Anonymous Biden moves to decriminalize M(...) 04/30/24(Tue)14:43:01 No. 1291487 https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/biden-administration-wants-to-reclassify-marijuana-as-less-dangerous-drug-d6735b23 https://apnews.com/article/marijuana-biden-dea-criminal-justice-pot-f833a8dae6ceb31a8658a5d65832a3b8 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/04/30/dea-reclassifies-marijuana-reports/72865632007/ WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration will move to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, The Associated Press has learned, a historic shift to generations of American drug policy that could have wide ripple effects across the country. The DEA’s proposal, which still must be reviewed by the White House Office of Management and Budget, would recognize the medical uses of cannabis and acknowledge it has less potential for abuse than some of the nation’s most dangerous drugs. However, it would not legalize marijuana outright for recreational use. The agency’s move, confirmed to the AP on Tuesday by five people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive regulatory review, clears the last significant regulatory hurdle before the agency’s biggest policy change in more than 50 years can take effect. Once OMB signs off, the DEA will take public comment on the plan to move marijuana from its current classification as a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD. It moves pot to Schedule III, alongside ketamine and some anabolic steroids, following a recommendation from the federal Health and Human Services Department. After the public comment period and a review by an administrative judge, the agency would eventually publish the final rule. >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)14:44:38 No. 1291488 It comes after President Joe Biden called for a review of federal marijuana law in October 2022 and moved to pardon thousands of Americans convicted federally of simple possession of the drug. He has also called on governors and local leaders to take similar steps to erase marijuana convictions. “Criminal records for marijuana use and possession have imposed needless barriers to employment, housing, and educational opportunities,” Biden said in December. “Too many lives have been upended because of our failed approach to marijuana. It’s time that we right these wrongs.” The election year announcement could help Biden, a Democrat, boost flagging support, particularly among younger voters. Biden and a growing number of lawmakers from both major political parties have been pushing for the DEA decision as marijuana has become increasingly decriminalized and accepted, particularly by younger people. A Gallup poll last fall found 70% of adults support legalization, the highest level yet recorded by the polling firm and more than double the roughly 30% who backed it in 2000. The DEA didn’t respond to repeated requests for comment. Schedule III drugs are still controlled substances and subject to rules and regulations, and people who traffic in them without permission could still face federal criminal prosecution. Some critics argue the DEA shouldn’t change course on marijuana, saying rescheduling isn’t necessary and could lead to harmful side effects. Jack Riley, a former deputy administrator of the DEA, said he had concerns about the proposed change because he thinks marijuana remains a possible “gateway drug,” one that may lead to the use of other drugs. “But in terms of us getting clear to use our resources to combat other major drugs, that’s a positive,” Riley said, noting that fentanyl alone accounts for more than 100,000 deaths in the U.S. a year. >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)14:45:38 No. 1291489 On the other end of the spectrum, others argue marijuana should be treated the way alcohol is. Last week, 21 Democrats led by Senate Majority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York sent a letter to DEA Administrator Anne Milgram and Attorney General Merrick Garland arguing marijuana should be dropped from the controlled-substances list and instead regulated like alcohol. “It is time for the DEA to act,” the lawmakers wrote. “Right now, the Administration has the opportunity to resolve more than 50 years of failed, racially discriminatory marijuana policy.” Federal drug policy has lagged behind many states in recent years, with 38 having already legalized medical marijuana and 24 legalizing its recreational use. That’s helped fuel fast growth in the marijuana industry, with an estimated worth of nearly $30 billion. Easing federal regulations could reduce the tax burden that can be 70% or more for businesses, according to industry groups. It could also make it easier to research marijuana, since it’s very difficult to conduct authorized clinical studies on Schedule I substances. The immediate effect of rescheduling on the nation’s criminal justice system would likely be more muted, since federal prosecutions for simple possession have been fairly rare in