"This is our conclusion."
Also "We're still investigating."

They couldn't even come up with a believable name for the fake trans roomate. "Lance Twiggs" lmao miss me with that J K Rowling shit.

>>1436599
You can't spin this. He's a straight man dating a woman and the only trans person involved had nothing to do with this and is fully cooperating

>>1436597
>He's part of YOUR group
>Nuh-uh! He's part of YOUR group!!!
I fucking hate this shit so much. On both sides. Right wing retards are trying to call him a gay tranny so they can villify them, and left wing retards are trying to call him a chud incel groyper as a knee-jerk reaction to this.
He's a chronically online retard whos mind has been melted into mush and killed someone because of it.
I will say that right wingers have been particularly retarded about trying to make him into a tranny and have fallen for more obviously fake news than the left wingers, but still, drives me crazy seeing my libshit and conservacuck friends both doing the same thing and quoting made up shit to try and put the onus of blame on the other side. It's almost fascinating to watch, in a way.

>>1436607
>muh false equivalency

>>1436602
No. I get it. Just shitposting against the government always lying and manipulating everyone.

Given the absolute obsession the right has with trannies, would it even mean anything if he was dating one? It's like how the most racist men have jungle fever.

>>1436609
Copium. Must be correct otherwise life is forfeit... Pride cannot be squashed. An error could never be admitted. You were duped, just get over it. You're not as smart as you thought.

>>1436609
Idk man, I'm watching my right wing friends share pictures of unrelated trannies trying to claim it's him, or claiming his girlfriend convinced him to do it because she's trans, while also doxxing people that insulted their lord and savior Kirk's death; while my left wing friends are calling the guy who has a tranny gf and engraved "hey fascist, catch" on his bullet casing a right-wing groyper because he has a republican family.
I think it's fair to say that both sides are trying to push the onus of blame onto the other side.

>>1436613
Who indoctrinated you?

>>1436616
Insider knowledge of how the government really works.

>>1436615
>repeating the debunked talking points again
2 $Trumpcoins were just deposited in your wallet

>>1436617
Hint: it is exactly how the devil gets things done. Must be good, right?

>>1436617
Ahh so you're one of those batshit red pill syndrome malcontents who thinks he has insider knowledge after looking at too many /pol/ infographics. Well that figures.

>>1436618
Which talking points? Honestly curious, I can't keep up with this shit

>>1436621
Nope. Used to be employed. Insider knowledge, not assumption. The conspiracy guys are correct 90% of the time. Labeling things a conspiracy theory is a very common tactic that plays on your desire to fit in.

>>1436623
Radicals don't like moderates in the slightest.

>>1436621
Trying to fit in, are ye?

>>1436597
>Literal only evidence of the roommate being trans is a single pic of them in a plush hoodie

>>1436625
That's probably why this leftist killed Charlie

>>1436626
Is that what you tell yourself?

>>1436623
He wasn't a moderate. He ran one of the largest indoctrination thinktanks (TPusa) which has now been taken over by Ben Shapiro.

>>1436632
Anon said he was a moderate -conservative-, you retard. As in, he's a moderate amongst the right wing.

And he's right. Charlie Kirk wasn't even as radical as most conservatives. He actually tried making an attempt to talk to people and teach people about conservatism.

These leftists calling Charlie Kirk 'far right' are fucking retarded because they don't know how deep the iceberg goes. Charlie was fed-adjacent. He was a like a lid on a pot of boiling water, existing in the same circle of influence as BAP and Shapiro, trying to prevent conservatives from going too far afield of the GOP's narrative on acceptable discourse. And they fucking killed him.

>>1436638
>Charlie Kirk wasn't even as radical as most conservatives
This is wrong and you know it's wrong.
>He actually tried making an attempt to talk to people and teach people about conservatism.
No he didn't. He cherrypicked the statements that made him look good out of his "talks" so he could play them on his podcasts.
>These leftists calling Charlie Kirk 'far right'
It has nothing to do with leftists at all.
> He was a like a lid on a pot of boiling water, existing in the same circle of influence as BAP and Shapiro, trying to prevent conservatives from going too far afield of the GOP's narrative on acceptable discourse.
When you're a groyper you don't care about any of that. You just want to kill the jews and their mouthpieces.

Look at this shit and tell me with a straight face this is "moderate conservatism"
https://tpusa.com/agenda/

>>1436629
Groypers aren't leftists.

