Happy Battle of Lexington and Concord day, all fucking redcoats must fucking hang Post made in America guns Guide: https://files.catbox.moe/9g5sv2.pdfPastebin: https://pastebin.com/gs6mLNikPrevious: >>61435877
All made in the US
>>61448567I used to go to the reenactments on the Lexington Green every year as a kid, followed by the parade on Mass Ave. That area is beyond wackadoo liberal now, it's such a shame.
>>61448644I want a flintlock pistol just because it sounds cooler than my gl*ck
>>61448581I was actually thinking about a 92fs for my next but I'm not the biggest fan of a 92 SB compact's trigger I tried out. Need to find one to shoot.
>>61448689Old 92s had retardly strong hammer springs of 20 pounds, people run 16 to 12-13 pounds now. LTT Trigger jobs are perhaps the best a DA/SA trigger could be. The 92X RDO stock has a similar trigger bar as a LTT but won’t be as smooth, it’ll have a decently short reset.If you want a 92SB like, the 92X compact had a railless version. It won’t have the RDO’s trigger bar but you should be buying LTT’s anyway. When people fellate 92s it’s usually with Langdon parts involved.
>>61448714>If you want a 92SB likeNo no, I want to stay away from the SB. >When people fellate 92s it's usually with Langdon parts involvedInteresting, so if I end up getting one it will likely involve some modifications then?
>>61448714The LTT trigger shit is truly incredible. The reset is so crisp and short it's almost like cheating on double taps. I cannot even remember what a regular 92FS trigger was like anymore.
It’s here.
>>61448737The standard 92FS trigger isn't bad, but it definitely feels unrefined compared to the LTT. I spoiled myself making my 1st handgun purchase the 92LTT
>>61448755Should have got the enclosed one because the autobrightness will rape your nodst. EPS enjoyer
>>61448772I’m not shooting my Glock under nods. I’ll be okay.
>>61448724You get the modifications not really because you have to, but because you can, as it does make a big difference and for not that much money. The full trigger job in a bag is 180 bucks, the main component is the trigger bar which can be had for 80 bucks. Just the trigger bar and a lower weight hammer spring like 13-14 and you’d have 70% of what the trigger job. It’s diminishing returns for the rest of the trigger job in a bag, but if you want the best you buy the best. The modifications are not permanent and is just part swaps, some parts are not trivial to install as springs under pressure and needing to line up holes but I can do it in less than 30 minutes since I’ve done it a lot. If you need tips on the hammer sear (hardest part) I’ll show you how I do it.
I wish I could even fathom being able to afford NODS
>>61448810i got a gen 3 pvs14 green complete unit for 1500. clean af, no blems.
>>61448803Thanks for all the info anon, I appreciate it. If I end up getting a 92 of my own I'll post again.>springs under tensionI was browsing some 3D printed jigs yesterday, wonder if any of those will help make things easier. Pic related.
>>61448567Anyone have tips for shooting a Steyr M9? I'm getting mixed advice on the correct sight picture. Otherwise it handles amazingly well. Kinda wish it had regular sights
Like ever good Lube I went to the range just to clean a handgun, there is no need to shhot if you can clean a gun! Because its a brand new early Prototype of a basedAF cleaner I used a gun with style as the 1st ever gun cleaned with a Coom Cleaner. Gonna edit the images now for a Blog post >>61448529Not mine, my shooting/reloading buddy picked her up brand new for 1400€ this morning. We tested trigger weights without shooting it which resulted in 1,45 to 1,58kg, lets see if its getting lower after a few 100s of bullets>>61446933Kind of what I did at the end, used Coomgrease on the slide and the barrel contact. Coom on all springs and part we did not know if those are important, directly after cleaning her out with CLP and mineral spirit. No malfunction, went very well. >>61447086I hope Anon is happy with his new tools
>>61448885The manual should tell you
>>61448900Beautiful gun Can you get LTT trigger bars in Germany or is that covered in ITAR
>>61448567
Cleaner was very fast, kind of caused the dirt to get liquid :) Best part: no cancer, stupid smell or gloves. Is/was that yellow color a staining from the brass? >>61448923We can buy triggers here, shouldnt be a problem
>>61448979>no cancerKek, I was literally thinking last night>I wonder how much cancer lube's lube might contain. Oh well !
Has anyone ever heard anything or gotten hands on with these arcus pistols? I'm tempted to nab one since they look like a cool mix of a sig 226 and a cz 75.
>>61448904Just flipped through it, nothing.
>>61449020Well, Im not using bad chemicals :D They might be cheaper and lower concentrated to use but those toxic formulation can stick with the retard products. I need to visit a professor for poisons and talk how to avoid heavy metalls during cleaning, if I know the way I go for it so its doing the same as the expensiv D-LEAD as a extra skill. Would be good as a quick wipe for externals t keep heavy metall contamination out of the house
>>61449033They are Hi Power copies not related to those other two afaik
Today’s gr00ps. 12 yds, 3 rds each, offhand, slow fire.
>>61449195Ran out of shoot n c’s today, so I’ll have to Amazon some more. I am proud to be Birchwood Casey’s most shabbos goy.
>>61449195nice shooting anon
>>61449232>>61449204
>>61449077Oh shit I see it now that you point it out. Idk why my brain went CZ 75 not hi power. I searched around for holsters and didn't find any so I think I'll pass.
>>61449232Thanks!
>>61449195>>61449204What gun?
>>61449411Glock 17
>>61449411>>61449195Nvm I'm blind, Glock with Acro?
>>61449422Yep!
>>61448885Just put the triangle in the middle of the rear sight between the two bars, and then use equal light, right?
Options:1. Keep my g23 with drop in 9mm conversion barrel, cut it for an MPS2. buy an OR p-10c, mount MPSI'd like to have a better trigger, I had a PDP that was awesome but I sold it like a dummy.
>>61449195What is the MOA of the acro dot? I've only ever shot through a 407k and I feel like the dot would be bigger than the bullseye at that distance.
>>61449685It's 3.5 MOA, so it occludes roughly 0.42 inches at 12 yards. The bullseye on a 6 inch shoot-n-c (the smaller bottom ones) is 0.6 inches I believe, so I'd estimate about two-thirds of the bull is occluded. These things vary greatly on individual astigmatisms, though.
>>61449736I do have a bit of an astigmatism so that makes sense. Nice shooting.
