>>35297814
previous thread >>35160132

also here's the site formatted to open this current thread, for what it's worth:
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35297814

>>35297831
thanks!! totally forgot. I'm also working on a landing page for the site. maybe a tutorial of how to use it.

>>35297864
is there any chance on making it update the status of unsee links once it fetches them? such as in the case of it being set to one view, then "fixed" later?

>>35297814
>- anyone have a cool name for it?
nosee
>- how many pics per album?
12
>- are captchas ok?
I'm fine with them
>- any sites to base the ui off of?
4chan
>- let album stay alive until thread dies
this sounds nice
>- require replies to view albums
this goes against the "rate me" posts
>- let uploader see visitor countries
I don't really like that but I guess if you want to add that fine
overall tranners.lol is a pretty cool site and this unsee clone seems interesting

>>35297872
I think I could have it periodically reevaluate the links. doing so is actually fairly easy, but:
- reevaluating it costs a view against the counter
- most albums seem to expire based on time
- I plan on making an unsee archive fairly soon* which would make this feature a bit moot anyway

* as in, I am nearly done with the new service, aside from some small features, security, and ui

>>35297893
makes sense. thank you. but, about the counter thing, i still don't know if there's any such thing besides unsees being set to one view. i've never uploaded to unsee myself, but i've only ever seen people say "you set it to one view". is it actually an option to arbitrarily limit the views beyond just a single view?

>>35297881
>nosee
nosee is cool! I was wondering how people felt about names based off of unsee, or if I should try to be a completely original product. I was thinking funsee as a pun on funsies! not sure if this sticks though...

>this goes against the "rate me" posts
this is true. I'm just brainstorming here, but how about:
- when you upload, you can request your album receive ratings
- when a visitor views an album that has requested ratings, they are required to reply to your post with a rating
- until they do so, they will not be able to view any other albums that request a rating

this sounds ok in my head, before getting into the technical challenges of it...

>>35297907
hm, it must be more than 1, otherwise the service wouldn't have collected the expiration time, it would have already expired by the time the service grabbed it. I think! unless for some reason the way the service queries unsee bypasses the counter which would be very poor security but not surprising if so!

>>35297921
you lost me, sorry. i just felt the options were "burn after reading" (i used this phrasing last thread, but, again, i don't know if it's actually called that; i just meant when it's set to one view), otherwise the timer is what determines expiry. is it even worth reconciling my lack of understanding on what you mean, if unsee isn't where your priorities are anymore, anyway?

>>35297814
Definitely don't copy the unsee shit that deletes after one view by default, half of posters miss it

>>35297938
let me try to explain better.

when the service finds a link, it immediately visits the link to collect the number of images in that album and find out when the album will expire. this is then cached forever.

if the album only allowed 1 view until it expired, then the service doing this would have made the album expire in the process. but, it doesn't, so that suggests that the album allows more than 1 view. if it only allowed 1 view, then most likely the album would have expired before the service could even collect it.

>>35297948
thanks for sharing! I've been considering how to implement this, mostly out of feature parity, but this is an interesting perspective. if very few people actually appreciate this feature and it is detrimental I am OK not implementing it! I mean, you could still use unsee for this purpose, I think.

>>35297881
>I don't really like that but I guess if you want to add that fine
maybe a different metric here... see how many unique visitors viewed the album? I don't know if unsee offers this capability, just though it would be neat to know.

>>35297966
Personally I wouldn't mind it as an option, but I think it would be best to not use it as default

>>35297914
>I was thinking funsee as a pun on funsies! not sure if this sticks though...
that is sillier
>- when a visitor views an album that has requested ratings, they are required to reply to your post with a rating
>- until they do so, they will not be able to view any other albums that request a rating
But what if they're just curious and not intending to rate or otherwise don't want to rate? Or what if the link expires before they can rate it? Then they would be banned from all rating. I don't really see the reason to revoke the person's ability to view albums with ranks just because they decided not to rank one album.

>>35297956
ooh, i get it, now. thank you. but, i have been the single view for unsees before, and i was able to visit it as many times as i wanted i am pretty sure. i think the "one view" behavior whitelists the first ip to visit it, so they are subject to the set timer, but for any following views, it redirects to the homepage as if it expired. once when i realized i was the "one view", i even saved the direct images on archive.org, back when the direct image link didn't resolve to personally identifying information. that wouldn't have been possible has the album actually expired upon the first view (unless expiring only means the album link redirects to homepage, or something, and the direct images would be taken down sometime later)

>>35297978
>maybe a different metric here... see how many unique visitors viewed the album?
yeah that seems good
> I don't know if unsee offers this capability, just though it would be neat to know.
Well the closest they have is a display for how many people are currently viewing the album.
also here >>35297982 I mean
>that is sillier
as a good thing if you didn't know

>>35297982
>that is sillier
in a bad way? I'm also thinking it's a convenient thing to memorize, just add an 'f' in front!

>But what if they're just curious and not intending to rate or otherwise don't want to rate? Or what if the link expires before they can rate it? Then they would be banned from all rating. I don't really see the reason to revoke the person's ability to view albums with ranks just because they decided not to rank one album.
so if it expired I would ensure that they wouldn't be banned, and this only applies to albums where the author has specifically opted into it. but, I'm not necessarily hard-set on this, and it's not exactly the easiest thing to implement. but I am curious if people who post in rate threads would appreciate it.

>>35297988
>once when i realized i was the "one view", i even saved the direct images on archive.org, back when the direct image link didn't resolve to personally identifying information.
i found the post where i did this:
https://archiveofsins.com/lgbt/thread/28998141/#28999764

you can see in the thread the anon who posted the unsee claimed he purposely set it to one view

>>35297988
thanks for explaining!! I had no idea it worked like a whitelist. that makes a lot of sense. hm, I can also implement this if people care about this feature.

>>35298005
You should name it honsee instead

>>35298041
that is so mean! lol

>>35298005
>in a bad way?
see>>35298000
>so if it expired I would ensure that they wouldn't be banned, and this only applies to albums where the author has specifically opted into it.
that is interesting; although I think at most it should be limited to the thread it was posted in
>I'm not necessarily hard-set on this, and it's not exactly the easiest thing to implement.
It seems fairly straightforward (unless it isn't; I don't know for sure I've never done backend web development)
>but I am curious if people who post in rate threads would appreciate it.
Well I haven't really been in those threads much so I don't know.

>>35298080
>>35298080
>see>>35298000
ok, then the real question is which sounds better? funsee.lol or funsee.cc?
>that is interesting; although I think at most it should be limited to the thread it was posted in
yeah, I haven't delved into details of it but that's what I think so as well.