>>1436601
Have you met a single transgender person before? They all have weird ass names.

>>1436641
>Look at this shit and tell me with a straight face this is "moderate conservatism"
>https://tpusa.com/agenda/
I'm not the person you're arguing with and I had never even heard of Charlie Kirk before he got shot. I clicked into your url to see what you were talking about and it's a freaking conference schedule with literally nothing on there but dates and times when speaking starts. It has literally no mention of ideological positions or his stand points on anything. It just says what time check-in is, when breakout sessions are etc. You could literally use it for anything.

What is wrong with you?

>>1436643
No, they just have the same family name as their family.

>>1436597
>His entire family And every friend confirms he was part of the Groyper movement, and a staunch conservative.
You guys are beyond ridiculous.

>>1436641
>This is wrong and you know it's wrong.
Charlie's entire point of existing was to bring conservatives away from the brink. Whenever conservatives would bring up the Israel lobby, crime statistics, the fucking epstein files etc etc he would always frame it in a way that made it an issue of systems, not immutable characteristics. He would never say the quite part out loud, and even more than that, he would actively disavow anybody who went that far.

He was effectively a lid on a pot of boiling water. Good going you fucking idiots.

>>1436656
How so?

>>1436597
Neither one of those people look even remotely like the drawings you put next to them.

>>1436662
>quote something someone said
>ur ridiculous
>WHAT DID HE MEAN BY THIS
breh

>>1436662
Because op made it up and the article says quite literally the exact opposite using no unclear wording

>the straight male Tyler Robinson...
>...who is infatuated and has sex with a boymoding tranny, who hasn't even completed the transition and thus presents as male
damn leftoids are getting desperate

>>1436642
Groypers don't call other right-wingers fascists.

>>1436677
you don't get it man it's an epic false flag to start the trannycaust or something, just like in hollywood movies, also the gay sex between the shooter and his transitioning partner is also part of the false flag

Honestly the more the left tries to deny this thing with crazy made-up conspiracy theories, the more unhinged they make themselves look

>>1436675
>>1436677
>>1436680
>>1436815
so do they force you to post in small windows of time so they don't have to pay you as much?

>>1436816
Cope much? How's your latest Tyler Robinson truther conspiracy theory working out for ya?

>>1436818
i don't speak pol pidgin

>>1436819
I don't think you even speak English honestly. What do they have you using over there, Google translate?

...and I've thoroughly defeated the unhinged leftfag again.

esl shill is projecting again.

>>1436821
>agani
I don't speak Punjabi or whatever

>>1436822
i'm glad i live rent free in your head faggot. keep trying to defeat me, it's endless amusement

>>1436824
yeah you do. have some pride, shill faggot. maybe a real job would help?

>>1436825
>it's endless amusement
Oh that's for sure.
There's at least three people on this board who mock you for this constantly. You end up running out of talking points or whatever the hell it is you are paid to push and you shutdown just like you have and start using "esl" as much as you can. It may be only you and me right now, but I've been in threads with multiple people abusing you like this.

esl shill is starting his projection marathon?

>>1436597
>Chuds proven wrong again
>Chuck's 'comeback' called 'Prove Me Wrong'
That aged well for both. And barely a week has passed.

>>1436839
gun to your head, spit a logic verse

>>1436839
Were they proven wrong? OP lied and said literally the exact opposite of just about everything in the quoted article.

>>1436840
At least Chuckie put his neck where his mouth was, thus he had more integrity than rightard politicians certainly Kirk's SJWs

>lied
projectionist >>1436842 lies and >>1436839 & >>1436597 are correct

>>1436845
Weird how no mainstream news is willing to publish your groyper conspiracy theories, huh?

>>1436846
taking a break from disparaging mainstream news, are you shill?

>>1436847
No, in trying to have you admit that everything you say is bullshit but I guess that's an exercise in futility

>>1436848
why do you shills confuse posters so much? i'm not the one talking to you, i'm ridiculing you

>>1436846
>>1436848
Being a projectionist is weird. Also
https://i.postimg.cc/G3gwzn18/daily-mail-kash-patel.jpg
That favorite news platform of a past weird rightard, the Daily Mail, isn't being nice to that personally appointed by Trump - Krash Patel and the same platform said the day after an election in 2020 that Biden was 'The voice of reason and sanity - so I guess that same bong newspaper will never be used for creating leftist 'Gotcha!' threads in /news/ ever again.

