fucking holy shit how in the blue hell are and would you even be able to realistically use this????https://petapixel.com/2024/05/03/see-portraits-shot-with-leicas-2-million-1600mm-f-5-6-lens/https://youtu.be/vpwivzzR6yU[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>how in the blue hell are and would you even be able to realistically use this????Maybe try reading the article you linked? "The lens is so large and heavy that the Sheikh reportedly had..."
>>4310515I like the two-man handle arrangement.
opened articlethere were no photos in itwhat the fuck anon
>f/5.6Not Gonna Make It
p1000 goes to 3000mm equivalent>inb4 muh bokehCope. Find a better background.
>>4310515>fucking holy shit how in the blue hell are and would you even be able to realistically use this????On an SLR
>>4310515>fucking holy shit how in the blue hell are and would you even be able to realistically use this????dyel
>>4310519I meant in the normal sense of using it
>>4310519had a what? I'm not giving clicks to some PETA website
>>4310515>That thing was too big to be called a lens. Too big, too thick, too heavy, and too rough, it was more like a large hunk of iron.
>>4310609That is the normal way of using it. Outside of the prototype it's a completely unique lens, and that is how it was used. It isn't meant to be carried around by a human.
Can we shoot porn with it?
>>4310587muh lightgathering?
>>4310587>p1000 goes to 3000mm equivalent>equivalent if only they made the sensor even smaller it could've been a 10000mm (equivalent)
>>4310703I can crop a 20mp photo to one pixel to get a 400,000mm equivalent.
>>4310650It's like a stadium broadcast lens for a normal sized camera
>>4310701Yeah, he knows full well an f/44.5 equivalent is gonna suck donkey arse there, but "P1000 lol" is his one joke (and a good chunk of his personality at large) so...
>>4310589No, nigger. Other way around.The SLR goes on this lens.
>>4310618>petapixel>some PETA websitekekfirst time I'm seeing this one
>>4310515>how in the blue hell are and would you even be able to realistically use this????This kind of lens would be mounted to a sturdy tripod atop a roof or in the back of a pickup truck or something.It's essentially a "big gun" style lens, not meant for your snapshots.You would photograph aircrafts and stuff with this, possibly using a robotic mount to track objects with hydraulics for handling movements.Other than that, it could be mounted to the side of a helicopter for news but those guys all use specialized devices with crop sensors (they're always filming daylight or with high beams, so full frame is a meme) so it will more or less live its entire life with very few hands attempting to dream about trying to hold the damn thing.
Slap an inch sensor to itReach
>>4310515If I won the lottery I'd buy it just to take pictures of birds in my backyard. A conversation piece. >Ahh, haha, yes this little thing was once owened by a Arab shiek...>my guests will chuckle with martinis in hand.
>>4310515results looks like a telephoto lens from aliexpress
>>4310705Your assumed attempt at exaggerating for effect may have failed horribly, in that I think it'd actually produce a focal length equivalent of 6.7 kilometres, with an aperture of f/25000.(Area shrinks 20 000 000 times, square root of that for lengthwise shrinkage, ie crop factor, of about 4472.)
>>4311430Why do so many Germans have such weak facial hair?
>>4311473facial hair signals "leave me alone, i am antisocial and potentially violent" in western cultures
>>4311430this lens seems like a marketing project. What is even so special about the specs or the looks. My meike 50mm f2 looks almost the same: Blurry background and normal looking subject.
>puts a 2x teleconverter on it
>>4311619If only OP had linked to an article talking about who it was made for, and what the customer wanted it for... Though you'd think 1500mm would be something of a clue even without that.
>>4311473You don't need facial hair when you have a strong jaw.
>>4311690Creepshots.
>>4313093Do you consider that a strong jaw?
>>4310515who has the beanie big enough for this?
>>4311430>chroma fringe everywhere>softthat famous Leica quality LOL
>>4313152circle the spots where there is color fringing, "everywhere"
>>4310515Hm. I can just about get that with Nikons new 600mm + teleconverter for their conssumer line for under 2k, without even resorting to their industrial & scientific lenses camerafags dont even knoww are their actual bread & butter.
>>4311473We’re evolving it out. Facial hair is for primitive apes, not intelligent man.
>>4313184idiot use your eyes lmaooo
>>4313184All along the left side of his face.
>>4311619prolly has the same amount of color fringing as well
>>4310515Easy, you need to have mind boggling amounts of money, influence, and customize an SUV specifically for utilization of that $2 million lens.
>>4310666>Need 1600mm macro to see anon's dickKek
