Lads, you know how the invention of the camera made artworks of real physical things like landscapes, people, and building obsolete and that branch of art went on a sharp decline and art became about imagination or whatever modern art was supposed to be now? With the advancement of AI that shit became obsolete too, people, companies and even world governments are using A.I to make all the art they need now cutting the middleman, which is the artist, between the commissioner and the piece of art they need made for whatever object they need. It's not just painting that's on the chopping block, it's music and sculpting and porn too. What would human art look like 10 years from now?
shut the fuck up *farts*
>>7910443Human made art will be a luxury market where the barrier to entry will be higher than it has ever been in all of human history. It will require novel creativity and appeal, skill and the proper connections to be able to get into. That's for like, consumer grade luxury market though. There will always be a market for "artisan crafted indie goods".
>>7910443the ads on this website are the perfect example
>>7910443Art is never a 1:1 copy of reality. People who do the so called hyperrealism always fail and it looks like shit. There will be always demand for paintings that people want to put on wall
>>7910464this was already the case long before AI
>>7910443>What would human art look like 10 years from now?probably worse but this is due to gay politics not technology.Fundamentally AI doesn't change shit if people wanna draw they will draw if they wanna prompt they will prompt if you wanna learn chess you will, the fact that computers basically outperform you in every way does not resolve your own desires.the fact that people use tech to oppress/abuse/fuck with the world is a political problem you should complain about it to your reps and/or join some kind of political movement that you think represents your views. If we have means to move beyond waged labor based economy we probably should instead of sticking with it for the lulz.
>>7910501Yeah, if shit continues down this route, just the basic act of creation/personal autonomy is going to become a political statement... sigh
You don't need to get hired to be successful anymore. You can literally do your own thing and get income straight from the people that are interested in it. The internet makes it possible. You only have that wageslave mindset because it's convenient.
>>7910443It will be Medieval cats again.
>>7910443>the invention of the camera made artworks of real physical things like landscapes, people, and building obsoleteNot true. If we're talking about artworks for the purpose of recording history, you're right, but there's still plenty of art being made of landscapes, buildings and people - painted portraits of yourself or family are like the height of luxury or the ultimate form of respects. Just look at the painted portraits for the American president; there's more to that than just tradition, it's a display of power and prestige as well.So the artwork and art form hasn't died off, rather, the purpose has changed.>What would human art look like 10 years from now?I think it will be much the same as it currently is, with constant witch hunts for the proompters, rather than tracers or art thieves that we had in the before times.The reason why we won't be moving entirely to AI generations for art is simply because those who wanted to create art would have already practiced or be practicing some craft - anyone who wants to create something wouldn't be interested in having a program create for them.Those who proompt may seem like they'll create something, but the reason they weren't creating anything before AI is because they lack the grit to actually do the work on a project, or even to get the skills to work on such a project.So they'll create shitty tik-tok shorts and poorly stitched together longer videos, but they'll never make anything of any actual substance.AI generation for most arts has been around for a bit now, but tell me, where is the great AI novel? Film? Animation? Comic? Or even single picture? The only culturally substantive thing AI has generated is memes, and even those are more like gimmicks, because of how uncanny the AI images and videos are.There's also something to be said about how AI generations fail in work environments, but this comment is long enoughSo I think the effect on the art by AI is overhyped and overstated.
>>7910443>it's a frog posting autistic assuming I don't have other skillsjust draw already lmao
>>7910443There are still many people who dislike AI art and would much rather prefer human made art. AI art is not nearly on the level of human made art anyway. Its storytelling sucks ass.
>>7910443You have to be 18 to post here retard
>>7910464>indieShut the fuck up.
