Always worth a lOOk
>>5185893such pixelmuch quality
>>5185549>Always worth a lOOkAs long as she isn't ruining a movie by being in it, fine.
>>5185549She’s a fat slob now but she was great at her peak.
>>5186218Is she?
>>5185549FAT Dennings
>>5186218didnt she get pregnant?
>>5199155>hfw you play the song Jesus Hitler by Carnivore
>>5199404kek
one of the many examples of women who fall off when they never show anything
One of the many examples of shit no one asked.
One of my dream titfuck
>>5204459she has leaks
Its surprising how she never went topless in a movie or tv show
I occasionally wonder -- small spy cameras are affordable and easy to concealWe never ever see hidden camera footage from the trailers or costume departments of movie sets.You near hear of a guy getting busted for trying to do it.The one or two "leaked" pics of her are about what you'd expect from that time period. Not great resolution.I always pictured her as having the ghostiest of pale areolae, and the photo kind of matches expectation.
>>5213825a) security around female actresses is super tight for this reason, esp around places where they change clothes, and closed sets/minimal crew during some thingsb) hire females for certain staff, not skeevy menc) you get busted once, even for trying to, and you are done with that company/studio for life, and probably the whole industry