Just like journalists ripped their asses off decades ago to claim that the internet was a waste of time that nobody used, they do the same today. They invent lies about nobody using AI, even though my grandmother literally uses it to generate good morning texts. They say AI is not capable of producing code, even though several famous programmers have started using AI in recent months. The only ones I see saying that AI is bad are anonymous programmers here or on leddit, useless programmers, by the way.There's clearly seething happening right now. I know it's hard to realise that your profession is obsolete, but it's better to accept it now and look for something else than to insist on the mistake and tomorrow it will be too late.Don't be a Luddite.
>>107924183I will not eat the bugsI will not live in the podI will not talk to the AI
The internet created millions of new jobs. How many jobs will AI create?
>>107924245But Dario said "it's over for coders": https://x.com/WesRoth/status/2013693268190437410>>107924248Probably just a few. That's why AI is evil.
>>107924183I think Machine Learning (not "AI") is a powerful tool that will gradually find uses and adoption both by industries and common people, in ways we can't even envision right nowThis AI craze is artificial hype meant to sell product. OAI and Meta and all these other megacorps want to force AI adoption, it doesn't work like that. Chatbots are a useless fad and the corporations trying to build around them will collapse
>>107924183I barley use the internet now compared to as I did in the 2000's. What is your point dumbass?
Shill more baggie.
The Internet is a $50/mo cable subscription for millenial babies that need to ask Alexa to turn their lights on and off. A failed experiment that escaped the lab and at its core is only truly good for sending messages quickly around the globe. I'm confident AI will be just as successful at its one true calling of mimicing human behavior. Yes, one day we will be able to see great works created instantly that are equivalent to hundreds of man-hours. Then we can pay $50/mo to have an AI cable subscription where we can ask Alexa to play a custom video for us.
>>107924252But it seems that Americans are the majority using AI even though India has like 5 or 10x more people.
>>107924183The internet had SOUL, it was fun and relatively cheap.AI is none of those things.If AI disappears tomorrow, only coomers and scammers would miss it.If the internet disappears tomorrow, most of its users would miss it. In fact, it *is* disappearing and people complain about it all the time and fondly remember its past.
>>107924296alexa, jangle keys in my face
>>107924302>the majority>17%ai eroded your basic literacy skills
>AI shilling thread #19,0032 cents have been deposited into your account. Thanks for helping usher in your own digital slavery.
>>107924296Watching oldcucks seethe and cry about muhleenials reminds me to be nicer to zoomers. It looks so goddamn pathetic.
>>107924296>>107924338>$50/mo>cheapThat's $600/year, the same you pay for a 5070 with enough VRAM to play with local models.AI can be pretty cheap and fun. The only reason you don't like it is because you're a fucking Luddite. The same way you say "AI art isn't art" is no different from the Luddites complaining about digital art saying that Paint Tool Sai wasn't a real mean to make art.
>>107924391theres a lot thays unnacounted for79.24% would be a majority
>>107924183suuuuure
>>107924183>Don't be a Luddite.Why not? AI brings me no benefit and instead threatens to take away from me, why would I want AI to succeed?
>>107924183I find machine learning very interesting and use AI, but don't believe that training an even higher parameter count LLM on the same dataset as every other big LLM is going to make the omnissiah real. All the hype about being able to fire all employees because big autocomplete will do everything is a scam.
>>107924245AI is the definition of a demon. Intelligence without love.
>>107924378Succinct
>>107924425After a while, b8 post like these become boring.
>>107924627yeah, bait used to be more believable.am i getting desensitized?
Jobs suck.You suck.
>>107924183>2000s>Internet sites make money>2026>AI sites lose moneyTruly a puzzle.
i understand why someone would be against AI, but the smug denial about its capabilities getting pretty pathetic
>>107925089>the capabilitiesyou must be quite retarded to be impressed by this dyslexic shit
Remember when Segway was going to be the next big thing?
>>107925153fun fact:the owner of the company rolled off a cliff in his own product and died
>>107925145Would you mind sharing the initial prompt? I've been debugging keyboard drivers with Claude lately and it's been quite nice. I'm not really a developer, but I work building custom keyboards, so every now and then I have to deal with QMK and ZMK fucking up my projects.