I know there's only so much utility I can get out of asking for input online before I just go to a gun store / gun range and just test the shit out for myselfbut out of these 5 which would you recommend I go with?or is there another brand or model that I should consider alongside these?I know I included the MSRP in the table, though frankly unless it's edging up against 1800 I'm really not too concerned about price
>>61449912Your table is wrong, all of those listed are DA/SA. You'll recognize a DAO revolver, because it'll either have a shrouded hammer, or the hammer spur will be cut off. I know you say you want a smaller frame, but I'd encourage you to look at the L-frames like the 586/686 instead of just the K-frames. K-frames can break down if you feed them a lot of .357, especially at the forcing cone. The newer L-frame forcing cone design largely remedies this issue. Moreover, you're missing perhaps the most salient difference between the big 3 of Smith, Colt, and Ruger: the chamber latch. Do you want to push forward (Smith), pull back (Colt), or push in (Ruger)? I'm a thumblet, and I can't work the Colt release for the life of me. The Smith and Ruger latches are much easier for me.
>>61450023>Moreover, you're missing perhaps the most salient difference between the big 3 of Smith, Colt, and Ruger: the chamber latch. Do you want to push forward (Smith), pull back (Colt), or push in (Ruger)? I'm a thumblet, and I can't work the Colt release for the life of me. The Smith and Ruger latches are much easier for me.this is where my ignorance hurts medidn't even know this was a consideration, and another reason to just go to a local store / range and try shit out for myselfalso it makes sense that the Colt and Rugers would be the ones I mislabeled as DAO, since those two had by far the shittiest websites with the least available information>specs>action: double>I know you say you want a smaller frame, but I'd encourage you to look at the L-frames like the 586/686I'm open to it, but I'm just a 5'10" manlet (just like my hero, Teddy Roosevelt) and want to still be able to CC whatever I end up going with
im so sorry i doubted you hgi tried a p226 legion and it still doesnt compare to my beretta 92even the hammer wobbling in a >>>>decocked state looks so amateurwhat brings people to enjoy the legion line specifically
>>61449912I would personally buy the SP101. I've always liked them and they are rock solid, but my next choice would be the Model 66 which will likely have a better factory trigger. Then the Colt, then the Kimber, Taurus never. You've really got all the options there unless you're ready to drop $3k on a Spohr.
>>61449912>>61450072Oh yeah, and just so you know I'm not talking out of my ass like most anons, I have a GP100 and a 686. There are some minor things I like better about the S&W but overall I keep coming back to the Ruger. I shoot it just as well or better even though the trigger isn't quite as good, and I haven't done any work on either one besides swap grips.
>>61450065I really enjoyed renting one at a range. Me and my buddy shot it very very well, much better than the pistols we had brough and were more practiced with. The trigger is nice and the ergos are great, the finish is just a bit lack luster.If the pistol is reliable and groups well in your hands that's most of what matters imho
>>61450065>>61450085Forgot to mention but the one we rented was a SAO trigger, the standard legion 226 may be worse.
>>61450084You got desiccant in there or is it just for transport? I've heard the foam can trap moisture and put it in contact with guns.
>>61449674If you want a better trigger, just get a Beretta. The triggers on striker guns are all various flavors of mid; it's not worth spending any money at all trying to find one that isn't blown clean out of the water by stock 92.
>>61449912I will add the model 66 uses a round butt K/L frame grip so you can greatly reduce the size (and shootability) of the grip if needed
>>61450023>I'm a thumblet, and I can't work the Colt release for the life of me.Did you try holding it still and pulling the gun away from it?
>>61449674if you're a poorfag who sells guns, why not a canik>inb4 turkshit
>>61448946What's your largest collection by manufacturer, Burt? And is it out of preference, or happenstance?
>>61450205Moisture is a very rare problem where I live, and I keep my guns well oiled, but it still wouldn't hurt to throw a dessicant in there.
>>61450273Not a Beretta fan>>61450285I like Czechs more than Turks
>>61448567Fuck Fedcoats too.
>>61450385Shadow 2 OR. Just don't install a gamer extendo firing pin and drop it from shoulder height onto a P320.
What's better, a hellcat pro with a sight or a m&p 2.0?
>>61450642M&P 2.0 without a doubt
>>61450642Optics are great because they force you to shoot properly, but non-microcompacts are also great because they give you a lot of leeway for not having perfect technique and you can always put a dot on them later.
>>61450324Walther. It started with an appreciation for their older pistols and became more obsessive. Not really preference even though there are a lot of appreciable attributes to the brand.
So I tried to convert a glock 26 to a glock 27 by swapping the ejector and slide. Just trying to cycle snap caps, I notice that I have to try really hard to get the slide to depress the next round and ride back. Is this normal .40 glock behavior?
>>61450752It's having to depress the next round by an extra millimeter, so that wouldn't surprise me.
>>61450752Racking a 23 with a full magazine requires more effort than any other pistol I’ve shot.
>>61450758I could also imagine it being an engineering choice to use the magazine to bleed off a little of the extra slide energy.
>>61449668Is the impact at the top of the triangle, the tip of the triangle, or cover the target with the whole triangle ? At ten yards I was getting mixed resultss, I dunno I might be a retard.
>>61448923Why wouldn't we just put the 92X Performance trigger on ours
>>61450798Idk where the impact is with respect to the triangle, I'd wager it's like a Glock so it's a very slightly 6 o'clock or combat hold, so sorta close to the tip. With that said, I think you're thinking about it wrong. Try shooting it like a "normal" pistol iron sight, equal height equal light. So, hold the top of the triangle flush with the top of the rear sight, and even out the air gap (you shouldn't have much at arm's length IIRC). Don't look "within" the triangle while shooting, just focus on getting the triangle itself centered within the rear sight.
best pistol for new pistol person? UWU
>>61450692Nice. I get it. I'm just now getting to the point I can say I have a collection of S&W pistols despite having no particular care for them. Always been more of an Americana thing and it sort of happened along the way. Those P5s are beautiful.
>>61450843Glock 19
>>61450817Because it's not as good.
>>61450840Thanks. Yeah I dunno I wear contacts to the range and I think my astigmatism was making me overthink and have trouble focusing on the front sight. I'll give it another go next week
>>61450843Get a Glock 19/17 so you can sell it at a loss in a year, buy something retarded to replace it, then come back here in 4-5 years when the cycle completes and you realize a Glock's your most practical choice. Then, and only then, will you be ready to explore new ideas.
>>61450882This isn't 2001 anymore there are lots of guns better than Glock 19. Like the M&P 2.0.
>>61450866It's good enough especially at that price and availability
>>61450900You're correct, but that's not the point. You'll understand.
>>61450879How do you like the SAO 226?
>>61450900The Glock 19 is the omega point of handgun design, sorry.
