[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: download.jpg (7 KB, 289x175)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>be me
>see cute femboy
>boner.jpg
>interested.jpg
>check his profile
>literally only videos of him riding black (like black people colored) dildos while wearing a chastity cage
>his dick is so shriveled it looks like a raisin glued to his crotch
>instantly lose my boner
>read his profile
>"I'm a sissy femboy slut whore that's only good for sucking BBC and submitting to superior men"
>spongebob_boowompface.jpg
>quit social media for like a week.
why can't femboys be normal. like I'm a femboy but I don't do that shit.
its so fucking pathetic that people willingly degrade themselves to this point of self worthlessness. its so pitiful its sad.
why cant femboy's just be cute and cuddle guys and hug blahaj like normal. I don't understand the "bbc superiority" garbage. did their father abandon them as a child? did they have a black kid bully in middle school? what even happened? were they brainwashed by sissy hypno or some crap?
>>
>>35516404
you seem autistic so who cares
>>
>>35516404
a generation of people indoctrinated by jewish propaganda psyops
>oy goy be a good goyem and mate with that black man so we can dilute your people
>white people suck btw
>its your culture now.
>we are white too. die for israel
>israel 0% blackpopulation.jpg
>>
>>35516527
>>35516404
It's so sad all these femboys are trying to undo Yakub's hard work
>>
>>35516404
>why can't femboys be normal
>femboy
>normal
What did she mean by this?
>>
>>35516404
It's either extreme insecurity and self-hatred or extreme emasculation fetish (usually both) using fucked up societal racism as an entrypoint to fusing sexual pleasure as a cathartic release of those feelings

A person needs to both be incredibly insecure and have a ton of racial anxiety (many different forms of that) for this kink to take hold of them
>>
You don't look like that THOUGH
>>
File: 1713849638422936.jpg (102 KB, 951x2048)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
>>35516404
Don't worry, I'm white femboy and have no interest whatsoever in that nonsense. I'm too prideful and want myself to be the object of desire. theres good ones out there but it is unfortunate how many how mindbroken by this stuff or other things
>>
>>35516404
what's his @ faggot
>>
>>35516404
There’s nothing wrong with being into weird stuff, as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone and is consensual. Christians said the same thing about us when we just wanted to be with others of the same sex.
>>
>>35518689
No. I've had enough of that false equivalency. Honestly I think that's one of the biggest problems for LGBT right now - it seems like many just throw out the concept of sexual morality altogether just because our orientation puts us outside of conventional religious "morality." They throw the baby out with the bath-water, so to speak, and you see people literally destroying themselves for fetishes and sexual impulses and crying out "Don't kinkshame me!!" while they slide deeper and deeper into self-destruction

At a certain point we need to lose the hysterical fear of sexual judgment and start differentiating between shit that's good for us and shit that's bad for us. And yes of course you should be ALLOWED to do stuff that's bad for you, but none of us should be pretending there's no difference between the two

I don't even mean this in a cruel way. I mean it in the sense that a good friend should call you out and express concern if they see you spiraling and fucking your life up and doing self-destructive shit
>>
>>35518689
It hurts people
>>
>>35518897
this
>>
>>35516404
>be ‘failed male’
>view black men as more manly, aggressive, animalistic etc (most likely due to racism in your upbringing or personal views)
>submit to the bnwopill
it's just racism. like that's it. i have an interracial fetish but i'm not going around with a queen of spades tattooed on my ass and jerking it to bnwo compilations.
>>
>>35518854
>you see people literally destroying themselves for fetishes and sexual impulses and crying out "Don't kinkshame me!!" while they slide deeper and deeper into self-destruction
Notice how they aren’t hurting anybody and are exercising their personal rights legally.

>I don't even mean this in a cruel way. I mean it in the sense that a good friend should call you out and express concern if they see you spiraling and fucking your life up and doing self-destructive shit
The problem is that you are judging them for engaging in sexual acts that you personally find gross and unappealing, and are citing that as a form of “destroying your life”. This is incredibly intolerant and presumptuous behavior that you, a member of the lgbt community, should feel real shame for. Let people enjoy what they like, as long as it’s not hurting anyone.
>>35518897
It does not
>>
>>35518993
No I don't mean hurt yourself idgaf what you doing with your body or mentality you can be smoking crack doped with pulverized asbestos for all I care
I don't have time for this shit but see 'dangerous myths of black men's sexuality' on youtube and hopefully conclude how infuriating and dehumanizing this shit can be when seen from a bird's eye view
>>
>>35519054
Who is being hurt by “infuriating and dehumanizing” fetishes? If they aren’t flaunting it in public, who are you to make the claim that this hurts people?
>>
>>35518993
You're being fundamentally dishonest and I know you know it in your heart. I'm willing to accept the premise that your intentions are good and you think you're protecting people from "shaming," but you're hurting them in the long run by erasing the distinctions between healthy and unhealthy sexual expressions and tacitly encouraging the unhealthy

