> The piss babies on the green site forum whining about the reduced motion setting, wanking themselves to death with "animations are inefficient I disable all of them", or going straight to "people with disabilities should not use computers", like the absolute dickheads they are
But that's a completely fair and reasonable post
>>107160276i hate when someone i hate says something i agree with
Use case for insults?
>>107160276Ebussy is wrong.Animations don't make computer use easier for cripples.It's the opposite.
>>107160266>people with disabilities should not use computersi don't see why gnome is complaining about that considering how much they crippled accessibility features over wayland
>>107160266which is the green site? rule34?
>>107160276ebussy made a false statement (animations are for accessibility) and a strawman (who said people with disabilities should not use computers?).If a window goes from non-existent into fullscreen with a 300ms animation on 30 fps (gnome cant do more), it has barely 9 frames to go from no-size to covering a 24" monitor.Without an animation - so simply pop into existence - it is easier to handle for people with disabilities.
>>107160313PhoronixWhich is ironic, since phoronix censored hard in the past month to kick out people who mentioned Jeremy Bicha in threads about Gnome.
>Defending animations in DE designThis must be like being a battered wife
>>107160266does the reduced animation setting not remove animations, and hes defending that?
I don't care about ableism (or however that is called), but in a public discussion, where you argue that you did something because you cared soo soo much about cripples, i would not use 'moron' as an insult.
Using GNOME is a disability.
>>107160266Our king speaketh words of wisdom yet again
Gnome always goes on about accessibility but no disabled person is even using Gnome except for the mentally disabled.And I bet their accessibility features are complete dog shit like the rest of the desktop.
REDEEM THE ANIMATIONS SAAR
>>107160650It's a RedHat project and corpos have to implement government mandated accessibility stuff.Therefor Gnome implements the required stuff and claims to care about accessibility, while in reality they don't give a fuck outside of what is mandated.There are two litmus tests:>are there accessibility features inside settings?Government mandated accessibility has to be implemented by default. A high contrast setting you have to enable in a preferences menu doesn't matter, it is considered to not exist in the first place.>did they remove symbols from buttons or context menus?Government mandates symbols to be friendly for all kinds of vision impaired people, and the easiest way to adhere to this is to... simply not have symbols at all! You don't have to care about mandated rules if you don't have it!... firefox removed the icons out of context menus for that reason.Both of those things make accessibility objectively worse, while by law you are more compliant.
>>107160266did ebussy finally snap?
>>107160650saving this gem of a post
>>107160386It's a great thing Cinnamon allows disabling them.
>>107160266What the fuck is the green site?
>>107160815use case for snapping?
>>107160962learn to read, he clearly says it
>>107160266What makes you think site colour is a metric?
Here's what made ebussy mad:https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/phoronix/latest-phoronix-articles/1589983-gtk-adds-reduced-motion-accessibility-option-to-follow-macos-windows-others
>>107160266Lol I just know ebussy from fucking 4chin, I had to fact check that post, it's real. Eh b-based?
https://mastodon.social/@ebassi/115514732806916070NigOP
>>107160761>use case for toilets?>what makes you think gorgeous looks are a metric?
>>107161052you mean picrel?
>>107160266>The piss babies on the green site forumThought that meant us. Phoronix hasn't ever been relevant.
>>107161052use case for mad ?
>>107160313>which is the green site?umm... 4chan?
>>107160325/thread
>>107160266jokes aside, imageboards, and forums on the majority of foss sites are full of complete schizos and retards. I am using linux, minding my own business 99% of the time, then I for no reason look here or there, see insane posts, and think, is this what "linux community" really is? Bunch of schizos, retards. and troons?Meanwhile, gnome developers are insane and completely detached. Ability to turn animations off is good for everyone including disabled people. Also ability to customize UI is good for disabled people, when you are able to set huge buttons, huge font, and custom colors for colorblind people. customization is necessary for accessibility, and is good. gnome looks pretty, but it is insane. and this idiot is insane. and everyone is insane. maybe i am insane as well, anyways fuck everyone.
>>107160266use case for green site forum?use case for bussy?use case for use case?use case for people with disabilities?use case for dickheads?use case for dicks?
>>107161734>ever even considering a Nintendo product>not only that, but buying LEGOs instead of the Nintendo shit product For all my hate for Nintendo cultists, there must be a special type of retards that are buying LEGOs instead.
What is a piss baby?
>>107160992Use case for reading comprehension?
>>107161889what makes you think reading is a metric?
>>107161052He is literally right. Old people and poor sight people benefit a lot from the animations
>>107161894How do people with a tendency for motion sickness benefit from lots of fast motion?
>>107161902use case for motion sickness? just disable it
>>107161382>>what makes you think gorgeous looks are a metric?Very nice, here's a (you) for you.
>>107161902Motion sickness people don't benefit
>>107161902Motion sickness "people" have no place in ze Gnome Reich
>>107160358kekyou can never be woke enough, you will always be outwoken
>>107161734>bussy is a tendielmaoLooking at the aboslute state of /v/ he would fit right in with the rest of the unhingen nin10yearolds.
but i do disable all animations and the disabled should be disalived
rofl
>>107162139How does being able to turn off animations affect disabled people in any way? They can just not turn them off if they wish?
>>107162171you desktop needs to be accessible to the disabled cop that is raiding your house chud
>>107160266That's it, add him to the sticky NOW
>>107162171It's all so tiresome, windows requires one thousand registry tweaks to make usable because the system is hodgepot of backwards compatibility and shareholder trends, excusable in my opinionthis piece of shit de requires ten thousand extensions and hacks because of developers' sheer hatred and disdain towards the user, miserable
>>107162171stop asking questions
>>107161450The least colorblind 4channel user
>>107160276we're only being ironic when we posts "use case" "what makes you think X is a metric?", the fact that faggots like you fell for the meme and believe that he do have substantial arguments are why this board sucks balls.also >>107160325
>>107161459Some retard posted to the Alpine mailing list this morning saying he was going to kill everyone for some reason. I really wonder what train of thought led to that email being sent.
I think ebussy is a cool guy, the more I read his comments the more I like him
>>107161052I hate boomers so much it's unreal
>>107160266lmao I was 100% certain he was referring to 4chan when he said green site forum. it was like the perfect punchline.
>>107160325Idk anon I was getting 144fps on an Intel n100.
>>107162455I was getting 500 fps on an Intel Core 2 Duo
>>107162596I was getting 1010 fps on an Intel i5-2500k
>>107160266what the actual fuck does any of that mean?maybe i'm getting too old for this place
Phoronix is now a Chud site? Lmaoo
use case for animations?
>>107162700saving the disabled
>>107161859I'm not sure, but it sure sounds like Ebussy is self-reporting his fetishes.
>>107160266Did he really say this?
This bussi guy is such a douchebag.
>gnome adds an option>phoronix forums have a total meltdownuse case for technology boards other than /g/?
>>107160266didn't GNOME call the people asking for better accessibility options nazis? can they pick a side already?
>>107162989they rightfully called out concern trolling learn to chud
>>107160358>Jeremy Bichanow that's a name I haven't heard in a while. anything interesting ever happen after he got the boot from Canonical?
>>107163005Gets mentioned every now and then in Debian and Gnome spaces and whoever mentions him gets banned very swiftly and the current discussion stalls.No idea if he even does anything anymore.
>>107163002>concern trollingnot a thing
>>107160266Aren't all babies "piss babies"? Does he assume that most babies don't piss?
>>107163084>pretending to care isn't a thingbut i'm doing it right now
