[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1763833255921031.jpg (85 KB, 1160x653)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
https://nypost.com/2025/11/23/us-news/minn-mom-shiloh-hendrix-facing-trial-for-calling-autistic-boy-the-n-word/

> Minnesota mom who called autistic boy, 5, the N-word in horrifying, viral video will face trial

A trial date has been set for a Minnesota mom accused of launching a racist tirade against a 5-year-old black child at a playground in a shocking viral video, before painting herself as the victim and raising hundreds of thousands of dollars through a fundraiser.

Shiloh Hendrix, 36, was charged with three counts of disorderly conduct stemming from the horrific incident on April 28 in Rochester, Minn.

The bigot’s trial is scheduled to begin on Aug. 31 next year, with a pre-trial hearing set for Aug. 21, prosecutors announced Thursday, according to ABC 6 News.

Hendrix — who has previous convictions for driving under the influence, disorderly conduct and brawling — has pleaded not guilty to the charges against her.

The blond, white woman went viral in early May after she was filmed by 30-year-old Sharmake Omar, who confronted her after she allegedly called a 5-year-old boy the N-word.

She repeated the vile slur multiple times during the short video, branding the boy a drain on the welfare system.

The 49-second clip shows Hendrix carrying her son and walking away from Omar, as he asks her to explain her actions and she admits to calling the child the hateful word.

“Mind your f–king own business,” Hendrix responded, accusing the boy of stealing items from her son’s diaper bag.
>>
>>1460108
The disturbing clip was quickly condemned by disgusted viewers in online comments.

Shortly after the video went viral, Hendrix outed herself as the woman in the clip and set up a fundraiser on the crowdfunding website GiveSendGo to raise money that she said was to “help protect” her family.

She claimed her personal information was leaked online and that she needed funds to relocate them.

By May 6, the donations page had raised over $700,000, including support from avowed neo-Nazis and white nationalists, along with others who defended her actions under the First Amendment.

In response, GiveSendGo decided to mute comments on the fundraiser.
>finished
>>
>>1460108
How do I marry this woman?
>>
it's crazy how white devils don't even need the kkk mask these days
>>
>>1460108
Face trial for what? Free speech? Charges will be dropped
>>1460111
Nigger
>>
>>1460108
Hendrix, S. thoughtcrime, Room 101.
>>
>>1460133
I think you believe MN follows established US law and the Constitution.
That's a lot of faith in Demoshits right there.
>>
itt esl shills misunderstand the justice system again
>>
>Hendrix — who has previous convictions for driving under the influence, disorderly conduct and brawling — has pleaded not guilty to the charges against her.

>The blond, white woman went viral in early May after she was filmed by 30-year-old Sharmake Omar, who confronted her after she allegedly called a 5-year-old boy the N-word.

>She repeated the vile slur multiple times during the short video, branding the boy a drain on the welfare system.

