Why do female artists have to be conventionally attractive and talented to succeed but males can be fugly and still get famous
>frogposterPost discarded.
>>121571541Men are more shallow
>>121571541How old were you when you realized you would never make it?
>>121571541society largely places higher importance on a woman's appearance than on a man's
Romeo Void's lead singer wasn't very good looking, but they were a cool band
>>121571564This isn't /v/ or /tv/. /mu/ is a pro frog board
>>121571541>female artists have to be conventionally attractiveplenty of counterexamples, Janis Joplin, Celine Dion, Barbra Streisand, Adele, Lady Gaga...etc
>>121571580Bowie was a qt but not sure if counts as conventionally attractive
>>121571667all handsome women
>>121571541have you seen charlie xcx?
>>121571567>>121571580>>121571596youre calling them ugly? damn bruh
>>121571541Because we live in a misogynistic hellscape.
>>121571541Because being conventionally attractive is the only value female artists have
>>121571541who except for taylor swift and maybe miley cyrus is conventionally attractive?
>>121571879Beyonce
>>121571541Nobody wants to see some ugly unkempt musician in pop music.
>>121571974haha, i'm asking seriously
