Can this difference be explained historically & humanitically?
opportunity cost
Atheism
>>18338664Density.All posts below are by retards. His is a retard board so this thread will receive hundreds of replies.
>>18338673density meaning what in this case?
>>18338677The education explanation, everything else fails empirically, density is the answer. There's no reason education would reduce fertility. However his is retarded and sometimes tries. Density obviously determines fertility and this has been proven in numerous threads, literally just read archive, his is retarded. https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/Density%20fertility%20/
>>18338677He is saying that the higher population density in a area the faster the birth rates fall off. And only places high in rainfall mitigate this trend somwhat.
>>18338681>>18338684i imagine it is difficult to sort out causation and correlation in this question.
>>18338684Rainfall is a proxy for the livable area, as the people who make statistics are tards. However obviously the carrying capacity and livable area determines everything, and capitalism is literally retards. Fertility has to be the easiest and most basic variable to explain. The national contrasts in fertility are because the previously fail areas got industrial agriculture and did better. Because this happened uniformly there isn't any excess factor. His is fascinated by fertility just because it's something it can understand, but the answer is very simple and direct which is density. >>18338699It's not it's just that his is retarded and will do anything to find retard explanations. But as I already said, all posts below are retarded so I'm calling my own post retarded.
is there any way for a liberal democracy to reverse fertility
>>18338708No because it's all density, politics doesn't matter at all. You raise fertility by killing people to restore density and create lebensraum. Hitler literally was density.
>>18338681https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-49129765.ampThe largest complete non fragmentary dinosaur femur ever found is 67% percent larger than. The size of the largest mammoth femur ever found. So unless the French cloned a fake bone from scratch your theory of impossible has some holes.
>>18338718I didn't say dinosaurs didn't exist, I said the leftist understanding of dinosaurs is not compatible with their claimed physical laws.
>>18338708It has not yet been demonstrated as possible. We've seen every kind of incentive offered without any measurable uptick in birth rates. It's basically a fact that if you remove women's dependence on men and give them access to unlimited birth control the fertility rate goes down, and keeps going down.
>>18338727That doesn't work at all, Irans fertility collapsed and it isn't feminist. So the feminism lowers fertility explanation is completely retarded.
>>18338720Is the normal calculation of tensile strength wrong? or did dinosaurs have superhuman unnatural bone structure like the LRP5 gene on steroids?
>>18338742The normal calculation of tensile strength is wrong because it uses pressure when the device to measure it is a per kg value based on a sample weight that's stretched. However dinosaurs were not anything special and they just had normal weak tissue every animal has, in reality dinosaurs were nonsenstient and just sat around and posted on 4chan all day like users here instead of going outside.
>>18338712That does not explain Israel. High density (compounded by the presence of deserts in the South) and yet a complete outlier in terms of fertility among OECD countries.
>>18338757Here is the full model. https://github.com/ingrahammark7/test/tree/master/tools/MiscI have posted this many times, his is retarded and still asks.Israel has high rainfall and the levant area produces all the food which makes it decent productivity, it does have slightly more population than expected but it has one of the highest rainfalls of any nation that isn't a jungle.
Here is a run of the program, including the secret mode that includes jidf.
>>18338663This topic is the great filter, you can immediately tell who's a political zombie who just says shit that aligns with their wing and people who actually want to know the answers behind problems.>Maybe if we had muh livable wages and conditions we'd have more kidsThis is the most obvious one, poor countries have higher TFRs, rich countries have low TFRs, if anything it's the opposite, nordic countries have tried welfare targeted at increasing birth rates and they haven't made a dent.>Women have become muh enlightened anti-natalists and don't want to have kidsThis is also untrue considering women consistently answer surveys showing that the number of kids they want on average is well over replacement rate of 2.1+>Muh feminism is brainwashing womenAs anon said >>18338733 Plenty of conservative non feminist-nations such as Iran, China and to some degree South Korea/Japan have horrendous birth rates.Then we get to the copes>Declining birth rates are good, less people?The problem isn't the amount of people it's the age of people, a declining birth rate means an older population, older population that needs to be supported through money and resources, taxes will either reach 60-80%+ or the entire system crumbles. Not to mention so many more issues.
Ultra orthodox in israel but in the stans it's female emancipation. Women are no longer oppressed economically or socially and actually choose to have kids.
>>18338839Ok so as predicted you made a retard reply, numerous replies like yours will be spammed forever.
>>18338842feel free to read into the social politics of the stans
>>18338849Feel free to just be retarded and post in this thread endlessly despite your argument being made hundreds of times in identical past threads, and will only be ended by mods deleting the entire board In six months.
