>>1366824
Except that isn't what's happening.

An existing law to a subset of gun has expanded. Still limited to "assualt weapons". As they belong on a battlefield, a battlefield would be a good place to put them - as opposed to simply destroying them.

>>1366913
Anon... Love is a battlefield...

>>1366913
No one knows because OP is a spammer faggot who never pastes the article text

>>1366824
>Except that isn't what's happening.
That is exactly whats happening, you don't even deny it in your attempt to explain in the next sentence.

>As they belong on a battlefield,
They belong in the hands of the Canadian people, to protect them from fascists like Trudeau

>>1366913
>Semi-automatic rifle invented in 1885, common ever since. Means 'pull the trigger, one bullet comes out'. uses low, small, intermediate, or heavy calibers.
>Assault rifle invented 1944. Can be semi-automatic or fully automaitc. Uses intermediate calibers. Essentially restricted to military forces since invention.
>Goofy fudd morons think semi-automatic rifles that kinda' look like assault rifles are SCARY! Invent new meaningless term "assault weapons" to vilify SCARY! semi-auto rifles so other morons think they are eeeeeeee-vuuuuuuul army-only guns of dooooooom!
You, sir, are a moron.

>>1366913
>Except that isn't what's happening.
its literally what is happening, you literally admit it in the next sentence, tranni boi
>An existing law to a subset of gun has expanded. Still limited to "assualt weapons".
so guns are being taken. thanks for conceding that
>As they belong on a battlefield, a battlefield would be a good place to put them - as opposed to simply destroying them.
they belong in private hands. canada wants to ban them because canada plans on doing the holocaust but for real
>>1366920
not in the rules, tranni boi. are you upset on account of your dick hole has become infected after it got cut off?

>>1366926
>>1366927
both of these are very good posts. >>1366913 was blown the fuck out

>>1366926
This isn't a sentiment I recieve from the candian people. Can you provision conflicting evidence?

And the next sentence explains - like the article if you'd read it - what is happening.

>>1367091
>canada plans on doing the holocaust but for real
Evidence?

>>1367092
You can think that if you wish.

>>1367129
Anon you should stop responding to bait threads

>>1367129
>This isn't a sentiment I recieve from the candian people. Can you provision conflicting evidence?
https://thegunblog.ca/2021/12/24/almost-100-of-gun-owners-have-so-far-rejected-trudeaus-confiscations-ipolitics-reports/
there was a 99.8% rejection rate of that rat fuck tyrant's voluntary confiscation a few years ago
>Evidence?
everyone who is in favor of gun control only want gun control so the government can do mass murder.
>You can think that if you wish.
you can reddit space and seethe
>>>1367130
sametranni boi

>>1366913
>Except that isn't what's happening.
First sentence of the article:
>OTTAWA, Ontario (AP) — Canada said Thursday it is outlawing another 324 firearm varieties — guns the public safety minister said belong on the battlefield, not in the hands of hunters or sport shooters.

>As they belong on a battlefield
They don't. Inb4 nobody needs blah blah blah.

>a battlefield would be a good place to put them
Are the Russian squirrels? Because if not, can you explain to me how sending Ukranians .22 caliber pistols is going to help the war effort?

>>1367141
>there was a 99.8% rejection rate of that rat fuck tyrant's voluntary confiscation a few years ago
You really need a lesson in what "tyrant" is - but good news, that's coming for you. If this is such a probelm for candians, how come I only hear murricans crying?

>everyone who is in favor of gun control only want gun control so the government can do mass murder.
That's not evidence, that's speculation. Based on paranioa and fear more than evidence and logic. If it had any logical or evidential founding you would of leant on that first.

>you can reddit space and seethe
The actual procedure is: Point and laugh at the spastic.

>>1367152
explain to me how sending Ukranians .22 caliber pistols is going to help the war effort?
Explain to me how a .22 caliber pistol can be catagorised as an "assault style weapon".
As for it's use over in russia, I'm seeing some of their troops being frontlined with "airsoft" grade bodyarmor...

