The allegations of censorship come amid a heated debate about immigration in the US.

It was partially sparked when Donald Trump named Indian-born entrepreneur Sriram Krishnan as his adviser on artificial intelligence, a move supported by tech-billionaire-turned-government-official Musk.

Trump's anti-immigration supporters attacked the appointment, with one prominent MAGA voice, Laura Loomer, calling it "deeply disturbing".

She now claims around "75% of the replies" on her account are being marked as probable spam by Musk's platform after an online spat with the billionaire.

Tesla founder Musk - who was born in South Africa and became a US citizen in 2002 - has voiced his support for skilled immigration for a long time.

Last year, he told his followers: "We should greatly increase legal immigration of anyone who is hard-working, honest and loves America.

"Every such person is an asset to the country.

"But massive illegal immigration of people we know nothing about is insane."

He has reiterated this view multiple times since, posting on Christmas Day: "The number of people who are super talented engineers AND super motivated in the USA is far too low.

"Think of this like a pro sports team: if you want your TEAM to win the championship, you need to recruit top talent wherever they may be."

>>1371162
>accused
I'm sure it's a coincidence that a dozen accounts that joined in on a public disagreement with him all got their verification badges revoked, their ability to post suspended, and some of their accounts banned right after.

Remember when we warned you retards that Musk's "free speech" extended only as far as he allowed it to? Welcome to the thing we warned you about when he bought the fucking app.

>B..b..but Musk was supposed to be our based tech savior
The leopards would NEVER eat my face

>>1371163
>"Think of this like a pro sports team: if you want your TEAM to win the championship, you need to recruit top talent wherever they may be."
>cut all the local children from the school sports team and replace them with better players from out of town
>attendence at games drops

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

>Gro(y)pers denied their right to have opinions on Xitter by Elol
>so much as think of having wrong opinions about Muskrat wanting millions of Indians in the US, Elol mjolnirs them
Is your 'Savior of the White Right' still 'based', rightards? Either Elol still is or he isn't. If he isn't, then it's all your fault for thinking your precious 'defender of free speech' isn't, now he's all for Indian rights over white rights.
Time to scrap the word 'Based', white rightards: it's done you no favors.

This is one of the oddest post-election democrat cope threads I've seen so far

>>1371182
Very ironic post

>>1371162
Thank God for Elon Musk and his shitpost memes. X is the home of free speech.

>>1371188
I went out and bought some gay beer, and then I got mad when I drank the beer and there was a rainbow on it

>>1371191
I bought 10 cans of that fag beer & drunk all them quick & I saw a rainbow & I followed the rainbow but no pot o' gold at the end but there was a cute fag leprechaun who used his magic to make me have gay sex with him. I was not of free volition. Elon is a genius, you tranny, and he won't make us PAY, PAL.

It's a private site, suck it up liberals

>>1371162
>Rich man tweets things right wingers want to hear
>Right wingers bust in their pants and immediately fall in love with him
>People who don't let Fox News tell them what to believe warn them the rich man is lying to them
>Right wingers throw temper tantrum and accuse anyone who doesn't actively fellate rich man of being a RINO or commie faggot
>Rich man immediately goes back on everything he said and actively fucks over right wingers
>Right wingers continue to defend rich man as he fucks them in the ass
>Rest of country has to continue to pretend right wingers have valid opinions that should be respected, all while they act as puppets for rich man every single time
It would be funny if it weren't so tragically predictable

>>1371232
To be fair, the Dems are aligned with the rich (albeit a different tribe of richfags than the Reps), and do their best to crush any lefty economic proposals from members like Sanders or Warren. They aren't as brazen with it as Elon and Trump right now, but there's a reason why healthcare has not been addressed, despite the vast majority of people seeing it as a collective blade of Damocles hanging over them. Even relatively well off Americans with "good" insurance plans have nightmares over medical bankruptcy. Then there's the food regulations, which are ridiculously bad. There's a reason why Americans will lose wait traveling abroad, despite not shifting their eating habits all that much. Finally, Dems and Reps have both done a shit job of running cities since they don't want to pay for infrastructure since that would require messing with the rich. Compare 95% of American cities to any Asian or Western Euro city of equivalent pop and the urban decay is stark in America.