recent years. >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)14:46:39 No. 1291490 But loosening restrictions could carry a host of unintended consequences in the drug war and beyond. Critics point out that as a Schedule III drug, marijuana would remain regulated by the DEA. That means the roughly 15,000 cannabis dispensaries in the U.S. would have to register with the DEA like regular pharmacies and fulfill strict reporting requirements, something that they are loath to do and that the DEA is ill equipped to handle. Then there’s the United States’ international treaty obligations, chief among them the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, which requires the criminalization of cannabis. In 2016, during the Obama administration, the DEA cited the U.S.’ international obligations and the findings of a federal court of appeals in Washington in denying a similar request to reschedule marijuana. ___ >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)14:59:08 No. 1291497 It's over. Biden just won the 2024 election. >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:05:24 No. 1291505 Time to buy back into some of those cannabis corps until this actually goes through. Buy on rumor, sell on news. >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:06:54 No. 1291508 After 50+ years in government he's finally going to do it, faggots! It's definitely going to happen this time! They surely wouldn't keep lying about it forever! >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:07:20 No. 1291511 >>1291505 This is not rumor, the DEA proposal to reclassify is already moving through the system. Granted that it will take months before it's enacted but this is more than just a whispers about what might happen, it's actually happening.>>
jews rape kids 04/30/24(Tue)15:16:13 No. 1291522 Jim Crow Joe and his handlers making more false promises before an election. Where have I seen this before? >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:24:13 No. 1291533 >>1291522 What makes you think the promises are false (besides your far-right indoctrination) ?>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:25:14 No. 1291536 >>1291497 At very least his approval rating just went up 30 or 40 points.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:27:58 No. 1291539 >>1291536 >30 or 40 points. the absolute delusional>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:31:07 No. 1291542 >>1291539 So how much do you think his rating is going to go up from this then, Nate Silver?>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:32:11 No. 1291544 >>1291542 absolutely none, because nobody buys this ridiculous bullshit.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:50:41 No. 1291566 >>1291544 What in your mind makes it ridiculous bullshit (besides your far-right indoctrination) ?>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:53:07 No. 1291567 >>1291566 They aren't going to legalize weed, and even if they did it wouldn't make any difference in voting, which is why nobody cares and they aren't going to.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)15:56:16 No. 1291571 >>1291567 No one said he was going to legalize it, just move it from Schedule I to Schedule III. It still would be as illegal as ketamine, just not as illegal as heroin or cocaine as it is now.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)16:20:35 No. 1291584 SLIDE IT >>
the check's in the mail, i pro(...) 04/30/24(Tue)16:28:12 No. 1291592 >>1291508 >After 50+ years in government he's finally going to do it, faggots! It's definitely going to happen this time! They surely wouldn't keep lying about it forever! for sure gonna happen AFTER the election>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)16:28:51 No. 1291593 >>1291592 I don't get why you think it wouldn't happen ASAP>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)16:29:25 No. 1291594 >>1291593 >literally born yesterday >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)16:43:51 No. 1291608 >>1291594 I understand you hate the government but give them some credit for fixing something they got wrong 80 years ago.>>
jews rape kids 04/30/24(Tue)16:53:19 No. 1291614 >>1291566 >>1291533 Bot>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:03:48 No. 1291629 >>1291608 Wow, this guy ova 'ere knows the long term effects of marijuana. Betcha he also knows the long term effects of second hand marijuana smoke on children, and marijuana's effects on developing children, ove 'ere.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:05:22 No. 1291632 >>1291629 Name something besides water you ingest which doesn't have any long term effects. The air you breathe has long term effects ffs.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:07:15 No. 1291635 >>1291632 Menthol cigarettes.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:08:26 No. 1291638 >>1291635 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zXDo4dL7SU >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:15:49 No. 1291647 >>1291632 Thanks, retard.