>>61450917The Glock 19 was the first handgun I ever bought and after I sold it I enjoyed literally every handgun I bought since a lot more. Glock is like the new fuddlore magnet gun and I am sick of it. You people that recommend Glocks day in and day out are the neo-boomers saying all you need is a 1911 in .45.
>>61450942If I could fit my 1911 in my snubby kit bag I would absolutely be carrying that in the woods.
>>61450942>You people that recommend Glocks day in and day out are the neo-boomers saying all you need is a 1911 in .45.That would be true, if every new handgun for half a century after the 1911 had just been a 1911 in .45 ACP with enough answers changed that the teacher wouldn't know they'd copied JMB's homework.
>>61450923I like it but I got it at employee pricing. Nice trigger and a big fat ambi safety which fit the bill of what I was looking for. Some people hate the finish but I'm good with it. Not sure what else to say.
>>61450843A compact sized pistol is easiest to both train on and conceal for a newbie. Get a kydex holster for it as well.There are a ton of good brands out there like the CZ p10c, Smith and Wessen M&P 2.0, FN 509c, and walther PDPc. A glock is probably the worst advice for a beginner as they have basically stalled out 6-7 years ago as a brand and everyone else kept improving either in price or quality or both. Google rental ranges around you and call them up, you should have at least one in your area that offers unlimited swaps for a flat rental fee of around $25. Try out all the options they have and go with whatever pistol you shoot best.Pic is my favorite pistol, the 509c
>>61450995Isn't the FN 509 a piece of shit? I heard they had a slew of issues with parts breaking, things being wildly out of spec, and shitty fitment.
>>61450942I don't think you get it. It has nothing to do with Glock supremacy, and everything to do with having realistic expectations for the vast majority of end users. Particularly someone who would ask that question in the first place.Glocks are not my favorite guns. But I appreciate them for what they are.
>>61451010FN has notoriously failed to produce a worthwhile 9mm in nearly 100 years, yes.
>>61451017The selling points of Glock are:>muh aftermarket>muh cheap mags>muh reliabilityThe average end user will not buy a lot of aftermarket shit.The average end user won't stockpile extra mags.Many guns are now just as reliable. Why recommend this gun above everything else in 2024? Get fucked.
>>61451010I shoot and own a lot of handguns, I have 8, my 4 range buddies have even more. My 509 is still my favorite pistol and I consistently shoot great groups with it as do 3/4 of my range buddies. I'm 8.5-9k rounds into this thing without a single gun related failure. Parts breakages were an issue with some very early models strikers that was fixed for every gun post 2019. The only complaint I hear is the trigger since it's a hinge trigger some people just don't dig it.>>61451022This guy is noguns and post this in every thread. He calls everyone else fat but refuses to post physique, and calls FN shit but refuses to prove he has even touched a pistol in his life. I believe him to be both a boomer European, and therefore his opinions should be disregarded.
>>61451043>This guy[...]The fact that there are enough people consistently shitting on FN handguns for you to confuse us for one monomaniacal shitposter should tell you something.
>>61451026Nobody else has a 9mm 10-rounder that has this dimension this short.
>>61451058Post gun or physique.
Gen 5 Glocks have:the best finish in their class (DLC over nitrocarburization)the best barrel in their class (hybrid polygonal/traditional rifling)the best holster availabilitythe best mag availabilitythe best spare parts availabilitythe lightest in their classby far the most adoption by militaries, special forces, law enforcement, etc.You might not prefer Glocks, but saying that there's "no reason" to get one is just abject dishonesty.
>>61451067Okay.
>>61451100oh, I forgot, they're also the easiest guns to work on, with the fewest parts, generally low bore axis, low reciprocating mass, and probably some other stuff
>>61451114Have you shot a 509? Have you ever owned a FN pistol? Your opionions seem to fly in the face of everyone who has.
>guy thinks that anyone who shit talks FN is one guy even though FN has been disappointing for literally decades>demands FN hater post guns because he surely has no guns>hater posts gun, it's actually pretty nice>"w-w-well you haven't shot an FN, have you? other people like it"give up faggot this is just cringe
>>61451026You could do with mellowing the fuck out about your hobby and learning to enjoy a state of blood pressure that isn't elevatedA major selling point of a Glock, yes, is its ubiquity. Have you asked yourself why they're so ubiquitous? Does it maybe have something to do with, at their price point, they are not significantly outdone by any other pistol? There's little compelling reason to buy almost anything else that would apply to a layman. And if they decide to want to make shooting a hobby, great. They have access to the cheapest and exponentially most accessible aftermarket than every other firearm on the market put together.
>>61451181do you think he gets genuinely upset at the "squishy squishy" meme?I do.
>>61451195>Have you asked yourself why they're so ubiquitous?Aggressive marketing.I don't hate Glocks but don't kid yourself that this is some magical super gun and that there aren't many competitive options.
>>61451181Hey retard, the sentence "FN has notoriously failed to produce a worthwhile 9mm in nearly 100 years" is not some origional thought somehow arrived at through the grace of god by multiple anons but is posted in almost every single thread for the past 6 months by what I can only imagine to be a single obsessive anon. It's not people calling FN shit, it's that single sentence without any further articulating on WHY the person thinks its shit. Once again, my expirence, the expirence of others, and the 40k rounds the LAPD put through theirs without failures is surely enough evidence to show that FN 509 is a reliable pistol.>>61451114Have you shot a 509? Have you ever owned a FN pistol? What the fuck are you basing your opinions on?
>>61451213>FN has notoriously failed to produce a worthwhile 9mm in nearly 100 yearsIt's true though. FN sucks. Their most famous handguns are known for sucking.
>>61451125My nephew likes FN pistols, for some reason. I shot some subcompact model he has with one of those magazines meant to bump it up to the size of a compact with a floorplate spacer; it was tolerable. PS looking at FN's lineup, it was probably a 509C—it disgusts me that FN would depart from accepted nomenclature like this, but I expect very little of them.If I'd somehow ended up buying one instead of a Glock, I probably would never noticed the difference—until I wanted to change the irons, or get the slide milled, or buy a holster, or do any sort of armorer work like replacing a slide catch or recoil spring, probably.I don't see what it has to offer over the default option, and even if I found the Glock lacking in some way, there would be multiple stops on my way from it to anything FN has on offer, even if I limited myself to striker guns.
>>61451213>could multiple people have noticed that the last really good 9mm FN made was the original Hi-Power in 1934, and that it's been 90 years since then?>no, it must be one maniac shitting on my favorite brand out of irrational hatred for the Belgian arms industry
>>61451213I know multiple people who bought the FN Reflex and had them shoot so inaccurately that they couldn't be trusted to protect anyone within 10 yards.
