[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: screen.jpg (115 KB, 1366x768)
115 KB JPG
What's with the influx of people on /g/ thinking you need more than 1080p?
I'm on a 1366x768 laptop and it works fine for me, anything more is luxury.
Scaling is completely solved at 1080p too.
>>
1080p is understandable but 768 is ancient.
1440p is good if you have a larger screen and 4k is retina.
>>
>>109116159
I recently upgraded to 1440p and I have no clue what to do with the space or how to utilize it. Scaling is absolutely fucked as well.

Its probably a bunch of GAYmers and artfags. And, to be fair, Xonotic looks amazing at 1440p...
>>
>>109116159
At this point 4chan overall is filled with elitist predditors who'd never miss the chance to flex their devotion to spend money on goyslop. Don't worry about their insignificant thought process and just use what you like and can afford to use.
>>
>>109116159
I need 4k because it looks awesome and I use my PC for media too
>>
>>109116159
You don't need anymore than 1024×768 for a laptop
>>
>>109116159
Yeah, it works fine and I liked my little 1366x768 laptop in the past, but I'd be full of shit if I said I liked it better than my current 2560x1600.
>>
>>109116159
Kek you clearly dont do any actual work on it then
>>
>>109116237
>yea bro let me get a 4k laptop then scale all the UI 2.5x
lmao retard
>>
>>109116159
I wish people doing crash courses on various tech like CI/CD used 1366x768 instead of 1080p. Using wide screen for work related stuff in dumb in general. Not to mention the resolution with retarded scaling. And my eyesight is not bad at all, it's just scaling being stupid, impossible to watch from a tv screen of a phone in portrait mode.
Can't informationmaxx while on the shitter.
>>
>>109116237
Right, nobody ever did any work on computers until 1080p monitors came out. It's impossible to fit code on a 1366x768 screen, the text just doesn't fit
>>
>>109116240
Why would you scale the UI? Weak eyes?
>>
>>109116245
They will be weak if you don't, lmao
>>
>>109116245
Every UI is designed to be used at a certain size. Why would you make shit harder to read and click on for no reason? The whole point of a higher res screen at the same size is for MORE clarity.
Also yes.
>>
My laptop starts to chug when I set the resolution higher than 768p.
>>
i have a 1080p 14 inch laptop and it's almost too many pixels even at that small. maybe it's good on MacOS, but it doesn't work in windows or linux
>>
why use better thing when you can just use worse thing?
>>
>>109116459
>more expensive = better
Explain why, without sounding stupid
>>
>>109116159
>anything more is luxury.
ok i guess
>>109116534
visual clarity

is this a bot thread or something



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.