Agree or disagree with this take on AI?https://ewtn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Magnifica_Humanitas_Full_English.pdfON SAFEGUARDING THE HUMAN PERSON IN THE TIME OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE"A particular responsibility rests on the shoulders of those who work in the field of research. All the key players in this field — scientists, business owners, investors, academic authorities, politicians and others — must work with a transparent and responsible mindset, while maintaining an acute awareness of the broader context of the technological advancements they help to cultivate, including those related to AI. When people limit themselves to looking only at their own sector, they may deceive themselves into believing they are performing actions that are morally neutral and avoid questions about the ultimate ends that guide certain experiments. In this way, they risk cooperating — perhaps unknowingly — with questionable projects that fuel new forms of violence, manipulation and dominance."
>>108905807The pope is a Luddite. We vibeGODS are going to replace them
>>108905807>must work with a transparent and responsible mindset, while maintaining an acute awareness of the broader context of the technological advancements they help to cultivate, including those related to AISo I assume it means that Scam Altman should come clean and admit that what's happening is just he downloaded and purchased all the archives of the Internet and then tried to sell us back our own information on a meter.
"A further risk, less visible but no less serious, is that of social control made possible by the massive collection of data and use of algorithmic systems. When every action — movements, purchases, relationships and preferences — leaves a trace, a new form of power emerges, namely the power to profile, predict and influence behavior, often without individuals being fully aware of it. If such kinds of data are used to make decisions affecting concrete opportunities — such as access to credit, employment or essential services — there is a risk of undermining freedom and discriminating against the most vulnerable. Furthermore, control is exercised not only through explicit prohibitions, but also through the architecture of visibility: what is amplified or rendered invisible, what is rewarded or penalized, ultimately shapes opinions and choices, fostering conformity and self-censorship. For this reason, freedom in the digital age is not merely a matter of interiority but also a public concern. It calls for clear rules, transparency, the possibility of recourse and proportionate limits on the use of intrusive technologies, so that technology will remain at the service of the human person and not become a form of control over consciences."
>>108905822>themDon't defile the holy church with your gender politics, libtard
>>108905857>libtard out of nowhereObsessed and Luddite
>>108905822"Today, the convergence of automation, robotics and AI is rapidly transforming the very structure of work. It is said that this will bring great improvements for everyone. In reality, however, the “new ways” of working are not necessarily better, for “while AI promises to boost productivity by taking over mundane tasks, it frequently forces workers to adapt to the speed and demands of machines, rather than machines being designed to support those who work. As a result, contrary to the advertised benefits of AI, current approaches to technology can paradoxically de-skill workers, subject them to automated surveillance and relegate them to rigid and repetitive tasks. The need to keep up with the pace of technology can erode workers’ sense of agency and stifle the innovative abilities they are expected to bring to their work.”152 Precisely in order to avoid this drift, it is necessary to design systems that are centered on the human person and not solely on performance. "The Pope summmed you up well.
>>108905807it's amodei not asmodei he got himself all worked up over nothing
>>108905870You’re trans
"For this reason, those who control digital platforms and means of communication have a considerable ability to affect the collective imagination and to present a particular vision of reality as desirable. Such power should be constantly guided by the pursuit of truth and respect for human dignity, so that the culture fostered on the internet does not become an instrument of excessive distraction, homogenization or dominance, but rather a setting in which inner freedom and critical thought can mature. Is 4chan good?
>>108905847absolutely basedwe need a new term for these people who have access to technology but access it in a retrogressive mannercause this luddite vs ai chad caricature is clearly a half-assed rhetoric masquerading as meme.
>>108905883I think calling a Catholic transexual is a measure of how the digital world has effected you mentally and harmed your ability to reason. If you continue down that road you will probably get so addled as to start referring to yourself as transexual with potentially disasterous consequences for your body and mind.
>>108905901That’s impossible because I’m not a coder (transgender activity).I’m a vibeGOD (straight and masculine activity)btw you lost
>>108905899At the root of these problems lies a technocratic and post-humanist mentality that tends to regard the human person as an object to be manipulated or a resource to be optimized,172 removing all safeguards against the unchecked pursuit of profit. What prevails is efficiency, rather than respect for freedom and human dignity. Some post-humanist currents even go so far as to envision “second-class” human beings, subordinate to the interests of elites who consider themselves superior. This troubling prospect becomes all the more serious when combined with technological tools that exponentially increase the capacity for control and selection. Even certain forms of structural indebtedness, which keep entire peoples in conditions of dependence, reflect the same mentality, in new forms, that tolerates relationships of subordination akin to slavery.
>>108905908The Pope is right, you are deskilled.
>>108905920>At the root of these problems lies a technocratic and post-humanist mentality>that tends to regard the human person as an object to be manipulated or a resource>to be optimized,HR karens confirmed as doers of evil.
>>108905887>Such power should be>constantly guided by the pursuit of truth and respect for human dignityAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>108905926Not true. I’m superior to you
>>108905945Maybe, maybe not, depends on criteria the fact you assume you are with insufficient data and no criteria means you are intellecually disabled.>>108905901>a measure of how the digital world has effected you mentally and harmed your ability to reason
>>108905932I see, you find the concept of human dignity and truth alien to you culturally.
>>108905920In no uncertain terms: retrogressives are accelerationists. All of these utopic delusions rest on one improvable and invalid outcome: the singularity. I imagine Freud felt the same when first high on cocaine, "a panacea", but reality gave way to paranoia and delusion - to then prescribe opiates for cocaine addiction. If you start with garbage you end up with garbage.
>>108906016Me? I'm not Scam Altman though.I've seen how platforms were rented to commies for propaganda purposes, how people run casinos to bribe each other by "losing" there, how social media were used to completely break democracy and there was not even a word uttered regarding appropriate punishment.I am surprised someone related to Church published somethign so grounded and fresh. I mean, I though they were retarded honestly, but here it is, they published some common sense. Very nice. But I'd rather not hear about dignity and truth from people who remain silent about Epstein and his friends.They have no authority to speak about dignity and truth.
>>108906066>Me? I'm not Scam Altman though.Kind of funny how there's a "no" missing here.
>>108905807Imagine how based it would be if the Pope declared a crusade on AI. It would get attention but people already turn their brains off whenever AI comes up so you really need to spell it out for them, which is what this does."Let's not make mistakes with this technology that is inevitably going to happen" is absolutely not a luddite take but people are saying it anyway, case in point.
>>108905807The Pope doesn't have to answer to shareholders. Profits are more important than people.
>>108905870Did the Pope ever spend any time in a factory? This is nothing new.
>>108906165Does "it was always bad, let it get worse" ever convince anyone? Have you ever gotten someone to say "wow, the world isn't perfect so I should have no standards at all, thanks anon!"?
i think papa needs to stop shitting youtube with his religios "crying Templar kinghts chant in silence" slop and similar generated contenthe should resort to the god, bible and other "natural" stuff and leave AI to technologists
