>"Why most pedophiles are homosexual men that want to molest male kids?"How do we reply?
>>35537077Honestly most gay "pedos" are guys in their 20s and 30s fucking consenting 16-year-olds off Grindr. I'm not saying it's good, it's not, but it's a lot different than kidnapping a fucking 8-year-old
why do people not really care if women molest boys, but men molesting boys is seen as a grave violation, and also enough to turn a straight boy gay?
>>35537077"Source??"Simple as
>>35537077Why don’t chuds care about straight men molesting little boys? These men just “don’t tell anyone” then stay safe to eternity
>>35537077Point out that most straight guys are pedos
>>35537142>"Just look at how many faggot appear in To Catch a Predator?":(
>>35537169I'm pretty sure it was mostly straight pedos caught on that show?
>>35537169The overwhelming majority of predators in To Catch a Predator were seeking underage girls, not boysJust from a quick search I got a total of 220 predators looking for girls vs 45 looking for boys
>>35537344>"Despite being 1% of the population, they represent over 20% of the pedo cases":(((((
>>35537367>1%aside from this not even being accurate it's... for a televised program that won't show boring cases! nice try though heteropedo
>>35537379>"I-it is an invalidate sample"
>>35537367Source??
paedophiles want to hurt kids, you can't extrapolate their sexuality from the gender of the kids they abuse, common misconception, straight men will abuse boys sometimes, it's about power and control not sexuality
>>35537077and our board is home to one: gincel
>>35537423source on your numbers of gay people being 1% of the population? :)
>>35537444Gossip me the details, fagbro
>>35537451>pol believesAre you stupid
>>35537433>>35537455>>35537379>It is actually more than 60%:(((
>>35537167the difference is those girls will suck and fuck guys sooner or later anywayboys are groomed into fucking pedo gay men and into thinking they're gay
>>35537451it wouldn't make me look bad because I'm not a gay man, it's just simply not about sex
Delet this
>>35537498paedos don't molest kids because they want to fuck men but just can't seem to find any
>>35537456>a: if that law did not exist, how young is your preference>g: anything from 9-20https://archived.moe/lgbt/thread/21146806
>>35537485>No replies*hetero smirk*
>>35537485Um... heterobros? Our response?
>>35537485You said of all cases first, now you're pointing out exclusively the ones on underage boysWould you make the same argument about straight men? You know the overwhelming majority of serial rapist target women, right?
>>35537587>The 95% confidence limits, of the risk children would identify recognizably homosexual adults as the potential abuser, are from 0% to 3.1%In this study, if the abused was a boy and the abuser was a male that was married, was the abuser considered homosexual or not?. The phrasing is extremely sketchy, my dear sodomite. Also>1994 Jul;94(1):41-4.>1994KEK
>>35537529>gay men are selectively targeting minors much more often than straight men areSource??
>>35537643weird, i thought the stats didn't lie?oh well, surely a 2022 study will indicate a significantly disproportionate percentage of diddlers... right?
>>35537529I would need to see evidence of that
>>35537790>Still high molestation rateHmm
>>35538065So what's the point of all this? Why are you even asking?
ive heard before that a lot of charges are from things like 16yo w/ 18yo type thing that is more likely to be pursued since they're gay. like also parents push for charges more often & get w/ statutory is this true? its just something i heard but idk if it is, i didnt actually look up the data to see
>>35538111Because they're a /pol/ tard with an agenda.
>>35537790>Compared with straight cisgender adults, more LGBTQ adults had three or more victims (9% vs. 17%)Wow...
>>35537077As a straight cis male I would point out that Pedophillia is it's own sexuality and that the reason a lot of pedophiles have homosexual targeting is because they were abused themselves and the reason it is disproportionately pedos targeting boys versus girls is that pedophiles tend to have access to boys.
>Imagine being a fag and unemployed
>>35538148imagine being straight where you're more likely to be disabled and retarded
>>35537077"That's very biphobic of you."
>Fag on kid rape statisticHmmm...
>>35538126>more victims per diddler>this means there's more diddlersanon... do you need to go back to second grade english?
>>35538199No, but doesnt this mean that if we move the study objective from "% of diddlers" to "% of the pedo cases made by fags", wouldnt this ratio be a little more scary, sodomitebro?Still, this study is pretty funny. Will dab on fags with maliciously cut info >:)
>>35537167This study has always bothered me. For one we have no comparable gay man study so it's kind of pointles. But more importantly, what are the parameters? Did they show them underage girls where their age was stated? You're talking about pure sexual stimulation which means that naturally the inherent tabooness of the material is going to illicit something more. Not to mention I would debate whether "normal men" would subject themselves to do this. And we don't know what the material was, was it straight up pornographic or just suggestive? The other thing is that thinking a 14 year old with a big set of fat titties is hot doesn't necessarily make you a pedophile. Pedophiles have their own clear sexuality, they're not into adults, they're into children. I don't think anyone cares that some 16 year olds are hot, I think people care that there are adults that act on predatory sexual urges.Essentially this study is useless because it has absolutely nothing to do with offenders.
>>35537790>The LGBTQ sample is composed solely by people who identified as fagsI guess men who raped boys were "straight" in some cases, heh?
