[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: M48.jpg (1.31 MB, 1600x1072)
1.31 MB
1.31 MB JPG
The greatest tank of the 50s passing through
>>
>>61584796
it would have been if it ever got a decent sabot round
it was stuck with APCR pretty much its entire time in US service, at a time when the british were already moving on to discarding sabot rounds
>>
>>61584796
God I love the M48, cant tell if I like it with the T-shaped muzzle on the 90mm or the 105 more
>>
File: bf33ea98af60d34.jpg (55 KB, 663x464)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>61584796
>The greatest tank of the 50s
>>
>>61584813
Why did it get shelved so quickly?
>>
>>61584796
Got stomped by centurion every time they faced each other. So did T-55.
>>
>>61584805
Fair point
>>61584812
Has taiwan put a 120mm on it yet?
>>61585131
Centurion was from the 40s
>>
>>61585131
>So did T-55.
US M48s dealt with NV T-55s fairly well
and israeli M48s, when upgunned with the 105mm, did destroy egyptian T-55s in great number a
>>
File: M48-Patton-8.jpg (555 KB, 1080x720)
555 KB
555 KB JPG
>>61584796
>A5
Close but the best M48 has the OG 90mm
>>
>>61585109
Conqueror wasn't tremendously mechanically reliable and its 120mm gun became somewhat redundant when Chieftain entered service.

MBTs had the armament and armour of heavy tanks and the mobility of mediums.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.