>>61451100>best finishbait. it scratches easily and is slippery as fuck. nobody likes it
>>61451100gen 3 glocks are better. Dare I say that gen 3 glock clones are better. Shadow systems foundation guns are $600 and come with a lot more features and a good optic solution. Gen 5 is retarded, glock knows the jig is up so are making everything proprietary like mags. Aftermarket mags like magpul are unreliable in gen 5 but perfect in gen 3
>>61451281Gen 5 also fell for the front serrations and "carry cuts" memes.
striker fired guns are dum
>>61451292Front serrations are objectively better than rear serrations.
>>61451265>scratches easilyNo it doesn’t lolHere’s a Glock with 12k through it versus a Sig with 2k through it
>>61451100>>61451120Someday.
>>61450974Interesting. When I shot a 226 and a 220 briefly at an Sig demo day, I shot them noticeably better in DA than in SA. I figured the SAO version of the 226 would have a better SA than the DA/SA versions, but maybe that’s not the case. >>61449742Thanks!
>>61451394>I figured the SAO version of the 226 would have a better SA than the DA/SA versions, but maybe that’s not the case.NTAMy understanding is that the SAO P22Xes are just DA/SA guns with the DA pull dummied out, like the "SAO" 92s (except that the SA pull on a 92 is delightful)
>>61451262I knew this guy who knew this guys cousin who knew this guys gay boyfriend who wasn't able to shoot and man he had a fn reflex and bam. It's the guns fault. (Totally real story because I said it)
Looks like I'll be getting this shiny LCP Max for about 350 out the door. How did I do? I've had one before and liked it, and call me a fag but I like the pretty slide
>>61451461I like the stainless too, and I’ll have you know I’m not a fag
>>61451410Word, that makes sense. Probably just swap the hammers.
>On today's episode of polishing the turdI fit a $20 'blem' EGW stainless mainspring housing to my Kimber, replacing the only piece of plastic on the gun.I blended it with a file then cleaned up with some sanding blocks and polishing pads and now it has a nicer fit msh than my Dan Wesson. First time I've hand fit and blended a part, felt pretty good.
>>61451208Nowadays I agree, absolutely. I don't even think it's marketing more than it being hard to really financially justify adopting another service pistol (and thus new parts, etc) for most departments. But for a solid 30 years, they WERE revolutionary. At this rate, as time goes by and more gear needs to be replaced, I do think Glock will fall out of favor with their main consumers in the coming years. And that's alright; it means that at the very least, even if nobody is truly innovating, they're at least improving.
>>61451518Very good job, anon.
>>61451518>>61451522I also took the grip safety off and blasted all the grit out then re-lubed everything with coom oil. If this shit doesn't work I'm going to firebomb Dresden again.
>>61451518looks seamless, well donehome tinkering is based, especially when the end product ends up being actually good
>>61451518what was the blem on the MSH?
The little circle thing at the base of the magazine spring flew out on disassembly and now I can't find it ahhh
>>61451533As far as I can tell the only blemish is that some of the points of the serrations are very slightly flattened. It's barely noticeable. Part was like half off or more so I figured it wouldn't hurt to give it a shot.
>>61451571Looks pretty good for twenty bucks
>>61451559MAYBE NEXT TIME YOU'LL DO YOUR AMATEUR GUNSMITHING IN A GIANT ZIPLOC LIKE I TOLD YOU TO
Tisas 1911s? Sneed it or feed it?
>>61451615Literally the best sub-$1500 1911 option right now
>>61451213>>61451427Dude you’re letting bots and internet sociopaths provoke you. Enjoy what you like, and don’t ever let a stranger make you explain yourself like this ever again.
>>61451615They're good. Fit and finish on mine is much better than one might expect. I have problems with their mags, though. All others work fine.
>>61451630>I have problems with their mags, though. All others work fine.Yeah, most 1911 mags suck.
>>61451525Nice work. Also, LubeAnon’s stuff is the best. I apply it with a paintbrush, per the instructions he gave me in one of these threads quite some time ago. Amazing product. Really the holy grail of nontoxic lubricants and rust inhibitor. I’ve even given it away as gifts.
>>61451518>Kimber>>>/hm/>>>/lgbt/
>>61448567Nice job OP. I can only add that we need to hang the loyalist traitors too.
>>61451608But I enjoy watching AR detent pin springs zip just past my eyeball and embed themselves in the ceiling.
>>61447086What are other /k/ approved 1911s in the 1k-1.5k pirce range?
>>61451774None; that's the local minimum where you're mostly just paying for marketing and brand recognition. More than that, and you're getting into semi-custom stuff that's arguably worth the money, and less than that you have stuff like Tisas guns that have like 80% of the features for 50% of the cost.
>>61451525Dont touch Dresden, I mean look at Berlin first!
>>61451664Do you live in Elk County? That might expalain how our seller gave out 7 gunshop samples in 1,5h.
>>61451774The middle ground is a little weird. There are some options like Alpha Foxtrot, Bul Armory, taking a chance on a Springfield, etc. Honestly though it seems like you might as well just buy a Tisas or a Dan Wesson and the middle range isn't that compelling. Could change, but right now idk.
>>61451890How come you can't get that shit to the EU marketI have to lather on Ballistol if I want nontoxic
>>61451774At that price you could also buy all the parts and hand fit a really nice one if you had the patience and dexterity. The time investment could make it a questionable value but you could end up with something very nice if you do a good job.
what are some good handguns made in New England. Interested both in the past and presently.
>>61451919A fitted slide/frame from Caspian alone is going to run you almost a grand.
>>61451912I can, 1 shop with webshop is stocked but wont put it online till Jared published the Gold Guard video. Otherwise I could sell it on ebay for non-Krauts. BTW, as a noncuck I trust Breakfree CLP and Coomoil, Ballistol doesnt do anything right besides cleaning black powder guns
>>61451774Get a new production Olt Gold Cup.
>>61451993Ballistol is great solvent, less runny than CLP and provides some ghetto lubrication tooIt does nothing for rust protection but I use Forrest for that. That said I'll buy your gay nano oil whenever I can get it
>>61452058Let me see when Im done with a early Prototype Cleaner. I might use the Promi code inside ebay to spot Anons and and some "shit" to tge orders, than i put some online.
>>61451298wrong
>>61451966Ruger has some nice stainless revolvers made in NH
>>61451615>roach shit
any good?
