I actually read books. I know that's hard for most of you guys to believe but it's true. I get better lit discussions on tv, of all the godforsaken places
a 12 year old boy made this meme
>>25116707Tv is a literary board, they spend all day obsessing over dialogue and media that is based on books
>>25116709I'm 55
/tv's taste in cinema is embarrassingly provincial, so I am skeptical of their taste in books. I think they rated the Dark Knight in their top ten greatest films of all time and Kurosawa didn't even get an entry in the top fifty
Last time I visited /tv/ they were praising the stupid Coppola Dracula movie that added that retarded romance subplot.
>>25116715I figured you were 25-30, so I was being extremely generous; I clearly said the person who MADE the meme and not posted it.
>>25116711spbp
>>25116727I did make it
>>25116731
arguing on tv has its drawbacks like engaging with the actress obsessed incels while trying to pop their bubble that films involving attractive actresses are not necessarily good, but it's definitely better than this place which always comes off as pretentious and elitist, on tv, you don't have to pretend you are some wannabe scholar
>>25116737Yeah but what books do they often talk about there? I want to go over and make them feel ashamed if they have shit taste you see.
>>25116737At least /tv/ likes women
>>25116707That invincible summer is named Jesus Christ! Hallelujah!
>>25116737/lit/ is more pretentious and elitist but it's also far smarter than /tv/ so you're just admitting to cutting corners and settling for the watered-down crap
>>25116737The drawback is that 99% of the time they discuss slop.
>>25116737the point of 4chan is to be elitist, retard. go back.
>>25116757and what have you achieved by being elitist, you are just stuck in a echochamber screaming at ghosts of your own making
>>25116765But you see, he's not a normalfag, so that makes it all worth it.
>>25116737>you don't have to pretend you are some wannabe scholaryou turned down the difficulty of the game and think that's worth bragging about JEJ
>>25116765way more than you've achieved by being a midwit dullard with a transparent inferiority complex
>>25116777So nothing at all then.
>>25116777it doesn't seem like so if the highlight of your day is wasting your time arguing with a dullard>>25116774what difficulty, most of you retards spend time regurgitating the same talking points and never getting anywhere
>>25116737Answer the question anon, I won’t go to that sty unless I have good reason to >>25116751
>>25116782Leave then, go back to /tv/ and discuss fucking dawsons creek or whatever you do there. Clearly you’re upset about the way you’re treated in /lit/. Only a doormat masochist or a retard would stick around if he hated it here so much.
>>25116787they discuss narrative not books, literature is not about books alone>>25116790i can do both anon, i can discuss with tv while admonishing lit, you seem like the angry one, pretending that /lit/ is in the best form it has ever been and can do no wrong
>>25116707>woah... discussing a topic in any board except its own is... better?First day in 4chan?
>>25116782The highlight of my day was my excellent supper, cope and mald more strawfaggot
>25116782>25116793>i fit in and belong hereno you don't. go back.
>>25116841doesn't seem like it was that good if you keep coming back for more bile
>>25116737it's so obvious you've been lurking/posting /tv/ FAR longer than here lmao, don't you have a media literacy subreddit to get back to moderating
>>25116822I was 32 when 4chan started so no
>>25116853you are one dumb retards who hates visual media because they don't get it, what's wrong, do color pixels give you a seizure, can't parse video information, have no visual imagination?
>>25116707>/lit/, you don't deserve me! I will continue to post here incessantly for the next 10 years nonethelessCan we just sticky one of these threads and leave it up on the board for all these guys so they don't make this exact post 20 times per day?
>>25116754And yet you wouldn't discuss the early Buddhist literature I've long been inviting you and /lit/ to read. You know why? I know why. Because you didn't read. You know why you didn't read? Because you were busy feigning intellectual character.
>>25116709While a 12 year old boy. I found within me, this meme.
>>25116757This. But you're a retard too.
>>25116754>far smarterBarely anon.
>>25116777Based trips of truth
Faulkner was right about who television is for.
>>25116881>adjusts fake moustache to fit in better
>>25116709A 12 year old man he is
>>25116914Television is for n*ggersLiterature is for faggots
>>25116711It's a pleb board that obsesses over actors and actresses and only watch hollywood slop. That that have read have only read genre slop.
>>25116707>I get better lit discussions on tvThat just means you get easily swayed by the internet forum equivalent of water cooler talk.
In the midst of it's over, I found there was, within me, an invincible we are so back
>>25116737Real. The worst part is the trolls aren't even funny anymore and the elitist criticism isn't even helpful, only dismissive and time-wasting.
>>25116707Why are you still here? Go to >>>/lit/
>>25117137Uh. Yeah! You tell him!
>>25117033>That that have read have only readWhoa, slow down there, champs. Breathe some air.
>>25116857Are you really acting this conceited over the fact that you sit in front of a tv and do nothing for 2 hours? Yeah, we’ve all watched a movie before retard, it’s not fucking hard, you’ve got nothing to act superior over.