This all goes back to money. Pelosi and Clinton each have over 240 million dollars each in net worth. Legalized corruption (lobbying and dark money) keep federal and state legislatures paralyzed. No matter the party, you have oligarchy. The only difference is that some oligarchs are more okay with rainbowshit while others are not.

To conclude:

>Despite the seemingly strong empirical support in previous studies for theories of majoritarian democracy, our analyses suggest that majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts. Americans do enjoy many features central to democratic governance, such as regular elections, freedom of speech and association, and a widespread (if still contested) franchise. But we believe that if policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then America’s claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened.
-Dr. Martin Gilens (Princeton)

>>1371162
ok? and? monetization is a privilege not a right. twitter is still infinitely better then with jack dorsey.

>>1371251
All accounts with Project Groyper permanently blanket suspended https://xcancel.com/AFpost/status/1872800876911616030

>>1371255
Why do you trannies complain incessantly about about nazis on social media, but somehow you become the champions of free speech whenever a platform decides to remove the honest to god mentally ill people, bad actors, and paid shills, from the platform?

>>1371255
i hate libshits and the far-left but if its against spammers then sure why not. Wish he'd ban more of the far-left lunatics too

>>1371262
They're not advocating for free speech absolutism. It was Elon (and the people who supported him) who justified his buying of twitter because he claimed to be such a champion of free speech. But it turns out that he'll ban and demonetize you if you disagree with him politically, just like those radical leftists running old twitter.

>>1371264
>only starts banning people for spam after he has a falling out with them

>>1371264
You sound like a far right lunatic. I bet you're a "libertarian". Libertarians are the perfect example of The Dunning–Kruger effect in action. Musk has this mental condition, besides other mentalnj048mkess.

>>1371265
Firstly. Elon isn't banning anyone just because they disagree with him. All of the people that got banned were acting like degenerates. It's how private platform and he has the right to just ban you if you start directly insulting him on his personal page. That has jack shit to do with your free speech. You faggots didn't have a problem when Jack was running out and employing literal FBI agents.

Secondly, he very explicitly said that hate speech isn't allowed . The constitution gives you free speech, but you still have consequences if you want to be retarded with what you say. Elon is infinitely more lenient than old twitter or reddit with what you can say.

You're just a retarded tranny arguing in bad faith though

>>1371269
I seem to of seen a thread where the thing that triggered musk into account and post removal was the challenge that he entered on a H1B visa, with supporting data supplied by 'grok'.

I've not seen the entire stream of data, but three of the five deleted posts was 'civilised'. From context of musk's shit still visable I'm operating under the assumption it whent loosely: where you hear that? Grok! Bullshit. I just fucking pasted it! your full of shit » goodbye account.

Looks like he b& 'em for disagreements to me.

Full disclosure: I wasn't a fan of 'old tw@r'. I detest and actively avoid docile media.

>The constitution gives you free speech
In america. Remind me again, where is 'the internet' located?

>>1371269
lmao Musk was the same dude who said he was a free speech absolutist. And the real issue is this whole position is completely opposite to Trump's entire campaign. You literally elected him to solve "da great replacement" and now he's going to implement it, but in the sense of giving all your jobs to people he can abuse even more.

MAGA is just now realizing Trump and his cabinet are a massive scam and they were the marks.

>>1371266
>muh it's against free speech he's not letting people earn a living on his platform. But its fine when it was under jack dorsey that was definitely a free speech paltform then when it was rampant with CP and half the political sphere that's more then the majority weren't allowed to talk.
>>1371265
>>1371279
This reminds me of that white guys for harris bullshit where it turns out it was a troll who impersonated people to receive donations. But i guess you can't really expect far-left retards to do any research they'll hop onto anything that fits their agenda.

>>1371294
Last time I checked:
>Musk literally personally unbanned someone who posted cp
>Musk also implemented new algorithm that forces his posts (and thus his politics) into everyone's feeds and shadowbans anyone against him
>Dorsey never literally removed things people paid for because they insulted him

>>1371298
https://x.com/elizableu/status/1566255230374842369
meanwhile pre-elon CP was endorsed by jack dorsey and his far-left crew even if the victims came out and showed their ID that they were underaged twitter refused to remove the videos.