>>61452827Every report I've heard raves about the Platy. Everything but the dumb goddamn name
>>61452827Asking A2 for handgun opinions is like asking Ash or Burt for dieting tipsStay in your containment thread plz
>>61453009We need more fun names over shit like Legion XMacro TacOps Elite Comp Niggerslayer Hunter
>>61453105Fair point to be sure, but Platypus?There's a derp-threashold. Like I don't want guns named:>Namby Pambo>Lavender Dryer Sheet>The Gee Wiliker>Rootin' Tootsie>BumbumOuch>Vanilla Gumball>Rotund Gerbil >Huggiewugz
>>61453177I would absolutely ventilate some smackhead with the Rotund Gerbil or Namby Pambo
>>61453195I rethought Rotund Gerbil right as I hit post
Every time I see a gun in the news used in a shooting, DGU or otherwise, it's an old revolver or a Taurus.You guys are surely more stylish, right? Imagine getting into a DGU and everyone finding out you carry Taurus.
>>61453228Some of us arent poor and can afford a dedicated beater carry.
>>61453228What's wrong with Taurus? G2 and G3 are good to go.
>>61453228On top of really not wanting to ever have a DGU, I sincerely hope I don't get to be the first person to use a printed glock in one.
>>61453018im just trolling in /arg/ Nobody cares what A2 thinks. Now, post your best platypus color combinations
>>61451064Ruger max 9
>>61453228What do you carry?
>>61453338This one is still for sale on gunbroker but someone from /k/ is definitely going to nab it soon
>>61451064That dimension doesn't matter for concealment unless you're fat and have to carry at 4 o'clock. A G26, G19, and G17 all hide the same AIWB. There's no reason to limit capacity and grip surface area anymore.
>>61453617I disagree, because I carry at around 1 o'clock.
>>61453009I think the name comes from the origin of the Platypus, scientists said it was a lie and an animal stitched together from other bodies. Just like how they said a 1911 that fed from glock magazines would be viewed by boomers
>>61453228generally speaking the people who get into shootings are poor people. if someone from /k/ got in a shooting they would be hooting and hollering about it like charlie getting the golden ticket.
Should I get the G19, G45, G47, or G49? Leaning on the 49rn. Gonna put a holosun on it.
>>61452827Yes, haven't had a malfunction yet. Drawback is they don't do a ton of fitting so mine has too little pretravel and a little too much over travel.>>61453338Mine, but you can't see
>>61453697I want one myself. I think the company went the extra mile with the gun designer and color swapping on their site too (tho it's still a touch glitchy.) I hope other companies follow suit on that front because the amount of "fudd can't tech" websites with gunbuilder pages that are 3 shitty drop down forms is depressing. The images of the gun should at minimum reflect the changes in options you made as you make choices.
What's the difference between 115gr and 124gr 9mm? Should I try some of both to see if my pistols like one or the other better? Is there a reason to choose one over the other?
>>61453728>be me>7-11 slurpy time>find myself face-to-face with the creature>i have to react quickly>2 shots, bam-bam, they're down>then the other 18 rounds into the thing while it writhes on the floor>cashier nowhere to be seen, it's still slurpy time though>see that the creature is wearing a uniform>"By god, it ate the cashier!">spare mag, 19 more rounds into the hideous monster>then all the Hostess Snack Cakes clapped
>>61453758The 124 will have a bullet that weighs 9 grains more. Most people would say that 115 feels a little bit more like a pop, and 124 feels a little bit less poppy and more pushy, and then the heavy for caliber 147 grain stuff feels downright pushy instead of poppy. NATO spec 9mm is typically a 124 grain loaded sorta hot, though not as hot as overpressure (+P) ammo. Some guns, especially select European and Turkish guns, run better on NATO spec 124 than they do on lightly loaded 115/124 range ammo. 124 is also better at knocking down steel targets that 115 if that’s a part of the sport you’re doing. I prefer 124 to 115, but not enough to pay more for it. You can get Blazer 124 for the same price as Blazer 115, though, so I just shoot a lot of Blazer 124.
>>61453758What this guy said.>>61453826Bear in mind that if you're new to firearms, there's a lot of minutiae like grain weight taken into account when designing certain firearms. Heavier grain ammo tends to perform worse out of short barrels than lighter ammo does, since heavy ammo needs more time in the barrel to burn powder and gain speed (since it's well, heavier) and 9mm expansion relies heavily on speed. Consequently, longer barrels might feed less reliably with lighter or low pressure ammo, since the larger mass of metal and material involved in a longer slide and barrel means more energy is required to push it back and cycle the gun properly. Most are designed nowadays to run with almost any load, but it still happens.
>>61454277BTW, heavy grain bulits contain less powder than light bulits. I wonder if a identical hotness loaded 115gr is more dirty than a 147gr
Thanks for helping me brainstorm, anons. Sadly, I found no el-cheapo 1911s nearby, just used examples of more premium options. I'd love a 1911, but I'm not just going to drop over a grand on a used gun I don't know anything about. So, airshit, cheapest airshit I could confirm uses "real" grips. It makes me feel ashamed, which should motivate me to actually buy a real one when summer comes around. More importantly, my first attempt at some cast aluminum grips fit perfectly. Now I can make some more complex ones for my friend's birthday.
>>61454302Light bullets and heavy powder charges are substantially dirtier than heavy bullets with light powder charges.In 357 Mag I'll load coated 180gr bullets over 5.5gr of Universal. All the powder is burnt before the base of the bullet has left the chamber.
>>61454308Congrats anon, you gonna put some custom crosshatched texture on those?
Is it just me or is the Model 66 literally just the old Model 19, but with a different finish and a different handle?
>>61454416Model 66 uses their sleeved barrel, the barrel is two piece where the sight and ejector rod lug thingy is one piece and the barrel is another. Makes it cheaper to produce, but it doesn't seem to be passed to the consumer unless stainless steel costs them that much more to produce then blued carbon steel. It can also cause outer sleeve not to be timed right so it doesn't perfectly line up with the rear sight (this is corrected with windage adjustment). Purists hate it, I don't mind it.
>>61454416The model 66 and 19 were always the same gun, but one is stainless and one is blue.
>>61454464
>>61454329I'm gonna get real weird with it.
>>61454416That’s correct. S&W model nomenclature contains information on the finish. For instance, the 586 is the same gun as the 686, except the 586 is blued and the 686 is stainless. The 66 was introduced as the stainless version of the 19, along with some quality of life stuff, like an adjustable sight iirc.
