Anonymous Democrats dismiss charges agai(...) 04/17/24(Wed)17:11:13 No. 1288126 Democrats dismiss charges against themselves Ignoring 200 years of precedent they table an impeachment motion against mayorkas instead of allowing a trial, effectively meaning the Senate can ignore the House when they impeach someone, something that's never been done before https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/live-blog/senators-begin-dhs-secretary-mayorkas-impeachment-trial-live-updates-rcna147038 The House impeached Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in February and, on Tuesday, formally referred the issue to the Senate for a trial. Democrats voted to rule both impeachment articles unconstitutional because they did not rise to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors." They then adjourned the trial. The first impeachment article had accused Mayorkas of “willfully and systemically” refusing to comply with federal immigration laws. The second charged him with making false statements to Congress. In the end, Sen. Eric Schmitt’s, R-Mo., objection to allowing for debate and procedural votes ahead of the Democrats’ motions to dispense with the two articles of impeachment precluded Republicans from putting Democrats in a tough spot with substantive votes. Republicans had planned to force Democrats to take tough votes, like on the constitutionality of not holding a trial. But because Schmitt objected to a debate agreement, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, immediately moved to question the constitutionality of the articles of impeachment. And that meant Republican senators could only force votes on procedural questions like adjourning or going into closed session. Schmitt was pressed on his decision by reporters and responded by saying, “Impeachments aren’t debatable. So if you have an impeachment trial, we don’t debate that we listen, we hear evidence. All we were asking for is something that has happened every single time articles of impeachment have ever come over the United States Senate.” >>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)18:53:44 No. 1288150 >>1288126 >And that meant Republican senators could only force votes on procedural questions like adjourning or going into closed session. >or going into closed session. So its really just Republicunts whining that they couldn't televise the trial and get out of context soundbites. If they were serious about the impeachment they'd continue in a closed session. Apparently it never was. Good to know>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)18:59:08 No. 1288151 >>1288150 Why are Democrats so hopelessly corrupt at every turn? Is it genetic?>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)19:11:32 No. 1288152 >>1288151 >Why are Democrats so hopelessly corrupt at every turn? The oddest part is that this dogshit talking point has lost you every election for the past several years but you still won't give it up. Does that not bother you at all?>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)19:20:02 No. 1288153 >>1288126 The rest of the country sees the republicans wasting time doing stupid partisan shit like this instead of keeping the government functioning or passing laws.>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)20:05:09 No. 1288158 >>1288151 They wouldn't be democrats if they weren't corrupt.>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)20:27:00 No. 1288161 >>1288158 Good point>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)22:31:54 No. 1288172 >>1288152 "Lost">Does that not bother you at all? Yeah it bothers me that nobody has stopped the cheaters yet. The bystander effect hits hard.>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)22:35:09 No. 1288173 >>1288158 yep!>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)22:47:30 No. 1288176 >>1288152 I'm not a Democrat so this doesn't apply to me at all>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)22:58:12 No. 1288177 >>1288172 >Yeah it bothers me that nobody has stopped the cheaters yet. This conspiracy hasn't panned out for you either. Do you not think its time to change your game plan?>>1288176 >I'm not a Democrat so this doesn't apply to me at all If you're not a Democrat in the U.S. then losing elections 100% applies to you. You lost in 2020 and under-performed in every single midterm since then with literally every metric on your side. The sooner you come to terms with the fact that your party is an embarrassment the quicker you can begin to formulate a plan to fix it.>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)23:01:05 No. 1288179 >>1288177 >This conspiracy hasn't panned out for you either. Yeah, but most conspiracies eventually come true, so I'm not worried.>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)23:05:58 No. 1288180 >>1288179 >I may believe in a thing with no evidence to support it and nationally mocked for years but just you wait, I'll have my day! Eventually! What a pathetically cucked way to live. I'm convinced you people literally have no sense of embarrassment.>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)23:08:23 No. 1288181 >>1288180 I don't really care about being mocked by people who will be dead in a few years. Because they'll be dead, and I'll be laughing.>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)23:14:13 No. 1288182 >>1288180 >retards call everything they dislike a conspiracy >conspiracy turns out to be true >retards ignore it >repeat ad infinitum https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/ >>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)23:14:27 No. 1288183 >>1288181 >Just you wait! You'll all be dead! I'll have the last laugh! One day I'll stop being an embarrassment! Eventually! You've got real big "old man yells at clouds" energy.>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)23:15:15 No. 1288184 >>1288183 See >>1288182 >>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)23:22:19 No. 1288185 >>1288182 Ah, so you fit the archetype perfectly. You believe in a multitude of debunked conspiracy theories. Keep yelling at that cloud, old man. One day you'll show those kids!>>