>Everything has effects No shit. BUT WHAT ARE THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS? Fucking moron.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:22:32 No. 1291648 >>1291487 >hey jack, I know you're real torn up about the whole Palestine thing. How 'bout you have a joint and loosen up? >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:23:31 No. 1291650 >>1291647 Ask Andy Kaufman. Oh wait you can't because he died of lung cancer 40 years ago despite never smoking anything.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:31:46 No. 1291656 >>1291650 Even Fauci admitted cigarettes don't cause lung cancer during the pandemic. Short answer is: you have no answer.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:36:09 No. 1291657 >>1291656 we've reached peak contrarianism>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)17:59:29 No. 1291663 >>1291657 Have we?>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)19:09:17 No. 1291694 >>1291663 Are you trying to be an edgy contrarian?>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)19:13:12 No. 1291696 >>1291508 >It's definitely going to happen this time! They surely wouldn't keep lying about it forever! I have no clue where you people get the idea that federal policy like this depends on what the president feels like and not national sentiment. You do realize that support for marijuana legalization has only peaked in the last 10 or so years, right? In what universe would Biden, or congress attempt to legalize marijuana in like 1994 when national polls were at like 15% in favor?>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)19:18:09 No. 1291697 >>1291567 There are tons of people who have never voted that would come out in support of him if he legalized it. There are probably even life long Republicans who would flip if he did it>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)19:22:20 No. 1291698 >>1291696 >You do realize that support for marijuana legalization has only peaked in the last 10 or so years, right? ..I have to imagine that the people who say shit like this have never actually smoked cannabis, or been around other people who smoke cannabis. In states like Washington, cannabis runs through the state like a river and has done so for half a century. Everybody knows at least one person who smokes. Also, legalization means literally nothing. People who have indulged in the lightning lettuce are going to continue to purchase it illegally because the taxes on cannabis make it prohibitively expensive to purchase through dispensaries.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)19:26:26 No. 1291700 >>1291696 >national sentiment shapes policy wow, that's bright, had to shield my eyes>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)19:30:58 No. 1291703 >>1291698 >..I have to imagine that the people who say shit like this have never actually smoked cannabis, or been around other people who smoke cannabis. It speaks a lot about your engagement with the topic that you think smoking weed or being around people who smoke weed has anything to do with national politics. Having a bunch of friends that smoke weed is great but that's an irrelevant anecdote. Polling and legislative support is what indicates where laws are going - not how many people you know that smoke weed.>In states like Washington, cannabis runs through the state like a river and has done so for half a century. Everybody knows at least one person who smokes. That's great. This has no impact on anything I said. National support for legalizing marijuana, in the 1990s and on a federal level, hovered around 15-20%. People didn't want it. As time moved on and support grew, the more liberal states like Oregon, California and Washington legalized at first and its been progressing ever since. This is just an objective fact.>Also, legalization means literally nothing. Well, you're wrong, both economically and criminally.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)19:39:01 No. 1291709 >>1291700 >wow, that's bright, had to shield my eyes Yeah, imagine being in a thread with people so low IQ that you actually have to say something this obvious.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)19:58:28 No. 1291714 >>1291703 >It speaks a lot about your engagement with the topic that you think smoking weed or being around people who smoke weed has anything to do with national politics. Didn't we just establish that federal policy is based on national sentiment? Would you like to try again, reddit-spacing retard-kun?>That's great. This has no impact on anything I said. You should spend more time reading the posts of the anons you are trying to mimic.>Well, you're wrong, both economically and criminally. Confirmed for not living in a legal state.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)20:02:10 No. 1291716 >>1291714 >Didn't we just establish that federal policy is based on national sentiment? Your friends who you smoke weed with are not the nation you fucking moron. "National polls say this thing is unpopular but everyone I know really likes it!" is the argument of a toddler. The world is larger than your social circle. Your personal anecdotes are irrelevant to national sentiment, anon.