"Reminder: a 13 year old minor survivor begged Twitter to remove a video sexually exploiting him.
Twitter reviewed the content and said NO.
They had his government ID showing that he was a minor at the time.
The video had over 160k views. Over 2k retweets."

"This individual made 8k selling child sexual exploitation material on Twitter. Some of the videos were of minor survivors crying and begging to not be exploited. Over 40+ minor male survivors.
He recently pled guilty."

https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/child-sex-abuser-twitter
and before you go muh its an opinion piece, the culprit who got 18 years is named and you can look up their criminal history. "Savannah Noel Hawthorne"

>>1371298
>>Musk also implemented new algorithm that forces his posts (and thus his politics) into everyone's feeds and shadowbans anyone against him
have you tried idk blocking elon musk's twitter account? The algorithm doesn't recommend him because he forced it to it's because he's an active poster with the highest follower count, that's how algorithms work popular people get more attention. He's far and away the biggest beating 2nd place Obama by over 70 million followers. The shadow banning is just made up nonsense you literally don't have the tools to prove it.

Jack dorsey banned a ton of of political discussions which is infinitely worst. I've yet to see Elon do a mass ban spree for anything beyond spam and impersonations.

>>1371303
lmao this was still happening, and probably is currently happening, under Musk.
>https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/musk-twitter-elon-child-abuse-material-rcna63621
Basically new boss, same as the old boss but with an even more fragile ego.

>>1371304
>have you tried idk blocking elon musk's twitter account?
They removed the ability to not see posts from people you block lmao.

>>1371306
>shill media
The person who reported on the CP cases openly stated Elon twitter is doing what jack dorsey didn't and allowing outsiders the tools to investigate instead of keeping it behind closed doors.
https://x.com/elizableu/status/1602800827089170432
but there you go supporting legacy media that's using whatever avenue they can to attack new twitter up to and including attacking people trying to expose twitter's horrendous moderation and supporting CP.
Fuck you.
>>1371307
https://x.com/PopBase/status/1838316636316766219
Are you stupid or am i missing something? It works the complete opposite way around. Where twitter used to hide your feed from users you've blocked.
Now they can still see your feed but can't interact with it.

dont worry France has seen worse these days..

>>1371308
Good post

>>1371308
>The person who reported on the CP cases openly stated Elon twitter is doing what jack dorsey didn't and allowing outsiders the tools to investigate instead of keeping it behind closed doors.
This is from before that article. They made a big display when Musk came in but didn't do shit.

>Now they can still see your feed but can't interact with it.
That's the problem fuckhead. I can block musk but I can still see his posts.

>>1371318
There's literally a mute button, you pearl clutching tranny. I like Elon and follow him, but I turn off his reposts because he does retweet too much retarded shit. It's still infinitely better than any liberal shit

>>1371318
>This is from before that article. They made a big display when Musk came in but didn't do shit.
except that's objectively wrong and there's even evidence of shill media smearing people who Elon is partnering with to investigate the child explotation and CP cases that WERE happening under jack dorsey.

You really aren't the brightest are you, you're literally siding with people who want to make the narriative "ELON TWITTER IS WORST THEN EVER" to the point they're literally helping cover up the asses of people releasing CP because that'd go against their narrative.

>>1371318
>>1371306
tell me again how its fair to hold Elon accountable for not fixing Twitter's CP problems immediately in lets see 4 months when he's opening investigations and actually working solving the issues that have been going on for oh idk fucking 16 years. and how that makes twitter somehow worst now that they're actually fixing the issues?

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/115286/documents/HHRG-118-GO00-20230208-SD013.pdf

>>1371323
Good post

Isn't Musk a migrant?

>>1371321
>>1371323
Musk fired most of the moderation team. He literally reduced their ability to remove this shit and let people who post this get verified. Every effort he's made towards it has been pure lip-service, like most of his promises.

Oh, and a few months back he literally got sued in Australian court for not actually showing what they were doing to ensure safety, and lost.
>https://time.com/7039433/australia-court-x-elon-musk-social-media-regulation/

Stop riding his dick.

