https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/nov/23/openai-was-working-on-advanced-model-so-powerful-it-alarmed-staff
there's so much marketing hype about the next model coming out being "too dangerous to release" to pump the stock for these two companies. When it's actually true nobody will believe it.
>>109136306They've made these claims about their models being scary good since their company started. Do you ever get bored of being literal afterbirth?
https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/17/openai-text-generator-dangerous/We have been doing this retarded dance for over 7 years years now, since 2019.The only danger is investor money drying up.
Give it a rest Sam
>>109136315It won't be true for literal hundreds, if not, thousands of years
>>109136330you don't realize this but "safety" just means not stealing googles ad revenue
>>109136337AI psychosis or Indian?
>>109136337chatgpt mogged google search, now they have to find a reason why they killed their golden goose for a chatbot anyone can build
>>109136327This.And the company is still not profitable and extremely dubious outlook in terms of what they might sell vs. what it costs them to produce with all the money sunk into it.
>>109136306GPT 2?https://openai.com/index/better-language-models/
>>109136358It superficially very much looks like chatgpt costs a lot more to operate per search AND the investments into it seem to have racked up well past one what it took to set up like... both Amazon the international retail/market place thing with its logistics and AWS? And then some stuff?It at the same time looks like indeed, others can also build close to or equal to 'that kind of chatbot'.Ya think this will work out? Do you genuinely believe them with the bullshit in the OP, the nth repeat of it? It is so strong and powerful my god it is dangerous (pls stop us no wait pls let us sell the idea that the global economy will still be subjugated by us no we can't really show you much but pls invest)... I mean fucking really, the investors fell for it and didn't check profits or the competition or jack shit?
>>109136306>2023Good job, though, you've proven that /g/ doesn't read articles.Or even read the link itself.
>>109136327>The only danger is investor money drying up.the only people in danger here are the tax payers that will need to bail them and the investors out and deal with the resulting economic crisis.whoopsie
>>109136337or wrongthink>rip taytay
>>109136306Bro really do be stealing Dario's homework.And after it worked out so well for Mythos.
>>109136336So, never? Because technological civilization isn't surviving past this century.
>>109137477Yeah man this is planet Africa. All we do is advance to the low diamond age and nuke ourselves over and over.
>>109136336t. anonymous 4chan /g/ poster
>>109136306>This time I'll trust this jew, he might be right.Kek
>>109136446Kek, I remember all the hype back thenThese fuckers play with names "Q*" "Strawberry" and seed terms into the media consciousnessHype cycle, fear, etcRepeat
>>109136306"It's SO POWERFUL we're AFRAID of it!"This is some 90s-tier tech shitflinding
>>109136306>company says they made overwhelmingly amazing thingYeah sure, niggerfaggots.
>>109136306Dario already did this. You aren't Chinese stop copying.
