>>1434621
Stop posting tweets and start posting news stories.

>>1434626
this is the story of the moment and honestly the biggest political news of the year so talking about it is appropriate. Then, since the story is constantly evolving, it's like posting a new story every time.

>>1434629
You don't seem to know what board you're on. This is not blue /pol/. Read the sticky, it says you need a valid news source, and twitter isn't one.

>>1434626
Orders from on top, gotta shill Charlies death because its not like his life was worth celebrating

Nothings too low for the ghouls that make up the MAGA shilling team

>>1434636
I'm pretty sure they're trying to slide the latest Epstein threads off the front page.

>>1434634
it's the FBI official account, I think it's pretty reliable, also every news source is reporting that rn

>>1434646
On this board if you can't find a single news story about it then it didn't happen. I don't care if Jesus Christ retweeted it.

>>1434636
funny coming from a guy that probably is worth less than nothing. A person with your morals will never have anything in life

>>1434650
I think that OP posted it before the news sources since they took 10 mins to catch up on the FBI x account. But he is right they are reposting this too: https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt#player

>>1434645
or maybe news come and go like every single day. Hop off your conspiracy theories

>>1434657
(gaslighting intensifies)

with 100k on his head he won't even last 2 days

>>1434663
I genuinely hope you don't have access to guns honestly

watch him get caught in a McDonald's now lmao

>>1434671
The guy was dressed like an ICE agent. We have those masked fucks wandering around everywhere.

Dude will "kill himself" before hes found

>>1434674
well if people didnt constantly dox them they wouldnt need to go around masked

>>1434703
epstein style

>>1434715
Maybe stop terrorizing communities then.

>>1434727
bro its called law. If you cross a border illegaly you are a criminal by definition and by law. Its not even philosophycal, its law. They enforce the law, the only terrorized are the illegals. Or are you happy that your taxes go to illegals? Nobody hates legal migrants. By the way your loved Obama deported more than 2 millions illegals (a record yet to be beaten)

>>1434748
it's funny how esl you are. are all the good shills decaying somewhere in ukraine or something?

Good chance they'll never payout. I wouldn't bother being a snitch.

>>1434755
funny how during a discussion your only comeback is mocking some grammar mistakes. Also you do this while using abbreviations.. Ironic

>>1434756
was the girl that turned mangione in paid?

>>1434760
you're a real alanis morissette

>>1434748
>They enforce the law, the only terrorized are the illegals.
lol
>Nobody hates legal migrants.
lmao

>>1434771
Congrats, you just defined irony worse than the song did

>>1434775
but seriously though, shill. why are you so incompetent?

>>1434779
so anyone with a different political opinion and that says law should be respected is incompetent, ok dude

>>1434786
see, this is what i'm talking about. you suck at everything a shill should be able to do: spelling, using logical fallacies convincingly, and not being easily baited into losing your temper. you're fun to fuck with though, i'll give you that

>>1434788
Please be careful taunting our resident lolcow
While we do want to farm them for as much content as possible, we also don't want to drive them off.
Luckily they're a masochist, but we still need to be careful

FBI didn't even pay for Luigi mangiones capture and you think they'll pay for the capture of the dude who blasted Charlie? okay retard

>>1434788
Keep in mind what this anon says about the schizo shill of /news/
>>1433346
>I bet they're the sort of faggot to deliberately introduce all those spelling errors into their posts just so they can gaslight themselves into believing their arguments are valid, they're just being mocked for spelling/grammatical errors.
>All while ignoring their actual arguments getting BTFO all over the place.

>>1434796
well there's no merit to any of their arguments anyways, since they're lies 100% of the time. if he wants to lie and look retarded at the same time, more power to him

It was Gavin Newsom
Where my money at?

>>1434621
whoever the guy is, he was at my place playing smash bros all week, so he has an alibi

where can I donate to the assassin's political defense fund?

>>1434816
>>1434822
>so basically, I am an abhorrent human being
Yeah, we get it. You can stop posting now.

>>1434833
Yeah so why are you upset we're joking about an abhorrent human being's death? Kirk did the same shit, why is he different?