>>35298101
not that anon, but the former sounds way better imo, since "funsee.lol" makes the whole link seem fanciful, as opposed to ".cc" not sounding like much of anything besides "see see" sounding like it has to do with using your eyes, which is related to image hosting

>>35298101
>ok, then the real question is which sounds better?
funsee.lol in my opinion sounds better and it fits the theme of "funsies"
>yeah, I haven't delved into details of it but that's what I think so as well.
Okay then I guess that's alright

>>35298118
I agree. .cc sounds kinda silly to me, never noticed until your post it meant "see see" in this context

>>35298138
>never noticed until your post it meant "see see" in this context
honestly i was just saying words and don't know if that was the intent or not, lol

>>35298005
>but I am curious if people who post in rate threads would appreciate it
I think most people already ignore unsees in passgen because it takes more effort to open, not sure if trying to force anyone who does open it to reply would help
Maybe hornygen posters would appreciate it, but that gen was killed wasn't it?

>>35298162
not her, but her site has been seeing a lot of use in CiPgen (could i pass general) >>35281358
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35281358

i never see many usees in passgen. like, fewer than three, if that, i think. but i don't really open passgen so idk

hmm, this feature seems more hassle than it's worth. I'll just shelf it for now since it's a little tricky to implement and don't want to increase friction to use my service over another.

also: funsee.lol is green light! I'll be putting a demo on it shortly, once I finish the web ui. functionally the service is implemented already (minus some remaining security features)

>>35298170
I don't see many unsees in passgen, but they almost always get ignored. Probably because there are already a ton of posts to reply to. I guess cipg tends to have fewer posts and posters, but they also seem more likely to reply to unsees anyway

>>35297814
this is a psyop to get our ip addresses and collect our data to sell to the us government before it begins the tranny genocide! Dont trust the op!!!1111

>>35297814
you can update the "feedback" link on your site to this thread now, if you're trying to do that

>>35297814
Hey anon could you please use a domain that doesn’t mention trannies at all lol, my isp is gonna block it eventually because I live in a country that hates us

>>35298301
hi! does your isp block tranners? I thought it was just a punny inside joke on this board but I am open to setting up another domain.

>>35298301
I'm not OP but couldn't you use a proxy or something?

>>35298301
tragic stuff

>>35298320
Yeah but you can’t post on 4chan or look at unsee’s with a vpn so it’s a constant pain in the ass to open and close it

>>35298287
fixed!! thanks for reminding me

I'm also reminded that there is no mechanism to link the current thread when a new thread is created... let me see if I can do something about that.

>>35298312
Hasn’t happened yet but recently they’ve blocked a lot of trans sites so I think it’s only a matter of time.

>>35297814
whatever you do, please make sure the default setting isn't "delete after 1 view"
I think that's the default on unsee and people post pics like that by accident constantly. It's annoying, make the default like 5-10 minutes.

>>35298365
totally open to the idea of using a new domain as a mirror site... let me know if/when this happens and I will sort something out. for now I'll hold off since buying a domain costs money.

>>35298334
>I'm also reminded that there is no mechanism to link the current thread when a new thread is created... let me see if I can do something about that.
just tried and unfortunately no! the only info I get is when you're on mobile and click an external link and all it receives is sys.4chan.org. not the thread id. oh well!

>>35298386
yes definitely. sensible defaults make sense. I might default to thread lifetime.

>>35298396
:333

>>35298420
>yes definitely. sensible defaults make sense. I might default to thread lifetime.
unsee completely and utterly BTFO with this one paragraph

>>35297814
Is there a way for you to link to the thread instead of just showing the URL?

>>35297814
>general questions:
>- anyone have a cool name for it?
tranoogle
>- how many pics per album?
4
>- are captchas ok? if not, what else?
Basic math like 3+6=?
>- any sites to base the ui off of?
https://rule34.xxx
>some optional feature ideas:
Dark mode
>- let album stay alive until thread dies
Yes
>- require replies to view albums
Yes
>- let uploader see visitor countries
No, just continent
>- more?
Yes

>>35298570
hi! what do you mean?

>>35298582
>>- how many pics per album?
>4
>>35298582
>>- any sites to base the ui off of?
>https://rule34.xxx
not her, but this would be a disaster

File: IMG_7576.jpg (214 KB, 828x500)

214 KB JPG

>>35298583
I mean to link to the thread itself for indexed URLs in picrel because sometimes you wanna see the replies or context etc. It’s a bit of a pain to do on mobile

>>35297814
> are captchas ok? if not, what else?
whats the reason for adding them? it can be ok i guess if it doesnt have the cloudflare verification on top

>>35298606
oh! when you are viewing a thread you can tap the post id to jump to the thread. but I can add a better way at the top of the page I guess

>>35298753
not that anon, but can you maybe include like a truncated version of the subject field/ text field of the threads? i get that anon seems to want to visit the original thread for context, but this would serve the same purpose

>>35298772
yeah, I can include the OP if that's what you mean
>>35298668
this is a security thing to prevent the type of crawling I'm doing on unsee

ok! small update. the thread page now has a link back to the thread. hope that helps!
>captcha GAAYK

there's a bunch of work remaining, but I've published a very beta-ish version of the service now

https://funsee.lol/

this should work for jpeg images up to 12mb ea (for now).

there are some limits I've set to prevent abuse, but hoping to receive some feedback! primarily on the functionality, the ui is a little primitive right now since I am focused on ironing out any bugs in the service first.

>>35300159
and just for demonstration purposes I've created an album that won't expire.

https://funsee.lol/albums/568151836207104

I will look into implementing some security features soon. ideally I'm just looking for confirmation here that everything simply works without bugs.

>>35300283
WTF I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW HOW TO SAVE THIS IMAGE. HOW DID YOU DO THIS?????

>>35300283
i kept fucking with it, and i think i broke it, cause now it stopped loading for me on firefox normally, but it loads for me in private browsing on firefox

>>35302121
nvm i didn't realize i could just right click the broken thumbnail and click "reload image". but i expect right click to be disabled soon enough (though in firefox you can always right click anyway with shift + right click)

>>35302322
you know, i am seeing how i'm breaking it: when i right click > copy image link > paste in a new tab, it breaks the image. so i'm doing it to myself

>>35302334
ok i figured it out. if i just ctrl + s the web page, for some reason that saves the image. this is the only way i have figured out to download the image (besides right clicking it, copying it, pasting it in mspaint, and saving as a .png)

methods that works on unsee, but doesn't work on funsee:
- open in firefox > ctrl + i > "media" tab > direct image link > copy > paste in new tab (automatically saves to your default download location on unsee; on funsee, it breaks the image, even on page refresh, until you right click the broken thumbnail then select "reload image")

huh... i guess that's it. i though right clicking and saving worked on unsee since i thought unsee disabled right clicking, but i just tried it on an unsee still up, and it didn't work >>35300711
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35300711

however, on unsee my addon "Image Max URL" has a right click option "Try to find larger image (IMU)", where if you expand a thumbnail, shift + right click on the expanded image, then select my addon's right click option, it opens the version of the expanded image you would find in the method i described earlier that you can actually save normally

>>35300283
The image doesn't scale well on mobile, but I'd guess that's because of the simple UI

>>35301994
so I’ve disabled direct links to the image. they just redirect back to the album. I haven’t tried using any client scripts to prevent right clicking. you might be getting rate limited if you see the image fail to load occasionally, which should only happen if you’re doing something other than just viewing

>>35297814
creating the service is super easy for any competent programmer but dealing with the logistical side of it is another story
somebody will upload child porn and if you're lucky the police will realize it's your anonymous upload service and simply subpoena you and cause you to spend a bunch on lawyers but if you're unlucky or they realize you're a troon and want to fuck with you they will send a swat to disappear you

>>35297814
Whatever you do, do not allow Tor. There will be abuse. There's a DNSBL you can use and you can block it via Cloudflare, too.