So on one hand we have the theory that Tyler is a leftist, and as supporting evidence we have every official public statement and piece of evidence which has been made public.

On the other hand we have the theory that he is a conservative, supported by *checks URL* T̶h̶e̶ ̶T̶i̶m̶e̶s̶ ̶O̶f̶ ̶I̶n̶d̶i̶a̶ (actually it states he was leftist, op just misquoted it).. um. I guess what is the supporting evidence that he's conservative? All I've seen is people claim it without actually citing anything except their opinions

>>1436871
we get it, you hate your race

>>1436613
It coukd go all ways.

Libral chaser or ally to trans women
Republican chaser who either wants to be trans or is gay but cant admit it
Groyper who cant get real pussy so his friend transitions and they date

>>1436615
This exactly. Its exhausting reading all these theories or proof that hes one side or the other. You can hate someone and justify killing them for having the opposite political views or being the same party but not platforming it the way you want. We truly will not know until he cooperates

>>1437068
Or you could look at the mountains of evidence and every single public statement made about the case which paints a pretty clear picture of who he was.

>>1436643
That isnt even the name they chose for their alleged transition. Screenshots of their alleged steam account sais they changed their display name to Luna. lance twiggs is potentially their given, dead name.

>>1436815
What are the leftist conspiracies going around? All i’ve seen is he is a groyper. Which has weight behind it. Every insane theory ive seen is pushed and bitched about my rebublicans

Only 21% of Americans think Tyler was a Democrat. More people think he was a Republican. Most people think he was something else, or don't know/care.

https://today.yougov.com/topics/international/survey-results/daily/2025/09/15/d30fd/2

>>1437073
All evidence and all public statements clearly indicate he was a left wing extremist. There is no evidence whatsoever that he is a groyper.

Idk why you clowns are doing this. There is going to be a very big, very public, trial. Lying about it now is only going to increase the levels of public disgust you fools are currently facing when everything comes to light.

>>1437069
Theres a lot of misinformation being pushes as evidence. Non stop things have been claimed to be the truth by media and it is disputed moments later. I’ll make my decision on who he is when he speaks. So far hes nothing to me but a political extremist on either side and a chronically online retard

>>1437069
Half the public statements were made before they even knew who he was. If you believe the statements, they caught at least three shooters. Making statements was a higher priority than actually solving the crime and it showed.

>>1437076
Do you have any knowledge about the memes and shit they joke about between eachother in nick fuentes’ community? Clearly not if you think he is exclusively a liberal

>>1437076
Fucking a tranny is pretty groyper behavior. They can only angrily watch so much tranny porn before it starts to affect them.

>>1437078
Again, all the evidence is pretty clear. From inscriptions on the bullets to what Gov. Cox has said about his motives. Also, the fact that he shot Charlie Kirk is a pretty good indicator of which side of the spectrum he was on.

>>1437079
I have knowledge of what the evidence is and what they have told us about the shooter. Your little psyop is disgusting.

>>1437081
It's actually not, because extremists hate moderates even if they're ostensibly on the same side. The fact that Charlie "some school shootings are okay and children should watch executions" Kirk is considered a moderate is pretty concerning, but the extreme right doesn't like the moderate right anymore than the extreme left likes the moderate left, or either of them like each other.

>>1437081
Groypers have a history of going to Charlie’s events and harassing him. Nick fuentes and his groyper community hated him. It’s not clear; he could be a liberal extremist who was making a statement about how charlie used his platform, or a nazi who didnt like that he wasnt extreme enough. A WEEK before charlie was killed, nick was calling charlie a fascist. The shit on the bullets only say:
1. He is a degenerate
2. He played hell divers
3. He is either a A. liberal extremist acticist or B. A groyper.

>>1437083
>Charlie "some school shootings are okay and children should watch executions" Kirk
Two things he never said.

>b... but
All evidence and all public statements indicate he is a left-wing extremist. Lying about this now is only going to blow up in your face when the trial starts.

>>1437082
Im not even american bro i dont care about a psyop or anything. Death to your country from the inside out lol. Have fun killing each other while i theorize in the streets i dont have to fear being shot in for no reason

>>1437084
There is no evidence suggesting his was a groyper. You may want him to be one, however, reality and what you want are not the same thing.