>>1434837
>Kirk was abhorrent
We get it, you're an extremist. You can stop now.

>>1434838
Do something.

>>1434838
Kirk literally called for people to bail out the guy who beat Pelosi's husband with a hammer. To quote him directly:
>And why is he still in jail? Why has he not been bailed out? By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out. I bet his bail's like 30 or 40,000 bucks. Bail him out, and then go ask him some questions. I wonder what his bail is? They're going after him with attempted murder, political assassination, all this sort of stuff.

>>1434839
I'm not going to do anything. I'm not a political extremist.

>>1434840
Yes. He called for him to be bailed out because Republicans were being blamed for the attack. So, bail him out and ask him questions to prove that the nudist surfer is not a Republican.

>>1434838
Yeah, why can't we all get behind Kirks common sense, centerist views like:
>If my 10 year old daughter gets raped, I'll force her to raise the rapists baby
>Its funny that someone broke into Pelosi's home and broke her husbands skull with a hammer
>People need to work until they die
>Vaccine requirements are a 'medical apartheid'
>most people are scared when they have a black pilot

>>1434840
they bought their tickets, they knew what they were getting into, i say let em crash

>>1434844
I mean, sure, you can massively misrepresent his arguments in an attempt to paint him as an extremist. However, the reality is his views are far closer to the center than your own.

>>1434843
>Guys they just need to confirm we're not to blame by letting the guy who almost beat a democrat's husband to death with a hammer
>I'm sure nothing will happen after he's let out
>But whoever does will be a real hero

Also curious as to your response to him saying gay people should be stoned to death? or is this just gonna be "uh he was quoting the bible he clearly didn't mean it"
>https://x.com/danielsogay/status/1965887308454101427

>>1434841
>I'm not going to do anything
We know.

>>1434847
No not really.
>are
Were. He's dead.

>>1434849
>Also curious as to your response to him saying gay people should be stoned to death?
He is quite obviously saying that gay people should not be stoned to death. He is critiquing someone else who quoted "love thy neighbor" as a justification for gay rights as the same book of the bible contains the passage about stoning people to death.

Its very interesting that all your big critiques of Kirk are pretty obvious misrepresentations of what he actually said.

>>1434850
Yes. Never in dispute. I am a normal person. You are not.

>>1434851
And in time you will regret he isn't.

>>1434853
normal people aren't shills

>>1434853
I disagree.

>>1434854
I'm not a shill.

I found him>>1434816 admitted to doing it, he'll take the fall right

>>1434852
>he's not pro gay people being stoned to death, he just said god's true law was they should be stoned to death
>he's basically against it

>>1434856
>i am not a shill, said the shill

>>1434858
Are you being intentionally dishonest or is this a genuine intelligence issue? He is OBVIOUSLY being critical of someone quoting a verse from the bible in support of gay marriage when the very next verse talks about stoning gays to death.

I genuinely don't know how to react to this.

>>1434852
Anon you do realize he's literally saying "uh you can't use the bible to justify tolerating gay people, because the bible says we should be stoning them to death". He's not anti-stoning, he's pro-stoning and pointing out that's what should be done per god's laws.

>>1434858
typical leftist taking things out of context, you're actual human garbage.

>>1434861
He's being critical by saying "hey you say it says 'love thy neighbor', but I say it says to stone them to death, which is god's true law." He's literally correcting them that the correct treatment, in his eyes, is them being stoned to death.

>>1434861
>>1434863
if gaslighting class existed, you would be in the lowest level of it

>>1434844
>Its funny that someone broke into Pelosi's home and broke her husbands skull with a hammer
Wtf have I been living under a rock, when did that happen?
I mean I fucking hate Pelosi and think she's guilty of insider trading along with 90% of the rest of the house but geeze...

>>1434862
>"uh you can't use the bible to justify tolerating gay people, because the bible says we should be stoning them to death".
Anon, he is highlighting the inconsistency in someone else argument. Obviously. Clearly.

