Artemis II - Journey to the Moon
>>5208887space dust?
>>5208902Nerve gas, actually.
Fake
>>5208909But enough about your Mom's tits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xw45hr4V-co
Christina Koch is kinda cute ngl
>>5208883Rotated with north (approximately) up, and annotated with constellation lines per H.A. Rey's book "The Star: A New Way To See Them," stars identified and prioritized by proper names, then Bayer letters, then Flamsteed numbers.
>>5208876>Artemis II - Journey to the MoonTheir site:https://www.nasa.gov/video-detail/art002m1200912237-saj-jettisonorig-3/
>>5208917Lol
any non-digital HR? fuck these pixel artifacts bro
>>5209079>non-digitalYou mean analog, like from film?
>>5209369This looks as fake as the day is long.
Don't you have a mud hut to build, faggot?
THE MOON IS FAKE!!!!IT'S SOME KIND OF A BALLOON THE GOVERNMENT PUT UP THERE TO CONFUSE EVERYBODY!
>>5209001Can you do the same with >>5209369 please?
>>5209429I'm not painfully autistic, so no.
>>5209429I was actually thinking of doing that. Offhand, it looks like Saturn is just lower-right of the Moon and Mars farther out. It also means north looks like it's really 'up', so I won't need to rotate imagery.>>5209432He wasn't asking you.
Incredible that so many people think this is all fake and gay
>>5209079NASA abandoned film cameras decades ago. At least we still have the apollo film archives.
>>5209079>>5209599They better send some film cameras up for Artemis IV and the landing
>>5209605>NASA drafts Christopher Nolan into the astronaut corps>he films everything in IMAX 70mm
>>5209637>Christopher NolanThe new Stanley Kubrick? The memes are writing themselves.
>>5209429>>5209369As before:>>5209001 (You)Except I didn't (need to) rotate the image at all.
>>5209643Field chart
>>5209605bet your ass they'll shoot tiktoks with the new space-iphone
>>5209643god damn that's cool
>>5209683Thanks! I enjoyed finding where all this was.
>>5209643You didn't need to rotate the other image.
>>5209468To be fair, the earth is pretty gay.
None of you are bothered the launch date of Artemis II was April 1. April Fools Day???? They're thumbing their noses at us.
>>5209723At you.
>>5209723> None of you are bothered the launch date of Artemis II was April 1. April Fools Day????No, is that your strongest evidence?
>>5209690>You didn't need to rotate the other image.To more easily find my bearings I did. Lots of potential for mistakes when rotating in my head during labeling.
>>5209723>They're thumbing their noses at us.It's just you, doing to yourself.
>>5209750Okay... where's the full-res version?
I'm not big on NASA-content, but why is it mostly limited to 1080p?Trying to access ~orig for most images throws a 403.
>>5209754>>5209753https://images.nasa.gov/search?q=orion&page=1&media=image&yearStart=2026&yearEnd=2026
>>5209754>why is it mostly limited to 1080p?It's what Anons find and post. Disappointing.At least one camera is a Nikon D5, 5568 x 33712 pixels. I've heard they have a Z6 as well, but haven't seen any exif to prove that.
>>5209753it's too big to uppload in hereis more than 8 MB
>>5209758>it's too big to uppload in hereI'm noticing a lot these are .png. Can you save it as a jpg?Or do you have a URL for the image you got it from?
>>5209759https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-ii-multimedia/#imagesMost of them are 1920x1280pxI open the image in the browserThen copy it and paste it here in the quick reply window.There are bigger pics herehttps://images.nasa.gov/search?q=Artemis%20II&page=1&media=image,video,audio&yearStart=1920&yearEnd=2026Those are bigger than 8 mb,
>>5209753
>>5209783jpeg compression artifacts up the ass
>>5209786Tell it to NASA.
>>5209756Z9https://images.nasa.gov/details/art002e012588
