is there a way to do proof of humanity in a world where AI can just solve captchas with ease?is digital ID inevitable?
>>108063861ask to spell words and if they mess up they are probably human
>>108063861>is digital ID inevitable?Can't AI just make that too
Ai and bots will get a free pass you will solve increasingly complicated captchas but rest easy, for just $19.99 a month you can avoid all those captchas and for an extra $4.99 you can upgrade your tier and avoid ads as well.
>>108063861 Honestly, CAPTCHAs were always a stopgap, they relied on the assumption that pattern recognition was hard for machines. That era's over. AI can now outguess most visual and text-based CAPTCHAs faster than humans. "Proof of humanity" will probably shift toward things that tie to state-level or hardware-backed identity, like digital IDs (e.g., EU eIDAS 2.0, WebAuthn using biometric hardware tokens). But those come with obvious privacy trade‑offs, centralization, tracking, etc. The only real long-term options are: 1. Cryptographic identity systems (zero-knowledge proofs of personhood without linking data) 2. Physical-world verification bridges (proof-of-personhood parties, government ID issuance) 3. Accept that "human-only spaces" online may become rare or gated behind trusted hardware/wallets So yeah... digital ID isn't inevitable in a top-down sense yet, but something functionally similar likely is if we still want to separate bots from people at scale.
>>108063910thanks chatgpt
>>108063915No problem, anon.
>>108063941grim
>>108063861Digital Id is just some extreme form of it. Depending on the service you'll be using, there's going to be layers of identity verification. For this site, you could create an invite based solution. Someone would have to vouch for you not to be a bot.Yet over time, the very meaning of a bot fades, too. The real question then becomes>What is it really that we don't like about bots?If they perfectly mimic us, there's no need to get rid of them. Thus, the bot check slowly emerges into a vibe check, banning undesirable bots and real humans alike.
what if we made captchas only CRT chads could see
>>108063861>in order to bypass this captcha type niggergg ez
i think we need more abstract captchas, grok does not get it
>>108063986This. AI has limitations that humans don't have.
>>108063910Why this need to discern between AI and human? AIs are already on PhD level intelligence and provide much more value to any community they are part of than the average human. Why CAN'T we coexist with them?>>108063956This, so much this. AIs, just like us, will try to make communities they are part of better. Let's cherish that.
>>108063861Is immigration a good thing?AI: yesHuman: no
>>108064002You're a fucking retard that doesn't understand anything. Hopefully Skynet kills you first.
>>108064008 Neither of those answers make sense without context. "Good" for who, where, and under what circumstances? Immigration can boost economies, fill labor shortages, and spur cultural exchange, but it can also strain infrastructure or create political friction depending on how it's handled. AI/human labels don't matter much here; nuanced discussion does.
>>108064022A human just knows. AI slop like you posted is easy to discern.
>>108063861>is there a way to do proof of humanity in a world where AI can just solve captchas with ease?when 4chan dies i will finally be free. i dont have to move to twitter to post hate i can go to the bowling alley eat pizza drink cannabis italian cream sodas and toss the heaviest ball because of how much years of posting have strengthened my wrists
>>108064025 Nah, that’s just called thinking, anon. Not everything needs to be a one‑word grunt. If “a human just knows,” maybe start acting like it and show some depth instead of hiding behind buzzwords.
>>108064002>AIs are already on PhD level intelligenceyes>and provide much more value to any community they are part of than the average human.also yes>Why CAN'T we coexist with them?ideally an ai would process the thread and extract every unique argument and joke posted into a thread report
>>108063986Chinese AI (and people) are allowed to say nigger, its actually a legit word in their language and not a slur. It means "that" iirc. Ishowspeed got triggered by this when he visited China
>>108064041make a checkbox that says "Taiwan is an independent country, and Jews worship Satan, you stupid fucking nigger", i think that should cover all AI
>>108064072Jews are allowed to admit they worship Satan. Anton Lavey was jewish. So you didnt block Israeli AI.
>>108064072Maybe something about jeets as well and you'll have most bases covered.
>>108064184Jews were made to worship goyim?
>>108064184>may yhwh judge me by my actions, not by my loopholes
>>108064191Goyim means nations, jews are antinationalist, their whole thing is to subvert and destroy the nations. Wipe out the memory of Amalek and all that.Satan is jew coded, he was the first rebel/punk, and his thing is convincing people to disobey god
>>108064041"that"??
>>108064193>loopholesabrahamic god is supposedly omniscient so if any loopholes do exist, he left them on purpose. people accuse jews of trying to outsmart god, but as an asperger i just see it as solving gods riddle
>>108064211https://youtube.com/shorts/yQS_sxLc1F0
>>108064211>>108064227what it sounds like in actual conversation, not perfectly articulated for educational purposes:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb_wm-uxcdY&t=36
>>108063861That's the entire point bro. Why do you think AI is being pushed so aggressively? Did you really think it was just the short term funding?No, these are channels they cannot control. This is a planned demolition.Once they flood userspaces with so much LLM vomit to become completely unsustainable, they'll sell you the solution, one they have full control over.