>>1434869
He's saying that god's true law and word is that they should be stoned to death. Coming from someone who is an avid christian to the point of declaring only heterosexual christian couples should be able to adopt kids.

Yeah I'm sure he has a very nuanced opinion on the passage he's quoting.

>>1434865
>hypothetical rhetorical devices mean you support the rhetorical device
You cant be serious.

>>1434870
If you cant understand a very basic rhetorical device there is no point in continuing this discussion.
>im an avid Christian
No, you're not.

We're done here.

>>1434873
work on your reading comprehension bud. bad day at the office amirite

>>1434863
Do you think you would be less mad if you weren't a NEET

>>1434871
Alright then, post the clip, it should be obvious-
>https://x.com/patriottakes/status/1800678317030564306
>Whoops he still cites it as God's Perfect Law
Are you saying that Charlie Kirk wasn't a devout christian who follows the bible then?

>>1434878
Do you have autism or something?

If you say as a Christian you must "love your neighbor" and its law because its in the bible a criticism of that is "the next passage says kill the gays" its ALSO law. You're pointing out the inconsistency in someone else's appeal to authority.

This is so obvious. So clear.

>>1434876
wanna hear a joke? >>1434876's life

>>1434870
>Coming from someone who is an avid christian to the point of declaring only heterosexual christian couples should be able to adopt kids.
Coming form what? A normie Christian? That's a normie Christian opinion. That was a normie American opinion until ~10 years ago.

>>1434881
So then Charlie Kirk didn't believe in the bible and, per his own words, God's True Law?

>>1434884
Charlie Kirk OBVIOUSLY disagreed with someone elses interpretation of the Bible and their use of a verse in the bible.

In terms of whether or not he thought gays should be killed, the section of the bible in question is Old Testament so it doesn't apply to Christians.

>>1434885
then why are the new and old testament attached

>>1434885
>the section of the bible in question is Old Testament so it doesn't apply to Christians.
Yeah that's not how the bible or Christianity works anon.

Also, he disagreed with her solely on the grounds that he believes, per the bible, that gays should be stoned to death.

>>1434886
Dude, if you dont understand the basic premise of Christianity why the hell are you arguing with me?

>>1434888
i'm asking for your opinion, shill, it's an open ended question

>>1434888
Anon Christians also use the Old Testament.

>>1434882
I wouldn't worry about me.

>>1434887
>Yeah that's not how the bible or Christianity works anon.
That is literally how it works.
Old Testament = Old Covenant
New Testament = New Covenant

We're bound by the New Covenant only. That's why Christians are not Jews.

>Also, he disagreed with her solely on the grounds that he believes, per the bible, that gays should be stoned to death.
In your opinion, because you want (need?) him to be a bad guy

>>1434889
last time someone engaged you in debate you murdered them.
>>1434891
hey when you pass can i get your piggybank and dog? i'll make sure to play with him.

>>1434885
>the section of the bible in question is Old Testament so it doesn't apply to christians
False.

>>1434893
You really took that NEET comment hard, didn't you

>>1434893
>last time someone engaged you in debate you murdered them.
i appreciate the unintentional compliment, esl shill

>>1434896
you're the textbook example of the raging kid gets so bad he can't debate he decides to flip the table and assault his opponent. except in your case you're a violent thug with a gun

esl shill is projecting again. he's so easily tilted, lol

>>1434892
Anon you fucking retard, this only applies to the laws jews have to live under (such as being kosher). In the clip he literally cites it as God's True Law, so then are you saying he DOESN'T believe in God's True Law?

>>1434897
>everyone I don't like is one person and they killed charlie
Nope. Anything else or was that your concession?

>>1434901
i think he's crying in the proverbial car at the moment

>>1434788
I couldn't care less of what you think about me, at the end of the day, you are an insignificant human being, with probably an insignificant real life, if you find that much amusement by being a retard on 4chan. But hey, everyone gets happy in their own way

>>1434796
I just know that you are the actual embodyment of a discord mod

>>1434904
u maaad

>>1434858
tipical leftist being a retard. Fucking kill yourself dude make this world a better place

>>1434907
so much for the tolerant right

>>1434904
>probably
XD

>>1434896
I think you can't possibly get more retarded than this guy.