>>61454467>>61454464so not only does the Model 19 look prettier, but it is also supposedly better built, all while being 10 dollars cheaper (MSRP)well I guess I know my #1 thing to go and finger fuck at a gun store / rangethanks guys
>>61454484Could you do Beretta 92 grips? Could you cast a bunny girl extruded titty grip? Like this? I can't find a better picture but these grips are literally unobtainable >>61454515you have more grip options with the 66 from boot conceal carry grips to fuck huge X500 grips
>>61448567Y'all training any this weekend? I got a free day tomorrow but not sure if I wanna go. WWYD?
>>61454464>>61454480I’d guess they probably did this so the interior barrel could be a harder steel, instead of the relatively soft stainless that makes up the frame.
>>61454540I went shooting yesterday, and I’m probably gonna go again today. :)
>>61454522wait would the grip options change?is it not the exact same frame underneath?shouldn't all necessary screw holes and other mounting points all still be the exact same?
>>61454308Hey anon that's really neat! I've often thought I'd like to have a pair of ultra thin aluminum grips for my 1911. The Alumagips 'grater' ones are almost there, but what I really want is something more like the grips on the Nighthawk Envoy but in raw aluminum, or the VZgrips 'slimline' stuff.
>>61454547Awesome dude wishing you good groupings
>>6145455266 uses a round butt frame while the Model 19 is square butt
>>61448581>made in the USgross
>>61454590okretarded questioncan you get a frame sandblasted and refinished if you wanted it to be blued?
>>61454663I do not believe you can sandblast and blue a stainless steel frame. You can get it cerakoted colors that kind of look like bluing from afar.
>>61454522Probably, but that's a project for the future. Right now I'm doing sand casting with greensand, it's really not what you want for aesthetic and detailed things. With investment casting, that shit is pretty trivial. I intend to try some investment casting later in the year, maybe I'll make some big-tiddy grips.>>61454563Oh I like that, that'd be fun to imitate.
>>61451461Could have gotten the anniversary edition for about 50 bucks cheaper, I just did. Not bad though
>>61451461If my LCPii continues to be reliable I'll probably have someone cerakote it like that. Looks is half of what matters with a firearm, plus the original ruger finish is shit
>>61454590wait actually are you sure?these are two images pulled from S7W's websiteand in the frame of the 568 I see that "square" butt frame you're talking about, but the butt of the 19's frame looks way more roundedare you sure the 19 has the square butt?
>>61454895I'm wrong thenI'm not a revolver nerd, I just have a few
>>61454918yay that means I can buy the model 19 and still have a lot of freedom for grips
>>61454314Mhh, thats nice to know. We reorder 124gr for the Shadow 2 of my buddy and the Canik I get all the time for IPSC. Than I should make myself some hot 115gr loads to dirt up the FS92 and Glock during genaral training. I guess blasting the internals with breakcleaner to allow nasty carbon sticking to the bare metall should be the best way to test cleaners >>61448979It was way to easy, so its time to step up the game
Hey check out this sonuvabitch I just got
>>61454467>>61454464https://youtu.be/Bp_9NLpaqts?si=uSba7sfygLNP4nJn&t=630timestampnew Model 19s also have the two-part barrelthere is absolutely zero difference between them after grip and finish it seems
>>61455145Congratulations. I'm still mad that CZ discontinued that motherfucker while I wasn't looking.
>>61455203Same, I only just found it from a guy for $700. He did install one of those MCarbo spring kits so the trigger is a lot smoother and lighter, plus the extra mag, so it wasn't a terrible purchase for something that isn't being made anymore.
>>61455145Where is the rest of it?
>>61455363Yeah, $700's a good deal. Great condition. Do the Ramis have the same problem with dryfire other CZs do? Only thing you might check.
>>61455495I think he replaced the part that breaks with a stronger one from Mcarbo so hopefully that doesn't need fixing.
>>61455521Hell yeah. Good stuff, man. Report back with your review once you've taken it for a spin. Unrelated, but does anyone have advice for changing P30 sights? I can't find anything stating they need to punch out one direction or the other. Fucking thing won't budge. Haven't needed to apply this much force with any of my other pistols.
I'm eyeing and wanting to get a newer metal framed Beretta, I have an old cop surplus one from the 80s in Italy but its got its wear and tear also shaved down/painted sights. Also have an APX green tactical which I do enjoy for what it is. What would be a good one to consider, for most use as a range gun? I've seen a few of you mention the RDO model, I do like the way the performance looks and is on rebate. A lot of the other stainless seem to be 40% to 2x the price of black or tan.
Just picked this up today on private sale. Less than twenty rounds through it. Told the guy I was probably gonna send it off to Ernest Langdon and let him work his magic on it. My first Beretta, usually a S&W guy, but is there anything I need to know other than don't dry fire on an empty chamber? I know .32ACP can suffer from rimlock if you load your magazines incorrectly too.>Have you bought any guns today, /k/?
>>61455707
>>61455734>implying this will happen to meUnless my plans change I probably won't shoot or carry this one too much, just gonna be an occasional plinker or safe queen. Doesn't bother me too much. I got the gun for $400 off MSRP, so even if it ends up being a complete lemon at the very least I still have the warranty and I've heard Beretta customer service ain't bad, even if it does take some time...
>>61455762Don't worry anon, it's fun to point out the known issue (that they claimed to fix, but didn't actually, before deciding it's always the customers fault), but most claim it takes thousands of rounds. Not a lot of folks shoot their Tomcracks enough to actually achieve the crack, and avoiding hot loads (may) help to prevent it.
>>61455791Yeah, for what it's worth, it came with a card in the box that says which ammunition to use with it and whatnot, and the manual recommends an initial "break-in" period which the seller informed me he hadn't done so the gun is still basically from factory.Although I'll admit your post did make me field strip to check and see how things look. Pic related.
>>61450752Shot 140 rounds through this thing today. My hands are tired and I have a flinch again.I've confirmed that my slide likes short truncated ogive bullets with a big radius. It really liked Blazer 165 gr (1.1217" average COL), did well with Sig V-crown 165gr (1.1228" average COL), less so with Federal Punch 165gr (1.1232" average COL), and absolutely hated Fiocchi truncated cone 165gr (1.1266" average COL).
>>61455707No but I did take a bunch of pics. Might post some later.
Who is hyped to try Bear Creek Arsenal's home brewed 9mm pistol?https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=28zfL0jH-zQ
I saw an old box of Federal Hi Power match ammo and bought it, but then saw the lead projectiles looked all discolored and grimy. I suppose it's deserved, but damn did that box look cool.
>>61456175Who gets hyped for another Glock clone?
>>61456175>BCAhell no
>>61456237What could go wrong ???
>>61456175Wasn't this supposed to come out 2 years ago?