Ironically, this bitch sounds like a complete nigger
>>
>>1460133
>Face trial for what? Free speech?
>three counts of disorderly conduct
You know in polite society it's actually considered uncool to harass children and call them slurs.
>>
>>1460155
Uncool, but not explicitly illegal.
>>
>>1460156
esl shill, how many locales do you pretend to live in? are you aware of all the different statutes you're supposed to memorize in doing so? you're making your job pretty hard on yourself
>>
>>1460157
What?
>>
>>1460156
Fix your bot, Ranjesh. It's being a jeet.
>>
>>1460158
esl shill can't read
>>
>>1460108
That woman deserves to be decorated for telling the hard cold truth in this sissified society. I am tired of having to lock everything so those thieves don't steal my goods. Why good hard working people like me have to keep those parasites alive?
>>
>>1460157
>>1460159
ESL Indians shitting up the board again
>>
>>1460108
>Violent career criminal chimps out, shrieking at children and throwing her feces in public
>Other subhumans see video of her chimp out on their computers, hop around their trailers shitting and pissing themselves, give her all of their digital bananas
So this is the master race
>>
>those parasites
But enough about inferior subhumans such as >>1460163
>>
>>1460111
The US economy is in bad shape and the easy solution is to move all your lazy asses back to Africa.
>>
>ESL Indians shitting up the board again
Such as >>1460156
>>
>>1460169
You have a flag hanging on the wall of your double wide the represents the kikes that tricked your retard ancestors into killing other white men and dying so they could keep bringing niggers into this country rather than pay your retarded ancestors for their labor
>>
>Please note that 4chan's global rules are in effect. Blatant trolling and racism is not permitted.
It would be nice if jannies actually enforced this.
>>
>You have a flag hanging on the wall of your double wide the represents
>double wide the represents
>the
Here is a post that represents how >>1460177 has hanging on the wall a flag that isn't the Stars and Stripes because the shill isn't American.
>>
>>1460180
they would have to delete the board. which, if we put it up to a vote, i'm all for
>>
>>1460180
Those rules are a bygone relic of a time before moot left and Hirohito let /pol/ take over every board
Ironically, they're still up because of how little he gives a shit about this site
>>
>>1460184
>they would have to delete the board
No they wouldn't, just rangeban the idiots (you) who think this is blue /pol/
>>
>>1460184
>they would have to delete the board. which, if we put it up to a vote, i'm all for
the shill would then have to crawl back to another board to justify its sad pathetic existence. Such as, say, /vt/.
>>
>>1460188
...What the fuck is that board?
>>
>>1460187
so is it racism when we don't let you larp as a white racist american? because last i checked that's nothing but a delusion you're repeatedly made fun of for
>>
>>1460189
What the fuck is this board, but just a blue /pol/.
If /news/ ceased to exist tomorrow, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it but the local jeet lolcow would.
>>
>>1460192
speaking in third person, are we
>>
>>1460156
Actually is. Hence why there's a charge you can make against someone in court for it.
>>
>>1460193
>we
Fix your bot, Ranjesh. It's being schizophrenic.
>>
>>1460196
maybe if you make fun of yourself 100 more times we'll go along with your larp, esl shill
>>
>>1460155
Id call you a nigger to your stupid brown face
>>
>>1460195
>Screams about fascists
>Protests "Kings'
>ACAB
>YOU CAN'T JUST SAY SHIT WITHOUT REPRECUSSIONS!!!
OK, fascist. The charge is disorderly conduct, for calling a little welfare thief a thief on camera.
Classy? No. Free speech? Yes.
And where were this thief's parents?
>>
>>1460193
>speaking in third person, are we
>we
>>1460198
>we'll
No wonder you're the ESL lolcow of /news/. Take your schizo meds.
>>
>>1460200
Yeah there's a difference between protests and randomly harassing a 5 year old on the street. Go try yelling slurs at children yourself to test.
>>
>>1460199
>>1460200
Nobody will ever think you're white or american. Ever
>>
>>1460200
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences.
Make an example of Shitlow Hendicks the inferior subhuman, Minnesota's legal system. Set the precedent.
>>
>>1460202
Normally I wouldn't but are their parents around, and are they stealing from me?
That would determine whether or not I get pissed enough to yell at a poorly raised aspiring scumbag.
>>
>>1460206
>are they stealing from me?
It was a 5 year old on a playground retard.
>>
>>1460207
And the reason she yelled at him was because he was stealing stuff.
>>
>>1460208
You're stealing the identity of an anonymous white american every time you post
>>
>>1460208
lol no he wasn't. She called him a welfare thief. He was literally just a 5 year old on a playground this alcoholic shithead decided to yell slurs at for fun.
>>
>>1460210
So, like, what do your posts even do here?
>>
>>1460211
>Hendrix responded, accusing the boy of stealing items from her son’s diaper bag.
Hmm.
>>
>>1460213
Remind you that you're a lover mostly
>>
>>1460199
>Id call you
>Id
I'd doubt that id Software would ever call you to work for them. They value highly educated people in their company.
>>
>>1460215
Indeed I am.
>>
>>1460215
*loser

