>>4310960
8 pages and 41 images left to go in "previous" thread you spastic adhd dipshit

>>4310964
lmao its tradition to start a new thread the moment it hits post limit anon!

>>4305516
This place looks familiar. Albany, New Hampshire?

Is black and white the final form of photography?

>whats your favorite B&t film to shoot?

>>4310960
>what kind of "consumer grade" filmstock do you enjoy the most?

Going to say a dark horse here, gold 200. It’s great for color shooting. I don’t shoot any cheap b&w as I fucking hate foma with a passion and don’t see the point in tri-x not being the default cheap b&w

File: tri-x133.jpg (770 KB, 2855x4405)

770 KB JPG

>>4310960
I like the fuji 400h that you used to get at pharmacys at shit.
Any of yall shot the new harman film?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:11:24 22:47:31
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: i100-03.jpg (463 KB, 4454x2960)

463 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Epson
Camera Model	PerfectionV600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:18 23:36:11
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 20240506_173854.jpg (1.03 MB, 1800x2154)

1.03 MB JPG

Testing strobes with wetplate because it is perpetually windy here. This took 3 full power bursts from two novatron 1000 strobes about 1 foot from the subject.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:06 17:38:54
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	8.2 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	9/5000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

File: p4-23-3.jpg (931 KB, 4494x3028)

931 KB JPG

I'm moving back to HI!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Epson
Camera Model	PerfectionV600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.0.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:11 21:31:25
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: AB023.jpg (2.31 MB, 2205x1470)

2.31 MB JPG

Got a couple rolls back, these few are from lomo metropolis

File: AB006.jpg (2.49 MB, 2205x1470)

2.49 MB JPG

>>4311068

File: AB013.jpg (2.24 MB, 2205x1470)

2.24 MB JPG

>>4311070

File: AB035.jpg (2.61 MB, 1470x2205)

2.61 MB JPG

>>4311071

File: 20240506_180744.jpg (1.14 MB, 1799x3194)

1.14 MB JPG

Last one for today. Put a mirror behind for fun. I took a closer picture and you can sorta tell just how finely detailed these are. Just amazing!


>>4311064
Aw shucks!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:06 18:07:45
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	4.7 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	83/10000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	50
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4311068
>>4311070
>>4311071
>>4311072
>>4311073
Hey wow, youve really utilized the look of the film well here. Love these.

File: AB010.jpg (1.93 MB, 2205x1470)

1.93 MB JPG

>>4311075
Yo thanks thats a solid boost of confidence. /p/ seems hard to please, but I do feel pretty good about how these turned out.

>>4310960
What film should I use for a portrait session outdoors in the evening hours?

>inb4 portra

>>4310960
>what kind of "consumer grade" filmstock do you enjoy the most?
What does that even mean? I just use Vision3 repacks since they are the cheapest and I like how they look better than Ultramax. B/W I like Delta 3200.

>>4311068
Never considered using Lomo films before, I thought they were a meme, but these are great. What exactly is Lomo Metropolis btw? Repacked Kodak with a tint applied somehow?

File: AB021.jpg (2.15 MB, 2205x1470)

2.15 MB JPG

>>4311098
Thanks my dude. I thought these had some feel to em. I'd give lomo a shot if you are bored or just want a off normal look. I'd stick to their non crazy colored ones.

Yeah, they kinda meme but still fun. Their stuff is mainly kodak with some chem wash or something to give it some "sovl". Metropolis is a stock/style they sell that is designed for muted saturation and punchy contrast. It has an expired film look and goes for hungry teen homeless looking cool on the concrete in Berlin vibes. That said they can be fun to shoot and do make some pretty nice images but I still dont take them 100% serious.

>>4311091
>tell me what I should use but please don’t mention the best option because I’m a faggot, apparently
Anon pls

File: scan0012_s.jpg (84 KB, 2205x1500)

84 KB JPG

>>4311091
Gold 200
HP5 Plus

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Nikon
Camera Model	LS-2000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2528
Image Height	3716
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	638 dpi
Vertical Resolution	638 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:07 06:21:04
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2205
Image Height	1500

File: 2024-05-06-0002_01.jpg (1.58 MB, 2620x3844)

1.58 MB JPG

Rollei 80s retro, my beloved.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:06 22:21:39
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2620
Image Height	3844

File: 2024-05-06-0001.jpg (1.21 MB, 3197x1889)