>>1371323
>tell me again how its fair to hold Elon accountable for not fixing Twitter's CP problems immediately in lets see 4 months
He's owned twitter for two years now retard.

>>1371269
>it's how private platform and he has the right to just ban you
That’s true but not what he claimed to be buying twitter for.

>>1371294
>its fine when it was under jack dorsey that was definitely a free speech platform
I don’t think that Jack Doresy ever described old Twitter as a “free speech” platform.

>>1371328
the moderation team that got twitter sued for refusing to take down CP because "it doesn't violate their policies"
>>1371331
are you fucking retarded look at the fucking article >>1371306 posted and tell me what date it was posted. Fuck you for being an american retard you make the west look bad
>>1371335
No but you far-left commentators with huge followings trying to gaslight people into saying jack dorsey is a free speech absolutionists. Like legal eagle.

>>1371336
Far-left loonies lying to their audiences is not the same as Elon, the owner, lying to everyone. If it was just the far-right crazies claiming that the purchase of Twitter was for free speech, I wouldn’t see Elon as a hypocrite in this case.

>>1371331
Elon has so many bot farms defending his ego online at this point that it's no surprise some of them don't get their talking points updated frequently enough

>>1371338
and where's the lie exactly? or are you just shoving words into people's mouths by being a double standard hypocrite.
If so please just kys.

>>1371341
Elon claimed to be a free speech absolutist and specifically bought twitter for that reason.

>>1371342
and i'm sure you'll be happy to properly quote him right also you'll also definitely show the sort of tweets that got the allegedly "innocent" accounts banned right to show how he's a liar.

cause the white guys for harris was a literal scam. you wouldn't fall for that right.

>>1371350
There's no need to be so performative while demanding for quotes and evidence you've already seen.

>https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1499976967105433600
>sorry to be a free speech absolutist

>https://x.com/PrimitivPatriot/status/1872791034754945275
>https://x.com/BrettAMacDonald/status/1872768172941811871
Photos of him banning and deleting an account he didn't like and then deleting the entire conversation to hide his tracks.

>>1371353
i could be a demorat about it and claim its just 1 person. but ya ur probably right on that. i am curious what the whole chain says though especially the last few messages

>>1371353
More like he banned another leftwing bots troll account

>>1371361
>https://x.com/LeahDiscovers/status/1872779093781168478
I'm pretty sure that the whole chain is six posts and ends with the "liar" post.

>>1371362
>left wing
>https://x.com/EagleZeroX/status/1873144265452470634

>>1371363
And? You realize that bot accounts aren't real people right?

Honestly it's getting pretty fucking old with all these boomers bringing their xitter drama here

>>1371364
If your claim that it was a left wing account turned out to be false, why should we trust your judgement on the account being a bot (which you presented without evidence)? And even if it was a bot, why would Elon delete his parts in the conversation and not even accuse the account of being a bot?

>>1371368
Honestly, I don't really care about this, but you've been making three assumptions I think it's time to address.
1. Elon suspended his account
Did he? Or did someone else for some other reason, and the accounts behavior brought attention to itself
2. It was suspended for "free speech"
Was that why? Or was it something else. You don't really know, you are guessing at what's convenient
3. There was an entire thread of deleted conversation
Do you have any evidence of this besides the accounts who said they "found it on reddit?"

>>1371368
Btw, number 3: >>1371370 is an underling question here. The screenshot suggests they found it on reddit and it isn't even authentic to begin with

>>1371363
so the guy got banned for spreading misinformation because he quoted a reddit post? i'd ban retards for slandering me like that tbh.
That's not even banning somoene for disagreements like I thought at the start that's just straight up banning a retard whose lying.

>>1371370
>>1371371
Someone replied to Elon's final liar comment, here:

https://x.com/BrettAMacDonald/status/1872768172941811871

There are also several different screenshots of the conversation from different accounts:

>https://x.com/Antunes1/status/1872772334563782817/photo/1
>https://x.com/AutistOfTheSoul/status/1872768782873313702/photo/1
>https://x.com/AlfredAlfer77/status/1872789836228378743/photo/1

As for proof that Elon did it and it was specifically because of these posts, if someone else did it, why were Elon's posts deleted as well if he had nothing to do with it?

