/k/ - So what would be the US equivalent to this - Weapons

Anonymous

04/22/24(Mon)09:58:48 No.61467489

File: Arsenal_Bird_Full_Shot.jpg (258 KB, 1920x1080)

258 KB JPG

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)09:58:48 No.61467489 Archived

So what would be the US equivalent to this

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)10:00:21 No.61467494

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)10:00:21 No.61467494

>>61467489
my dick

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)10:10:39 No.61467543

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)10:10:39 No.61467543

File: 205 class.png (1.75 MB, 1920x1080)

1.75 MB PNG

>>61467489

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)10:12:28 No.61467556

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)10:12:28 No.61467556

File: Convair_B-36_Peacemaker.jpg (44 KB, 640x373)

44 KB JPG

What do you mean, "would be"?

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)10:21:02 No.61467598

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)10:21:02 No.61467598

>>61467489
In the modern day? The B-2 fleet probably. Otherwise >>61467556

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)10:37:00 No.61467664

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)10:37:00 No.61467664

File: General_Atomics_LongShot_(...).png (1.35 MB, 1440x810)

1.35 MB PNG

>>61467489
B-2A/B-52J/B-1B with 16/20/24 of these fellas instead of JASSMs

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)10:38:28 No.61467678

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)10:38:28 No.61467678

File: 230816-F-AF000-1001.jpg (230 KB, 2000x1255)

230 KB JPG

This thing once it evolves past the demo stage

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)10:45:22 No.61467715

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)10:45:22 No.61467715

>>61467489
It is directly inspired by the American YB-35

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)10:47:18 No.61467724

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)10:47:18 No.61467724

File: XB-35.jpg (283 KB, 1280x1682)

283 KB JPG

>>61467489
You're just soft balling it in, anon.

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)14:45:34 No.61469141

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)14:45:34 No.61469141

The fact the US doesnt have something like picrel patrolling every country in the world is just sad

Anonymous
04/22/24(Mon)14:54:47 No.61469216

Anonymous 04/22/24(Mon)14:54:47 No.61469216

>>61469141
It is called the B-21 and turbofans replaced turboprops a long time ago

Anonymous
04/23/24(Tue)00:01:21 No.61472857

Anonymous 04/23/24(Tue)00:01:21 No.61472857

>>61467724
I'm still mad this never became a thing. I know eventually we ended up with the B-2, but goddammit. The B-36 was glorious but in terms of usefulness it sucked

Anonymous
04/23/24(Tue)07:20:11 No.61474903

Anonymous 04/23/24(Tue)07:20:11 No.61474903

File: f521ee15e00fdedf77a3c9721(...).jpg (98 KB, 1080x720)

98 KB JPG

>>61467556
based and convairpilled. Shame the Air Force never invested into the XC-99