>>61456278Speaking of which, still waiting for that Monark
This is my concealed carry atm. I still need to get more accessories for it, but I am happy with its performance. Was a half inch off the bullseye at 50 yards which was very nice.
>>61456313What has it been, like fifteen+ years since Vltor announced they were remaking the Bren Ten?
>>61456313I'm not just drunk, am I Burt? Wasn't that BCA Glockalike teased quite some time ago? God damn I want that fucking Reliant.
>>61456313I think we can give up on the Monarch ever happening. The design always looked cool, but there's no niche for it in the current market. On the flip side, the Detonix STX might have a chance at coming back since 2011s are getting popular now.
so this has to be a industry breaking gun right? they wouldn't take forever just to get left behind right?
>>61456395Industry breaking? Lmao, HK is several years behind the curve and with less features. It only will appeal to its fanboys who thrive off of muh teutonic steel even though it's a polymer frame. It should be on Burt's list though. All the controversial launches should have an X btw let's be honest >>61456313
>>61456395I'd probably cop one. But from what I understand HK has told people that it's for some mil/LE contract and they won't be releasing it for commercial sale.
>>61456395I meanI'm an HKfag but they absolutely would. I haven't bought a 1 1/2 stack micro-9 in anticipation of this, and I'm starting to get real fuckin antsy.
>>61456420Really hard to tell if what you said was a joke or not and that really speaks volumes on HK and its fanboys.
>>61456432Get a shield plus. It'll be half the price, same reliability, has an optic cut and a good trigger.
>>61456395lol, the industry will have gravitated back towards traditional double stacks by the time this thing comes out
>>61456442No, I'm not joking. To be fair I don't have an actual need for a micro-9 anyway. I just want one, and I may as well wait until HK releases theirs since I collect their shit despite their hatred of me. You can tell they're just dragging their feet and slow getting their shit to the market with this one. Their reps have been pushing the modularity aspect despite that fad being long over.>>61456449I cannot be reasoned with.
holy shit is the p239 loudwho the fuck thought a compact .357 Sig was a good ideathat thing was like three lanes away and it still blew my ears off every time it fired
>>61456531That is a pretty silly idea. Now I am curious what the intended barrel length for .357 sig.
>>61456531Based.
>>61456531That's just .357 SIG, champ. It fucks if you get used to the sensory overload and cost. Little bastards fucking fly out of the barrel. Plus, the taper gives them a cute comblock aesthetic. I loved the shit out of my P239 when I had it despite its incredibly unnatural ergos and absolutely unreasonable thickness for a single stack.
>>61448567but what if am the redcoats? :(>>61448644took part in it last week, we did the hyperautism 20 mile march down mass ave to lexington at 2am
>>61456612Idk man, I’ve been around other .357 Sigs, and none were this bad. Maybe it was an ammo thing
>>61456666Probably. I don't shoot it anymore, but I remember some defensive loads pushing 1600-1700 fps out of 4in barrels. Dudes who are still shooting. 357 SIG are more likely to be into wacky shit like that than most people.
>>61456432i already got the 43x and agency arms trigger, so i don't know how much extra HX can actually do without going into modularity meme
Anyone ever buy a handgun because of a dream?
>>61456718>1600-1700 fps out of a 4 inch barrellol, that’s fucking nutsI’m pretty sure 125 grain .357 Magnum is “only” like 1550
>>61456334idk if it's been that long but probably in the ballpark>>61456338Dunno mane. You're not thinking of that Canadian aluminium Glock are you? I was mildly hyped for that>>61456350It was maybe the first aluminum framed notaglock, and still would be among very few even after so many years. Actually I think there still aren't any on the market, since Icarus frames are aftermarket and the rest are literallyaglocks or steel.
>>61456750When are you buying the Daniel?
>>61456750Isn't the Rock Island glonk aluminum? I've also never seen one ever, so i'm not actually sure they're more than a fever dream I had once.
>>61456521>Their reps have been pushing the modularity aspectHas there been anything official released or said about the SFP9CC in the last year? I'm curious if the pistol has been scrapped entirely because it would mark the first time ever that H&K has chased a trend in the US civilian market. It's probably a really stupid idea, but maybe keeping the "you suck and we hate you" attitude is actually better for the brand.>>61456745Not because of a dream, but I frequently have dreams in which I find the next gun on my wishlist and get to play around with it. It usually ends with me saying I'll come back to buy it later and then never getting back there.
Should I get a Charter Arms? Their Hi Polish looks really nice.
>>61456776Not until they go on clearance for $700 :)>>61456792Yes but it's a literallyaglock, not a notaglock. There have been aluminum literallyaglock frames since like the 90s.
>>61456891For fun? Yeah, if the price is right. They're very underappreciated as tinker toys if you're into some minor gunsmithing. You can have 'em for cheap enough to cut your losses. Elbow and grease and youtube videos can get them comparable to a Smith in the trigger. Worst case you can just beat the piss out of it and have fun.
>>61456747That 357 Sig is assuredly a lighter bullet than 125gr.Actual velocity from a 4" barrel with 125gr in a Sig shows around 1350-1475fps. Which is around what I get with them in my 3" SP101. According to my chrono data, I have 110gr going 1561fps, 125gr going 1432fps, 158gr going 1316fps, and a 180gr going 1241fps.
Just got back from the range after installing my new recoil spring for +p 9mm.The difference between standard 9mm and +p 9mm really isnt much recoil wise.
>>61456916You're right. I've read the naughty G-word so many times in the past hour that my reading comprehension was completely obliterated and I skipped that part of your reply. That reminds me though, does anyone know more about the material that italian IS-9 pistol is using? Someone mentioned it here a while back and the shit has my brain buzzing. Is it PPS? Does anyone else use it?
>>61456934Ah, word, 1400ish sounds much more reasonable for a ~125 grain projectile.
>>61453740If you're planning on putting an optic on it, what do you need the extra sight radius for? Get a 19.
>>61448946>might wanna inspect for cracks in one of those :o
>>61456960How heavy is that spring? Do any anons know: are there any risks or penalties to installing a heavier spring like this?
>>61457181The risk of not installibg a heavier spring is battering the gun to death using +P loads. The risk of installing it could mean that powderpuff loads may not cycle the action.
>>61457181One main downside is what this guy says: >>61457211. It might not cycle weak loads. Another downside is that the slide will return to battery with too much momentum, which can cause your slide/gun to dip down past level, which will slow you down. Some guys call this "porpoising". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxb8kKH8PHs&ab_channel=AtlasGunworksThis video might help you.
>>61456395Handguns as we know them will never be the same again once this comes out.