>>1371373
Spreading misinformation and lying is protected under free speech. And the owner of a social media company is now allowed to be arbiter of whose lying and who isn't?

>>1371376
>Spreading misinformation and lying is protected under free speech. And the owner of a social media company is now allowed to be arbiter of whose lying and who isn't?
Slander isn't free speech protected, If it was protected under free speech reddit would be dead that site is fulled with terminally ill power hungry far-leftist retards.
You got caught in a lie, you pretended he banned someone for disagreeing with him. He banned him for spreading a fake screenshot and putting words in his mouth.
The other angles don't matter you fucking lied to me telling me he banned conservatives for disagreeing with him not FAKING his fucking posts and spreading it around as if he said something he didn't.>>1371361(me)
I'm taking back my ur probably right in my above post.

>>1371373
>so the guy got banned for spreading misinformation
Pretty sure that's not against twitter's ToS. So what you meant was "they got banned because Musk singled them out".

It's okay for Musk to single people out. He owns the site. You shouldn't need to pretend something else happened. Face reality.

>>1371379
>It's okay for Musk to single people out. He owns the site.
He's also technically a government employee now, so it's a violation of the 1st amendment.

>>1371251
>ok? and?
tl;dr he banned/decertified conservatives that weren't in favor of replacing tech jobs with foreign laborers.

This began with him arguing that he believes that economic growth and international competition is literally all that matters, which is why it is a proponent of H1B visas.

Conservatives became mad that his priority wasn't bolstering the American economy by giving Americans jobs, but instead preferring to hire pajeets on H1B visas because they (according to them) were willing to work harder, and because he came to America on a H1B visa too.

When conservatives bitched him out, he (and Vivek) called Americans too stupid, lazy and unemployable to become engineers, which is why he was resorting to H1B visas. But that doesn't make sense, because the average IQ of a pajeet is 76 (literally), and most H1B visas are reserved for unskilled laborers like janitors.

Finally, he went on his alt account (Adrian Dittmann) and bitched out all of the conservatives, called them racists, and finally stated he openly advocated for replacing white Americans in the tech industry.

>>1371380
except he didn't ban someone twitter did. so gl getting a lawsuit through to claim your freedom of expression is being supressed because Elon personally banned you.
>>1371379
"We reserve the right to remove Content that violates the User Agreement, including for example, copyright or trademark violations, impersonation, unlawful conduct, or harassment."
This falls under impersonation so it is in there since the guy's sharing a fake screenshot someone else made pretending to be Elon's tweet.
If i didn't make it clear enough in my last message>>1371378 I agreed with him banning someone for lying.

But TOS are so widely broad they cover literally everything you can think of.

>>1371383
>except he didn't ban someone twitter did
He was justifying it on group chat anon, under the pseudonym Adrian Dittman.

>>1371382
>>tl;dr he banned/decertified conservatives that weren't in favor of replacing tech jobs with foreign laborers.
he banned 1 person who spread a screenshot that was community noted proving it was fake. The faked screenshot was a tweet of elon saying something along the lines of its too much of a hassle and expensive to train americans.
He did not ban someone for having a different opinion he banned the guy for lying and spreading a fake screenshot.
>>1371385
but he didn't say it publicly did he. also saying he made an alt just to shitpost about americans is basically conspiracy theory levels. I get it could be true but thats no where close to same as him publicly saying those things.

>>1371387
>but he didn't say it publicly did he. also saying he made an alt just to shitpost about americans is basically conspiracy theory levels.
Yeah. He was under his alt account, but he talked about Elon in the first person, justified his bans and had a shitfit because Laura Loomer said she didn't want to vote for an Indian.
>I get it could be true but thats no where close to same as him publicly saying those things.
Adrian (his alt) had the same laugh and mannerisms as Musk when speaking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLfWG-p3k4Q
This is irreparably bad optics all-around because he essentially has the same mindset as the democrats who imported Haitians into Springfield Ohio.
People want to be around other people who look like them and have the same values. Selling out the country to people who have a cultural habit of shitting on street corners is how you get Shariah law in England.

