Pin-ups, magazines, models, etc...
>veiled leg and foot fetish thread
>>5135899What did they mean by this?
I wonder why at some point after WW2 legs and feet stopped being a normal part to be attracted to and became muh fetish. Just from these pics you can really tell that it was normalized back then. Somehow the 60s sexual revolution made it taboo?(!?!?)
>>5140030Just to take a guess, I'm assuming a lot of the attraction to legs had more to do with the social attitude towards revealing attire. I assume that legs were so prominent because they're really all women could get away with revealing or showing off without being considered obscene. I assume since men got used to seeing more in the following decades our desire got redirected elsewhere, mostly on tits obviously
>>5141248>>5141249Excellent.
>>5140322What is she wearing on her toe?
>>5133454wew.... Audery Horne Twin Peaks Vibes going on here.....
>>5140283Maybe, I'd say that the more taboo a body part is, the more it becomes attractive. In the 18th century breasts were more exposed and seen as normal, and legs were covered under long garments, making them very taboo and super sexy. So it's probably a come and go phenomenon with different eras causing the next one's fetishes, oscillating between tits and legs (asses are too sexual to take part in this process, they'll always be seen as risque)
>>5144277Mmmm, you're right... sexo