1.21 MB JPG

>>4311115

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:06 22:18:38
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3197
Image Height	1889

File: 2024-05-06-0003.jpg (2.04 MB, 3828x2568)

2.04 MB JPG

>>4311116

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:06 22:19:29
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3828
Image Height	2568

File: 2024-05-06-0004_01.jpg (1.74 MB, 3875x2415)

1.74 MB JPG

>>4311118

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:06 22:22:36
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3875
Image Height	2415

>>4310960
>what kind of "consumer grade" filmstock do you enjoy the most?
it was Superia 400 for color
now it's HP5 Plus, usually pushed a stop or 2
I haven't developed the rolls of Tri-X I've shot so it might change soon

>>4311068
>>4311104
I agree, I'm digging the vibes especially on these two.

>>4311115
>>4311118
I feel like Retro 80S doesn't get as much love as it should

>>4311106
>best
>implying one film is "better" than another.

I'm asking for suggestions. Maybe someone will suggest something I haven't thought about and provide a compelling reason or example. I know Portra(AS IN PORTRAIT) is good for portraits. I don't need it suggested.

I found out something really cool today when making 4x5 wetplates/contact prints.

Contact prints where your magnification ratio is close to or greater than 1:1 look amazing because the subject matter is larger rather than smaller than in real life. Even if the plate/print is relatively small it feels big because of the subject matter being magnified!
Maybe obvious to some, but I found it to be an interesting realization after I did some ~3x mag macro shots.

>>4311123
Haha im glad you dig those bc technically I shouldnt have shared them, its against the rules to photograph these areas, but I couldnt resist

What are some good film stocks that have a cooler/greener look like 400H and are easy to buy today?

Would anyone here be interested in my SWC? Figured I'd try here before listing it elsewhere and have to pay fees.

>Camera works great
>This film back is finicky and sometimes has issues
>$1350

Can post more pics and contact info it anyone is interested

File: IMG_5545.jpg (2.55 MB, 4032x3024)

2.55 MB JPG

>>4311216
Forgot pic

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPad mini
Camera Software	17.4.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:07 08:12:22
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	0.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	3.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: F5910003.jpg (1.12 MB, 1840x1232)

1.12 MB JPG

>>4310960

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:26 12:06:09
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: MOD01339-Edit_e2d43ea2-d5(...).jpg (35 KB, 982x982)

35 KB JPG

Just bought a roll of this to shoot some portraits on my RB67.
I have never shot black and white film in my life.
How do I meter this so that I don't fuck it up?
Will be shooting this outdoors on an overcast day.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	982
Image Height	982

Will the high cost of E100 hurt it's long term availability? It's 2.5x the cost of gold 20 and almost 2x the cost of ektar or portra.

File: F5910019.jpg (1.21 MB, 1840x1232)

1.21 MB JPG

>>4311218

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:26 12:06:11
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4311219
Highlights

File: F5910013.jpg (1017 KB, 1840x1232)

1017 KB JPG

>>4311221

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:26 12:06:10
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4311219
>At f8 set 200 shutter speed

File: F5910018.jpg (1006 KB, 1840x1232)

1006 KB JPG

>>4311224

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:26 12:06:10
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 2kwqBL8K34X1T4FGav5rWY0zr(...).png (224 KB, 779x557)

224 KB PNG

>>4311218
>>4311224
>>4311226

>>4311218
kind of a banger with the Holy light leak blessing your image -- 10/10, ignore the sharpness/focus faggot that replied

>>4311308
Nice samefag, learn to focus fucking tard

>>4311218
If this were an intentional use of defocus it would be cool but knowing you're a /p/ user and did it by accident ruins the photo

>>4311217
Were you careful to not get much stripper juices on it?

