I'd like to take a moment to adress an issue that has risen in just a few short years: The overwhelming amount of generic AI porn slop.Just yesterday I went looking for some Rule 34 material, and... well, the whole site was filled to the brim with generic AI slop.And it's all so... soulless. It's PAINFULLY generic, each scene barely any different from others. The ease of generating AI porn has caused multiple issues. Amongst these are the drasticly increased amount of porn depicting children/underage kids (those wankers have hard time finding material, so they pump it out with AI in massive quantities) which I object to on moral grounds. The ease of producing that material is going to be a big issue in society and legal grounds in the future, which we will have to have a talk over eventually. But that's a whole can of worms of it's own. Another issue is the whole deepfake thing; making porn out of real people, which I also object to. It genuinely ruins lives. But the thing that irks me personally is the boring similarity of all these pictures. Sure, AI can get that shiny skin down easier than a real artist, but it also means everything looks the GOD DAMN SAME!There used to be a sort of ART in generating quality porn. Sure, there was a lot of poor quality crap, but at least there was effort put into it. Even if it was poorly and unskilledly drawn, someone cared enough to take time making it. Nowdays the fact that you can just pump out ENDLESS amount of AI generated porn and ...well, it seems to drown out all the good stuff. I hate going through dozens of pages of AI slop just to find that one picture that isn't soulless.
Welcome to the future. Enjoy your stay.
>>8718493>don't know how to filter AI>complains it's all AII have no problems with my rule34 partaking, so I'm convinced it'skill issue, you deserve it.
>>8718493I rarely see it cause I just filter it.
>>8718493There is a reason it all looks the same its because there's a lot of 1girl in void poses or sex positions that are just reused all over everywhere to draw reference from. As soon as you try to make the girl do something interesting the AI has a brainfart and devolves a couple years.
>>8719804That was the case in 2023 but AI can very easily do common sex poses now. It can't do interesting compositions/fight scenes and shit like that though sure.
It's a shame, really. I have actually seen some genuinely good a.i porn out there. The biggest strength it has is people can more easily create images/videos of some of the more niche or specific kinks (including pedo shit, unfortunately). It could be a great tool for padding out some of the less popular tags but the problem is the sheer amount of low effort slop. A.i """art""" can be generated in a fraction of the time it takes a real artist to make something, without moderation it completely suffocates all tags and genres it's posted to. Most of it is uninspired generic garbage, but even if some is worthwhile and well made it's overall becoming a blight on most porn sites.
>>8718493>anon still looks for materials as if it's still the late 2000's when there are plenty of ways to filter them out, or you can just straight up gen your own shit (cope because not even AI can save shitters like you)Actual skill issue.
>>8721409I mean, there's objectively extreme amount of aislop dumped to the internet now. It's easy to filter out most of it on boorus but you still see really low-quality slop posted here and there. It's absolutely possible to make it look pretty appealing but most of the AI users shit out ugly greasy shit and call it a day and the good-looking stuff is buried beneath all the samey slop.
>>8721424Hey I don't complain when the objectively garbage Western artworks in general or from drawthreads breaches containment. To me nothing really changed because half of the shit that gets posted on this site was already low quality and tasteless anyways. Like I said, it's an actual skill issue when you think tools like Google became bad because of AI when in reality it was already showing signs of it being trash years prior.Also the fact that you're still complaining about shiny skin is enough of an indication that you don't actually experiment or gen your own shit or are genuinely too retarded to even use AI properly. Either way in like a decade you're still going to be making the same exact seethe threads or trying desperately to discourage AI posting(but all it really does is derail the discussion when people are already enjoying shit), and I'm not about to babysit a literal mouth-breather so goobye.
>>872144870iq seething retard with no reading comprehension, kek.
>>8721451you lost, retard.
>>8718493>The overwhelming amount of generic AI porn slopwhich only exists because the datasets always contain 20 thousand sakimichan/"""realistic"""/gook """realistic""" (sakimichan but more gookish) sameface sameshading picswith a healthy sprinkle of robuttsif anything it should've made you aware of just how much normies love that shit and how big the market for it really is
Why you imply that ai cunny is bad? If anything, it's actually good for society. If people can easily generate good quality loli porn they'll be less interested in the real thing so the industry will collapse and less children will be abused.
>>8722164Half the pedos they arrest for CSAM also have loli porn in their collections. It doesn't give them a healthy outlet for their child rape fantasies, it just inflames their evil urges.
>>8722321That's obviously a severe selection bias, and furthermore incorrectly assumed causation from mere correlation.And you know it, you liar.