>>1371378
Slander is free speech protected. It's not a crime. The government can't charge you with it. Only other individuals can sue you for it.

>he banned him for spreading a fake screenshot and putting words in his mouth
Where is Elon's proof that the statement was a lie beyond his word? Elon has already deleted his own tweets in this incident. And notice how when you sue someone for slander, it's not you who determines if they are lying; it's a third party court. So Elon is acting as both judge, jury, and executioner.

>>1371387
>he banned the guy for lying
So old Twitter was justified for banning Donald Trump for lying about the results of the 2020 election?

>>1371395
>Where is Elon's proof that the statement was a lie beyond his word?
it was community noted with evidence that it was faked.
>>1371398
uh actually the democrats have proven trump was right about 2020 being fixed with that chart showing the voter turn out nice try though.
>>1371392
that's still in conspiracy territory. Well good thing democrats didn't spend the last decade oppressing people accross every social media platform and continue to on most /s, not like people are going to say its fine to do it back to them. Well i certainly won't lose any sleep over it.
>People want to be around other people who look like them and have the same values.
its not even the values thing people vote and debate for their own benefits. People don't want skilled foreign workers because that means more competition for them. anything that devalues someone's own labor is a negative so i don't blame them for it even if comes from an understandably selfish desire. That's the same reason Elon is pushing for foreigners to come in because the average american is a slothful arrogant asshole with little drive for success beyond anything that won't get them fired.

>>1371383
>This falls under impersonation
It doesn't.

>Impersonation is a violation of the X Rules. Accounts that pose as another person, group, or organization in a confusing or deceptive manner may be permanently suspended under X’s misleading and deceptive identities policy.
>Impersonation: You may not impersonate other identities of individuals, groups, or organizations to deceive others. Although you are not required to display your real identity on your profile, your account should not use false profile information to impersonate others. We allow compliant Parody, Commentary, and Fan (PCF) accounts on X only if the purpose is to discuss, satirize or share information. If you believe an account is posing as you or your brand, you can file a report here.

>>1371412
>it was community noted with evidence that it was faked.
Post the evidence.

>>1371412
>six million less people votes for dems in 2024, that means there was fraud
Also, certain voter fraud claims were lies because the people in Trump's camp (Rudy Giuliani) admitted that they were lies: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23887430-us-district-court-for-the-district-of-columbia/

>>1371380
>He's also technically a government employee now
DOGE or whatever the fuck isn't and isn't planned to be a government agency.

Billionaires don't work for governments, they own them.

>>1371383
>But TOS are so widely broad they cover literally everything you can think of.
You're conflating two things here. I said it wasn't a violation of the ToS (and it wasn't), not that it couldn't be removed under the ToS.

I'm sure there's some catch all clause in the ToS that let's Musk remove whatever the fuck he wants. I know he can hijack any account he wants. But that's not the same thing as an account being in violation of the ToS.

As I said, the account wasn't removed for a specific violation, but because Musk chose to target it.

>>1371418
literally in the screenshot >>1371363
"this image is fabricated" followed by a link in the community note.
>>1371420
everything and anything is against TOS idiot saying its against tos is like saying americans are blessed by god and everything they fart and shit should be worshipped. Its backup by nothing and means nothing.

Ok and? i don't get why we're having a discussion we both agree Elon banned the account specifically and not a mass ban, U said he can do whatever he wants, I was just arguing the guy was a retard and posting a reddit cropped screenshot that turned out to be a lie. We're literally not against each other on anything besides whether it was against tos which we all know all TOS are utterly pointless drivel.

>>1371421
The link in the screenshot is cut off and looks like it leads to a comment made by Musk saying he didn't make the statement. So it's not proof beyond Musk saying he didn't make the statement (which he could have deleted like his posts calling the other guy a liar).

>>1371162
He's a bastard, there have been multiple red flags for years now that this guy's not what he seems. What's sad is this bit of proof will be forgotten like every instance before it and his star will simply continue to rise in spite of a mountain of proof.

>>1371423
you don't understand how community notes work huh nice copium.

>>1371427
The proof in the community note is irrespective of whether people voted it up or not. Although considering Elon controls twitter, there is always the possibility that he could be rigging the system.