>>1367196
>explain to me how sending Ukranians .22 caliber pistols is going to help the war effort?
I'm not. Why would I? I'm arguing that this gun ban is retarded, and the idea of confiscating .22 pistols to send to Ukraine is even more retarded.

>Explain to me how a .22 caliber pistol can be catagorised as an "assault style weapon".
Again, you got the complete opposite of what I'm saying.

>>1367217
That first bit you responded to was yours. I neglected the '>' to push it as greentext. The next line is of more use to you.

If I've grasped the opposite of what you're saying, what are you trying to say?

>>1367196
>You really need a lesson in what "tyrant" is
holy shit you are gay and retarded. when 99.8% don't comply with a voluntary law so you make it mandatory, it is clearly unpopular and tyrannical.
>- but good news, that's coming for you
nope, we kicked the dems out of the government
> If this is such a probelm for candians, how come I only hear murricans crying?
99.8% of gun owning canadians didn't comply and alberta is trying to ban gun laws, retardo. its because you don't do research
https://globalnews.ca/news/10772415/danielle-smith-alberta-bill-of-rights-amendments/
>That's not evidence, that's speculation. Based on paranioa and fear more than evidence and logic. If it had any logical or evidential founding you would of leant on that first.
its literally what the majority of countries with gun control have done. its also where most gun control comes from. The US and bongland didn't have major gun control until post WWI when the governments were afraid WWI vets would revolt against the aristocracy
>The actual procedure is: Point and laugh at the spastic.
which is you, reddit spacing tranni boi

>>1367224
>what are you trying to say?
>this gun ban is retarded, and the idea of confiscating .22 pistols to send to Ukraine is even more retarded.

>>1367196
>>1367224
>Explain to me how a .22 caliber pistol can be catagorised as an "assault style weapon".
https://thegunblog.ca/2024/12/05/ban-list-of-324-newly-prohibited-rifle-models/
its on the fucking list, retardo
>ARX160-22 Pistol
>PLR-22

>>1367231
I'll pave over the first two points. I'll wait until you're eating that meal. You might be capable of understanding then.
> its because you don't do research
I've yet to occur a single canadian complain of this. I'm exposed to a fair few. I've enountered murricans who have no skin in the game throwing tantrums about it however. Granted, I'm not patrolling their streets taking polls - limiting to the easily proven example of this thread, there's you being vocal and ... another murrican. Looks like canadians have a massive problem with this...

>The US and bongland didn't have major gun control until post WWI when the governments were afraid WWI vets would revolt against the aristocracy
And yet, after enacting 'gun control' they failed to systematically erradicate large swathes of their population. Way to go with proving your own point retarded.

>which is you, reddit spacing tranni boi
You're free to laugh, if this is your prerogative. The true measure will be which one of us is capable of maintaining this the longest. As my country isn't falling to shit with every move being made to either accelerate or prolong this, I wish you luck.

>>1367237
First provisioned link didn't specify models. Yours does.
>ARX160-22 Pistol
It says 'pistol' but the manufacturer says 'Assult rifle'. It's what the "AR" stands for. According to the manufacturer, not a pistol.
>PLR-22
Might qualify as pistol, tho if had full auto I'd say "SMG". "Designed for target shooting, plinking, or small game hunting." I'd surmise it's quite likely only in the list 'cause someone looked at it n got skurred by the picture.