>>35538288yes you fucking retardmost child rape is about power not actual sexual attraction
>>35538251...which, evidently, can be debunked by even a cursory glance at that very source.>>35538288Lots of straight women and gay guys diddling girls, too, I imagine? Oh, wait, that implication isn't convenient?
>>35537423>"I-it is an invalidate sample"
>>35538314>most child rape is about power not actual sexual attractionTalking from personal experience?
also, you've made this same thread for months nowim starting to think that you're actually a pedo>>35538357no, from the dataremember when i told you to actually fucking read the stuff? like what the FBI says & such? remember? did you do it?
>>35537438>paedophiles want to hurt kids, you can't extrapolate their sexuality from the gender of the kids they abuse, common misconception, straight men will abuse boys sometimes, it's about power and control not sexualityI think this sort of a cope. It's almost always some mix of both; and, for most, it's more about sexual attraction than anything else, regardless of the sex of the victim or perpetrator. I think there's some research on this.
>BTFOing my faggot cousin on the family chat group with my own reading of >>35537790>Gets block by him(female)homochads, help me apologize to him
>>35538366>(((data)))I mean, I dont care if the fag identified as a fag or a normal guy. If the studies doesnt exclusively take into account the gender of the abuser and abused, I call BS
>>35537077>"Why are most criminals black?"
>>35537077most pedos are catholics how do we respond to this?
>>35538401Hmmm too far man. I will let you know I am a huge black man. Kindly delete this
>>35538393ok, im actually convinced you're just a pedo, you care more about dunking on gay dudes my misconstruing data that you dont understand than you are about the actual issue of child molestationkys pedo
>>35538401this is such a funny idea of how you lot think the argument would go, the argument would be that there are systemic and cultural factors that cause men to commit more crime and we need to fix the underlying root problems
>>35538413Eradicate all form of organized religion>>35538415>No youOk, fag
>>35538420>>35538414
>>35538425you've been making these types of threads for months and still havent even looked into the actual issueyou are a pedo
>>35538393in that case... factoring in exclusively:>child sexual abuse by gender (more female victims)>gender of perpetrators of this abuse (more male offenders)...you should think straight men are the problem?
>>35538442>you've been making these types of threads for monthsI swear dead serious this is my first time here. I needed some time off 4chan and im trying to get ban. It is true mods here are lax enough to let us pester you for months without bans?
>>35538530mods exist only in theory dummy
>>35538530you know you can evade bans right? fucking newfags
>>35538546kek. I guess it is time to become a regular here>>35538547I got this thing call "honor system" (please no bully)
>>35538437wow an ai said something based on the data it was trained on
>>35538530>im trying to get banDon't bother. I've only received three day bans trying to do the same shit you are. This place isn't going to let you go, it's a crab bucket.
Sorry faggotbros. You guys are ok. Will be back soon. Sleep tight and avoid AIDS
>>35538566in my experience this board's boring as hell and is mostly useful as a depression fuel pit stopthis is the most engaging thread on the board in a bit and that's really saying a lot considering it didnt even make it to 50 replies before overt admittance of bad faithbait /v/ instead its way easier and funnier
>>35537077CSA isn't about attraction, it's about power. Most CSAers aren't medically pedophiles, and visa versa, there's loads of academic research backing that up. Under patriarchal power structures, the expression of CSA which is going to make one feel most powerful is a man committing CSA on a boy. It has nothing to do with homosexuality and very little to do with pedophilia
>>35538634>bait /v/ instead its way easier and funniertoo repetitive and formulaic. Everyone is doing it so most of my thread die or get killed instantly by tranny mods
>>35538664meh, everything in moderation. you want good bait here my best experience is arguing over whether something is malebrained/fembrained or agp/hsts, hits the brainwormed attention-hungry people here a lot better
>>35537167>>35538283the graph is fake, the study doesn't have that data at all. what the study did say was men are sexually attracted to those under 18, but not as much as they are to those over 18.this chart gets posted so much but no one ever actually bothers to look at the study cause access requires a uni account or money
>>35538999Australian Satan decimating lying fags
>op posting pedoanimehuh? i wonder why incels love japan
I'd argue that pedophilia is a sexuality in an of itself. Kids sport no definite sexual characteristics, genitals aside, so it makes little sense to try and categorise the attraction based on gender itself. Concept like heterosexuality and homosexuality lose meaning where kids are involved imho, they're so amorphous they're barely human. I dunno, I can't help but be very wary of kids, they are psychos in a weirdly fucked up body of mismatched proportions. Little goblins. Anyway, always curious about why female molesters don't get as much attention, always struck me as largely hypocritical by those that like to point fingers.
God the world can be a horrible place sometimes Jesus christ
>>35537077CDC finds that 1 in 4 girls were child sex victims and 1 in 20 boys were. That means the rate for girls was 5 times that of boys, which makes for a fraction of 5/6 = 83%. So that calculation suggests that homosexuals are perhaps a disproportionate share but they are not the majority. I also think it's a leap to assume that someone attracted to prepubescent boys would be attracted to adult men, and that's why this gets brought up: to suggest that you should be suspicious of gay people generally, even if you know they're in a relationship with an adult man.