>>35297814
while everyone's talking about worst case scenarios and stuff, that reminds me that you should probably flag archive.today and archive.org's ips as VPNs like unsee does, so if they try to view an album, it appears blurred to the point of being unrecognizable at the very least

>>35303394
also maybe https://ghostarchive.org/. i didn't even know this archive existed until i opened a basedjak wiki page once, and it provided a link to this archive of an old version of the wiki page that was "uncensored". idk how to find archives

>>35303331
it’s the same concerns that unsee has. also I do have tools available to run against csam database.

>>35303353
thanks for this advice. I will definitely look into it!

>>35303394
I’m definitely wanting to disable crawlers. I don’t know which sites ignore robots.txt but I have manually blocked some services already. E.g. if you use the url in discord I block their proxy service from loading the image. This will probably be a moot thing once I implement captchas to prevent crawlers from collecting images, but I’m still interested in hardblocking as many as I can.

>>35304174
good stuff all around. i wish you the best of luck, dev femanon

>>35304174
they're not unique concerns but you do have to decide if you want to deal with them

>>35304258
honestly if someone abused this service for that purpose I would go out of my way to report them. this does give me some ideas of how to detect and log such behavior for authorities and I’d be happy to go the further mile if needed

>>35304413
not that anon, but please be careful with your phrasing! i am not a lawyer, so i don't know what can and can't be used against you. but the semantics of language might allow someone to purposely misconstrue what you're saying. obviously to anyone with a brain, by "abuse" you are referring to the very precedent of using your service to host illegal content. but a dishonest person might pretend by "abuse" you only mean either habitual offenders, or people who host a large amount of it, implicitly saying that the precedent is okay as long as it isn't particularly egregious on your bandwidth. stay safe

>>35304529
I would have a field day if a lawyer sued me over this

>>35304831
i guess i was thinking of a movie scene i saw once or something, where a guy was like "i shot him" or something, and he said it in a really incredulous tone, pointing at himself, in obvious disbelief, merely in response to what someone else just said about him. but what was transcribed, of course, was simply the words themselves, so it made him look bad. i guess it's just entertainment, so

>>35304863
responding to myself, but forgot to scene took place in a courtroom, hence the transcription

File: 1710626944701.png (538 KB, 1471x1020)

538 KB PNG

>>35304174
i found this image of more crawlers by searching "ghostarchive" on /g/. i don't think awareness of them must be very high, but still
https://via.hypothes.is/
http://www.freezepage.com/

>>35306260
thanks, I’ll try this out and log the request so I can block em

>>35300283
on my iphone i can literally just click and hold to save to photos

>>35308524
not her, but i tried the same on android and it saved as a 383 byte "0.htm" instead

>>35308524
hi! is that something unexpected? does unsee prevent you from saving pictures? there’s no real way to prevent this and it was never my intention to try… but I can look at making this harder if that is something that you as a user expected?

>>35308557
nah on iphone works perfectly well. saves as a 600x800 154kb jpeg
im using duckduckgo browser btw

>>35308587
>im using duckduckgo browser btw
i tried it in firefox

>>35308557
this is because your browser attempted to download the image by requesting it again, but the iPhone is saving from memory. it wasn’t actually my intention to make saving harder, just to prevent users from direct linking images.

>>35308582
yeah unsee prevents this
i guess it's not really a big deal it just sorta means the illusion that your image won't be saved permanently onto someone's hard drive is dispelled much more readily
ultimately, it's up to you whether or not you want to support that illusion. i think a lot of unsee's widespread use comes from that illusion, but it is still just an illusion, and arguably dishonest how much effort unsee puts into maintaining it

>>35308582
not that anon, but i just tried it on android and yeah unsee prevents even saving the broken image that your site yields for me >>35307941
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35306421

>>35308582
>does unsee prevent you from saving pictures?
theoretically yes; pragmatically no. The slight difficulty in downloading images off of that site is it's main appeal.
>there’s no real way to prevent this
Hence the pragmatically no.

>>35308640
>>35308671
>>35308772
ok, thanks for the feedback. I can trivially make it harder to save the image, which I’ll address when I focus on the ui. (it’s a ui thing)

>>35308874
np, if anything I look at unsee's image protection as a sort of metaphorical rusty old lock on a shed --where it's more of an agreement between two parties that the shed will not be opened rather then an effective measure against the shed being opened (but instead of a shed being opened it's an image being downloaded).

>>35309006
not her, but imo the point isn't disincentivizing saving as much as it is disincentivizing reposting. but i guess making saving more difficult just makes reposting it that much more inconvenient, which deters more people than otherwise, so

>>35298285
>https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35297814
i hope you're being ironic..
if you're not, wait until you realize every website collects ips.

not op, but here's one line nginx's access.log from my website
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [07/Apr/2024:18:54:55 +0000] "POST / HTTP/1.1" 405 568 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/104.0.0.0 Safari/537.36"

seriously considering making my own board archiver. I have so much issues using archived.moe on my phone! just reading a thread and getting redirected to some scam site over and over. can’t even search on mobile because it won’t focus onto the text field. it truly vexes me how crappy these archive sites are and if there were enough interest I’d probably make my own at a loss just so I don’t have to deal with such nonsense.

>>35309374
archived.moe was pretty much unusable for me yesterday on desktop. Although I guess it is called an "archive of last resort" for a reason.

>>35309437
I don’t know what passive income the webmaster makes on that site but it’s absolutely atrocious the usability problems I have. clicking every link is a pop under sex ad and sometimes even if navigating to a reply in the same thread. it’s complete garbage and makes me mad thinking about it!

>>35309464
I use it on firefox with strict security and brave so the ads aren't really an issue for me but I can see how they could be annoying to someone on a different browser.

>>35309552
>and brave
and on brave*

>>35309552
thanks for the tip! I’ll try that next time. once I have more data I might investigate if this is worth investing in. it doesn’t even seem like to me that images are even stored on there which is the bulk of the expenses I’d imagine.

>>35309374
/tttt/ has two archives according to here:
https://archive.4plebs.org/_/articles/credits/

https://archiveofsins.com/lgbt/
https://archived.moe/lgbt/

i prefer archiveofsins over archived.moe because it fetches posts faster, but i have PTSD from archiveofsins being down for i think two weeks once upon a time, resulting in some lost media, like this (2022-09-17):
https://archived.moe/lgbt/search/image/B5Sdu38MFHj-0AfJ5g001w/

>>35309624
I don’t remember specifics but there was also a period of time where archived.moe went down as well. something to do with the underlying software they’re all using I think, which is bonkers that they didn’t even write it themselves

>>35297814
make it ipv6-only to make the v4-chuds seethe

>>35309844
to be honest I am a little confused what unsee does to handle ipv6. my site does support it and watermarks images with the ipv6 address but I have not seen unsee do this which is a little confusing.

shoutout to whoever uploaded a longcat. lol

ok! tor should be blocked now. and a few other cloud providers... sorry vpn users!