>>1434909
well everyone here is very tolerant, left and right. Can't you see?

>>1434906
nah we all chillin

>>1434910
apparently that's funny ig

today 4chan is more retarded than usual, that's new

>>1434764
Nope. She didn't report him in the one specific manner required to earn the bounty. I don't think they even say how you're supposed to do it, just that they only pay out under very, very specific circumstances.

I FOUND THE VIDEO OF SHOOTER EXITING AND ENTERING THE BUILDING
Tweet https://x.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1966275195586621580?t=QB6UHRRKpxJDThOxQQp-gQ&s=19
VIDEO IS FROM TMZ
PLS HELP IN FINDING THAT PERSON

>>1434933
yeah, because stiffing narcs on a technicality is really going to encourage more people to report.

>>1434893
>last time someone engaged you in debate you murdered them
Charlie Kirk lost that debate by a longshot
>>1434573
1434893
1434889
>you murdered them
>you
Making unjustifiable accusations is actionable in court, you know
>you
>>1434893
The same can be said about you, who condones violence. Hey, we can say the same about you:
1434622
1434614
>you're now a denier and a viable target
1434685
1434684
>you've just made yourself a "valid" target
1434696
1434694
>you deserve the same treatment
1434734
1434724
>you are now a valid target.
>>1434893
>you
Accusations are Admissions

>>1434937
>Charlie Kirk lost that debate
He won the debate so hard extremists (you) had to kill him.

>>1434938
>you
>>1434573
1434622
1434614
>you're now a denier and a viable target
1434685
1434684
>you've just made yourself a "valid" target
1434696
1434694
>you deserve the same treatment
1434734
1434724
>you are now a valid target.
>>1434893
>you
Accusations are Admissions

>>1434940
Yes, (you)

>>1434918
You made me laugh so yeah

>>1434938
>everyone on the internet killed charlie kirk
You need a break from social media.

>>1434947
>>everyone on the internet killed charlie kirk
Who are you quoting?

>>1434948
I was quoting you

>>1434949
Obviously not, because I didn't write that.

>>1434950
Not verbatim no.

>>1434943
>no, ur the murderer!
Nope. To quote >>1434901,
Anything else, or was that your concession? I'll be generous and let someone else have your concession, violence-obsessed shill that's busy being a projectionist at a Bollywood cinema in Calcutta. I still have that movie Gandhi you can show. Y'know, the one about the guy who never so much as thought in a violent way, thus making him the better human being unlike you because of your behavior & obsessional violent mindset. Oh, and inb4 'you couldn't pay me enough to read what the violent leftist schizo is saying' or any variation on that avoidance tactic due to you being cornered

>>1434956
Take your meds.

>>1434950
>>1434938
>extremists (you) had to kill him
>saying the same in >>1434573
>accusing others of being the shooter
Yes you did write that

>>1434946
happy to hear that

>>1434957
meant for >>1434938

>>1434957
I've never needed them, because I'm a normal sane human. Unlike you
>Take your meds
Says the meds-needer projecting. again, accusing others. Accusations are Admissions, meds-needing >>1434957
>inb4 'no u'

>>1434962
Thanks!

can we just stop endorsing fucking violence to solve our problems? Nobody deserves that, and violence only lead to violence. How long do you think it will take for a now radicalised right wing extremist to do a terror attack? Then a leftist will do it, and then a right winger again. Can yall stop eating fucking crayons for a moment and use your brain?

>>1434969
Nobody here did a god damn thing retard

>>1434969
>How long do you think it will take for a now radicalised right wing extremist to do a terror attack?
Just over 24 hours ago
A right wing extremist having wrong opinions due to committing thoughtcrime up to the point where he said 'Counting or not counting gang violence'
He would still be alive today if he wasn't a rightard, and instead of being a vile anti-diversity Christain he was a hyper-tolerant atheist, And never so much as allowed wrong opinions to exist in his mind in the first place.
Just stop being a rightard having wrong opinions. Rightards never had the right to have their wrong opinions listened to in the first place. Until they change their mindsets completely, just say to them 'When I want your opinion I'll give it to you'. Not allowing wrong opinions to exist in one's mind. That's too lethal for some so-called... 'people'.