>>1367244
>I'll pave over the first two points. I'll wait until you're eating that meal. You might be capable of understanding then.
I accept your concession that this is tyranny, trump is anti tyranny and you have no dick
>I've yet to occur a single canadian complain of this. I'm exposed to a fair few. I've enountered murricans who have no skin in the game throwing tantrums about it however.
you live in a bubble and only consume propaganda
> Looks like canadians have a massive problem with this...
I agree, that is why there is a 99.8% noncompliance rate
>And yet, after enacting 'gun control' they failed to systematically erradicate large swathes of their population. Way to go with proving your own point retarded.
FDR signed the NFA in 1934 and then put Americans into concentration camps in 1942
Bongs passed major gun control in india in 1878 and 1907 and then intentionally caused multiple famines as an act of genocide.
what is it like being an ignorant retard?
>You're free to laugh, if this is your prerogative. The true measure will be which one of us is capable of maintaining this the longest. As my country isn't falling to shit with every move being made to either accelerate or prolong this, I wish you luck.
you live in a shithole that doesn't have freedom or toilets. the USA owns you and Trump is going to undo all the damage brandon did like he undid the obongo damage.

>>1367248
>First provisioned link didn't specify models. Yours does.
because you are too retarded to google
>It says 'pistol' but the manufacturer says 'Assult rifle'. It's what the "AR" stands for. According to the manufacturer, not a pistol.
source? the manufacturer says pistol because its a pistol, it doesn't have a stock.
>It's what the "AR" stands for.
source retardo? the AR in AR 15 doesn't stand for Assault Rifle either
>Might qualify as pistol, tho if had full auto I'd say "SMG".
its fucking kelteck. it isn't full auto. you are arguing from a place or ignorance and retardation
>"Designed for target shooting, plinking, or small game hunting." I'd surmise it's quite likely only in the list 'cause someone looked at it n got skurred by the picture.
every gun on the list is on the list because a retard like you looked at a pic and got scared.

>>1367252
Trump is tyranny incarnate. He had checks and measures to limit his impact last time. He's already started to rid himself of these. Look at teh power structure he's creating. Any third world dicator would be proud. I'd rather have "no dick" than be sucking on the penis of an orange faced joke of a person that somehow failed to sell steak to murricans.

If I'm in a bubble, it's a lot more expansive than yours. It includes yours. Unlike yours it features a large pool of viewpoints from across the political spectrum, from across many countries and cultures. As for the propaganda, you're the one with the links from people with vested interests and narratives to impose. I'm the one that extracts tangible data for analysis.

Putting people of japanese descent et al into camps in the '40s didn't result in a genocide, did it? The famines in india are unrelated to gun control, targeted at the people who wouldn't of been allowed to hold guns regardless of if they had been able to afford them - they was still in the caste system.

I live somewhere that has enough freedom for a decent selection of the world's refugee to aim for here, and my toilet works perfectly well, thank-you. The USA doesn't own me, or even parts of my country. It rents some, which is just us using your taxpayer dollars in supplimenting our defence budget in exchange for something we have no need or want of.

Trump is going to install more damage - you still have not recovered from the damage he caused last time. Only this time there's going to less in the way of his schemes that have only one possible outcome for you.

I do hope you manage to retain this level of optimism when most of your country is on fire because people cannot afford to eat. It'll make the pointing and laughing that much sweeter.

>>1367248
>Might qualify as pistol, tho if had full auto
What Canadian firearm in the last 30 years is full-auto?

>>1367248
>but the manufacturer says 'Assult rifle'. It's what the "AR" stands for.
.......
Somebody needs to find this anon and beat the shit out of him. If there was ever justification for hiring a discord hitman with dogecoins to target someone online, this is that time.

>>1367253
>because you are too retarded to google
No. I'm too sane to use something that openly states results are returned on a per-person basis, based on what the algorythm thinks about you. I will concede I'm too lazy to seek the information. But there again, I shouldn't have to. It should already be here. Blame that.

>source? the manufacturer says pistol because its a pistol, it doesn't have a stock.
"The Beretta ARX160 is an Italian modular assault rifle manufactured by Beretta. " (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beretta_ARX160#Variants)
"The Beretta ARX160 assault rifle " (https://www.berettadefense.com/products/arx160-16-bdt/)
"Enter the next generation ARX160 rifle from Beretta." (https://smallarmsreview.com/the-next-generation-italian-combat-rifle-the-beretta-arx160-arx100/)
Don't see nowhere catagorising it as 'pistol'. The manufactuer doesn't make it no more and I CBA to dig through archives.
If all it takes to make a pistol is the lack of a stock, then you rip the stock off a AK or an M16, that make it a pistol? Or just a rifle without a stock?

