[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 09i09i09rg54g4.png (2.94 MB, 1756x1168)
2.94 MB
2.94 MB PNG
Is it a good idea to get AI to show you where your art could be if you were better? Or are you robbing yourself from being happy of incremental improvements?
>>
It's pointless.
>>
>>7903132
If you're not capable of figuring out how to replicate the AI output then it's pointless. It's basically just finish the rest of the owl.
>>
>>7903132
You knew the answer was no before you asked.
>>
>>7903132
is it wrong of me to think that the ai in picrel is pretty good
>>
>>7903132
It's interesting at least. Maybe you even could draw something similar if you actually used decent paper and in and color.
>>
>>7903132
>Maybe I could've been an astronaut if I weren't retarded.
Imagining what you could've been is free, retard.
>>
>>7903430
The background would look decent if OP didn't do those retarded fucking squiggles, even the AI just ignored them

>>7903432
If he followed some pen & ink watercolor tutorials he could get something close
>>
>>7903132
What program was this used with? Kinda interesting to play with the idea of being able to see a random doodle extrapolated out.
>>
File: banjo frog comparison.png (3.07 MB, 1756x1168)
3.07 MB
3.07 MB PNG
>>7904929
grok is the best at it
this is the prompt i used

In the distinctive style of Arthur Rackham's Golden Age illustrations from Irish Fairy Tales, 1920 edition: whimsical yet slightly melancholic and mysterious mood, intricate detailed pen-and-ink linework with expressive wiry lines, subtle layered transparent watercolor washes in muted earthy tones -- soft sepia, pale greens, muted blues, delicate pinks and lavenders, high contrast in shadows and highlights, rich textured details, dreamlike fusion of realism and fantasy, vintage book illustration aesthetic, no modern elements --stylize 600 --v 6

obviously change the colors to fit what you want, if you want it to add a background you have to specify that at the start of the prompt.
sometimes it'll mess up the details, like in picrel where it turns the thumb on his picking hand into another finger
>>
>>7903132
it's poo in the loo, not shit on the street
>>
File: 1770140370086443.jpg (113 KB, 736x737)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>7904954
Many thanks. Funny enough, I've been using some AI stuff to try and work backwards on some painting and learning some other stuff. I paint both traditionally and digitally, and it would be really interesting to see what potential a basic doodle has to try and visualize out what I would like to do. I think AI is just another tool for artists who use it with sincerity and purpose. Again, many thanks anon. I
>>
>>7904970
Typo.
>to try and visualize out what I would like to do.
*** to try and visualize out what it would look like.
>>
>>7904970
if you want it to emulate a style of another image, just give it an image and tell it to generate a prompt based on that image, it's how i got that arthur rackham prompt



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.