Now THIS is epic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ffFB1lEfxE
we've talked about metal framed glocks, but what about polymer framed 1911s?
>>61457309And has nothing to do with this thread.
>>61457321Handguns are featured prominently and used.
Thunder over Louisville is awesome as alwaysHad jets flying over my house all day kek
>>61457337lmao, here in San Francisco we have fags who claim fleet week gives them fucking ptsd
>>61457323Rifles have been used in the ukeshit war too, doesn't many any of the images or videos posted for the last 2 years are weapon related.
>>61457321you mad pedo boy
>>61457309>Make pedo shoot himself twice>unload full clip from two directions to make sure he is deadbased
>>61457389If they're not weapon related then why don't the jannies remove the posts then? I see your point, but that was close enough. We often talk gunfight tactics etc in police videos. In that video we can witness a cop 1 handed with a glock and it doesn't jam.
>>61457412They do. The independent thread made for that video of the pedo getting shot has already been deleted.
>>61457412>If they're not weapon related then why don't the jannies remove the posts then?Because they're, for some reason, emotionally invested in a war on the other side of the planet that only affects them to the extent that the government throws our money at it.
>>61457419Not gonna lie anon, I check the catalog maybe 3 times a week. I've seen many stay up, didn't see they removed that one. It just confirms the jannies are pedos. A single post about handgun use in a handgun thread seems fine to me if they don't want it shitting up the catalog (that is already full of shit). Have a handgun pic as repentance.>>61457430It is what it is. Usually people in here find cop shootings interesting, didn't notice there had been a thread for it.
>>61457211Thanks for the simple explanation.>>61457234This is also helpful./hg/ is where the good people are.
>>61454484I should model those "shall not" grips now.
>>61456313I wish Vis-100 mags weren't $60 each.
>>61457310Seems like a solution looking for a problem.You can't tell me it's more reliable than a steel frame. 1911's are already finicky as it is.
>>61457310It will probably work and be lighter. As I understand it plastic flex aids polymer guns in reliability.
>>61457482I wish the Vis-100 had anything to recommend it besides novelty.
>>61457571Sometimes novelty is enough.
>>61457609The only reason you would get a VIS-100 is if you were a serious Polish nationalist or your ancestors were hussars or some shit. Those guns are $600 in Poland and $1100 in the US. Fuck that.
I want an M9 because that's what I had when I was in the Army. Am I old? Am I a fudd?
>>61457637No, the 92FS with the Langdon Tacticool stuff is the best duty DA/SA in existence now, by a significant margin.
>>61457637Nah, they're not only good guns but you have sentimental value in a M9. So you have more reason to have one then most people. Most of the problems with the M9 were caused by shitty 3rd party parts (especially the magazines) and not allowing Beretta to update M9s with the incremental improvements they made for the commercial market.
>>61450817The LTT bar is slightly better
>>61457637>giving a shit about zoomer preferenceNo. Stop that. Carry what is best suited for you.
>>61457689learning about the Berettas history in the military makes you understand how petty the military is when they are forced to change to something that is better than before. also you get to see corruption with how they cancelled the 06 pistol competition to then make another competition specifically to make SIG win
>>61457609yeahalthough for that sort of gun, the cost of magazines isn't a huge issue unless you just really want to minimize the time you spend jamming mags at the range
>>61457751I was actually just being silly. Have a good night frens
Today I learned that I am not good with handguns. Or my P365xl has some problems. Probably the former.
>>61457637Nah, Luv me M9
>>61458301lel, now you see pistols are much harder than rifles!what exactly happened?
>>61458315Lots of ammo used but very few hits on a small tree target. Shooting low left at 10ish yards (I think) when aiming what I thought was dead on. Adjusted top right and started hitting a few but overall was still bad. So now I have to figure out if it's me or not.
>>61458301It takes some practice fren. Pistol shooting is 80% trigger control imho. Make sure you're doing dry-fire exercise every single day. When you do go to the range remember to slow down and focus on the fundamentals . You'll get there. :)
>>61458357Thanks anon, I intend to keep at it until I git gud.
>>61458352shooting low left is almost always because you're jerking the trigger as a right-handerhappens to just about every novice handgun shootermore dryfire practice should help :)
The platypus shilling worked. I just ordered one
>>61458374Looks nice anon. I've got my second being built right now, you'll like it.
>>61456521>to be fair I don't have an actual need for a micro-9 anyway.why, do you have a micro 380 already?
>>61458384It’s going to be my first 1911. I didn’t want to go full clown mode with the colors
>>61458370Roger that sir, appreciate that feedback.
>>61457689I never had a problem with mine, positive memories. Kept me company all through the Stan. >>61457743>>61458306>>61457665Thanks for the validation. Its mostly going to be a range toy, I just miss the feel of it and I always liked the way it shoots.
#burtwatch>>61458407I approve of the blue, you'll like it. Did you get the bull barrel or bushing? Also did they make that RMR cut lower? Seems way lower than before
>>61458419Nvm I'm bugging, mine is that low. Just doesn't look like it with the RMR HD.
>>61458419bull barrel and it’s the RMRcc cut. It’s indeed very low
>>61458374I like this design.
>>61457181No idea, it is longer than the factory spring though.
>>61457181>Do any anons know: are there any risks or penalties to installing a heavier spring like this?Probably similar to running your car hard.If you constantly rev it, it will not last as long as it should.
>>61451281You are retarded if you think that the Gen3 or Shadow Systems are better than a Gen5. I mean only a fucktard would actively buy a Shadow Systems >>61451615They are the Norinco 1911s of the 2020s. Only Turk firearms I actively buy.
>>61459531I'd take a gen 3 RTF2 over a gen 5 personally.
I can't believe Glock refuses to update their sights for the gen 5 even though the sights are the thing most people complain about on Glocks.
>Youtube ginger with fat wife puts out a list of the most reliable handguns for the end of the world>USP>Sig P226>S&W 686>Staccato P>Glock 34>no 92FSIt's over
>>61460796mind broken
>>61460796>Sigalso Garand Thumb did his ice and mud tests and the M&P 2.0 was the distinct winner of both, and yet whatever retard made this list didn't include
>>61460916Honest Outlaw is the guy anon is queefing about, I'm pretty sure.
>>61460796I don’t think the 92FS would make the top 5 but it should be definitely over a fucking 2011
>this jewtuber said this!>oh yeah? Well, THIS jewtuber said THIS!!
>>61461545Mike is one of ours.
>>61461980>>61461980>>61461980Post trigger finger
>>61461782Though he denies it now. Can't have the goyim speaking against the (((leviathan tribe)))
>>61462353Where has he denied it?
