>brave search>browses 3 pages>confirm you are not a botSo is this the power of the lion?
>>108562697google has been asking me if im a bot just from making a simple searchit's so strange how these companies dont use heuristics to give captchas, they just give you one immediately and piss people offlike if i make 1000 requests in a second, then give me it. if im just doing regular user shit, what are you doing
>>108562697I have to solve captchas just be on Google now. mullvad browser and IronFox are way better than Brave, but I don't care about my privacy enough to avoid being able to use functioning websites. Brave is significantly faster than Firefox though and doesn't crash as much since FF has become so bloated
>>108562697>>108562706>>108563653Luke Smith uses Firefox you fucking retard (Source: his fucking site you far-left advertiser slave: https://lukesmith.xyz/programs/ ) Brave is literally proprietary (no reproducible builds), is created by LGBT CEO from Mozilla, is based on Google Chromium, forcing everybody to being unable to use adblocking, forcing us to have Google monopoly. Brave stole money from users.Luke Smith's principled stance on digital autonomy naturally aligns with Librewolf's uncompromising approach, which strips away the bloat and hidden agendas plaguing mainstream browsers. While Brave markets itself as privacy-focused, its reliance on Chromium—a framework steered by Google—raises eyebrows among those attuned to corporate influence. Librewolf, a hardened Firefox fork, eliminates telemetry and auto-updates by default, contrasting sharply with Brave’s opaque connections to Amazon servers for HTTPS rulesets or its controversial Uphold integration for BAT payouts. Smith’s critique of centralized crypto gatekeepers like Uphold mirrors Librewolf’s rejection of monetized features, opting instead for pure ad-blocking without crypto gimmicks. Brave’s optional "Rewards" system, despite being disabled by default, still tethers users to a surveillance-adjacent ecosystem—antithetical to Librewolf’s philosophy of zero trust. When Brave skeptics highlight its fingerprinting risks or affiliate-link controversies, Librewolf emerges as the logical choice: no affiliate bloat, no Chromium strings, just unbroken privacy. Smith’s disdain for half-measures explains why he’d champion Librewolf’s transparency over Brave’s "too good to be true" promises, where even auditable code can’t mask foundational compromises.
>>108562706Brave is for trans sexuals that love LGBT and Google being their proprietary master. Brave is most used browser in India. Only ones Reddit calls "facist nazi right wing" are Floorp and LadyBird. Chromium based is obviously LGBT so can't use that. LadyBird is not released yet so until it is, I use Floorp which is open source and no telemetry either. If you are trans and love LGBT Google spyware, then try proprietary Brave spyware to get full MITM tracking and they will steal your money and manipulate referral links and route your full traffic through their Brave vpn brave search brave this and brave crypto that. Be brave and be slave.tl;dr only browser you ever need is the facist-nazi-right approved Floorp or LadyBird (when it is released)>no telemetry>allows privacy extensions etc.>open source (so no fake "open source" like proprietary Brave, FUTO etc.)>nice license>bonus: politically right, so nobody can cry about it being "woke" or something*I was using Librewolf which is all of this and more, but anons cried about it because one dev somewhere said something "woke" so they think whole browser is now shit, so I ended up with Floorp because it is all of "good" AND facist nazi meme.*you search 4chan archives anons agreeing it is right wing and even the Reddit users and woke git devs are crying how "browser is facist nazi right wing DO NOT USE" approved.