>>1434973
you're everything that is wrong with our country rn, no wonder people are calling you a retard

>>1434971
read the thread you underdeveloped ape

>you're everything that is wrong with our country rn, no wonder people are calling you a retard
As >>1434978 demonstrates here >>1434573 as well as in this thread
>inb4 'no u', 'take your meds', 'I'm not reading all of that' or anything else said by the violence-endorsing extremist that is the resident schizo shill lolcow of /news/

>>1434979
says the extremist violence-minded rightist or he wouldn't behave the way he does in /news/ as a whole

>>1434981
i really hope you don't have access to guns, you are actually mental institution worthy material. It's honestly hard to believe that people like you exist in real life, you must be 400lbs with blue hair cause ain't no way

>>1434984
yeah you are actually retarded you don't even know which side I'm on since I only wrote that violence is wrong. But why am I even trying to discuss with a fucking ape

I watched his debate vs a Cambridge professor. I'm not really impressed.
>"Ukraine isn't a democracy because not holding election"
>pressed on constitution not allowing election under martial law
>"he's the president or prime minister he can do whatever he wants" <- almost exact words
>gets told that's not how it works
>"he could do a CEREMONIAL ELECTION" <- basically exact words
Is this it? Is this just how he is? I can totally see him BTFOing unprepared freshmen on campus, he has a very aggressive debate style where he fires off right wing talking points in quick order, sometimes not even allowing opponents to answer back, and always projects extreme confidence even if caught stating a statement that's blatantly false. In terms of actual substance, there's not much of it.

I don't see this as a great loss of a political intellectual.

>>1434985
>It's honestly hard to believe that people like you exist in real life
>says that which behaves the way it does in 4chan
It's easy to accept that I'm not a rightard because I'm not you, and your behavior in /news/, being a shitstirrer & shitting up threads. I don't speak, act or think the way you do - thus you being a prime example of a vile rightard - so what's your excuse? All those who caused you to be the pearl-clutcher you are in /news/: who harmed you? Are those you don't like in the room with you right now? Now point out on the doll where those you don't like touched you personally, >>1434985. Because if they have never harmed you personally, you're completely alone where you are, and anyone not exactly like you have never touched you personally, what's your excuse for being in /news/, least of all your justifications for behaving the way you do here? I would never so much as think of behaving the way you do here, so what's your excuse, other than being what others here already know what you are, thus you becoming the resident lolcow of /news/?

>>1434992
I've never read something this hypocritical ever

>>1434969
>can we just stop
>>1434986
>actually retarded
Can you stop behaving the way you do in /news/? I don't behave the way you do here, so what's your excuse?

>>1434986
If violence is wrong, explain WW2

>>1434996
a ton of people are calling you a retard in every forum. There's a reason. Don't even think that you are better than everyone else, cause you aren't. Hell you don't even have a moral high ground

>>1434995
meant for >>1434938 >>1434969

>>1434998
>Don't even think that you are better than everyone else
...and that's why you're /news/ resident lolcow. As demonstrated here >>1434573
>a ton of people
Proof or you're a liar. But others in /news/ already know that, as per you being BTFO here >>1434573

>>1434997
>If violence is wrong, explain WW2
>>1434986
>violence is wrong
Is what Bomber Harris ordering RAF Avro Lancasters to do what they did to Dresden wrong?
>Luftwaffe bombs
>V-1s
>V-2s
What Bomber Harris did was based.

>>1434986
>violence is wrong
Storm Shadow missiles given to Ukraine to launch at Ivans for the crime of existing in a location they never had the right to be in the first place.
Starmer is based.
>Did the Allies annex Sudetenland? Did the Allies invade Poland, thus starting WWII?
Did NATO annex Crimea? Did NATO invade Ukraine?