File: CNV000014.jpg (3.97 MB, 4425x3038)

3.97 MB JPG

shot some abandoned boats and a quarry on FP4 pushed to 400
getting fucking tired of getting scans with black levels blown the fuck out

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:07 17:56:35
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4311324
different dude, learn to appreciate The Light

File: CNV000009.jpg (2.87 MB, 4425x3038)

2.87 MB JPG

>>4311330
and of course some kind of fuck up by the lab on few frames

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:07 18:17:12
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4311330
Shooting FP at 400 when HP exists and complaining about tonal fuckups is a bit of self-own desu

>>4311308
>ignore the sharpness/focus faggot that replied
They are all rubbish snapshits that belong on cutting room floor. >>4311221 included, only thay one is at least correctly focused.
>>4311218 is both out of focus AND haS camera shake, like nigga wtf are you doing. This is accidental exposure tier shit.
>>4311224 is the closest to a serviceable composition (even if a banal symmetry one), but you were still a step or two too far to the left. And forgot to focus.
If those are the best you got out of the roll then God damn anon you need to keep practicing, and slow down and start thinking about what you're doing before you release the shutter. Have a mental checklist, exposure, focus, composition, and make sure all are checked. If they're not, then don't waste film on it.
And have some critical eye for your own work, even if this is the first roll you shot then you should be able to tell what's in focus and what is not. And just because they're your least shit doesn't mean they're worth posting, they're still shit.
Good luck, hope to see some BETTER work from you at some point.

>>4311329
Nah couldn't stop it. Bitches loveed it when I hit em with the SWC, started creaming all over it.

>>4311219
meter for the shadows and you'll be fine

>>4311330
this was my thought lmaoooo >>4311364

File: CNV000041.jpg (3.03 MB, 4425x3038)

3.03 MB JPG

>>4311364
>>4311432
nah I don't think so, it's the problem of the scanner used by the lab, I've had many other films shot on native iso or pushed and the black levels were fucked on some, even when the exposure was fine
nothing wrong with pushing FP4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:08 00:23:51
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_5546.jpg (611 KB, 1162x1973)

611 KB JPG

>27 rolls of 120 is $300

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1162
Image Height	1973

>>4311481
>Professional
>Professional
>Professional
You're buying film that explicitly says, right on the box, that it's meant to be shot for profit. Of course it's expensive.

Been looking to get into photography and I would like to start with an analog one. I've read the Nikon FM series are a good purchase. Are they okay for a beginner trying to figure out the hobby?

File: [14] Kodak Gold 200 - 120(...).jpg (3.7 MB, 6789x5529)

3.7 MB JPG

>>4310960
>what kind of "consumer grade" filmstock do you enjoy the most?
I've been digging Gold lately
Not literally, unfortunately

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:07 17:43:52
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4311490
What's stopping you?

>>4311487
>>4311481
Other than e100 that’s the average price for film.

>>4311490
lmao gold is "professional" now, apparently
>>4311487
>>4311481

File: snapshit4.jpg (4.98 MB, 4427x2914)

4.98 MB JPG

Found a plustek 7200 (second hand) for a really good price, going to be picking it up this weekend to replace my v550 for 35mm scans, anyone else here use one and have any sample pics? and does the 7200 differ from the 8100 much at all?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4522
Image Height	2976
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:05:03 18:34:42
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4427
Image Height	2914

>>4311489
probably
get whatever you think will get you out shooting, they're pretty much all the same

File: trator_composicao_medres.jpg (4.7 MB, 3102x1896)

4.7 MB JPG

>>4311491
Force of will

>>4311481
Just shoot 120 for a project or if you’re getting paid if it’s such an issue.

>>4311124
Why?

>>4311219
1) Expose for what you need and just except that either top or bottom is going to clip.
2) expect it to be extremely sharp and detailed as far as the middle is concerned (like the anti fomapan)
3) Be ready for the grain
4) handles pushing (dono about pulling) very well though i shoot it at box speed 90% of the time

Play around with light. it handles contrast very well. anything that glints like water or a window blowing out looks wonderful.
The film to take for a sunny day .

>>4311561
I shoot all my XX at 800. Comes out nice.

>>4311481
>using anything except kentmere or foma
>probably just going to be all snapshits anyway
Yeah I mean a fool and their money and all that.

>>4311124
>I know Portra(AS IN PORTRAIT) is good for portraits.
If you admit this, I understand your question even less. Why not use what works and is a known quantity? Slight differences in colour temperature are not going to improve your snapshits. I don’t get it.

>>4311566
I know it does but what makes it special for me is that excellent tri-x worthy tone separation that has at box speed.
But i use use it more as a street , then a portraiture film.

Just shot a theater production on it yesterday.
(Attribute any spelling mistakes to me staying for drinks with the cast and only getting home at 2 am)

>>4311572
XX takes a giant steaming shit all over foma and kentmeres hairless and effeminate chest without even breaking a sweat.

