This is happening even as trump is allowing pollouters to poison children multiple other ways https://apnews.com/article/trump-lead-pipes-drinking-water-contamination-epa-6e1c7c45f1ba41ae69dfb13fa9510ef8WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration said Friday it backs a 10-year deadline for most cities and towns to replace their harmful lead pipes, giving notice that it will support a tough rule approved under the Biden administration to reduce lead in drinking water.The Environmental Protection Agency told a federal appeals court in Washington that it would defend the strongest overhaul of lead-in-water standards in three decades against a court challenge by a utility industry association.The Trump administration has typically favored rapid deregulation, including reducing or killing rules on air and water pollution. On Friday, for example, it repealed tight limits on mercury and other toxic emissions from coal plants. But the agency has taken a different approach to drinking water.“After intensive stakeholder involvement, EPA concluded that the only way to comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act’s mandate to prevent anticipated adverse health effects ‘to the extent feasible’ is to require replacement of lead service lines,” the agency’s court filing said.Doing so by a 10-year deadline is feasible, the agency added, supporting a rule that was based in part of the finding that old rules that relied on chemical treatment and monitoring to reduce lead “failed to prevent system-wide lead contamination and widespread adverse health effects.”The EPA said in August it planned to defend the Biden administration’s aggressive rule, but added that it would also “develop new tools and information to support practical implementation flexibilities and regulatory clarity.” Some environmental activists worried that that meant the EPA was looking to create loopholes.
.Lead, a heavy metal once common in products like pipes and paints, is a neurotoxin that can stunt children’s development, lower IQ scores and increase blood pressure in adults. Lead pipes can corrode and contaminate drinking water. The previous Trump administration’s rule had looser standards and did not mandate the replacement of all pipes.Standards aimed at protecting kidsThe Biden administration finalized its lead-in-water overhaul in 2024. It mandated that utilities act to combat lead in water at lower concentrations, with just 10 parts per billion as a trigger, down from 15. If higher levels were found, water systems had to inform their consumers, take immediate action to reduce lead and work to replace lead pipes that are commonly the main source of lead in drinking water.The Biden administration at the time estimated the stricter standards would protect up to 900,000 infants from having low birth weight and avoid up to 1,500 premature deaths a year from heart disease.“People power and years of lead-contaminated communities fighting to clean up tap water have made it a third rail to oppose rules to protect our health from the scourge of toxic lead. Maybe only a hidebound water utility trade group is willing to attack this basic public health measure,” said Erik Olson, senior director at the Natural Resource Defense Council, an environmental nonprofit.The American Water Works Association, a utility industry association, had challenged the rule in court, arguing the EPA lacks authority to regulate the portion of the pipe that’s on private property and therefore cannot require water systems to replace them.The agency countered on Friday that utilities can be required to replace the entire lead pipe because they have sufficient control over them.
The AWWA also said the 10-year deadline wasn’t feasible, noting it’s hard to find enough labor to do the work and water utilities face other significant infrastructure challenges simultaneously. Water utilities were given three years to prepare before the 10-year timeframe starts and some cities with a lot of lead were given longer.The agency said they looked closely at data from dozens of water utilities and concluded that the vast majority could replace their lead pipes in 10 years or less.Replacing decades-old standardsThe original lead and copper rule for drinking water was enacted by the EPA more than 30 years ago. The rules have significantly reduced lead in water but have been criticized for letting cities move too slowly when levels rose too high.Lead pipes are most commonly found in older, industrial parts of the country, including major cities such as Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit and Milwaukee. The rule also revises the way lead amounts are measured, which could significantly expand the number of communities found violating the rules.The EPA under President Donald Trump has celebrated deregulation. Officials have sought to slash climate change programs and promote fossil fuel development. On drinking water issues, however, their initial actions have been more nuanced.In March, for example, the EPA announced plans to partially roll back rules to reduce so-called “forever chemicals” in drinking water — the other major Biden-era tap water protection. That change sought to keep tough limits for some common PFAS, but also proposed scrapping and reconsidering standards for other types and extending deadlines.PFAS and lead pipes are both costly threats to safe water. There are some federal funds to help communities.
The Biden administration estimated about 9 million lead pipes provide water to homes and businesses in the United States. The Trump administration updated the analysis and now projects there are roughly 4 million lead pipes. Changes in methodology, including assuming that communities that did not submit data did not have lead pipes, resulted in the significant shift. The new estimate does correct odd results from some states — activists said that the agency’s initial assumptions for Florida, for example, seemed far too high.The EPA declined to comment on pending litigation. The AWWA pointed to their previous court filing when asked for comment.
tRump Don't drink tap water He drinks canned water aka diet Coke.The rest of us elites in circle of cronies only drink that French fancy water
>>1491165How will liggerals complain about this one?
Democrats will drink from lead pipes just to be against Trump. They have to frame it as Trump losing for Democrats not drink from lead pipes.
>>1491202They will drink from lead pipes and blame trump, even if every level of government in Flint Michigan is run by Democrats
>>1491202Democrats will drink from lead pipes just to be against Biden…?!FTFY.
President Trump only drinks the urine of little girls.
>>1491185Like they are in the OP: saying it was Biden's idea and Trump is just caving to democrats for having the same common-sense idea of ... oh I don't know, not fucking drinking water filled with lead?
>>1491165Trump’s cutting vaccines, cutting air quality laws, and bringing back fucking Roundup, and I’m supposed to clap about less lead in pipes? Fuck off.
>>1491207Republicans you mean
>>1491219>RoundupIt never went away, turdo. What are you talking about?
>>1491206>Republicans ignoring their fascist power play where they override local officialsClassic
>>1491219Wait, when did we ban Roundup? Is this like a Los Angeles/NYC thing?
>>1491264I don't think even they did.
>>1491165>>1491165Look at those broad, muscular shoulders. He's got the frame of a linebacker. Dude looks like he could bench press a compact car and bicep curl a whole horse.No wonder he's hated by so many low-t leftists. He intimidates them
>>1491264It wasn't banned, but its main chemical was being voluntary phased out since it causes cancer. Of course trump would push bring it back, I'm assuming asbestos is next on the list.
>>1491264Bayer was toying with discontinuing it because of litigation but now since there's an EO declaring it a strategic resource they can't stop won't stop.
>>1491273And by that, Bayer probably just bribed trump to do it like most of these actions.
>>1491274Yup. Bayer donated a million to his inauguration. They'd never done that before.
Trump shows signs of chronic lead poisoning from drinking water from lead lined pipes when he was a child.He should surely be in favor of this legislation.
>>1491310>He should surely be in favor of this legislation.Did you mean, 'LEADgislation'