>>107925241do you insist on that?i would need to log into my gmail accountand for that i need to find my phone (havent seen it in several days now)(its somewhere in my house, i heard it ringing, but i got drunk recently and i have no fucking idea where it is)
>>107925145>>107925241Yesterday I had Claude generate and apply three live kernel patches through /dev/kmem to modify FunctionFS so I could emulate HID devices on a phone from 2012 I had lying around.I go through these "it's so over" and "we're so back" cycles too but honestly it's an invaluable tool if you stop seething and accept its limitations.
>>107925326i know its limitations very welli use shatbots dailynow show the code.
>>107925241>>107925268forgot picrel btwim not avoiding passing the prompt, im trying to avoid having to search my house for the next 15 minutes for argument sakeim not even sure what you want to check with the prompt
>>107925326>>107925348oh, also im a solodev"its so over" is not a thing in my positioni dont wageslave nor ever will. also bc i did cs when i was 30, and dropped out once i learned what i wanted anyways
>AI sucks, bro>AI couldn't do what I asked it to do>here's 1% of the conversation proving my point>see AI got this 1 point wrong even though it got 90 points correct previously>I won't share my initial prompt because... uh... because I'm not a home right now!!!EVERY FUCKING TIME! You niggers claim that "AI sucks" but you never share your prompt. There's only 2 scenarios I can think of:>you asked it to generate a wrong answer on purpose just to take a screenshot>you wrote a very poor prompt like "my program crashed, fix it">>107925326>I go through these "it's so over" and "we're so back" cycles tooI don't even do that. I just see AI as a tool, a very nice tool by the way. The reason for that is because you need to know what to ask of it. If you're a retard like >>107925199 there's no AI that can save you. So even if it replaces most low IQ brownies, there will still be room for people that at least know what to ask for.
>>107925389soudns like cope.+you still didnt post code, tranimeshitter shill
>>107924280Agreed, and there are still many orders of magnitudes moge efficient models that we have not yet discovered.
>>107925478>using a statistical engine to solve deterministic problemyidiot illiterate cultist>>>/lit/>>>/x/>>>/lgbt/
>>107925499Exactly. We know any two programmers, when faced with the same problem, will always come up with the same solution. There is no probability distribution. AI on the other hand will always be all over the place. "Close enough", they say. I don't think so.
>>107925478>discoveredshiit uourself
>>107925565close enough just doesnt fucking compile, kekreprompting, handholding, and often a full rewrite ensues>We know any two programmers, when faced with the same problem, will always come up with the same solution.this isnt true though. youre gonna see the background of the programmer show up in their solutioin the tech stack they choose, for starters.also you have multiple ways to approach a similar problem.
>>107925199>>Segway>fun fact:>the owner of the company rolled off a cliff in his own product and died
>>107925609AI can basically reproduce most of the algorithm already implemented, that means we don't need programmers to do what is already figured out. We will only need programmers for novel things. Your job as a CRUD/Web shitter is coming to an end. Most of your work is just connecting frameworks together until something work, that's something AI can do better than you.>but it can't generate a new algorithm that will boost performance of 3D rendering by 20xYeah, neither do you. Most programmers are easily replaceable, most programmers are mediocre and produce mediocre code. We don't need them any more.
>>107925675>Yeah, neither do you.speak for yourself faggotlamaosucks to suck i guessgo jump under a train or something, i dont care much for losers
>>107925675also>ai can do xyzno it cant. unless by that you mean "actually indians"
>>107924282This, I was way more involved in hobby websites and forums of old. Now I only use the internet to do quick fact checking and email... oh and like 1 hour or so a day of 4chan. Way less connect with how shit social media for the cattle has become.
>>107925813>how shit social media for the cattle has become.>becomeit was always cringe shit for normies
>>107925838True, I was comparing to how shit it has "become" from old forums of the 90's and early 00's. MySpace and Facebook were always shit. Never had one.
>>107925884ahyeah 100% agree then