>You should spend more time reading the posts of the anons you are trying to mimic. Not an argument.>Confirmed for not living in a legal state. Not an argument. Thanks for playing.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)20:02:57 No. 1291717 >>1291714 >>Well, you're wrong, both economically and criminally. >Confirmed for not living in a legal state. Legal marijuana brings in billions of dollars in taxable revenue for states every year. California alone has made over 5B since 2018 https://www.cdtfa.ca.gov/news/23-07.htm#:~:text=Since%20January%202018%2C%20total%20cannabis,of%20cannabis%20tax%20reform%20legislation. >>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)20:05:59 No. 1291720 >>1291717 >Legal marijuana brings in billions of dollars in taxable revenue for states every year. Compare and contrast this to the black market, which has existed for fifty years at the very least.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)20:07:56 No. 1291721 >>1291720 >Compare and contrast this to the black market, which has existed for fifty years at the very least. The contrast is that the black market doesn't generate revenue for the state you absolute buffoon.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)20:09:47 No. 1291722 >>1291716 > "National polls say this thing is unpopular but everyone I know really likes it!" Anon, states have been holding massive weed conferences and festivals before you were born. There are literally acres of wild cannabis plants growing in the ditches of the I-5 corridor from California to Washington because smokers pick the seeds out of their weed and throwing it out the window. You're a faggot liar if you think weed only became popular in the last ten years.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)20:11:22 No. 1291723 >>1291721 >an industry doesn't generate revenue for the state >that means the industry doesn't exist Alright you guys need to kill yourselves, you're clearly too stupid to argue with.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)20:15:24 No. 1291726 >>1291722 >Anon, states have been holding massive weed conferences and festivals before you were born. This has absolutely nothing to do with voter sentiment, anon. >There are literally acres of wild cannabis plants growing in the ditches of the I-5 corridor from California to Washington because smokers pick the seeds out of their weed and throwing it out the window. You're a faggot liar if you think weed only became popular in the last ten years. I don't really know how to speak to you. You seem to conflate people who smoke weed with active voting populaces and I don't know how to bridge that gap for you. If you had bothered to read anything I said my claim was that ELECTORAL SUPPORT FOR LEGALIZING MARIJUANA has only peaked in the last ten years or so, not people who like and smoke weed. Please, anon, this conversation will go so much smoother if you just read what people are saying to you before reflexively responding.>>1291723 You're actually illiterate. You're not following the conversation at all.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)20:21:12 No. 1291731 >>1291721 >"Compare and contrast state revenue to the black market!" >"Well, the contrast is that the black market doesn't generate revenue for the state" >"OH SO YOU'RE SAYING THE BLACK MARKET DOESN'T EXIST???" Please go away. The adults are talking here.>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)21:29:55 No. 1291750 >>1291717 Now tell me how much the private prison system made off marijuana incarcerations in just one year>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)21:31:17 No. 1291751 >>1291750 Little to none>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)21:50:57 No. 1291754 >Biden literally pulling an Andrew Cuomo Ironic, his penning of the 1994 crime bill put thousands of people in jail for marijuana possession- now he thinks undoing his crime against humanity will save his election chances? Lmao>>
Anonymous 04/30/24(Tue)22:41:43 No. 1291766 >>1291754 Republicans loved it what are you talking about>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)00:05:26 No. 1291777 >>1291766 Well, none of us thought it was a bad thing. We're just pointing out your ideological inconsistency, knowing full well you don't really care.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)00:17:44 No. 1291783 >>1291754 The 1994 crime bill actually didn't alter drug crime laws or enforcement. Had to do with a ton of other shit, but not that. Not saying Biden never had involvement with the criminalization of drug use/sales, but you're just wrong on this shit. Also it's poetic, not ironic. He campaigned on reducing drug enforcement vis a vis pot and this is broadly politically popular, especially after decades of the drug war proving an abject and costly failure and pot turning out to have medical uses and being less destructive than alcohol or tobacco.