Eco-fascists in the news when I was a kid: Let's blow up this logging equipment with C4 and chain ourselves to these giant sequoyah trees so they can't log. Maybe later we'll kidnap the owner of a chemical company and ransom him to fund future activities and then I'll breed some hairy legged bitches in our off grid tree house.Eco-fascists in the news now: Let's throw pies and orange paint at people and block traffic so nobody can get to work and maybe later we'll go to the museum and ruin some priceless art. While wearing skirts.It's /out/ related because these used to be the warriors for the forest and honestly did save some important trees and parts of ecosystems from logging and development. They made it risky, financially and personally, to target public lands and spaces.With them all but gone, what's to make government and corporate interests afraid to parcel out and sell off our state and national parks? As gay and cringe as they were, were they the good guys after all?
>>2837582>Eco-fascistsAre a made-up gimmick. I'm not reading the rest of your blog. Go outside nigga.
>>2837582Like any revolutionary movement people are to comfortable currently. The thing with feel good revolutionary movements is people have to be so comfortable they need something to get behind and support. People have to much to stress about between culture issues, globalism, and being poor. There will always be fringe Uncle T. Types but no big organizations. I have been thinking about starting a non-profit to advocate for natural conservation but it is a lot of work when you have a job and family. TLDR: People have more immediate pressing things to stress about.
>>2837582Was any art actually damaged? It seemed like they went for famous pieces that have extra protection like glass in the frame or whatever. Either way, i think this is separate from the rest and is actually violent activism, regardless of whether you find it justified. Holding things society finds dear hostage for an environmental goal sounds proper eco-terrorism to meTo your question though, the answer is they succeeded and we made all of the land grabbing and exploitation extremely hard and slow to do in legal and bureaucracy. They delay of permitting and going through NEPA and all the research of impact and EPA compliance etc etc, and things like the wilderness act, is all the victories these people were fighting for. Pretty much everything worth protecting that isnt already destroyed/developed has been protected. And then also larger truths about political activism and ethics in the internet age, the world is different, blah blah blah
Are you talking about literal eco-fascists or environmental activists in general? Real eco-fascism is a meme that has never been and will never be a meaningful political force. Left leaning ecological groups in the US (ELF, Earth First, etc) were mostly destroyed by government repression during the "green scare" period of the early 2000s. They're having a bit of a resurgence now with things like the Atlanta Forest Defense and campaigns against this or that data center/pipeline/whatever. And yes, they are the good guys.>>2837607I think this is true in general but the American ecological movement was actually most active during the 80s/90s when the standard of living was better than today. Maybe when people who would otherwise be urban class/race based activists make enough money to go kayaking or whatever they end up as forest defenders?
>>2837582The kinds of people who used to get into that stuff only give a shit about trannies and gaza now, and are all urbanists who actively want to live in dystopian cyberpunk hive cities and give zero fucks what happens to nature, in fact they're actively hostile to it in many cases because it's seen as a white thing.
>>2837582CIA budget cuts.
>>2838343this really, the Ted K. experiment showed stringing along individual gender specials was way cheaper and more manageable than maintaining whole unstable groups.