>>35311319
how come they're blocked anon?

>>35311566
cloud services can be used to run scrapers. in general this makes it so a scraper needs to be run on someone's personal pc rather than a cloud network. vpns also tend to run here so there might be some collateral there... I'd be open to exploring other solutions if anyone is affected

>>35311615
>cloud services can be used to run scrapers. in general this makes it so a scraper needs to be run on someone's personal pc rather than a cloud network.
oh well I guess if that's a concern of yours then it makes sense. But then again I don't think the tor network is really built for large scale web scraping.
>I'd be open to exploring other solutions if anyone is affected
Maybe load the captcha before the site content? That way if the captcha is failed nothing really big can be scraped. As for tor I remember reading that one of the sites had a timer on the captcha where if you didn't complete it in a certain amount of time it would temporarily block that node further preventing bots from scraping it.

>>35311832
tor is blocked to curb illegal activity, not necessarily for scraping.

captcha can work though I'll wait to see if anyone is actually affected before investing time into this. firewall rule is much quicker and easier otherwise

>>35311974
>tor is blocked to curb illegal activity, not necessarily for scraping.
oh well that's reasonable considering this is a one person thing
>captcha can work though I'll wait to see if anyone is actually affected before investing time into this.
okay that makes sense

thanks everyone for testing it! some stats:
- >1k served requests
- 0 errors
- slowest cpu 1.3ms
- slowest wall time 540ms

I've got some things to address for now. might be a while until next update.

>>35312226
whats your cpu

>>35319405
like on my custom rig?

Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 3504 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)

nothing very impressive, I didn't think it was worth buying i6 or i7 back in 2016 when I built it. jokes on me cuz I got the last cpu that doesn't support win11 without some chinese hack

>>35320977
You're running the website on your personal computer?

>>35324300
no of course not. and on cloud infra I don’t have that info available. it’s all serverless

>>35320977
Very cute rig

>>35297814
>- how many pics per album?
i never knew the album limit for unsee (still don't), but i just checked hornygen on your site, and it says someone posted an album wit 27 images, which is far and away the most i've seen so far >>35307171
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35307171

are you trying to support all that?

>>35327091
it's not necessarily out of the question. some improvements I am currently making will remove a hardlimit (outside of size). so - maybe! as long as the total size is within a range

>>35333666
sounds good. i don't know if 4chan ever changed it, cause i rarely try to upload such images, but i vaguely remember 4chan having a resolution limit on any board but "/hr/ - High Resolution", which was always so stupid to me. even setting an avatar and shit on some websites has a resolution limit instead of a filesize limit. i don't know why sites are like this. i would've never thought about the optimal way to do this, so i'm glad you're just going for it unprovoked

>>35333767
hm, this does bring up the question of what good resolution limits would be. early on I thought about at least 100x100, but haven't implemented it, so technically you could upload a 1x1 jpeg

>>35333815
if you standardize the thumbnail size like unsee, it wouldn't matter. or, it could be like my image viewer JPEGView where if you zoom out enough, the window size doesn't get smaller than a certain size unless you reshape it smaller yourself. but that made me think that maybe you can offer different gallery views, of either thumbnails, or expanded images. i don't know if unsee offers this since i never checked. also no pressure to add this feature just cause it crossed my mind

>>35333865
not sure if I care to support thumbnails but that's possible. it means storing two versions of the images though and I'm leaning towards just keeping it at one and letting the browser 'thumbnail' an image using the full data vs keeping/watermarking a redundant copy

>>35333878
you lost me at the browser thumbnailing an image part. but, i understand. i just assumed you needed thumbnails to prevent saving on iphones like the other anon said they could do, cause unsee has thumbnails, so i thought it was necessary

>>35333892
I mean just resizing it smaller in the browser, for some gallery view. but it's still the same underlying data. no, there are lots of ways to make it harder to save, but I'm not focused on that yet since that's more of a UI thing.

>>35333926
ooh, i see, thank you. and, of course. any progress and priority is fair

made some changes to improve cache rate and reduce number of requests.

tldr all pictures now load in a single, all-or-none request, which should prevent getting rate-limited loading an album

I still have some work to add security checks for a few ways to abuse the service but hoping to wrap up and start focus on the ui

I made an update to tranners.lol so that it should also collect thread titles in the catalog now... test album#test

>>35334661
ok, i finally see. i was wondering, but it just doesn't work retroactively. cheers

>>35335078
there was a bug I fixed. should be more consistent now.

also I added support for catbox

I've implemented an anti-bot measure now!

currently only required for uploading albums, but I might extend this to viewing.

it should be mostly hands-free and not intensive like the captcha on this board. let me know if you encounter any issues! getting closer to wrapping this project up now

>>35335619
the catbox support is very cool, especially considering so many people break their catbox links, for some reason, despite it not being wordfiltered (21 hits for "catbox" in the current hornygen, but not a single hit for ".catbox.", from keeping the periods in the link) >>35334943
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35334943

the scaling makes it easy to miss other media that may be in between each catbox image, but this is a lot more convenient than manually fixing each catbox link. plus them loading all at once when catbox's download speed seems super ass saves me from wasting my life on waiting for them to load in their own tab one by one

idk if i'm rate-limited, but for some reason trying to open >>35333284 in your site returns an "Error 1101", "Worker threw exception" error
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35333284

>>35338375
also i just noticed the favicon. cute

for some reason it doesn't show up for me in my normal firefox window, but shows up when i opened your site in private browsing to see if that would fix the error. i guess i need to refresh the site cache or something

>>35338375
oh no :( my code must have a bug

sorry I’m doing an IPL session and then going to bed in a bit. I will investigate in the morn and fix it.

>>35338486
idk what an "IPL session" is. but it's ok. i'm normally not up at this time, so it's really unusual that i managed to even provide that feedback. any pace you manage is ok

>>35338499
ipl is diy laser hair removal for shy people

>>35338543
cute

>>35338402
also, yeah, doing "clear cookies and site data" for the site made the favicon start showing up for me in my normal firefox window

using the same hornygen link in >>35338275, i can see the way your site fixes catbox links doesn't account for litterbox links, which is just catbox but with a preset expiry date option for images

>>35338375
this is fixed now

>>35341883
cheers

>>35341552
>https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35334943
this should handle litterbox links now. though I can't really tell if they're expired so you might see broken imgs now

>>35341952
yeah you fixed it, thanks. the anon replied clarifying that in the stack they posted >>35340889, they accidentally set the first to expire in one hour >>35341702

this is random, but i was looking for something else and on the archives and found your first thread about your site >>35144833
https://archiveofsins.com/lgbt/thread/35144833/

i missed it completely despite browsing here 24/7

cool! the idea behind tranners.lol was suggested in that thread. almost done with the bigger underlying service now, but seems like the highlights service has become it’s own useful thing

>>35306260
baste
t. basic bitch

someone posted a catbox webm in the same current hornygen i've mention about like twice now >>35338275, and it understandably broke >>35346755, probably because catbox download speed is ass. i don't expect you to be able to do anything to reconcile this besides maybe communicating that it's a webm instead of trying to embed it. maybe you can just make it show up as a clickable link? or you can come up with another solution

>>35346805
fixed!