I'll break it down in simple objective terms: Healthy sexuality encourages and deepens interpersonal bonds, it expresses and deepens attraction snd affection. Unhealthy sexuality keeps you locked up in a room gooning your life away, it alienates potential partners and creates barriers for interpersonal intimacy, it promotes loveless and even outright hateful sex

You can coddle the latter and tell them pleasant-sounding lies about a utopia where none of our actions have any weight or meaning, but that is not the truth of the world we live in, and your well-intentioned drivel is actively harmful to anybody impressionable enough to take you seriously
>>
>>35519110
>Healthy sexuality encourages and deepens interpersonal bonds, it expresses and deepens attraction snd affection. Unhealthy sexuality keeps you locked up in a room gooning your life away, it alienates potential partners and creates barriers for interpersonal intimacy, it promotes loveless and even outright hateful sex
Give me examples of a healthy sexuality and unhealthy sexuality, and explain to me what denotes them as such.
>>
>>35519185
My explanation was clear enough and I don't believe you're arguing in good faith, so I'm not giving you another effortpost
>>
>>35519208
You have no interest at in having a genuine conversation, it’s clear from you accusing me of being “fundamentally dishonest” just because you disagree with me.

In your opinion, engaging in sexual behavior you personally find appealing is “healthy”. Meanwhile, engaging in sexual behavior that you personally find unappealing is “unhealthy”.

The problem with you is that you are a bigot who is intolerant of people expressing their sexuality in a way you find unappealing, and slandering them as destroying their life. If they did exactly as they are doing, but with a sexuality or fetish that you personally enjoy or are not offended by, you would never make the same accusation.

I honestly do not understand what compels you to even be in an lgbt space. You are very averse against people expressing their sexuality in a way they find meaningful and makes them happy. Shame on you.
>>
>>35519339
>In your opinion, engaging in sexual behavior you personally find appealing is “healthy”. Meanwhile, engaging in sexual behavior that you personally find unappealing is “unhealthy”.
That's not the case. I would say that almost literally anything you do for MUTUAL pleasure and enjoyment with a partner who likes you and cares about you is healthy sexuality. Even if they're into a laundry-list of fetishes that repulse me, if both of them finish it feeling like they bonded and satisfied each other, I don't have a single negative thing to say about it

If you've developed a sexuality or a fetish that keeps you alone, or stuck in a cycle of loveless encounters with strangers or near-strangers who do not care about you, that is not healthy

>You are very averse against people expressing their sexuality in a way they find meaningful and makes them happy
I don't think it makes people unhappy to overindulge in the unhealthy. I think most of them are doing it because they're unhappy in the first place, I think they're mostly aware on some level that they're doing something that isn't good for them, and it becomes easy to fall into an addictive pattern that pushes them further and further away from happiness. And I really do think you're being dishonest if you won't acknowledge this, and I do think you're doing harm if you encourage them to keep doing something miserable

I don't give a damn about interracial relationships, if that's what you think. If a black person and a white person actually like each other and treat each other well then I'd be happy for them
>>
>>35519469
>I don't think it makes people unhappy to overindulge in the unhealthy
Typo, I don't think it makes them HAPPY
>>
>>35519469
>If you've developed a sexuality or a fetish that keeps you alone, or stuck in a cycle of loveless encounters with strangers or near-strangers who do not care about you, that is not healthy
Keep in mind, that’s not what this sexuality does. So we can go ahead and dismiss this premise. Not to mention, I don’t know of a single sexuality outside of zoophilia and pedophilia that does this.