>>4311561
>>4311577
Let me add that this a film that really benefits from spot metering

>>4311577
Do you use d96 for it as well? I just use rodinal 1+100 stand, or 1+50 because I'm lazy.

>>4311580
D-96 or D-76 depending on what i want/have.

I've had really bad luck sending it to the lab. IDK why but they dont wash it properly. Maybe it's just confirmation bias but i dont trust them with XX film.

>>4311566
retarded question but do you push process it at 800 or just normal process

>>4311590
For stand dev I may or may not add an extra ml or 2 of rodinal depending on my mood. If I'm doing a 1+50 dilution I follow the massive dev chart.

>>4311364
>>4311330
>self own
same for letting someone else do your scans and then bitching about them
but tbqhfa m
>fp4
The worst fucking film out; not fast, not sharp, not cheap, won't hold a latent image for more than 5 minutes, takes ages to process.
Its only strength is that you can blow it the fuck out with contrast and it keeps building an image without blocking up. It's probably pretty easy to print from as well.

>>4311220
I bet it has something to do with the retarded bongboomer pensioners at alaris fucking with everything. You can get a 400' roll of E100 from Eastman for what equates to about $7 per 36 exposures

>>4311481
what camera are you shooting this with?

File: scan0047.jpg (2.65 MB, 3654x5373)

2.65 MB JPG

>>4311596
>underexposing 5222 in rodinal
based grainfag
pic related is 5222@800 in rodinal 1:50

File: scan0037.jpg (3.03 MB, 3656x5373)

3.03 MB JPG

>>4311612
probably metered incorrectly and underexposed more than intentionally
pic related is from the same roll

Story time:

I had just finished a photoshoot where I used quite a bit of bulbs and flash photography and being too lazy to disassemble it all completely was carelessly shoving it into my car when two police officers approached me asking to have a look at my photos.

I tried to explain that it was film (which didn't seem to mean much to em). I was then told that there had been a local creep taking upskirts of kids and that one way or the other they would have to look at my pictures.

In my most patient voice I explained that I would have to develop the film first, Which they interpreted as a delaying tactic, as they then threatened to confiscate my film until they could determine that they were safe.

I was only allowed to go after I called up the model to confirm where I was and to show them some Instagram photos she took.

Fucking pigs man.

>>4311617
>giving off such big creep vibes that the police make up a reason to fuck with you
Have you tried looking like less of a miserable misanthrope in public?

>>4311617
whats your BMI and BO? onions? i'm surprised the model didn't just disown you over the phone just for the lels

>>4311621
>>4311618

Thin dude, no bo.
My honest guess is they mistook me for a tranny. I have shoulder length hair and had nail polish on (it's called style look it up lol)
I work with people all the time so i don't generally give off a creepy vibe.

But who knows what's normal among artsy people is probably the first sign of the Antichrist to suburban cops.

>>4311554
27 rolls of 35mm would cost the same lol. Granted it'd be more exposures.

>>4311572
I've never used Kentmere but foma is trash. The images themselves are ok but the curl level of the film image is insane and you have to always shoot it at half box speed to get usable images. Foma is trash.

File: 345435432.jpg (3.05 MB, 2921x4254)

3.05 MB JPG

took some delta3200 and shot some moody underexposed pics

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:08 11:39:48
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 5463452345.jpg (3.44 MB, 2958x4308)

3.44 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:08 11:18:48
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4311627
its called being an icky fag lol

File: 6575464358.jpg (3.88 MB, 2989x4354)

3.88 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:08 11:23:17
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 6544230.jpg (2.97 MB, 3038x4425)

2.97 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:08 11:23:50
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMG_20240508_232603.jpg (4.89 MB, 4000x3000)

4.89 MB JPG

Excited to scan this roll of Velvia tomorrow

>>4311647
>astro on slide
Absolute madman. How did you meter and calculate reciprocity?

Just developed a roll and it's all light leaks everywhere... maybe half the frames are usable

I have 12 more undeveloped for a project i've been working really hard on.

I feel like crying.

>>4311657
I doubled for recipro, though I did find a rough guide that went up to 8mins ish, this was 1 hour at 5.6 on the 45mm f4 for my 6x7. It's a touch under, I wish i'd gone a half stop brighter on the aperture, and then longer on the exposure as it would've given me cooler star trails. There's a weird dip in light at some point in the trail though, my guess is someone didn't see my camera setup in the dark and blocked it a bit while I was doing digital work

File: oppenheimer-christopher-nolan6.jpg (168 KB, 1825x1217)

168 KB JPG

What B&W 120 film would you use to get as close as possible to the Oppenheimer look?