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)00:25:14 No. 1291784 >>1291777 It's really funny to see people criticizing the democrats for the crime bill in the 90s when the entire point was Newt Gringrich's hyperconservative house of reps wouldn't allow passage of anything less stringent.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)00:50:14 No. 1291790 >>1291566 Because by now stoners actually read these laws and can identify a nothingburger as it isn't getting legalized for recreational use. Getting it legalized in so many states required us to take actual political action and with the internet making it so much easier to communicate, we've gotten a lot better at identifying this shit. Besides, we're all getting it decriminalized where it counts these days, in state law, or just doing it illegally already, nobody gives a shit. >>1291571 This.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)00:52:44 No. 1291792 >>1291751 Kamala Harris made plenty off it.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)01:47:12 No. 1291803 >>1291784 Biden authored the bill though. And I'm not criticizing it, but you Biden supporters and voters sure should be. Instead, you voted for Biden. What retards.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)01:50:46 No. 1291805 >>1291792 Shhhh. They don't know their biggest beefs with the US criminal justice system are due to their team. It's funny. Keep laughing at them.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)03:06:28 No. 1291813 >>1291803 >Instead, you voted for Biden. Because he said he'd loosen current laws.>What retards. He's loosening current laws, dipshit. That's what this thread is about. The>You fucking dipshit, you voted for the same bullshit that fucked up last time and expected a different outcome and just got the same bullshit again. criticism doesn't work when we actually get a different fucking outcome. How many more felonies do you want your candidate to get the opportunity to rack up, btw? Trump's not even promising to change. He's just promising to fail to make america great again again.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)03:12:09 No. 1291816 >>1291813 >The guy whose policy I hate said he'd reverse policy. Listen 'ere to this copin' sack'a bananas.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)05:37:10 No. 1291833 >>1291487 I hope the UK does this too. But the UK will never follo suit, because the UK is built to n misery and suffering. They can't allow people to get even a whiff of real laxation or freedom, lest they wake up and realise how much they've been scammed their whole life and their want more.>>
anon 05/01/24(Wed)07:13:46 No. 1291849 >>1291805 >Shhhh. They don't know their biggest beefs with the US criminal justice system are due to their team. >It's funny. Keep laughing at them. what did they mean by this?>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)09:16:52 No. 1291869 >>1291833 You guys have an election coming up, don't you? You could at least try to get the ball rolling.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)10:28:28 No. 1291880 >>1291813 >criticism doesn't work when we actually get a different fucking outcome. The big dripping dick of the criminal justice system finally removing itself from your asshole isn't proof the dick is now your friend because you voted correctly. It means you literally suffer from Stockholm syndrome and allow politicians to abuse you because you're a servile nitwit. Both Biden and Harris built their careers on putting people in jail for pot possession, Harris especially while she was in Cali. It has nothing to do with doing whats right or even what he promised, and you know it. The only reason he's doing this is because he's getting BTFO in the polls. Andrew Cuomo tried this in NY and they still literally ran him out of office so hard he left his dog behind. You're happy to be a lick-spittle for corruption and power as long as it throws you a bone in your cage once in a while. Pathetic.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)11:12:36 No. 1291888 >>1291698 every white person i know in CA buys from dispensaries>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)11:13:44 No. 1291889 >>1291698 >>1291888 I guess I should actually say LA, Humboldt I'm sure doesnt buy from dispensaries>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)12:46:46 No. 1291898 >>1291497 >>1291536 why do you think there are that many weed addicts?>>1291487 expect a massive crime spike. every single time weed has been legalized crimes has gone up because weed makes people violent retards>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)12:52:31 No. 1291900 >>1291898 How was the DARE conference?