[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: PHL-191.jpg (440 KB, 1920x1080)
440 KB
440 KB JPG
Thoughts about modular reloading pods for MRL?
>>
congratulations China for catching up to the west 30 years later!

why are all your threads like this?
>>
File: 1698036128891.jpg (618 KB, 1898x586)
618 KB
618 KB JPG
>>61423112
https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3561549/dod-releases-2023-report-on-military-and-security-developments-involving-the-pe/
>>
>>61423112
whiny bitch posting hours
>>
>>61423128
Imple--- you know what? I'm not going to bother finishing.
>>
>>61423128
Norks have enough artillery close enough to the DMZ to level most of the Seoul northern metro area.
>>
>>61423112
>30 years later
It's closer to 45. MLRS prototypes were built before 1980
>>
>>61423135
>immediate seethe
Just make a good thread for once, shillboi
>>
>>61423090
Implessive ! There. Now back to your cell and hope no one wants to buy your kidneys today.
>>
File: 201243.jpg (68 KB, 618x342)
68 KB
68 KB JPG
>370mm rocket
It would be fucking scary if a rocket that size couldn't fucking reach taiwan. Also you have to park it on the beach for the 220km version to reach actual targets.
>>
>>61423112
>congratulations China for catching up to the west 30 years later!

Russia still needs to get there so... Yeah, congrats to China for being the least retarded of its little gang ?
>>
>>61423090
They're still doing it wrong, fucking morons. The crane is meant to be built into the MLRS vehicle so that it can reload pods that have been left stored on the ground without a need for a support vehicle. Reloading them the chink way, using a truck with a crane to hoist them on to the MLRS vehicle, completely defeats the purpose of the modular pods. Fucking cargo cult retards.
>>
File: PHL-191 370MM.png (32 KB, 585x716)
32 KB
32 KB PNG
>>61423173
Actually It's 300km, since It's a copy of the Israeli PULS, which they "bought" the blueprints from an israeli engineer. That's why It uses that weird 370mm caliber rocket instead of 400mm.
>>
File: file.png (279 KB, 500x281)
279 KB
279 KB PNG
>>61423257
Pic related for those of you who might not know what I'm talking about. There's a crane that comes out the back and can pick up the pods. Himars uses the same sort of crane, scaled down to one pod instead of two.
>>
File: SR-5.jpg (97 KB, 556x479)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>61423276
>>61423257
They do have It for the Export model, the SR-5
>>
>>61423128
>>61423090
Implessive
>>
>>61423257
>>61423276
gonna add onto this guy and say the himars does have the crane integrated, but the resupply vehicles also have cranes
(they use their cranes to drop pods at a designated point, then himars drives over, picks up a pod and loads it)
>t. deployed with a himars battalion
13Ms are all fuckin retards though I just gotta put that out there
>>
>>61423090
Essential. A necessary adaptation for Soviet rocket stockpiles for post-soviet countries. China has already done it, and exactly enough time has passed since this was last a popular topic on here and on you tube for Ukraine to suddenly have such a thing deployed they we're going to find out about soon.

Because this is one of those threads, isn't it?
>>
>>61426206
Well that is flexibility in deployment strategy in regards to counter battery. I rate it. Particularly because I'm too stupid to think of that myself
>>
>>61426241
this is literally just a chinkshill spamthread. it shows up the exact same time as other low effort threads that they abandon nearly immediately
>>
>>61426299
>Not interested in a thread
>whine about shills

GIT OUT THEN
>>
>>61427397
just stop making such low quality threads, that's all you have to do
>>
>>61427397
>be low quality faggot
>make low quality thread
>attracts low quality posters
Change starts with you, Anon.
>>
>>61423276
God that is the most American shit, and I mean that in the best way possible. Such an embedded understanding of the power of maintaining logistical supremacy that your rocket artillery contains its own loading support vehicle. Top shit.
>>
>>61428577
It doesn't take a genius to realize that rocket artillery isn't useful if it can only fire once a day. The reason the chinks don't have it is because of a cargo cult mentality that if you can make something look the same, it will perform the same.
>>
File: China PLA-2.webm (2.17 MB, 1920x1080)
2.17 MB
2.17 MB WEBM
>>61423112
>the west

Only USA is worth mentioning
>>
File: 1713359892732.jpg (297 KB, 822x952)
297 KB
297 KB JPG
>>61423090
Based
>>
File: 23iqraq88ec71.jpg (1.64 MB, 4678x3119)
1.64 MB
1.64 MB JPG
>>61423090
>>61423128
>>61430233
>>61430706
>Needing a seperate vehicle to reload
ngmi
>>
>>61423090
Link to the video pls? Couldn't find it
>>
File: Army_mlrs_1982_02.jpg (55 KB, 560x699)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>61431015
I sometimes wonder if losing half the rocket load is worth being faster to reload.
>>
>>61432311
Rocket artillery's at it's most vulnerable when reloading. Halving the time it takes to reload, means more fire missions and more safety. It also means less logistical footprint and an easer way to hide reloads around a mission area. You can just drive around with a flat bed dropping fresh reloads in barns, and thickets wherever you want hours before your launcher is ever going to be in the area to pick them up.

From their performance in Ukraine, it seems like the quicker 6 pack launchers are fantastic for strategic ball flicking going after high value stuff near the front. Save the bigger MLRS systems for "fuck that entire grid" level actions from safer supply lines.
>>
>>61430233
my truck!
>>
>>61432311
Different doctrinal uses. HIMARS is designed around being a more mobile platform which is exactly how it's being employed. It shoots, it scoots. Lacking a second load doesn't matter if sticking around to shoot it, or to load it, is going to get an orgy of FPV drones up your ass.
Grid square removal system comes into its own when you have a more permissive environment behind the front. If you can loiter in one place longer safely then the greater potential firepower becomes more useful.
>>
File: IMG_1240.jpg (55 KB, 863x616)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
Looks like a copy of the Uragan-1M which was developed in the 90s to compete with HIMARS. They tested it in 2012 and was to enter service in 2017 (lol) and was said to be delivered to the battlefield last year.
>>
File: Chinks.gif (379 KB, 1000x661)
379 KB
379 KB GIF
>>61423090
I
M
P
L
E
S
S
I
V
E
!
VERY CYNG KA LUY KHWN CHANG KY LANG LU
>>
File: IMG_2536.jpg (332 KB, 1920x1080)
332 KB
332 KB JPG
>>61423090
>>
>>61423276
This is logi design done right.
>can dump missiles on the ground wherever
>launcher can load itself from the ground
>any vehicle that can get a missile pod to the ground without dropping it will work for delivery
A tilt tray truck can support these launchers, no crane, no specialist shit, just slide them to the ground and leave the rest to the launcher.
>>
>>61436149
Yeah, it seems obvious when you see a vehicle doing it but integrating that capacity instead of requiring a paired support platform does a ton to simplify supporting them in the field.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.