>puts the blame of what ever a kid does back on the guardian who handed them the adult age verified device >nooooo this is bad!!!! we need for parents to be able to sue tech companies because of parents not parenting their children and supervising their device usageWhose behind the idiotic push trying to allow parents to launch frivolous lawsuits against tech companies for their parenting failures?
>>108657839tt's all about making you a "real person" on some database so advertising to you counts.
welcome to life in the urinated sharts of shitmerica: land of the freedomless - George Orwell 1984 edition.
>>108657928It's not just America doing this you fucktard.
>>108657927This is a good point. I always wonder what advertiser's think of sites like kick and twitch where a lot of the "popular" people have heavily inflated numbers. They are basically paying to display adds to no one they must be getting pretty pissed off about that.
>>108657839>Thinks it's still about the childrenWith section 230 protection tech companies are immune, they might throw a bone every once and awhile as a cost of doing business. The whole plot is to remove privacy as a hurdle for AI manipulation and training to control the population. Next comes UBI to make you dependent on social credits.
>>108657969It started there. It's like saying covid wasn't China's fault just because it got everywhere.
>>108658081who funded the labs and designed the virus clown
>>108657839:^)do you know WHY they are doing that?It's not encryption. That cat's out of the bag.It's ai. ai is rapidly becoming very capable of a lot of things. AND it's getting better at running on older hardware.
>>108657839Have you heard of Judaism, anon?
>>108657839fuck off glowie.
>>108657839The blame is already on the guardians who give kids devices.
>>108658264Who built it and actually worked there?Who accepted the money?
>>108657839No-one pushing for that garbage gives 2 cents about kids, it's all about sucking off big tech and making sure they get as much data out of you as possible.
>>108657839> State enforcement agent build into all my devices.> Instantly gets shilled on 4chan day and night.EU publicly stated they want this stuff to become accepted. Full control over the individual by interests of the collective will be achieved.
>>108657839Listen nigger, this thing has more to do with surveillance ans controling information through censorship than safety. This is Patriots Act + Fake News Fact Checking v2.0.
>>108657839its always jews retard.
>>108660225Pollution is also legal in China doesn't mean west kikes aren't taking advantage of their loose jurisdictions.
>>108658081Not true but even if it were, what kind of cuck does your country have to be to blindly do anything the US does? And why aren't you doing anything in your country to oppose it? Are you that much of a pussy?
>>108660524You will call me mommy.
>>108657839Should fall on mobile carriers at the time a parent registers a number. Phone numbers ought to come with an attribute: isUser18Plus?No storing birthdates or names. Simply reveal if the number is used by someone underage. Website/app policies can then be setup to blacklist, ban, and delete accounts for anyone who is lying.
>>108657839anon, if it had anything to do with kids then I wouldn't be able to access pornhub just by clicking yes on a popupthe goal is to just keep pushing and normalizing until they have digital ID with minimal resistance, and then they can use that to harass americans for posting protected speech without having to get a warrant that they would never be able to get from an actual court