Anonymous 04/17/24(Wed)23:51:24 No. 1288188 >>1288182 Wild to think people actually injected this stuff into their bloodstream lmao>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)00:36:51 No. 1288193 >>1288188 Yeah, billions of people. But just you wait, the conspiracy schizos will be vindicated any day!>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)00:48:29 No. 1288195 >>1288193 Pretty sure they were already vindicated by the fact that the shot doesn't provide immunity nor does it prevent transmission as was sold to the public.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)01:13:59 No. 1288196 >>1288126 >McConnel bitches about the very thing he did 3 years ago Is anyone really surprised by republican hypocracy anymore?>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)01:50:29 No. 1288202 >>1288126 so impeachment is now a polical question and not based on crimes? Good to know when trump wins in november. no more impeachments>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)01:55:22 No. 1288203 >>1288202 >so impeachment is now a polical question and not based on crimes? you're making this argument late this is just failed republican bullshit>And that meant Republican senators could only force votes on procedural questions like adjourning or going into closed session. Republicans could have forced it to trial, in a closed session. They decided to scrap it instead, because they can't generate any of their bullshit news with a closed session.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)02:03:40 No. 1288206 >>1288203 >you're making this argument late >this is just failed republican bullshit literally not an argument from you retard. (((schumer))) is saying the senate now considers impeachments a political question, so trump can't get impeached at all if he has 50 senators>Republicans could have forced it to trial, in a closed session. They decided to scrap it instead, because they can't generate any of their bullshit news with a closed session. a closed session where dems are going to acquit him because there could be fucking film of him saying he is importing illegals to destroy America while driving a truck load of illegals in and dems wouldn't care. like how dems acquitted clinton after he raped that child in the oval office and then lied about it>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)03:36:57 No. 1288209 >>1288206 >there could be fucking film of him saying he is importing illegals to destroy America Where do you people get this shit from?>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)04:30:46 No. 1288210 >>1288209 schizophrenia>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)04:35:06 No. 1288211 >>1288202 >so impeachment is now a polical question and not based on crimes? It always has been you moron.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)04:58:45 No. 1288212 >>1288211 >high crimes and misdemeanors? no no, that's a POLITICAL QUESTION, not a LEGAL QUESTION >>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)05:23:49 No. 1288213 >>1288212 yea, retard>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)07:04:27 No. 1288226 >>1288213 >crime isn't a legal question Alright, everybody in DC is retarded. No exceptions.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)07:52:55 No. 1288227 >>1288209 They're the ones bussing illegals in too, so the rest of the post is likely projection as well. They're just violent and retarded, the American way>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)08:18:02 No. 1288228 >>1288226 Calling founding fathers retard? You’re not American.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)09:41:46 No. 1288234 >>1288226 >doesn't know how the constitution works Are you foreign? Or have a red state education?>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)10:39:58 No. 1288243 We really do have to kill them.. yhere is no other way. >>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)10:49:24 No. 1288246 >>1288243 Be sure to live stream the shooting>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)10:52:40 No. 1288248 >>1288243 As the founding fathers intended.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)11:45:28 No. 1288255 >>1288206 >so trump can't get impeached at all if he has 50 senators you're a retard who doesn't understand how impeachment works>a closed session where dems are going to acquit him So Republicunts could have forced it to a trial, but they decided to scrap it because they wanted a spectacle instead of an actual trial. Thanks for proving my point, faggot>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)14:22:43 No. 1288271 >>1288209 why are we letting millions of illegals in per year if it isn't to destroy the country?>>1288210 samefag>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)14:25:47 No. 1288273 >>1288211 high crimes and misdemeanors isn't a political question.>>1288255 >you're a retard who doesn't understand how impeachment works you are the one defending dems for ignoring articles of impeachment. Guess the GOP can now do the same thing >So Republicunts could have forced it to a trial, but they decided to scrap it because they wanted a spectacle instead of an actual trial. this is why we need flags, to show what third world shithole you are actually from. a closed door impeachment is a waste of time because dms will all vote to acquit even if there is a video of the guy actively driving the illegals in himself because dems don't care about other dems breaking the lae>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)14:35:20 No. 1288274 >>1288271 Those illegals deserve to be here more than you do.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)14:41:20 No. 1288277 >>1288273 No one thinks Mayorkas did anything wrong but MAGA cultists. Cry even more that you're an extremist minority in society.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)14:48:24 No. 1288278 >>1288274 80% of illegals are rapists and they all hate America and want to destroy it and want to own slaves>>1288277 >No one thinks Mayorkas did anything wrong but MAGA cultists. dems don't think hunter did anything wrong by smoking crack and then lying about it to buy a gun. But dems still want stricter gun laws despite thinking its fine to lie on a background check>Cry even more that you're an extremist minority in society. wow, an extreme minority that won the 2016 election>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:06:10 No. 1288279 >>1288278 It's not just dems, half of republicans also think he did nothing wrong.