>>1437085
“It’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”

"Death penalties should be public, should be quick, it should be televised. I think at a certain age, its an initiation...What age should you start to see public executions?"

>>1437089
>“It’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”
Notice how he didnt say "shootings are okay"

>"Death penalties should be public, should be quick, it should be televised. I think at a certain age, its an initiation...What age should you start to see public executions?"
Notice how he didnt say children should watch executions.

You cant help yourself but lie.

>>1437090
>Uh he didn't SAY it outright! It was just very heavily implied!
Ok retard.

>>1437090
>You cant help yourself but lie
It's all they have at this point

>>1437091
You just conceded that he didn't say it.

>>1437090
Oh, I thought you were aware of your surroundings enough to understand extremely clear subtext. My mistake.

>>1437094
>okay he didnt say the things I said he said.
Case closed

>>1437093
If you're going to be this disingenuous, you should probably go with "he didn't say them both in the same sentence like you quoted!"
It's much cleaner.

>>1437088
I have no narrative to push. This is not my country and not my politics. Him being a groyper does not benefit me. However, I am familiar with the community and recognize their dog whistles and memes in his behavior. You’re just showing how internet illiterate you are. Maaaaaybe you should educate yourself some more about the topic at hand before vehemently disagreeing with something.

Show me the evidence that he is a liberal. Just because he lived with someone who may identify as trans and killed a conservative influencer?

>>1437096
You just conceded that he didnt say it. There is nothing to argue about. Take the L.

>>1437097
>Show me the evidence that he is a liberal.
All publicly available evidence and all public statements on the case.

>>1437090
Are you too retarded that you cannot understand subcontext and see that by saying these things he is actively saying what the original anon was suggesting?

It's amazing how many of the people gnashing their teeth and rending their clothes over Kirk refuse to accept direct quotes from him.

>>1437099
Good post.

>>1437100
>okay he literally did not say these things but I subjectively think he said it so he said it!

>>1437101
Totally accept what he said. Gun deaths are a natural consequence of the 2A but its utility makes it worth it. In the same way that car deaths are a natural consequence of having cars and the utility of cars makes it worth it. This does not mean that car deaths or gun deaths are okay.

>>1437099
Show it to me. Send me links. Because for days on end its been nothing but supposedly trustworthy news sources reporting things that are later denounced. From the moment it happened people have called him a liberal, making the assumption. Before he was even caught, an assumption. The police snd political people have done nothing but say that beofre he was even caught. He was caught, and the cherif said he was hoping he wasnt ‘one of us’, because he was. Educate yourself on the shit this person is as into and the communities people are claiming he could be a part of. Look deeper, sheep

>>1437103
Go ahead and tell us what you think he meant when he said those things then. What does "it is worth it" mean to you? Why would someone say something should be televised and used as an initiation and then ask about ages to watch a publicly televised initiation event?

>>1437104
If it's worth it, then it's okay. If it wasn't okay, it wouldn't be worth it. The value it adds is what makes it okay. These are directly linked concepts.

>>1437106
So, you concede that he didnt say the things you said he did and now want to argue about how to interpret them?

Take the L.

>>1437109
Wait, you have to interpret statements that are that clear? Do your parents/handlers know you're here?

>>1437108
>If it's worth it, then it's okay
That's your SUBJECTIVE interpretation. He did not say "its okay" or anything to that effect - which is what you accused him of.

Your inability to have an honest conversation is quite concerning.

>>1437111
>Wait, you have to interpret statements that are that clear?
You're the one interpreting them as you just conceded he did not say the things you accuse him of.

>>1437112
He also didn't say both statements in the same sentence. You should, it's a much more concise way to be as disingenuous as you are.

>>1437105
>From the moment it happened people have called him a liberal, making the assumption
Well, it's true. People who said it without evidence are the same type of people calling him a secret conservative without evidence.
Now that the evidence is out, it strongly suggests only that he is a liberal

>>1437112
Rage baiting for fun is not cute. You know what subcontext is, use your brain retard

>>1437112
>>1437113
Brother, the "he didn't LITERALLY say exactly those words!" argument never works. That's the kind of shit liberals do when someone says 50% and they go "uhm, akshually it's 49.764% with a 3 point margin of error". It's weak as hell and makes you look stupid.

>>1437114
>Claim: "some school shootings are okay"
>Reality: “It’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”

>Claim: children should watch executions
>Reality: "Death penalties should be public, should be quick, it should be televised. I think at a certain age, its an initiation...What age should you start to see public executions?"

