How realistic is the idea of an AI moderator that has to approve every post before it goes live?
why throw ideas like this into the universe, op
>>107162569Stupid idea. AI moderators objectively suck, they get false positives frequently
>>107162569They are good judges in an extremely specific well-defined context. using them to judge random posts is a bad idea
>>107162569In my setup every single post not made by a moderator is thrown to a llamaguard model>>107162853>they get false positives frequentlyI noticed this with emojis, if a user says nothing but emojis it *sometimes* gets flagged as unsafe. I'm currently working on replacing streamer.bot with nothing but python and thankfully twitch irc on_pubmsg tags include emoji character length and start/end location so i can effictively strip them from chat prior to moderation
>>107162569it's inevitable and is already happenning everywhereall these models will ultimately start pruning posts even slightly deviant from norm and thus will converge to a complete "zero discussion possible" mode.
>>107162569>How realistic is the idea of an AI moderator that has to approve every post before it goes live?they already have that it's called llama guard(meta) and omni-moderation-latest(openai)
>>1071628294chan already blocks content on upload>System thinks your post is spam>md5 blocks on certain images/webmsetc. etc.Using AI would just make it more sophisticated.
>>107162913>they already have that it's called llama guardyepp. i just mentioned it and i use it for live content filtering >>107162893i dont punish the sender if a message is marked as unsafe though, since if its unsafe nobody actually sees the message but me