>>35347346
whoa!!! i didn't expect the embed to work. thanks a lot

Hi op i hope you have a nice day/night

>>35349756
nice! thanks!

big update! loading an album is now a secure operation. the same checks that are used to post on this board are used when uploading and now also when downloading.

this should be transparent to you as a user, except that albums might load marginally slower now as it performs the authentication in the background. but it means that albums effectively cannot be scraped in the same way I am scraping unsee.

I dramatically improved site performance.

this has the unintended quirk that albums can now be viewed after they expire. they're deleted on the server, but your browser still keeps it cached around.

questions:
- is this bad? (I think so)
- this is not much different than leaving the tab open after an album expired. should images dynamically nuke if the tab is open too long?

I don't know the precedent unsee sets here, but those are the issues I am looking at resolving. I have a very short list of last things to scratch off and then I will begin working on the unsee archiver.

>>35300159
I'd suggest allowing multiple selections in the file picker instead of having a bunch of them, it'd make it easier to upload multiple files

>>35297814
Guaranteed anonymity.

>>35351141
unsee for sure redirects to homepage after albums expire. on unsee, you lose access to the images on expiry unless you have the ctrl + i firefox window open that gives you the direct links. but on your site direct links don't work, so i don't think anyone would still have access to the images were you to kick them out. i'm not one who uploads to unsee, so i'm not the target demographic for this question, but i think conventionally it would be seen as bad to not block access after expiry. i mean controlling the viewing window and disincentivizing reposting is the main draw of unsee, no? also i purposely didn't mention making saving difficult being a possible draw cause of the discourse surrounding it earlier, and it being an intermediary step to conceivably reposting. but i think conventionally that must be an appeal to unsee, too
>I have a very short list of last things to scratch off and then I will begin working on the unsee archiver.
giga based

>>35351803
yeah that is like my big concern even with unsee

>>35351767
thanks! I plan to update the file picker when I get to working on the ui. I just generated that simple one with ChatGPT to get the ball rolling.
>>35353063
I think I agree. once timer hits I’ll prevent the album from being rendered even if you sorta have the data all in your browser cache. direct links might “work” now; some changes I made to how photos load have changed the behavior from before when I could intercept the request your browser performs to save a picture.
>>35351803
I don’t have any plans to make accounts a requirement on this. Unless there’s rampant abuse, I guess. ideally it will remain like chans where you can anonymously use it

>>35353985
>I just generated that simple one with ChatGPT to get the ball rolling.
the future is now

>>35304863
My Cousin Vinny

>>35356429
cheers. insane to recognize that and provide a source, lol

>>35297814
add vocaroo support pls

>>35359232
she did! >>35333277
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35333277

>>35359232
hi! I could do this, any specific reason why? I assume you want temporary voice clips? does vocaroo not support this?

>>35359251
oh i guess i misunderstood the request, lmao

>>35359275
no I might have, idk really!

>>35359397
nah i don't think you did. you said you forgot about tranners.lol when making the thread, so since the person realistically just opened the thread, read it, and responded to it, occam's razor dictates they must've been referring to funsee.lol. i just forgot about all that. so good catch

>>35359251
incidentally it seems like vocaroo is poorly designed that viewing too many embeds gets you rate limited. I’ll try to address this

bump

bump

>>35364696
4chan hit me with the "Error: You cannot delete posts this often." i didn't even know that was a thing, and i've been here for like 15 years. i thought there was a 30 minute window to delete posts, and i'm still getting the error an hour later. i get the error even when i try deleting posts i didn't make, so it just replaces any other error. guess i have to bump without a condom for now. idk how long this lasts

bump

>>35365100
my cooldown expired by now, since now trying to delete it says "Error: You cannot delete a post this old."

i remember in the previous thread you said >>35171032
>great news! my test worked. it’s a lot less expensive to check for updates now. I’ve lowered the refresh time to 30s, though could possibly do less. doubt there will ever be enough pics posted rapidly that it would be a concern
does that mean keeping a tranners.lol tab open would automatically update with new media? because i don't feel it does, and i don't remember if it ever did

>>35367324
it should update at least once every 30 seconds. if you're seeing otherwise, let me know!

File: Untitled.png (20 KB, 811x445)

20 KB PNG

>>35368282
i mean i swear it's not updating for me. again, i don't even remember if it ever did. here is me opening a new tab of the current CiPgen and taking a screenshot of how the new tab has a new album the old one doesn't

File: capture.jpg (54 KB, 767x294)

54 KB JPG

>>35368361
so it's designed to cache the response for 30s, but maybe your browser is caching it longer.

can you open the dev tools (F12) and check network tab? I have a chrome ss but should be similar in ff

I'm looking for what value you see here

File: Untitled.png (44 KB, 1598x662)

44 KB PNG

>>35368789
i don't know if firefox troubleshooting offers enough for this. i clicked the stopwatch icon in the first half of pic related, which produced the bottom half. i tried to drag the window out of my main window to resize it, but i think having F12 open crashed the tab, so i had to reload it and try it again in its own window for the screencap

File: Untitled.png (30 KB, 1616x330)

30 KB PNG

>>35368789
oh, sorry, i didn't realize the "reload" button would do something, too; i thought it would literally just reload the page. when i click "reload" i see pic related, for what it's worth

>>35370250
Click the url in that ss

File: Untitled.png (10 KB, 471x304)

10 KB PNG

>>35370449
oooh, i see, thank you. also, in trying to figure out what to censor or not, and not being sure if censoring just what dev femanon censored would be enough, since her crop doesn't show everything, i realized the yellow might've been a highlight made by her, to signify what she was looking for. i didn't register it as such until now, so here's me showing only that

>>35370569
this is good, nothing bad shown in it.

your ss shows that the cache is valid for 14 more seconds when you took this. so supposedly after 14 seconds you will get a new version of the page. if you are not seeing this behavior and see it staying stale despite new content being collectable, post a ss when it happens and that might help chase it down. it could be a lot of things that aren't really easy to detect, since browsers don't give off a lot of details why they do what they do.

bump. i'm gonna take a nap and then work on this later!

>>35373066
godspeed, dev femanon. hope you sleep well. you deserve it

File: Untitled.png (34 KB, 1633x410)

34 KB PNG

>>35372222
i did it to a page that hadn't updated to show the new unsee for 20 minutes (it was >>35373532 posted in >>35371833, but the "reload" button did in fact reload the page, as it said it would, i guess. the line just says "cache-control public, max-age=25"

>>35373813
like many things only when we try to catch it in the act does it start behaving properly!