>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)13:03:30 No. 1291902 >>1291900 there are dozens of peer reviewed articles that show how in places like oregon violent crime and property crime when up when weed was legalized or in norway how weed was associated with violence in men. I don't understand why you retards think a highly addictive drug that fucks with people's brains doesn't do anything>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)13:12:22 No. 1291903 >>1291902 How's it feel to be perpetually stuck in 1950?>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)13:16:01 No. 1291904 Freedom hating Republicans just can't stop being fascist faggots >>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)13:24:03 No. 1291905 >>1291697 If it's legalized and that's all they care about, why would they bother to vote for him after the fact?>>1291904 Legalize weed, but ban menthols. Hmmm.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)13:24:49 No. 1291906 >>1291903 >no argument >muh 50s you are a weed addict >>1291904 >banning guns and speech is fine >no don't ban muh narcotic I am addicted to, this is fascism reeeeeeeeeee >>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)14:07:23 No. 1291912 >>1291906 >doesn't even realize he just got BTFO (You)>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)14:13:17 No. 1291915 >>1291889 CA allows you to get weed cards from """doctors""" for migraines. It has practically been legal way before it was legalized state-wide. At least one person you know probably grows as a hobby and gives it away for free.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)14:14:35 No. 1291916 >>1291816 >The guy whose policy I hate said he'd reverse policy. And he is actively doing that. This isn't a "we're looking into it" step. This is actual fucking progress, you fucking idiot.>>1291880 >The big dripping dick of the criminal justice system finally removing itself from your asshole isn't proof the dick is now your friend because you voted correctly I didn't say it was. Cope and seethe.>It has nothing to do with doing whats right or even what he promised, and you know it. I genuinely don't care what it has to do with as long as I get what I want.>You're happy to be a lick-spittle for corruption I'm not a Republican voter. You seem very mad that a good thing is happening.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)14:19:17 No. 1291919 >>1291912 I'm pretty sure you are just high and don't know what is going on>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)14:37:45 No. 1291924 >>1291916 >And he is actively doing that. This isn't a "we're looking into it" step. This is actual fucking progress, you fucking idiot. I'm not the idiot who voted for the guy that voted for everything I hate. Simply imagine how retarded one must be to willingly vote and advocate for the single worst person to be president since Jimmy Carter. Even worse that Biden has had a storied history of creating legislature and voting for legislature that you hate. What an idiot you are. It's astounding.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)14:40:54 No. 1291925 >>1291924 > the single worst person to be president since Jimmy Carter. More like FDR. Can't wait until the vaxx comes home to roost.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)14:43:02 No. 1291926 >>1291924 >>1291925 trump sure made you folks delusional>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)15:07:19 No. 1291931 >>1291919 You are "pretty sure" about that and a lot of other bullshit which has no basis in reality>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)15:10:44 No. 1291933 >>1291657 no we haven't>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)15:10:59 No. 1291934 >>1291931 yeah, you are high and have a small penis>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)15:41:51 No. 1291939 >>1291924 >I'm not the idiot who voted for the guy that voted for everything I hate. You voted for a subhuman conman that did nothing but make America shittier and corrupt government for his personal benefit. If you don't hate what you voted for, that just makes you stupid AND evil.>Even worse that Biden has had a storied history of creating legislature and voting for legislature that you hate. Yes. I know. I don't care. He's done a ton of shit I support in office. Would I rather someone who didn't fuck up a ton in the past be doing all this shit? Sure. But the shit getting done is what is most important. I can hate the guy for his past fuckups and still applaud and accept the good shit he's doing now.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)15:44:03 No. 1291940 >>1291925 >Can't wait until the vaxx comes home to roost. The vax released under Trump and he promotes it to this day. Anyway, shouldn't it have come home to roost by now? How many years of testing do you expect shit to go through before release?>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)15:48:03 No. 1291941 >>1291905 >Hey this guy legalized that thing we've been asking about for decades now. I wonder what else he might give us I'd assume that line of logic is what Biden and his team are hoping for if he were to legalize it.