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:15:14 No. 1288283 >>1288279 >half of republicans also think he did nothing wrong. I don't know where you get these wild claims from, but at least in the context of Hunter's tax crimes 77% of Americans think he committed evasion https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/reutersipsos-poll-finds-half-americans-think-hunter-biden-receiving-favorable-treatment >>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:16:18 No. 1288284 >>1288279 >25% of Americans think hunter is innocent Let me guess, your source is either your own asshole, or a dailykos poll of dailykos readers>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:16:21 No. 1288285 >>1288279 >half of republicans also think he did nothing wrong. CITATION NEEDED>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:20:13 No. 1288286 >>1288283 >wild claims The only wild claims ITT are the ones about Mayorkas and Hunter Biden, which is why the impeachment is going nowhere.>>1288284 >dailykos Ahahah you're trotting out the 2008 boogeyman again>>1288285 It's a high IQ thing, you wouldn't understand.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:24:35 No. 1288289 >>1288285 I made it up. Most Americans actually think hunter is guilty and that his father at best, acted inappropriately wrt hunters business interests while he was vp>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:26:17 No. 1288291 >>1288286 >It's a high IQ thing, you wouldn't understand. where is the source, jew boi?>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:26:41 No. 1288292 >>1288291 Like I said. I made it up. Sorry>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:29:31 No. 1288294 >>1288289 >>1288291 >>1288292 chud headcanon is so wild>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:32:32 No. 1288295 >>1288294 Lmao you gave up, eh? Hard to dispute sources when you have none, I know. Better luck next time I guess, maybe stop making unfounded claims>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:35:54 No. 1288296 >>1288295 It's not hard to claim there aren't any sources when you live in an information vacuum like you do>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)15:43:21 No. 1288297 >>1288294 where is the source on most republicans thinking hunter is innocent?>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)16:13:10 No. 1288317 >>1288297 where is the post ITT besides your own that said "most republicans think hunter is innocent"? (protip: no one said that)>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)16:18:29 No. 1288325 >>1288317 see>>1288279 >>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)16:25:44 No. 1288327 >>1288325 >half = most Ahh so you're a retard>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)16:31:00 No. 1288330 >>1288327 source on half of all republicans thinking crackhead hunter did zero crimes, jew>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)17:05:20 No. 1288337 >>1288279 Who is supposed to believe this?>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)17:13:34 No. 1288338 >>1288330 where is the post ITT besides your own that said "hunter did zero crimes"? (protip: no one said that)>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)17:14:40 No. 1288339 >>1288337 Clear-thinking, rational, level-headed Americans of high intelligence and good parenting. (i.e. not Trumpsimps)>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)17:17:43 No. 1288340 >>1288338 see>>1288279 >>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)17:24:39 No. 1288342 >>1288126 >Using articles of impeachment to change policy you don't agree with. You're doing the constitution wrong. Repuglicans showing everyone what we already knew: They don't know the law.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)19:01:17 No. 1288378 >>1288342 Didn't democrats hold months of congressional hearings labeling Trump as a traitor without subjecting him to due process? Why should we care about rule of law again?>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)19:02:41 No. 1288382 >>1288378 >Didn't democrats hold months of congressional hearings giving direct proof Trump was a traitor? *ftfy >without subjecting him to due process? His army of lawyers being there would seem to contradict that.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)19:08:08 No. 1288383 >>1288382 >*ftfy You do understand that those hearings were legal proceedings, right? They had no evidentiary standards or presumption of innocence. A literal kangaroo court. >His army of lawyers being there would seem to contradict that. Do you even know what I'm talking about?>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)19:11:30 No. 1288386 >>1288383 >They had no evidentiary standards or presumption of innocence >A literal kangaroo court. Its not a criminal court you fucking moron.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)19:39:00 No. 1288390 >>1288386 Jesus christ you're an idiot. I'm talking about the J6 hearings.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)19:44:37 No. 1288391 >>1288390 You're the perfect combination of confident and retarded. A congressional hearing is not a criminal court. There is no presumption of innocence because there's no such thing as being found guilty in a congressional hearing. There are no evidentiary standards because the purpose of a congressional hearing is not to evaluate whether or not someone has violated a criminal statute. You have absolutely zero clue what you're talking about, anon, and the more you talk the more apparent it is.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)22:58:05 No. 1288413 >>1288391 >There is no presumption of innocence because there's no such thing as being found guilty in a congressional hearing. That was literally my point you absolute fucking imbecile. God, the posters here are some of the dumbest people on the planet. A dead russian contributes more to political discourse than you do.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)23:16:16 No. 1288416 >>1288279 they hated him because he spake truth.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)23:37:58 No. 1288420 >>1288413 >That was literally my point you absolute fucking imbecile. No it wasn't. You said the Jan 6th hearings were a "kangaroo court" because they had no evidentiary standards or presumption of innocence, seemingly having no idea that a fucking congressional hearing is not a court. Acting indignant isn't going to change what a moron you are.>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)02:44:17 No. 1288458 >>1288420 >how could it be a kangaroo court if there were no kangaroos? checkmate, atheists
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.