Which year mx5 is the best? 1990, 2016, 2024?
>>28118896This might be more your style
>>28118899>$140,000even in worthless australian dollars that's laughable, it would probably cost $140k to get that piece of shit running
>>28118902Fuck off
>>28118914hahahahaNO. rotards deserve to be bullied at every opportunity.
>>28118879I have a 91, but there are no bad choices here.
>>28118879NA and NB
NA is cult but NC still looks the best.and I still hate mazda for stop selling the mps.its was a 2.3l i4 tarbothat is such a nice usp they throw away right at the beginning of the boost wars.
>>281188791999 and 2000
>>28118879I'd swap my NA for ND in a heartbeat but the pop ups are way too qt.
ND2 and ND3 2.0 probably, but they're the most expensive.
Soul Red ND