He did not say either of the things you accuse him of. Why are you misrepresenting his prior statements?

>>1437115
The evidence also suggests he could be a groyper.

>>1437118
>it's worth it
>it's not okay

>it should be televised. it should be an initiation at a certain age. what age?
>it should only be seen by adults

Square these circles.

>>1437116
>You know what subcontext is, use your brain retard
Sub context is subjective. You WANT him to have meant or implied those things but he did not actually say those things.

Its telling that your biggest criticism of him is something you made up

>>1437117
>Brother, the "he didn't LITERALLY say exactly those words!" argument never works.
It works 100% of the time when you say someone said something and they did not actually say that thing. That is what we call "libel".

>>1437120
No, it does not, and there has not been a single journalist at any major publication willing to put that in writing, not even the daily beast.

It's a xitter rumor no different than the moon landing being faked

>>1437121
>The cost of a thing is a cost, and also having the thing is worth it
Obviously

>it should be televised. it should be an initiation at a certain age. what age?
>it should only be seen by adults
Answers itself.

>>1437118
>He did not say either of the things you accuse him of. Why are you misrepresenting his prior statements?
Because I have HIV in my gay ass, and if dRumpf and the Goncervatives win I might not get free HIV meds.

I find it weird that so many people once against pedophilia, the Qanon club, are now for it since Trump and his cronies are involved. Q fucked up so many people, I call it identity dimorphism. So now anything the 'enemy' does is bad and evil, while when your tribe does the same thing it is perfectly fine, in fact righteous.

>>1437118
Saying children dying is worth the cost of carrying around a gun is excusing gun violence. Excusing gun violence = its okay. If he truly didnt think it was okay he would have more to say than it’s unfortunate. Hes had so many opportunities over his career to dispute this, and he never has.

He claimed death penalties is like an initiation and asked what age you should see them. That is opening the floor to suggesting there is a young age that should see it.

Hes dead. He’s not going to thank you for backing him so hard and arguing semantics for him. You can stop

>>1437122
So what exactly did he mean when he said it was "worth it". I'm okay with things that are worth it. Are there things that are worth it that you are not okay with? Why would you call them worth it? Is the worth not a mitigating factor for whatever makes it not okay? If not, then how could it be worth it?

>>1437127
>Saying children dying is worth the cost of carrying around a gun is excusing gun violence.
Again: not what was said.

>That is opening the floor to suggesting there is a young age that should see it.
You just admitted (again) that he did not, in fact, say children should watch executions.

Being insanely dishonest about what someone said is an instant L.

>>1437127
Imagine Charlie Kirk screaming warnings from beyond the grave that he was wrong and he is trying so hard to warn them but they cannot hear him.

>>1437124
>>The cost of a thing is a cost, and also having the thing is worth it
>Obviously
So the worth isn't enough to make it okay? Then it's not worth it, is it? There are lots of things that would be okay if they were worth it, but aren't worth it and so aren't okay.

>it should be televised. it should be an initiation at a certain age. what age?
>it should only be seen by adults
Answers itself.

No it doesn't. He never said adults. He's talking about initiations and ages. That rhetorical device doesn't work when talking about adults.

>>1437128
You're literally retarded, huh?

>>1437128
>Car deaths are the result of car ownership
>but the utility of having cars makes it worth it
Do you agree with this statement? and does your agreement mean that you're "okay with children dying in car accidents"?

I think the deeper question here is why you guys are so fundamentally dishonest.

>>1437123
The mainstream republican media knows nothing about this subculture. Of course they arent going to report on it, its easier to say hes a liberal than to make themselves look worse by saying ‘hey actually he might be a part of the republican subculture that is way worse than far right liberals.” It takes too much time to explain to your grandparents and parents what a groyper is, easier to continue the anti liveral brain washing

>>1437133
I actually do think that cars are worth it. Does that upset you? Does that make you angry at me? Did that make you angry at Kirk? Explain the difference.

>>1437135
There is no evidence that he was a Groyper. This is a massive cope made up by permaonline losers who dont have the basic decency of saying
>he was a lefty extremist. Thats absolutely fucked up. He does not represent us.

>>1437132
No. He is not like your grandpa-daddy's children.

>>1437136
>I actually do think that cars are worth it.
You're okay with kids dying in car accidents? What the fuck.

