[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/m/ - Mecha


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1714501137032348.jpg (126 KB, 720x576)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
I get UC purists have to defend their timeline but why do you guys give the AU entries such unrelenting shit? Every English corner of the Gundam fandom has the same old "UC good all others bad, worst of UC beats best of AU". I actually want to see UC purists' point of view on this.
>>
You have made up a scenario of fictional people in your head and now you want internet strangers to validate your delusions.
>>
It's the non-Tomino UCfags that shit on AUs. The only UC entries that matter are the ones by Tomino. I support AUs since Tomino supports them.
>>
>>22615926
This. But i also like all of the UC's & AU's except seed. That belongs all the hate it gets. Everything else is fine/great.
>>
>>22615920
>Every English corner of the Gundam fandom
Be specific, OP. Which "corners" are those?
>the plebbitor vermin?
>the twatter refuse?
>the youtard e-celeb/simp machine?
>>
>>22615935
All of the above plus here.
>>
>>22615924
fpbp
>>
>>22615926
>I support AUs since Tomino supports them.
No, he doesn't. His opinion on those is that they're a good opportunity for new people in the industry to get experience, but he's never expressed that he likes them. In all honesty, he's never expressed any interest in anything except his own projects which are nonsensical garbage that seriously need an editor
Also, your veneration of a specific individual is quite pathetic.
>>
>>22615944
0083, 08th, Unicorn, and NT are pure shit, bro.
>>
>>22615931
>except seed. That belongs all the hate it gets. Everything else is fine/great.
I feel very negatively against everything AGE. "UC for toddlers" shouldn't have happened in the first place.
My complaints on other stuff are down to staff (in)competence and wasted potential.
>>
>>22615949
>0083, 08th,
I forgive those on the basis on their excellent animation and designs. Screenwriting we can debate.

>Unicorn
And that on some of its designs.
>>
>>22615949
Imagine being this incorrect so hard.
>>
>>22615953
Why debate when they don't matter since they're not by Tomino? Simple as.
>>
File: Spoiler Image (787 KB, 1305x892)
787 KB
787 KB PNG
>>22615958
>since they're not by Tomino? Simple as.
Oh, you're one of those people.
The only thing worse than franchise fanatics are creator fanatics.
>>
>>22615924
fpbp
>>
>>22615920
Did you just wake up from a coma or something? It's not 2005 anymore. People you are talking about barely exist these days.
>>
>>22615926
>>22615949
>>22615958
Kill yourself
>>
>>22615920

Serious Answer: In the early 2000s, accessing the UC shows was hard because licensor would only release shows they deemed "popular" and "marketable" in the US. UC shows were deemed less marketable because they were older (and when they did try airing 0079 TV, it clearly didn't do as well as Wing did before it), which led to resentment about the sheer difficulty of watching them with any official translation.

This led to a lot of frustration and pissing about "casuals" ruining the market. It took 17 years for every gundam show to be officially released in the US after they began, and even now, not everyone was given modern staples like a full, consistent cast dub like most popular titles get.

It's all pointless and stupid now, and it was always stupid, but there was a history that led to this mentality.
>>
>>22615958
Kinda based? But naw..
>>22615944
Fuck (you) >>22615978
& Fuck (you).
>Posts Mentally Discarded
>>
>>22616017
The 3 UC OVAS and CCA were licensed right away - you used to be able to buy MSIA of 0080 suits at Walmart in 2002, and you could find all of them at video rental stores if you didn't catch them on TV.

https://youtu.be/HJVC_d1tMLc?si=y6ozVO61j1dJIR2v

Zeta came just a few years later, and UC purists always discounted Victory, F91 and ZZ anyways. If anything they tended to privilege the 3 fanfiction OVAs. The only one that had any prestige that was unlicensed for a few years was Zeta, so I really don't see this narrative working.
>>
>>22615926
>>22615944
Based
>>
>>22615926
>non-Tomino UCfags
Those exist?
>>
>>22615924
/thread
>>
File: 1714577915763825.jpg (108 KB, 1080x910)
108 KB
108 KB JPG
00 is the only AU that feels like a decently thought out world to me. X, Turn A and G-reco are fine but they essentially just use UC as the framework (some more literally than others). G Gundam doesn't put much stake into the timeline itself. AGE and SEED are bloated messes with nonsense tech progression. And IBO and G-Witch essentially have these larger settings looming over their respective shows, but it just feels like the narrative doesn't want you to be curious about them, and I really don't like that. Haven't bothered to really look into Frozen Teardrop beyond basic synopsis to really form and opinion on Wing's overall timeline. But the TV series has a serviceable setting.
>>
>>22616201
0080fags, 0083fags, 08MSfags and Unicornfags unironically exist.
And while I can excuse War in the Pocket-only fags for being normalfags that usually aren't into mecha, the rest are retarded.
>>
>>22615931
The AUs I like are Tomino's, SEED, Wing, G, and X, and the only UCs I like are Tomino's, 0080, Crossbone, and G-Saviour. I don't like 00 for being a Wing rehash, and IBO and G-Witch were messes all around.
>>
>>22616201
Toonami babies think the only good Gundam shows are Wing, 08thMS, and 0083.
>>
>>22616660
Also Unicorn, probably because they have no investment in the UC lore.
>>
>>22616660
>>22616665
>Blatantly disregard G Gundam to sound like you fit in
Yeah that definitely sounds like something Toonami Babies would do.
>>
>>22615920
Not a UC purist, I quite like a few of the AUs, but it's not very hard to see where they're coming from if you just take a step back and look at the AU shows and realize most of them are actually shit. Even 00 which is pretty good and decent well liked still has a controversial second season and movie that a lot of people dislike. But then we've got Wing, SEED, AGE, IBO, G-Witch... it's pretty easy to just write off AUs entirely when almost all of them are garbage, even if there are some like G, X, and 00 still holding them up. And I wouldn't blame someone who likes UC for instinctively dismissing G either, given how different and silly it is.
>>
>>22615924
basado
>>
>>22616674
G Gundam was never on the same level of popularity as the other 3.
>>
>>22616717
Nice revisionist history. EVERYONE loved G Gundam. To say you didn't is something a Toonami Baby would do to keep up their pretend hipster appearance.
>>
>>22615950
Only things I remember from AGE worth a damn are cranky old man Flit and Super Pilot Asem (which lasts like 2 episodes before they did a poor man's Crossbone with him).
>>
>>22616891
>>22616891
>EVERYONE loved G Gundam
No they fucking didn't. Either you don't remember correctly, making shit up, or existed in some bubble. G Gundam has a ton of people calling stupid and childish and a DBZ ripoff. Fuck off.
>>
>>22616891
>>22617027
imao. I can't agree or disagree with ether of you. I don't know & i don't care because toonami babies are reprobates.
>>
>>22615920
How has AU being shit anything to do with UC?
>>
>>22617027
>G Gundam has a ton of people calling stupid and childish
Contrarian tumblrinas and retards that only read anime magazines like >>22617283 don't encompass the entire internet. People actually had fun with G Gundam and were happy whenever it showed up in a game. You lose.

>>22617297
Because UC can be pretty shit too. See: the OVAs, ZZ, F91 for prime examples.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.