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)15:58:44 No. 1291942 >>1291939 >You voted for a subhuman conman that did nothing but make America shittier by what metrics, cripple?>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)16:03:05 No. 1291943 >>1291934 Only in your head>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)16:31:36 No. 1291947 >>1291942 >by what metrics, cripple? Employment, life expectancy, extra judicial killings, foreign relations, civil rights, governmental ethics, national security, honestly you'd be hard-pressed to come up with a metric Trump didn't make worse.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)17:06:40 No. 1291948 >>1291947 Ironically, operation warp speed was pretty based. Its funny that Trump wanted to take a victory lap for using U.S. ingenuity to produce a vaccine at lightning speed but his followers are so schizophrenic and conspiracy brained that he had to stop and do a complete 180.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)17:17:47 No. 1291950 >>1291948 You have to keep in mind at the time Operation Warp Speed was going on, before the conspiracy theories about the origin took over, Trump's followers were still denying that the virus existed.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)18:03:23 No. 1291975 >>1291950 I seem to remember them going to party in China town after calling the dRumpf a rassist.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)18:10:19 No. 1291980 >>1291975 I seem to remember the reason for Nancy's visit to Chinatown was to have a press conference denouncing Trump calling it the "China Virus" because asian people in San Francisco were getting their teeth knocked in by chuds who thought they spread it.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)18:15:59 No. 1291982 >>1291975 >Trump supporters are retarded and were saying the virus didn't exist while hundreds of thousands of people were dying >"YEAH WELL NANCY PELOSI DID THIS THING ONE TIME!" Nice whatabout.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)18:28:05 No. 1291985 >>1291980 Sorry the blacks did that. Democrats are terrible people.>>1291982 >Does a strawman >Complains about a whataboutism Point that critical lens at yourself, faggot.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)18:28:18 No. 1291986 >>1291980 You must have a poor memory then because chuds aren't real. Just your left-wing indoctrination.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)18:29:45 No. 1291987 >>1291986 you're not real?>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)18:32:15 No. 1291989 >>1291947 Crippletroon headcanon is wild asf.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)18:34:47 No. 1291991 >>1291985 >Does a strawman What part about Trump supporters massively spreading anti-vax conspiracies and coining the phrase "plandemic" to imply that the virus wasn't real and orchestrated by the government who covers up ivermectin research and inflates death numbers a strawman? Which part of that is not accurate?>Point that critical lens at yourself, faggot. There's nothing I can say that will make sense to you were not conscious during 2019-Present.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)18:35:39 No. 1291992 >>1291989 >Literally cannot stop thinking about trannies Seek help>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)21:23:46 No. 1292063 >>1291986 You live in a fantasy world.>>
Anonymous 05/01/24(Wed)21:54:37 No. 1292080 >>1291989 What the fuck is a crippletroon?>>
Anonymous 05/02/24(Thu)00:32:53 No. 1292137 >>1291992 Crippletroon is literally a tranny though.>>
Anonymous 05/02/24(Thu)00:34:11 No. 1292140 >>1292080 Check the 4chan invasion Discord. He posts pics of his micro penis and all the faggots call it a clit. LMFAO.>>
Anonymous 05/02/24(Thu)00:37:22 No. 1292142 >>1291991 >What part about Trump supporters massively spreading anti-vax conspiracies and coining the phrase "plandemic" to imply that the virus wasn't real and orchestrated by the government who covers up ivermectin research and inflates death numbers a strawman? Which part of that is not accurate? The part where blacks attacked the Chinese over the China virus which came from a Chinese lab, nice attempt at goal post shifting. Besides that, many people who aren't Trump supporters now believe it was a plandemic. In fact, it was obviously a plandemic orchestrated by the UN/WEF/WHO.>>
Anonymous 05/02/24(Thu)13:17:38 No. 1292281 >>1292142 >>>/x/ >>
Anonymous 05/02/24(Thu)17:57:15 No. 1292336 >>1292281 Well-established facts don't belong on /x/, Slapnuts.>>
Anonymous 05/02/24(Thu)22:18:16 No. 1292382 >>1292336 Your alternative facts aren't real.>>
Anonymous 05/03/24(Fri)12:19:30 No. 1292469 >>1291487 Since when does what Berlin does matter anyway?>>
Anonymous 05/03/24(Fri)14:52:34 No. 1292521 >>1292469 Since now when marijuana is being decriminalized in America.>>
Anonymous 05/03/24(Fri)15:15:02 No. 1292536 >>1292521 But it isn't. It's still going to be illegal at the federal level.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.