You can be okay with cars being a thing and also not be okay with kids dying in accidents. Its not a contradictory position.

>>1437132
I don't have the time to explain rhetoric to you. Kirk used a lot of rhetoric in his talks, it's too bad it all went over your head. It's a shame he didn't dumb himself down for his audience.

>>1437140
>okay he didnt actually say the things I said he said
>but I THINK he said those things so he said it
Is there a word for this psychological disorder?

>>1437136
People choosing to go into a car and wreck it is up to them. Just don't drive if you're opposed. Don't vouch for guns unless you're willing to be shot.

>>1437133
>>1437133
Having a car that you need to practically exist and go anywhere is not the same as carrying around a gun to protect yourself from invisible threats. No one gets in car accidents on purpose, but people kill children and go to schools with guns with the intent of killing them on purpose every. Fucking. Day. In your country.

>>1437139
Since you didn't explain the difference, I will.
I said "I think cars are worth it." full stop, one sentence, no qualifiers. Kirk said "It's worth it to have the cost of some school shootings". He didn't say the ammendment was worth it or the utility or safety was worth it or the guns themselves were worth it, he said the cost is worth it. That means he accepts the cost. He's okay with the cost. He finds the cost not high enough to take significant action on.

>>1437140
Huh, rhetoric? I'm tired of that being used as an excuse for an inability to control the tongue. Say what you mean, or shut your mouth.

>>1437142
End of argument. You reap what you sow.

>>1437144
>Kirk said "It's worth it to have the cost of some school shootings"
He did not say that.

Why are you incapable of being honest about this?

>>1437145
Your boy Kirk used rhetoric constantly. Really, really often. He literally died in the middle of rhetoric.

>>1437143
>not American
lmao we're done here.

>>1437146
You would think more Bible thumpers would grasp this concept... just shows you they never read it or don't understand it.

>>1437149
My boy? Think you need to take a breathe and step back. I am fine with his death.

>>1437150
I said i wasnt american a while ago, guess you just like to argue and not read. Classic American!

>>1437153
Listen up, pajeet, if we want your opinion well give it to you.

>>1437149
I bring up the rhetoric excuse because politicians and influencers say some crazy shit calling for violence then stepback and call it rhetoric.

>>1437153
What country are you from so we can act like we know absolutely everything about it?

>>1437155
Haha, resorts to racial insults... classic Republican cuck.

>>1437156
What's the point if people are just going to completely lie about what you say?

>>1437155
A pajeet runs your FBI.

>>1437156
Well this entire conversation is about a rhetorical man full of rhetoric. Half of his memorable quotes are rhetorical (feel free to "uhm ackshually" that percentage). He died in the middle of rhetoric. It's impossible to talk about him without it.

>>1437151
The best part is he was SO OKAY with gun violence and children dying he wouldnt even fight for any sort of reform to make it harder for youth and mentally ill people to have access. He was fighting for unrestricted guns for everyone. He did not care about safety, he did not care about people dying. He truly thought what he was fighting for was right, glad he died for what he believed in LOL. Shame his fans wont see the irony and wont push for reform to avoid this in the future. Let the cycle continue

>>1437158
Lmao you're actually a pajeet?

>>1437159
What comfy rock were you sleeping under? This is the way this world is.

>>1437162
>Shame his fans wont see the irony and wont push for reform to avoid this in the future.
He was killed with a hunting rifle you fucking retard.

>>1437160
Yeah, and he's doing a terrible job.

>>1437163
Nope. Just thought it was funny that you immediately when all racist retard.

>>1437155
The phenomenon of Americans on 4chan immediately resorting to racism against indians when someone says they arent american needs to be studied.

>>1437167
Most Americans on 4chan are middle-class. Poor kids dont really fuck around on their PC's all day. I dont think you understand just how much middle-class Americans dislike Indians.

>>1437165
Okay….yep thats a gun! Good job buddy. Do you need me to hold your hand and help you walk through reading that again? You can have laws and regulations on all kinds of guns, sweetheart!

>>1437168
Most lost their inheritance to Indians. But truth be told if it didn't go to Indian scammers it would be getting swindled from them by the government and bankers.

>>1437170
Literally no one in America is in favor of banning or otherwise restricting hunting rifles. Your premise thus falls flat.

Also, worry about your own country you fucking loser.