>>1371428
you're a moron. community notes don't show unless they have a majority of upvotes.geez the far-left are all just conspiracy nuts and copium.

>>1371412
>that's still in conspiracy territory.
Yes. It's literally a conspiracy against the American people by the billionaire class so they can spend less money hiring people.
If people don't work, they don't eat. Denying people jobs because they aren't immigrants is the same as killing them.

>>1371430
>community notes don't show unless they have a majority of upvotes
And what about this means they can't be rigged? I don't think the community note is rigged, but I take umbridge that the only proof given is Elon saying he didn't write the tweet. Still, it's secondary to the point because lying on twitter is clearly allowed. It's only when you lie about Elon that you get banned clearly.

>the far-left are all just conspiracy nuts and copium
I agree. You want to go through all the crazy conspiracies on the right too?

>>1371430
Accurate

>>1371421
>we all know all TOS are utterly pointless drivel
They aren't and you should always read and familiarize yourself with them. You sound like a fucking idiot.

>>1371437
>And what about this means they can't be rigged?
They are good for extra context in a lot of situations and they're great at pointing out hypocrisy or someone flat out lying, but there are many that are the equivalent of mass down voting to get unpopular opinions out of view. Twitter is still a very jewish site and your free speech will always end where the Talmud begins

>>1371450
they 100% are because they include clauses for literally everything this isn't fucking south park retard, you should just resign yourself to being treated as livestock the minute you sign up for it and assume they can do anything short of murder to you.
>>1371457
>>1371437
the far-left crowd and tried and failed to false flag community notes. Its alot harder then people think and for 99% of cases the community note is accurate and factual.
>>1371436
the conspiracy theory is that the owner of the site rigged the system to falseflag a community note so it'd pass on a probably sub 10k follower account tweet he had an argument with. Which he then later banned the account anyways. then went on an alt account to shit post about how stupid and that its a waste of time training americans.

>>1371425
He's literally autistic. Has Aspergers or someshit.

>>1371480
>the conspiracy theory is that the owner of the site rigged the system to falseflag a community note so it'd pass on a probably sub 10k follower account tweet he had an argument with.
m8 he was dicking around with various accounts during his melty. He admitted it on his alt.

>>1371162
Why the fuck else would these rich cock suckers buy the media companies? To silence people who disagree with them. They're piss ants. They are so sensitive they cannot allow people to say mean shit about them or disagree with them.

>>1371480
>they 100% are because they include clauses for literally everything
1. No they don't. There's plenty of consumer protection bullshits companies have to put in ToSes no matter how much they bitch.
2. You should read them for the bullshit they DO slip in, dipshit. Companies can do more than just terminate your fucking service if you don't pay attention to who you get in bed with.

I swear to fuck, when someone asks you to hand them your balls you don't just fucking nod and smile, fuckwit.

>>1371489
>I swear to fuck, when someone asks you to hand them your balls you don't just fucking nod and smile, fuckwit.
if ur an american and you use a company owned by any corpo like disney you've signed your life away retard. you're a fucking retard if you think TOS are anything new or special its always the same things. they can terminate your usage for virtually any reason, you sign away all rights to sue them and if you die your family has to handle it privately in arbitration.
>>1371484
lemme guess sub 1k follower accounts of people who were cussing at him. and that he was stupid enough to fall for the bait of arguing with common peasant retards.

>>1371510
>lemme guess sub 1k follower accounts of people who were cussing at him
Ann Coulter. Members of the press. Various members of bannonite conservative groups.

>>1371547
the mutual assured destruction of america has commence. May Elon do his part in shattering the minds of these fragile livestock, he should start banning leftists too

>>1371564
So no more free speech I see.

>>1371165
>Remember when we warned you
Imagine trying to make yourself sound like the voice of reason when you were just screeching hysterically because he took your heavily censored echo chamber away from you.
Yes, Musk made it clear from the start that he played loose with his own rules, everyone knew this. We were just glad that the platform was more free than it was previously.

>>1371564
>start
lmao

>>1371723
>you were just screeching hysterically
I just stopped using the website and used other ones. Maybe this scenario you're imagining only exists in your head?

>>1371723
>We
Who?