While some AI vibecoder tech bro who makes 10,000 commits a second without even looking at the output is perfectly fine
>>110087799What if AI says gamer words?
>>110087799I only ever use Github by making throwaway accounts to contribute to projects that don't accept patches over email.
>>110087799I have a local copy of my own slop
>>110087823The github of that foid who worked on that black hole imaging app is still around even though its completely fraudulent and exists only to waste bandwidth, but that github along with million of others are fine because they don't say hurty words or point out fake programmers.Many such cases. Sad! Oh well, I'll just switch to GitGud when I get banned, too many subhumans on this platform anyways
Oh no, now I will have to type 2 commands to change the remote and resync my repo!
>>110087799>your GitHub account could get bannedwhat this anon said >>110087909gitea is api compatible, it can even run actions
hard to judge this without knowing what you did to break the rule. though the rule is pretty vague
>>110088687This is my README, the only slightly "offensive" thing on my profile
>>110088718hm, i could see how someone would be offended by that (making a joke referencing an event where the person in question died), but i'm not sure how it relates to their cited rules.where's the hate and to which person/group?
>>1100887184chan has really warped your outlook on to what is acceptable in a public setting. But it's okay, it happens to a lot of people.
>>110088759I've had this profile for a year, I'm sure someone got butthurt over it but you are correct in that it is not in itself offensive. It's likely me recently shitting on some vibecoder and calling all their projects worthless and that they should kill themselves, to which they they responded with mass reporting me like the useless petty jeets that they are.
>>110088787I'd be more embarassed by having a contribution graph that looks like this than having Saint Floyd in the README.