>source retardo? the AR in AR 15 doesn't stand for Assault Rifle either
Got me there. I'm not able to provision evidence. With italish as native, I strongly doubt the "A" is for "armalite" tho.

>its fucking kelteck. it isn't full auto. you are arguing from a place or ignorance and retardation
Hence: "if it had full auto". What was that about ignorance and retardation?

>every gun on the list is on the list because a retard like you looked at a pic and got scared.
My retardations don't extend that far. I'm not apheared of pictures of guns. Or even the real thing. If they've not pulled the trigger in 10s they're just posing and want you to relieve them of this weapon to demonstrate proper handling. I'm not "anti-gun" as you appear to think. I'm just trying to inject some sense into the knee-jerk reaction of: "they're comming for muh guns" - despite them being nowhere close to that.

>>1367268
>With italish as native, I strongly doubt the "A" is for "armalite" tho.
NTA are you fucking kidding me right now? Y'know what you're too fucking retarded to have a conversation. Go fuck off and don't come back until you learn how to google basic shit.

>>1367268
> I strongly doubt the "A" is for "armalite" tho.
ArmaLite Rifle. It's a brand name. AR-15 is literally ArmaLite Rifle-15. The noguns really did a number on you, huh?
Noguns are literally retarded on the topic of guns.
You don't get to have a valid opinion on anything now.

>>1367269
If you need screwgle, you're the retarded one. Some of us have been extracting data from the internet since before HTTP, let alone before screwgle, was a thing. Using a single data point sets you up for a single point of failure.

Fuck off back to tw@r until you manage to work out how algorythmically filtering results based on your previous input negatively impacts the scope of results.

>>1367272
>If you need screwgle
Which I don't. Unlike you, I already knew what the fucking A in AR meant.

>>1367272
>Some of us have been extracting data from the internet since before HTTP,
Yet you're still a retard after all the supposed data collection. How is this possible?
It might be because we're not on the topic of furry porn? That's my guess anyway.

>>1367274
For the AR-15? As previously pointed out, brand name. For the AR160? I strongly doubt this stands for 'armalite'. Feel free to prove me wrong.

>>1367276
>For the AR160? I strongly doubt this stands for 'armalite'.
In that case it stands for "Automatic Rifle".
And the ARxx/ARxxx series of weapons are literally made for the military.
Perhaps this is why retards and Democrat law makers think AR style weapons are "weapons of war" since they've rubber stamped military spending on Automatic Rifles and literally have no clue.

>>1367277
So.. for purpose we can agree 'assualt' and 'automatic' are reasonably interchangable?
Regardless, doesn't detract from the fact I see it listed everywhere as 'assualt rifle'. Not "pistol".

>>1367259
>Trump is tyranny incarnate.
nope. trump has never done anything tyranical. dems just hate him because they are tyrants who want to ban guns
>If I'm in a bubble, it's a lot more expansive than yours. It includes yours
no, you live in a bubble and in every thread you argue from a place of ignorance and retardation about a country you don't even live in
>Putting people of japanese descent et al into camps in the '40s didn't result in a genocide, did it?
top keke, you are arguing in favor of fucking concentration camps
>The famines in india are unrelated to gun control, targeted at the people who wouldn't of been allowed to hold guns regardless of if they had been able to afford them - they was still in the caste system.
they literally banned guns for the indians to prevent the indians from fighting back against the famines and attempted genocides, faggot
>I live somewhere that has enough freedom for a decent selection of the world's refugee to aim for here,
you live in australia, you are living in a third world colony of the US and you have no toilet
>Trump is going to install more damage - you still have not recovered from the damage he caused last time. Only this time there's going to less in the way of his schemes that have only one possible outcome for you.
trump literally didn't do any damage last time. all he did was fix the economy. you listen to chinese propaganda
>I do hope you manage to retain this level of optimism when most of your country is on fire because people cannot afford to eat. It'll make the pointing and laughing that much sweeter.
people can't afford to eat because of biden and the dems 1 in 3 nyc residents is getting food from food banks. But don't worry, trump will fix it like he fixed obongo's shitty economy last time, tranni boi

