible image board
>>103292887If size is not an issue then why don't you just download the higher resolution version?
>>103297223processing power. my 12yo 1366x768 laptop has a bit of trouble playing 1080p sometimes, if bitrate too high or a codec newer than AVC. when that's the case I download both the 720p and 1080p versions and play the 720p video with the audio in the 1080p file.I'm doing it right now but with a "yify" 1.6GB 1080p and the DTS audio of a 15GB 1080p file. We'll see if I can play it without slowdown. It's going to sound so sweet. (well, the signal has to pass through an USB audio card and old iPhone headphones)>Stream #0:0: Video: h264 (High), yuv420p(progressive), 1920x800 [SAR 1:1 DAR 12:5], 23.98 fps, 23.98 tbr, 1k tbn (default)>1.5 GB>1855 kbps>Stream #0:0: Audio: dts (DTS-HD MA), 48000 Hz, 5.1(side), s32p (24 bit) (default)>3.4 GB of audio>4148 kbps
>>103293951My nigger, if you're watching movies on your phone or a 20 year old Dell laptop, you're part of the problem.
>>103298000>he doesn't know that Elon Musk solved that problem a while ago
Hey anon, I work for the RIAA. It's all about maximizing the file size. We just pump this shit out for the RIAA so when you download them, your IP gets pinged. We know that you're trying to watch the latest goislop and want to download them delete it after one watch, nobody is backing up these low quality videos. So like making it 350mb is the priority. Why? So you download it. Your IP gets pinged and we contact the ISP, your name goes into a database and gets tracked. Let's say you use a VPN, we just contact the VPN and 90% of them rat you out. We don't actually care if your Internet gets disconnected. That goes against our business model. We want you to keep breaking the law so when you do get nailed, you're going to actual federal prison.