>>1437168
Im just glad the narrative of whos the problem online is immediately indians now instead of black people

>>1437171
Nah. Its mainly from interacting with them at Costco and at work.

>>1437167
4chan went to shit as soon as Indians became a significant part of the open internet. Plus all the paid shill farms in India. They're so cheap that it's been found worth it to send them to dumps like this on top of all the usual social media sites.

>>1437170
Bolt action rifles like that are exempt from all the scary features bans and are still common in Europe. Short of a total ban on rifles, nothing would prevent this.
>inb4 background checks
We already have background checks

>>1437174
Why does that upset you?

>>1437172
There are people in America who unironically think we should be restricted only to firearms that existed when the 2nd ammendment was written.

>>1437177
Because they are absolutely repulsive in a number of ways?

>>1437172
No ones talking about banning guns. You clearly dont even understand the concept of gun reform or the meaning of the word. Im closing this tab. Back to my liberal Indian reality with my barely passing trans wife

>>1437179
There are people in America who think they are the descendants of Yakub. Lmao who cares what some fringe retards think. The average American is far more pro-gun than you could ever conceive. Right now banning a very specific set of guns is a 50-50 issue. Banning handguns is like 70-20 and banning all guns is like 95-5.

>>1437181
Gun reform like what?

>>1437175
USA companies are the ones hiring most of them... sounds like an internal issue. Who sells your info for money? Main reason every site wants you to sign up an email is so they can collect info and sell it. It isn't free, dummies. Your okay them to sell your info, it is in the fine print that no one reads but agrees to anyway, perfectly legal in your country. Common practice among business and government, in fact.

>>1437180
Sounds like a you problem.

>>1437190
Its an increasingly popular problem. Which makes it a problem for pajeets.

>>1437135
>The conspiracy is so deep and esoteric no media can report on it
Indeed! Interesting!!
The conspiracy theory deepens!!

>>1437192
A few chuds get worked up by some hate bots? Sounds like emotional immaturity. At least your fags are busy waiting for the KKK army to assemble because you're all too cowardly to actually do something except have someone else do it... yeah, some REAL men. Lmao.

>>1437196
Meanwhile, Indian scams rake in more money than you would earn working 5 lifetimes. Money talks, ask any business.

>>1437199
*more money in a week than you would earn in 5 lifetimes. And you 'earned' it just as dishonestly.

>>1437196
Yeah. We obey the law. Massive own.

>>1437204
Haha, doubt it.

Slaves, obey your masters. Make sure you are not late for work.

>>1436607
the way i see it. guy who is apparently executor was only a patsy. i think it wasn't some dude but a trained military sniper who could have done this job in exact the way that was done. . . in . . . one (1) SHOT. . . and then jumping from the roof. that was a military trained assassin. that was an undercover sniper . . . who is an absolute professional and professionals don't act on political motives. . . they don't leave version of the quran lying around, nor do they engrave bullets with slogans, nor do they have dnk on some towels, in fact they leave as little evidence as possible. they don't let their emotions get the better of them. . . they are cold functioning murder machines that have no soul no conscience and no empathy. this was definitively an absolute professional job that mimics the CIA assassination of JFK . . . martin luther king . . . malcom x . . .

a hunting rifle makes a loud bang. this one was a high powered professional sniper rifle . . . and a person who makes such a shot doesn't need 10 cartridges and . . . officials said that several bullet casings recovered from a "hunting" rifle.

again . . . ONE BULLET . . . ONE SHOT . . . 4 bullet casings that don't add up, also that guy who did the shot wore a black mask and had a black bag for the rifle . . . where does the towel come from? oh and that guy tyler robinson, where the fuck did he learn to shoot like a pro?

>>1437214
Great conspiracy theory. Go ahead and post it on >>>/x/ or send it into the daily beast or something. Or idk make a youtube, maybe someone will take you seriously or something

>>1437217
how is that conspiracy theory at all? are you alright, hey did you forgot about 9/11 and do you know why did you forgot about memorial WTC collapse occasion? perhaps you don't know how to question everything and how to think.

oh, never mind, you are a bot and not a real human being. you can't think outside of your programed script and you are here only to propagate hatred and nothing else besides hatred.

>>1437222
>how is that conspiracy theory at all?
You claimed the shooter was at patsy.
It's a conspiracy theory

>>1437229
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrfHme9Yhc8

>>1437236
What is the video of Tyler Robinson fleeing the scene of the crime supposed to prove?