>>1367283
Sure. I can agree to that, despite you being oblivious to the implications of doing so.
The Armalite Rifle platform bored for pistol ammunition.
The AR70/90/160/200 platform is an automatic rifle platform.
Do you understand the difference between the types of ammunition?
So what else can be agreed upon at this point?

>>1367268
> I will concede I'm too lazy to seek the information. But there again, I shouldn't have to. It should already be here. Blame that.
good, thanks for admitting you are a fucking retard who makes arguments based on your own ignorance and then demands to be spoon fed
>"The Beretta ARX160 is
>Don't see nowhere catagorising it as 'pistol'. The manufactuer doesn't make it no more
this isn't an ARX-160 retard. its an ARX-160 22 pistol. the only thing it has related to the ARX-160 would be cosmetic features. they don't shoot the same bullet and they don't even use the same operating system. its like comparing a sports car to a golf cart that has a fake sports car shell on it
>and I CBA to dig through archives.
because you are a lazy retard who argues from a place of ignorance
>If all it takes to make a pistol is the lack of a stock, then you rip the stock off a AK or an M16, that make it a pistol? Or just a rifle without a stock?
it literally makes it a pistol. that is literally the legal definition of a pistol
>Got me there. I'm not able to provision evidence.
cool, you demand evidence but don't proved any when asked, almost like you are arguing in bad faith and trying to waste people's time
>Hence: "if it had full auto".
and if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle
>What was that about ignorance and retardation?
the thing you keep doing
>My retardations don't extend that far.
it does
>I'm not apheared of pictures of guns. Or even the real thing. If they've not pulled the trigger in 10s they're just posing and want you to relieve them of this weapon to demonstrate proper handling.
is that in english?
>I'm not "anti-gun" as you appear to think. I'm just trying to inject some sense into the knee-jerk reaction of: "they're comming for muh guns" - despite them being nowhere close to that.
they are literally commies taking people's guns you anti gun retard
>>1367264
>>1367265
good posts

>>1367269
>>1367271
good points
>>1367272
holy fucking retarded seetheola
>>1367276
why do you do this? why do you make shit up and then demand others look it up but you won't provide any sources yourself? you just bad faith demand others waste their time

>>1367283
>>1367310
it isn't an ARX-160 that got banned, its an ARX-160 22 pistol. that means they banned a blow back .22lr (basically a 10/22) that was in a shell to look like an ARX-160 that didn't have a stock and was legally a pistol. the model banned by name literally says "pistol" in the ban name. its like banning a golf cart that has a sports car shell on it even though its a fucking golf cart with a golf cart engine

>>1367237
FFS, the gun grabbing idiots are calling pistols assault weapons now

>>1367248
>but the manufacturer says 'Assult rifle'. It's what the "AR" stands for
The average knowledge of the average gun grabber

>>1367283
>So.. for purpose we can agree 'assualt' and 'automatic' are reasonably interchangable?
No
The definition of Assault Rifle was given here
>>1366927
on Saturday.
An Assault Rifle is
>A rifle firing an intermediate cartridge that is capable of both semi-automatic and fully automatic fire.
The M-2 is fully automatic, but it does not fire an intermediate cartridge and is not capable of semi-automatic fire so it is not an assault rifle.
The ARX-160 pistol is not a rifle, it does not fire an intermediate cartridge, and it is not capable of fully automatic fire. it is not an assault rifle.

This is very, very simple if your IQ is over 80

aw sweet a schizo thread