All there’s to be found is literature ABOUT incels, but never from incels. When it’s an acute and relevant topic.
>>25200971Not a fiction writer but I'm working on an intellectual history of involuntary celibacy interspersed with theology and socio-political philosophy and I struggle to attract women indefinitely. Its a work in progress.
My Twisted World, Elliot Rodger
Read Mitchell Heisman's Suicide Note>https://legacy.gscdn.nl/archives/images/suicide_note.pdf
>>25200979Infohazard
>>25200971Incels can't produce anything of artistic value.
>>25200971we read incel lit all day being on 4chanand its shite.good fucking luck
>>25201014False. Most philosophers were defacto incels.
>>25200971I'm planning on writing an anonymous work and distributing it as PDF on here as a systems description of how one gets disjointed from reality by access to the internet to such an extent that they become a miserable degenerate. It will focus on a systems theory / Cybernetics framing treating social scripts as programmable modes of interface overfit to a digital surrogate environment. I will likely call it enchuddification.Chuds are forced to a digital environment through ostracism from the physical. Their physical worlds as children may not have been the kindest, so they encode their personalities in a digital milieu to keep themselves sane. Learned helplessness ensures they never try again.Interface with the physical world requires responding and adapting to, or rejecting, challenges to one's identity, which is difficult. In the digital world, these challenges can be controlled, and therefore entirely eliminated creating maladaptive nothing people, the beautiful ones from rat hell. They don't need to adapt, so they don't grow up.Don't know if I'll ever go through with it, but I'd like to. I've escaped the encapsulation within the digital simulacrum, for the most part, and would like to bring forth my residual of understanding for study. Frankly I'd like to see the entire digital space torn down and rebuilt as a healthier extension of the physical.
>>25201061I will counter your assumption that most of this is probably not their fault. I have written about six works. We should compare.