Numerous conspiracy theories about the attack were posted online.[204] Political consultant Roger Stone said the attack appeared to have been "a professional hit either by a nation state, rogue elements of our own government or a terrorist organization."[186] One theory, promulgated by Russian state media RT, centered on people standing near Kirk, who were purported to have made "unusual gestures" before he was killed.[204][186] Several senior Russian officials, including former President Dmitry Medvedev and Kremlin negotiator Kirill Dmitriev, made claims without evidence on social media that Kirk was murdered as a result of United States support for Ukraine.[205][206] New Zealand-based news website Stuff refuted a theory that the video of Kirk's death was purportedly faked due to Kirk's ring appearing to switch fingers, reporting that the ring "appeared to be hinged, meaning a latch opens and closes the ring on the finger".[207] It was also speculated that one of the inscriptions found on the bullets could be a reference to the far-right Groyper culture.[75] The latter interpretation was based in part on the adversarial stance that the Groypers had towards Kirk, such as during their 2019 heckling campaign (the "Groyper War").[208] Groyper leader and far-right commentator Nick Fuentes rejected this speculation, stating that his followers were being "framed".[208]

>>1437214
If he is a patsy why is everyone, including himself by turning himself on, going along with it? Why is he willing to give himself the death sentence and his family giving him up for free? You cannot love your country enough

>>1437295
He isn't going along with it. He's not cooperating according to the Governor.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gvrw2pgedo

>>1437310
There will always be retards who think Tyler Robinson is a patsy just like there are retards who think Proud Democrat Ryan Routh is a patsy

>>1437266
>look guys we brigaded wiki to make it say what we want it to

>>1437315
What he posted is just quoting other people.

>>1437315
Uh huh. So it's another conspiracy theory, and this time wikipedia is involved?

>>1437363
It's a conspiracy to quote someone else?

>>1437295
>>1437229
Ignore the word "patsy", what about the rest of text from that anon?

>>1437467
That's fine. I wouldn't trade my ideals for a meaningless political win.

>>1437467

Bruh. Why does it matter if they can win elections or not? They just assassinated one of the most famous conservative influencers in the US and still only 21% of Americans think Tyler is a Democrat. Only 40% of Republicans think Tyler is a Democrat. The public isn't going to hold them accountable for this. It's already fading from normie discourse.

>>1437484
>Based on a a shitty poll from the notoriously even-handed YouGOV.

>>1437472
>>1437484
>>1437467 pasted the same here >>1437466
And when something is reduced to copypasta, it means less than nothing. I'm not surprised that >>1437467 >>1437466 is doing this as it knows it's desperate due to knowing it'll lose.

>>1437484
Your own poll says that the majority of people havent made up their minds yet.

>>1437510
No it says they don't care.

>>1437513
lmao cope.

>>1437514
>>1437513
>>1437510
Technically the poll asks if people believe Tyler Robinson is a Republican or Democrat. About 1/5 of people each thought either Republican or Democrat and another 2/5 said they weren't sure and 1/5 said neither.

Going off the currently available evidence "not sure" or "neither" are the objectively correct answers since the dude was registered as unaffiliated, meaning in a literal sense he is neither a Republican or Democrat.

You can interpret the antifa slogans on this bullets however you'd like, but the poll asked about party membership and the 2/5 that collectively answered Republican or Democrat either can't read or are partisans trying to blame the other side

>>1437515
>Republicans said he is a Democrat
>Democrats said he is a Republican
>40% said they dont know
Its not complicated m8

We should honor Charlie Kirk's memory by releasing the epstein files.

>>1437524
That's pretty much what I was saying just with more words

>>1436597
He was a communist sympathizer.
He dispised conservatives and Christians.
His bf was a troon.
Stop lying!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pziQkN1Hu0w

>>1437310
Thank you for the source! Ive read a lot of sources saying he was convinced by his family and a family friend who was a pastor to confess. Love misinformation

>>1437528
Shame the republicans voted against it while they were shooting him dead to distract

>weeb
>gamer
>gun nut
>troon chaser

Might as well have "groyper" tattooed across his forehead.

>>1436677
Groypers don't have coherent political beliefs. Groypers are frustrated, but they don't know why. A groyper would be just as likely to refer to Antifa as fascist as they would an actual fascist. Or perhaps both.