Urban sprawl is good as long as you have extensive coverage of railways, it's comfy too because it makes the urban core larger and takes longer to navigate through which is a vibe. Does your city qualify for CHAD status? Requirements:>central urban area footprint of >=300 km^2 >at least 5 major intercity railway terminals within the urban zone>metro footprint >=1200 km^2
>>1994210Care to explain a bit more about the map ? There seems to be going on alot more than the legend explains.
>>1994215Picrel is not relevant, just a depiction of urban pop concentration, problem is that urban areas are often interchangeably conflated with metro area, I'm defining urban area as "city footprint".
>>1994210>Urban sprawl is good as long as you have extensive coverage of railways
Asshurt schizophrenic troll thread
>>1994216Ok, but i too would like to know what is going on in that map. what do the black lines represent, why is it so distorted?
>>1994210How many Indians do you reckon have died on those tracks
>>1994335Just a case of predators keeping the local population from growing out of control
>>1994317It appears to distort the landmass so that the population density is equal across it. The farther apart the line spacing, the denser the population in an undistorted map.Basically it swells high population density areas like India, China, Europe, Nigeria, East Africa, etc. while shrinking low population density areas like Canada, Siberia/Central Asia, the Sahara, the Amazon and Congo basins, etc.