>>35359536
update! after investigating seems like vocaroo does not allow playing audio clips directly and you have to embed their widget with ads. makes sense but still sad that it gets rate limited if too many load! I will add a refresh button next to the widget since there's nothing else I can really do here.
>>35359232
still open to supporting this if someone can explain!

>>35297814
It should be called "bussee"

>>35376103
lol

>>35353985
>once timer hits I’ll prevent the album from being rendered even if you sorta have the data all in your browser cache.
this is done now!

few more short list items to have this polished and production-ready... but it's close!

>>35375871
i mean it still wasn't behaving properly though; it just refreshed the page, cause otherwise it would never fetch any more media

>>35334661
i just realized that there's no way to tell what thread you're in once you open it. can you add the same feature to the non-catalog page as well?

>>35334661
also do you think you can display a media count on the catalog view? maybe specifying how many are hosted on each platform for each thread

>>35378658
>>35379215
yeah this is both doable

>>35379698
is there anything more i can do as far as firefox troubleshooting is concerned? since the F12 thing you asked of me refreshes the page, i'm not sure it's very useful. you did say browsers don't provide much feedback of what they're doing, so if so i understand. also are you sure it updates to fetch new media in chrome?

>>35379708
I use chrome and haven’t seen any issue. if you’re still seeing it happen try to record it if possible. could be a lot of things, like your browser caching more persistently for whatever reason

>>35379732
record it with video recording software, you mean? if my computer can handle it, i don't mind doing that, but what is there to see besides showing the old tab remaining old with a countdown until i refresh?

>>35379746
at least in chrome it lets you know if it was loaded from disk. looking for that kind of info

>>35380081
record what exactly? i don't understand. refreshing an old page to get new media?

hm, I am seeing on the catalog stale results even past the cache expiration. I'll have to check why

bump

>>35380103
I think I fixed it! turns out I cached 60,000 seconds instead of 60 seconds. whoops!

>>35384938
jesus, lmao. thanks

Program me pls. I wanna get brainwashed.

>>35384984
hypnotube time?

new update!

I've added some restrictions to prevent abuse:
- an image can only exist in 1 album at a time
- you can only upload 1 album at a time

I can look at making these limits flexible if need be... but I think this lines up with how the service is typically used and should prevent abuse

>>35297814
videos, could you make videos work? They are much better at showing how a person actually looks, and I don't think unsee has them right now.

>>35387978
she said a few words about videos last thread. not to say she is against saying any more about it now, though >>35264442
>>video support
>so this kinda ties in with the last thoughts. if the site is generating enough money then I can afford to do cooler things like this. I don't know if the market is really saturated enough with people using this kinda service, but we'll see! I might also segregate a slice of disk space for this purpose and just have videos short-lived, but converting them is going to be computationally expensive and really need to play around to see what the impact is on my pricing tier.

>>35387978
basically >>35387993

a picture is easy to watermark and takes less than a second to generate the text, decode the image, overlay the text, and encode back. a video on the other hand involves decoding every frame and watermarking before encoding back. it’s not to say it can’t be done, but by nature it will be slower and cost more cpu and that will require me to purchase more resources to handle. I’m not against this but not if it’s at a loss. I don’t run any ads currently but hypothetically if I did, I’d need videos to have a more aggressive monetization strategy to offset the costs of serving a unique video to each visitor of an album.

where are the titties at

>>35394758
the service is usable! just not the best ui at the moment.

be the change you want to see in the world!

dev femanon, while you fixed .webm embedding for tranners.lol >>35347346, .MOV embedding is still broken >>35395701
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35388231

in a way i don't expect it to work, cause i have a vague memory of uploading a .MOV file to catbox, and opening the link just downloading itself to my default downloads folder automatically instead of autoplaying (at least in firefox, idk about chrome). but for some reason, this one plays if you open it in a new tab

>>35395791
ok, fixed! how many video types are available on catbox? I've just been manually adding them

>>35398787
i didn't imagine they had any limits, since i've seen anything hosted on catbox. looking at their faq page, it only says:
https://catbox.moe/faq.php
>>What file types aren't allowed?
>The following file types are currently not allowed: .exe, .scr, .cpl, .doc*, .jar

>>35398787
o and thanks for the update, of course. cheers

>>35298301
Use an alternative DNS then they won't see the domain.

>>35297814
Enable DNSSEC on namecheap, you don't have it.

>>35400905
impressive anon! this is enabled now and I've just learned more about dns than I ever wanted.

>>35400231
hrm, this is going to require me to enumerate every type of image and video file extension to really handle properly then... another to do list item unless someone gracious has a list for me to steal


unrelated: I had a fun thought - what if I started offering @tranners.lol email addresses?

not an actual mailbox where I could read your emails, really just pointing to your mail server.

I need to verify the specifics, but I do have this set up on one of my other domains so that I can send and receive emails out of my gmail using a custom domain.

my thoughts would be something like:
<tripname>@<maybeasubdomain>.tranners.lol.

of course this would require you to actually register your trip -> email address beforehand. and probably a few other hurdles I need to figure out. maybe this is not super useful though, I'll wait for some feedback!

>>35401207
idk what "tripname" is supposed to mean. like tripfags? i'm personally just a retard who uses gmail and hotmail, and don't use my email for any reason beyond signing up to sites and notifications for those sites, but, i think there might be an appeal for some people less retarded than me

there is a site like this that has novelty email things for 4chan users:
https://cock.li/

i remember being there when one got created. i am pretty sure i have noko@horsefucker.org or something. but i wasn't using a password manager at the time, and had no idea how to use it, so in the end i just squatted the name, don't remember the password, and never used it before. i regret squatting the name. but it's not unprecedented for people to give a fuck about this. i don't see any tranny references in the domain list, so anyone who would use one of these could see value in your domain name, yeah

>>35401249
right, like my reply should have the trip for #test in it.

it would be kinda neat I think but I'm also thinking most trips are probably not smart enough to set this up and a waste of investment

>>35401126
That now puts you ahead of 90% of people running websites today.

>>35401275
i mean there are some tech-savvy people here. i saw this post in the drawthread the other day >>35372696, and i also saw a thread asking if there's a wiki about tripfags >>35356622, and after someone floated an idea on how to incorporate it into practice >>35357091, an anon >>35357207 replies saying they'd work on it on the following weekend. i was wondering if that was you, but evidently it appears not

but you're probably right. i mean, the numbers at https://cock.li/ speak for itself on how many have signed up to each domain, even though consistent usage would be far lower. but you are not some ancient site with awareness of them being relatively high for the service they offer, and the barrier for entry is either high or unusual, as you said. so i don't know. again, i wouldn't personally use it, since i only use gmail and hotmail

>>35401311
do you know places where this is actually meaningful in practice? I would guess maybe SEA
>>35401312
just to clarify, I wouldn't be running a mailbox. you'd still use gmail/whatever, just you'd have an alternate address you can send/receive from. it's the same mailbox.

no that was not me, but I did have a thought a few days ago about adding a wiki to tranners.lol. I'm not sure how to moderate something like that though so it's just a thought for now.