>I think most of them are doing it because they're unhappy in the first place, I think they're mostly aware on some level that they're doing something that isn't good for them, and it becomes easy to fall into an addictive pattern that pushes them further and further away from happiness.
This isn’t groundbreaking. People express their sexuality on porn sites, NAFW art, and ERP because they are unhappy, and doing so gives them enjoyment and fulfills them in a satisfying way, at least temporarily. I agree having a partner is more ideal for fulfilling their sexuality and happiness, but that doesn’t render masturbation and ERP destructive, even if it involves a weird sexuality or fetish. Anyone can “fall into an addictive pattern that pushes them farther and farther from happiness”, and that’s actual my point of contention with you. Straights can and often do, gays do, romantics do, aromantics do, all of these groups have people falling into it. But for some unexplainable reason, you choose to only attribute this to people that express their sexuality with interracial (and other alternative weird fetishes). You’ve spoken nothing about this potential pitfall for ANYONE of any orientation and sexuality that engages in it. This is why I’m accusing you of being a bigot. You are selective in your “concern”, which I believe is a guise of you expressing that you disapprove of people that enjoy interracial in this instance. Once again, very shameful behavior, especially of someone who is lgbt and supports sexual freedom.
>>
>>35519616
>Straights can and often do, gays do, romantics do, aromantics do, all of these groups have people falling into it. But for some unexplainable reason, you choose to only attribute this to people that express their sexuality with interracial (and other alternative weird fetishes). You’ve spoken nothing about this potential pitfall for ANYONE of any orientation and sexuality that engages in it. This is why I’m accusing you of being a bigot
I agree, though. This discussion happens to be occurring in an interracial thread, but my statements have been much more broad. I was actually reacting to your statement more than I was reacting to OP. I'm not particularly hung up on the interracial thing in specific, although I do think OP's example fits my premise - if the femboy had a black boyfriend who loves him and enjoys the same kink, it would not fit. But he doesn't. he's publicly spouting cringe, filming himself bouncing on black dildos for the world to see, alienating any potential partner who isn't black, and most black people too, for that matter. I would not call any of that healthy and I highly doubt it's going to bring him much happiness, short term or long term. Arousal and orgasm =/= happiness

What makes it a little bit different for LGBT, though, is that we already fall outside of social norms. So I think it's far more difficult to figure out what a healthy expression of our sexuality is supposed to look like and feel like than it is for straight people. I think the waters are muddied even further when, even within our own community, we're reassuring each other's self-destruction rather than having the strength and compassion to say "I don't think that's good for you," which, again, I see as an act of love rather than bigotry. If I'm wrong, and they're legitimately happy with their choices, they are not required to listen to me
>>
>>35519846
>he's publicly spouting cringe, filming himself bouncing on black dildos for the world to see
So you believe that no one should upload any pictures or videos of themselves masturbating or expressing their sexuality online, nor discuss or mention their sexuality, correct?
>alienating any potential partner who isn't black, and most black people too, for that matter
That’s a presumptuous claim. There are potential partners who aren’t bothered or are attracted to whatever weird sexuality they’re expressing, and in this case, other whites and blacks as well. To me, it seems like you’re making an argument equivalent to a guy engaging in gay behavior being bad because it alienates himself from potential female partners, when he is not interested in partners who are female anyway. Maybe a guy with a sexuality regarding black dildos wants to alienate those who are not attracted to that sexual expression, much like lesbians who dress and act masculine to alienate themselves from males and those not attracted to it. Anyways, I’ve very well seen whites on this board who have shown interest to this particular sexuality anyways, more than I wish to.

If you don’t find happiness in expressing your sexuality, then I respect your view. But you can’t determine whether other people find satisfaction and fulfillment in it, just because you don’t. Again, it’s presumptuous (1/2)
>>
>>35520085
>What makes it a little bit different for LGBT, though, is that we already fall outside of social norms. So I think it's far more difficult to figure out what a healthy expression of our sexuality is supposed to look like and feel like than it is for straight people.
It is not more difficult on the slightest. The “social norm” is completely irrelevant in understanding what a healthy way of expressing your sexuality is. It doesn’t matter if it’s weird or socially acceptable, that is not a factor. It’s all about consent and not harming others. LGBT expressing their sexuality in a way that isn’t straight doesn’t make something unhealthy. Just like straights who express their sexuality in various forms: rapeplay, pegging, choking, anal, bondage, femdom, etc. They are all weird, but weirdness is not a factor in whether sexual expression is unhealthy or not. And neither is expressing a sexuality in the form of interracial.

Again, it does not “alienate” everyone, only some who are not attracted to it. Some are actually drawn in toward it. It’s not an unhealthy way of expressing sexuality. (2/2)
>>
>>35520085
>>35520099
I don't have time to respond properly right now, so for now I'll just bump the thread and give you the synopsis: You're full of shit and living in a fantasy world (respectfully)
>>
>open bbc thread
>scroll down
>goku ultra instinct music starts playing
>>
femboys don't be a weird racist challenge impossible
>>
>>35516404
they're almost certainly attention and touch starved. They'd bottom for the nearest White man as soon as they'd make eye contact.
>>
>>35520884
Right back at you. You’re truly no better than bigoted republicans who yearn to restrict sexual freedom from lgbt people, sad to witness.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.