I guess my autocorrect wants me to be nice to you but I disagree
>>
>>1460214
>Uh no actually the 5 year old totally stole stuff from my bag
>That's why I didn't say that in the actual video and instead waited until I got shit for my drunk ass calling an autistic 5 year old slurs
>I'm just a heckin victim!
>>
>>1460219
It's your esl acting up, Ivan.
>>
>>1460214
>Hendrix — who has previous convictions for driving under the influence, disorderly conduct and brawling
Yep, sounds like someone who would never lie for sympathy
>>
>>1460222
Could be possible.
Could be possible she thought he was stealing.
Could be possible he actually was stealing.
The missing piece here is an ass-whooping from a concerned parent.
Which makes me think he's poorly raised and stealing.
Either way, there should be no conviction, as even if she was mistaken, she was still just speaking.
So fuck you fascist faggot.
>>
>>1460225
>SHE WAS A GOOD GURL SHE DINDU NUFFIN
>>
>>1460225
>Either way, there should be no conviction, as even if she was mistaken, she was still just speaking.
>Guys it was just calling a 5 year old slurs at a public playground. She basically did nothing
She's gonna get a year in jail. Or have to pay all that shit she fundraised for herself to the people she harassed.
>>
>>1460226
Where in the fuck did I say that?
Did you read my post?
If you're not going to read the posts, then I just won't post and you can yell at dRumpf or whatever to yourself and get 100% agreement from the retarded Indian troll.
I'd imagine you'll be bored, since he doesn't even speak English and is probably a little shit in whatever language he uses.
>>
>>1460108
>Hendrix — who has previous convictions for driving under the influence, disorderly conduct and brawling
So this is who rightoids were simping for and wanting to make into a millionaire, kek
>>
>NYpost
>Already 60 posts
Reminder this is bait designed to distract you from the fact that trump is destroying the economy and is a pedophile on the epstein list.
>>
>>1460226
Protip: the guy videotaping the interaction is a pedophile.
>>
>>1460203
Not my problem brownoid
>>
>Shiloh
>Hendrix
two of the blackest names ever stuck on an Aryan. parents these past couple decades man.
>>
>>1460108
will the kid be charged for literally trying to mug her son?
will the kid's parents be arrested for grooming a child into becoming a criminal.
>>
>>1460236
>karmelo anthony a black guy who murdered a white teenager is fine though
ok lefty I'll take the lady who takes the N word over a literal murderer but i guess you'd be happy to fund his house because muh oppression.
I hope you get shanked next you'd deserve it
>>
>>1460426
Lol why would they? In America that gets them a free pass because she used the n word, that automatically negates any crime they may or may not have committed
>>
>>1460426
>>1460427
>>1460428
why do you spam like this
>>
>>1460431
why do you lie so much, and why are you so mad at anonymous posts
>>
Free speech has been abolished in Washington State too, but that's fine, no one was using it anyway and there's no one around worth talking to.
>>
>>1460133
>freeze peach
Doesn't exist anymore. In WA State, the governor, when he was the AG, directed prosecutors to prosecute NON-CRIMES just to see if they could stamp on unpopular speech. No one has sued in court AND there's a snitch line. It goes like this: if you say something that hurts someone's feelings, they can call the snitch line, then the state does its best to frame the "victim" as a downtrodden minority. They even spelled that out.
>>
The joke 'Charlie Kirk was pro-life. Irony bit him in the neck' - and so many others in that artery... I mean vein is the price to pay for thinking that the 'N'-word, especially used against kids of a certain color, is protected by the 1st Amendment.
If you're offended by the former, you never had the right to so much as think of using the latter. At any time, and to anyone. Even 'as a joke'.
Fair's fair.
>>
I’m just so glad good Christians banded together to raise money for a woman who called a disabled child a racial slur
>>
>>1460856
>a disabled child
That's pretty much the intelligence level of most Blacks in North American and Europe, yet we're supposed to treat them as capable as most upper-middle class Whites.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.