>>35401338
>just to clarify, I wouldn't be running a mailbox. you'd still use gmail/whatever, just you'd have an alternate address you can send/receive from. it's the same mailbox.
you're right, sorry: that is a meaningful distinction that requires less commitment from users. but also i am retarded, as i said, so i wouldn't use it myself. i have seen people drop temporary emails in place of dropping their discord, or something, though. and that anon whose post i linked in the drawthread might use your service instead of linking a discord chat invite had they considered it an option, but also maybe not, since the barrier for entry to have someone email them to then add them on discord is higher than opening a discord chat invite. but also, they might find it worth it since they value their privacy so much. i'm just saying words at this point; i am not the target audience for this, so i can't provide contextual feedback

>>35401338
Prevents DNS spoofing, ensures that your domain is actually goes to the website I intended to go to, on top of HTTPS it just gives visitors/users of your site a bit more safety, mostly for a lot of the "just in case" stuff, but it really doesn't hurt to have it. It can also prevent some email related attacks, but not really relevant to you.

>>35401366
oh that isn't a bad idea, a temporary email service

>>35401374
i think the barrier for entry would be lower for that, yeah. i myself have literally added someone once from their using a temporary email service asking me to email them my discord. i could see people who are afraid of dropping their discord using it, mutually, to add one another, especially with the domain having a cute tranny-coded name

>>35297814
this really doesn't matter that much, but on the catalog view of tranners.lol, apostrophes appear as i assume they're formatted under the hood, like when you copy the link in your URL bar, and the link has a space in it, so the space appears as "%20". such as in >>35399683
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/catalog
>what&#039;s the point of transitioning after 15 if you&#039;re not a luckshit

also i should've said the following a long time ago, but the catalog really incentivizes me to open any threads with media in them on your site, so others can find them. pretty interesting feature imo

>>35401207
>hrm, this is going to require me to enumerate every type of image and video file extension to really handle properly then... another to do list item unless someone gracious has a list for me to steal
i just googled "mpv default" (mpv is a video player) and found an 8/9 years old github page with filetypes technically listed, if it helps:
https://github.com/rossy/mpv-install
https://github.com/rossy/mpv-install/blob/master/mpv-install.bat

i say "technically listed" because it isn't an actual list; it's just the script, but it's formatted in a readable way. you can't just plug it into anything considering, though

>>35401886
oh yeah, that’s something I noticed. seems the data scraped from 4chan comes html encoded and I need to decode them

>>35384938
i mean tranners.lol still isn't updating with new media for me in firefox

>>35408615
this is hard to debug without data. I haven't navigated to the catalog all day, and I just now clicked it and see unvisited urls. so, at least for me, it's working as intended. could you replicate this, maybe in a private session?

File: Untitled.png (57 KB, 1149x933)

57 KB PNG

>>35411368 >>35406143
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35406143

same thing as the first time >>35368361
>could you replicate this, maybe in a private session?
idk what you mean by this. open a tab of it in incognito, and watch if it still doesn't update?

>>35411706
yeah, essentially that.

how do you verify it doesn't update? do you reload the page and it's the same, or do you navigate to it from another page and it is the same? or do you type the url directly and see no updates?

>>35411815
it updates if i refresh the page, just as before. the tab on the left is in my main viewing window, which i opened when the thread had three media; the window on the right was a page i just opened for the screenshot

if i reload the page, it updates, which is how the window on the right has new media. when i did your F12 request from earlier, it refreshes the page, which fetches new media. but im not getting what i thought was expected behavior of keeping the tab open, and it updating with new media without my manually refreshing the entire page

>>35412024
not sure I follow.
you expected it to update without refresh?

>>35412155
yeah. is it not supposed to?

>>35412185
no, once a site loads that's it. same as the 4chan catalog

>>35412278
so this >>35367324
>does that mean keeping a tranners.lol tab open would automatically update with new media? because i don't feel it does, and i don't remember if it ever did
>>35368282
>it should update at least once every 30 seconds. if you're seeing otherwise, let me know!
was just a misunderstanding?

>>35412294
oh yeah. I meant that if you refreshed within that interval, nothing would happen, because the service never polled for updates in less than x seconds.

>>35412309
ok, i see. better late than never when it comes to reconciling a misunderstanding

bump

>>35423805
thanks!! busy past couple days but hope to wrap this up soon. maybe do a penetration test

>>35423814
oop, no problem. i deleted it anyway, but take your time

hard smooth tranner penis

>>35459124
fascinating

>>35423830
>>35459124
how is there a 3 day gap between these posts

>>35459464
https://archiveofsins.com/lgbt/thread/35297814/#35423830

>>35460005
fascinating

thanks for the continued bumps. it’s been a long work week. going to work on this some more tonight probs!

>>35462590
no problem. hope you got through it okay. best of luck

plap plap plap

>>35459124
yummm

loving the funny sexual related bumps! plap plap

sorry for no updates lately, doing a bit of housework and taking my cat to the vet.

>>35474210
no worries. take your time. hope everything turns out alright with your cat

>>35297814
someone posted a .flac catbox link, and it didn't embed >>35479100
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35475000
i think .flac is just lossless .mp3, but idk for sure

>>35474210
i would take your cat to my vet, if you know what i mean

>>35481978
>if you know what i mean
(kissing)

>>35459124
>hard smooth tranner penis
this

How the fuck is this thread still up two weeks later that's fucking insane board is dead

>>35479516
I've added support for this now! it'll still be a cat and mouse game until I find a huge list of file types though.

looks like it parsed the post that person is upset about correctly too!
>>35481978
I do not know what you mean haha!
>>35485944
we just have the best thread bumper on /lgbt/!

File: giphy-384454.gif (161 KB, 480x480)

161 KB GIF

>>35459124
this occurred to me in a dream

>>35486910
very disturbing gif.

>>35486179
>I've added support for this now! it'll still be a cat and mouse game until I find a huge list of file types though.
cheers. but, is the video filetype "list" onthe github page >>35403919 no good? again, it is not a "list" as much as it is just a script formatted with readability in mind. so it would be annoying to isolate the filetypes unless you can automate it somehow. but still

>>35486910
Delicious

>>35401311
This .

>>35459124
oiled up too

>>35376103
Bussr

>>35459124
*wet noises*

how about agp.rapehon.io/skinwalker

>>35297814

> anyone have a cool name for it?

4see, or 4sight?

>>35297814
I'm a new-ish dev looking to gain some experience. Is there anything I could possible help you code?

>>35297814
you aren't an anime girl. you aren't even a hon. you're just a man.

>>35511886
cock4cock

>>35511886
4skin

>>35511642
I'm not going to lie this made me laugh!
>>35511886
4sight is a real punny name actually! Hm, I'll see if the current name funsee sticks or not, but I like 4sight.
>>35512112
Hi anon! Of course I am not an anime girl!
>>35520447
lol

>>35511908
everything is pretty much done at this point! just need to focus on the web ui. but I've been a little busy with my real job and family. hoping to get a minute to push some updates soon.
>>35487298
I might be able to see the defaults that the browser uses on file types... somewhere

>>35522974
i like 4sight a lot

File: 1707753529505675.png (9 KB, 176x217)

9 KB PNG

>>35522974
also just announcing that 4sight is great and it shall be chosen (or poll it :p) funsee kinda sucks if youre adding vocaroo support etc. like i think i saw two fucking WEEKS AGo in here

>>35297814
Anon, appreciate your work, as always.

