>>216644564It's an ambiguous question: Does each man have seven wives, or are there only seven wives distributed among the men?
>>216644653It's one of those gay questions where there is no correct answer. They just want to see how you think.It's like those supremely gay order-of-operations maths questions.
1372Cock
>>216644564357 or something
7. Women and children aren't people.
Three hundred ninety-nine.
>>21664456463 people total: 14 adults and 49 children
>>216644564Eight billion
>>2166445647+7=1414*7=9898+14=112
>>216644564637 + 7 = 14 (men and their wives)7 × 7 = 49 (their children)14 + 49 = 63Putting that aside. What kind of question even is this? Is this some hyperpolygamy thing? My wife's children?
63
>>216644788real answer
>>216644921or 112
Wait, there's more than 399...
>>216644788BASED TRVKE
If you say 63 you are a racist transphobic chud, there are non binary couples y'know...and all of the 14 adults can get pregnant even if they aren't biological females
448
>>216644842>>216644866>>216644881>>216644921>>216644948Low IQ
>>216644564it could be anywhere from 21 to 63.it is not stated that each man has 1 wife, so it's possible that there is 1 man with 7 wives, and 6 others without any, etc.
>>216644564+++++++++ATTENTION+++++++++Harvard doesn't quiz you dumb social media bait """""IQ test""" questions in their interviews.
7 men49 women2401 children
It’s 21
>>216645034Doesn't matter to them.They are no MIT or Cambridge so going there to study Math related stuff is beyond retarded. I just have to accuse them of racism if they do not accept me as part of the diversity quota and get a 100% scholarship to study law there because that's what Harvard is known for: laws and medicine.
Garbage unsolvable question made to get engagement on social media. Go back to facebook
>>216644564im ESL so i might be wrong but it sounds like each man has 7 wivesin that case the answer is 7 + 7^2 + 7^3
>>216645034You're right.The correct answer was this: >>216644788
Those children are Tyrone's thoughbeit
>>21664456463 if you consider children as “people”
>>216644564How does each man and each wife have 7 children? So the wives and husbands are all cheating on each other?
>>21664456463
141 man has 5 wives, 1 man has 1 wife, 2 men are gay/tranny for each other, 2 other men share 1 wife. the final man is a blackpilled incelmaxxing doomer posting on 4chan. nobody gives birth and the number of kids are made up for tax fraud
How do we know the men are sharing wives or some shit. As the Kiwi said, this tests more of your assumptions you make than the answer you give
vague language that could be interpreted many ways, but one way is to consider the men and wives as having children separately with other partners before marrying each other, the language places an odd emphasis on "each" for both men and wives, so the solution could be:>7 men each have 7 children = 49 children>7 wives each have 7 children = 49 children >7 men and 7 wives = 14 adults>49 + 49 + 14 = 112 people
>>216646671I wouldn't be suprised if this question was for law school
>>216644564To me 7 men have 7 wives mean that each man has 1 wife, not that each man has 7 wives, else you'd say 7 men have 7 wives each. Each man and each wife have 7 children is the same as saying that each man has 7 children, since the man and wife will have the same children. So 7x7=49. Then you add the 7 men and 7 wives, you get 63. Locking this as my final answer
Ah shit, didn't take into consideration the wives and husbands could have separate children. Well fuck this stupid globohomo question
>>216644564The wording is deliberately unclear, but the lower bound is 63. That's the least possible number of people you could have that still satisifes the parameters.
>>2166445647 people and the rest are women and children i dont care fuck i hate women
>>216646967Why are you gay
>>216647040Why are you a simping cuck for any pussy that looks your way?
>>216647040i m not gay i dont like men sexually but women arent people.
>>216644564these sorta "questions" seem so stupid>i'm so smart. i asked something that could have all sorts of answers but i get the power to decide which it is!it's always some sorta attempt by a narcissist to flex.>>216644788this is the answer
>>216646879wrong, it says 90% were eliminated, so the lower bound is 56.7
>>216647837*6.3