>>35523849
so I haven't done anything to support vocaroo, mostly because that anon never really elaborated what they wanted that would differ from vocaroo itself. I assume they meant temporary storage, but I think litterbox works for that already? not to say I am not interested - just no plans until someone can clarify what specifically they want!
>>35523951
thanks! I am glad to hear! I hope when the UI work is done it'll look a little friendlier to use. and I intend on making the unsee archiver a bit later just to really drive the point home (to use a more secure service)

>>35511886
Brappuccino

and the logo is a boymoder in an oversized coffee cup

>>35524542
>vocaroo
ya i meant something like >>35359536 but forgot it doesnt work,.,. are you unable to temporarily save those audios yourself while the thread is still active n integrate that little play thing with those files idk ._. throwing whatever out there cause it would be cool sincerest apologies if im retarded

>>35524661
oh I see what you mean, so kind of leaning on the idea behind the image sharing service's proposed feature that x files last as long as the thread, but now allowing you to upload audio files (and without the horrible ratelimiting)? yeah, that is totally doable and I see the use case now!

>>35524687
meant grab them direct from vocaroo but if the images are going thru you too then whatever works i guess :p

>>35524704
oh you mean like, mirror the files? I don't think that would be easy or worth it. I did add a refresh button to counter the rate limiting problem. maybe I can figure out their limits and incorporate that as well.

>>35297814
if you're never going to add updating unsee links to reflect changes to the album (image count, expiry date, idk what else), do you think you can add the timestamp of each 4chan post, auto converted to local time for each viewer, like 4chan displays timestamps? if i know an unsee isn't six hours old yet, i wouldn't mind clicking it even if your site says it's expired, just in case it was accidentally set to one view, but later fixed. as it is, every single expired unsee may as well be clicked on if i want to be sure in that way, since i can't tell when it was posted

>>35297814
do you think you can label litterbox links differently from catbox links? i can't tell from your site's thread view whether it's a file extension not being supported issue, or it's an expired litterbox link, unless i click the "[show]" button (in this case it was just an expired litterbox link)

>>35297814
maybe you should add a list of the supported sites for tranners.lol on the site itself somehow, since otherwise people wouldn't recognize its current utility

could you add a group voice chat feature with an inbuilt chipmunk filter so we all sound like chipmunks?

>>35529063
I think I understand, you want timestamps on the post rather than the expiry time of the content? this probably requires a bit of revamping how I present information... if you can describe it in detail I'm open!
>>35531572
oh that's unfortunate, yes I can make a change, and maybe not default to img when the filetype is unknown to boot.
>>35535370
hm, so far it's catbox/litterbox/vocaroo/unsee... but I see what you mean. I will work on documenting this better.
>>35536831
hmm, most of the site work I'm doing is all rapid processing stuff. anything that requires an open connection for long periods of time is not necessarily out of the question but does require me to start renting a dedicated server to handle such traffic. it's a maybe, but no plans for now!

>>35537331
>I think I understand, you want timestamps on the post rather than the expiry time of the content? this probably requires a bit of revamping how I present information... if you can describe it in detail I'm open!
i didn't mean "rather than", as if to say removing the expiry time of unsee albums would be of any benefit, but yes. but actually, when i hover over the timestamps on 4chan, it tells me how long ago the post was, just like on the catalog (for example, hovering over your post's timestamp for me right now says "3 hours and 19 minutes ago". that is what i want to see, so i know that if the post was submitted more than six hours ago that the unsee has zero chance of still being online, since unsee timers only last six hours at most

unfortunately, i see what you mean in that doing so would require revamping the format of the site, since really the entire format of each instance of media your site fetches and displays is completely different from 4chan. plus, having both a timestamp of when the post was made and an expiry timer for albums might make it less immediately intuitive that the expiry timer is the main thing people should be concerned with. so maybe it's not so great of an idea, after all, especially if you were to display the timestamp of the post in the same HH:MM:SS stopwatch format, but counting upwards

if you were to bother adding this at all, maybe since i'm only requesting this to ensure i don't click unsees older than six hours, you could format timestamps posted within the past six hours as "5 hours and 59 minutes ago" or under, but anything older than that could use a non-relative timestamp format, like for example, 4chan displays your post as "04/25/24(Thu)22:22:59" for me, or the archives (archiveofsins.com, archived.moe) use "Thu 25 Apr 2024 22:22:59". anything would be fine. in the end, i don't know if this would be worth the trouble, but just throwing it out there

how do i know youre not a chaser setting up a honeypot to store cute tranner pic?

>>35297814
>anyone have a cool name for it?
invis.lol

>>35539425
good feedback, I think as more things get tacked on I need to revamp the format anyway. it's kinda weird when someone posts a bunch of links and it makes N 'posts' on the site rather than 1.

>>35546958
sorry anon! I have nothing to dilate!

>>35546986
how do you know unsee isn't?

but I have considered this concern. I thought of a solution, that you can use a random password to encrypt your photos before uploading it to the service, and if someone views your album they need that password to decrypt the photo.

the problem is that I can't watermark it then, since it's no longer an image format. at that point I'm just serving a raw file of indeterminable type. so I'm still trying to work out what that would look like and if anyone would be willing to use it knowing they cannot watermark it.

>>35550764
oh, that's not bad either.

>>35550924
>sorry anon! I have nothing to dilate!
based

>>35546986
more eyes on cute gocks i guess
could be a possible name
www.gock.see

>>35546986
cute?

>>35553899
chasers are cute too

>>35297814
Anon i’m curious how much web dev experience you have could u share?

>>35555542
I’ve been recreationally doing web dev for a long time. never had a web dev job, but it’s just a hobby of mine. I wouldn’t use this site as a measure of skill though.

>>35557550
great job so far

>>35297814
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35571796
>>35573619
>>35573660
if someone breaks catbox links by putting them on two different lines, your site doesn't pick them up. testing to see if this breaks unsee links, too

>>35572830
https://unsee cc/album
#bu9i5EqnsbVK

>>35573710
https://tranners.lol/lgbt/thread/35297814
it's kinda funny it tries to display "https://catbox.moe/faq.php" >>35400231 as an image, by turning it into "https://files.catbox.moe/faq.php". but no, your site doesn't pick up when unsees are broken up this way, either

>>35573710
fixed!
>>35573747
not fixed... yet!

>>35577386
cheers. i didn't actually think it was possible to support

I am become death, destroyer of bump limits

>>35511886
4juicy

File: 1686557822493.gif (2.96 MB, 506x640)

2.96 MB GIF

>>35297814

>>35589309
Me and who?

File: 1693522569574.gif (2.81 MB, 440x251)

2.81 MB GIF

>>35592765