File: [8] Kodak Gold 200 - 120-(...).jpg (3.75 MB, 6785x5552)

3.75 MB JPG

>>4311541
>critique wanted yadda yadda

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:08 10:33:24
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4311665
It was shoot on Double X so...

>>4311665
5222, thats what it was shot on according to /tv/

File: [6] Kodak Gold 200 - 120-(...).jpg (3.58 MB, 6766x5601)

3.58 MB JPG

>>4311666
I like this first one better because of the composition, but although I don't quite like the cars blocking the view in picrel I wanted to capture that couple on the stairs and it worked

>>4311665
Kodak Double-X since it's the film stock used for the film
You already searched for "Oppenheimer Nolan" on Google to get that photo, could have just added "black and white film stock" to your search and get your answer right away

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:08 10:44:36
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: [13] VIoleta 12-Pano_medres.jpg (3.87 MB, 3987x7782)

3.87 MB JPG

>>4311670

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:07 22:23:47
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	0.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4311098
>>4311104
Metropolis, turquoise and purple are coated by InnovisCoat/ORWO. They are not Kodak

File: 1000002846.jpg (88 KB, 1000x833)

88 KB JPG

how fucked would I be for shooting Fuji 200 (we all know it's Gold 200 essentially) at f/5.6 1/250 in broad daylight? I think that's like three stops overexposed, thinking with Sunny 16 in mind. My subject was a few cows in a grass field, chilling outside where there were no shade.

gonna get it developed in a few days, but I'm not feeling optimistic about those particular pics

>>4311612
High grain, high sharpness is a compromise I'm willing to make.

That picture would be so awesome to print big on some nice fiber paper. Love me a big, grainy print.

>>4311612
that looks like ass tho

>>4311683
Nah, printlet.

>>4311682
thanks bro
will try to print it and this one >>4310459 when i get the opportunity

>>4311667
>>4311668
>>4311670
But CineStill's Double X looks like dogshit?

>>4311689
its the same stock nigga, it will of course look better larger and Oppenheimer was shoot on 70mm.

File: 1.jpg (227 KB, 1380x1053)

227 KB JPG

Some photos I shot on my Canon A1 have some weird supposedly light bleed issue. Shot on a Kodak Gold 200. What could cause this?

>>4311700
light leaks, probably from the side

>>4311700
You have leaks coming both front and back. Check the padding around the hinge as that is a very common place for leaks.

>>4311659
rip
maybe you can turn the light leaks into your project lol

>>4311681
Use a light meter next time there's even free light meter apps for your phone

>>4311689
that's cuz you gotta use the Kodak Double-X (5222) version
besides we're boycotting Cinestill

File: 2024_0010_004.jpg (145 KB, 1017x704)

145 KB JPG

>>4311681
I'd say that's between 2 to 4 stops over, depending on how much sky you had in the frame.
I shot a roll of it at 100 and it looked perfect developed normally. The neg is denser, but overall it has a slightly softer, almost pastel flatter look. In some frames it looks even better to me than at 200. In a very few it looks worse.
Pic is one of the worst frames and it's still perfectly workable, I'd just dial it 1/3rd stop down when scanning and fix it further with curves. (This is a raw quick preview scan on full auto and no ICE obviously).
Anyway it's a consumer neg that has a ton of latitude. If the cow pics are critically important, then have it developed at -2. If not very important, and you metered the rest of the roll correctly, then try -1 for a middle ground. Post results.

>>4311708
looks like a wes anderson movie
man how I hate that faggot

>>4311709
Didn't think about it, but you're right. It wouldn't look like this after I was done processing it, but maybe I should actually leave it like this and start replicating this style more often just to annoy people kek

>>4311578
That may be so, but does it really matter if all you’re shooting is building corners and your annoyed cat, as people here do?

>>4311659
>doesn’t shoot a test roll or two before embarking on a big project
Holy based retard, RIP

what kind of tape for reusing cartridges when bulk loading?

>>4311689
They didn’t use cinestill, genius, they used the real thing.

>>4311715
I used micropore tape, and it works a treat. There's definitely cheaper options, but you don't use much when bulk loading.

>>4311715
masking tape has been fine for me tbqh

>>4311715
that scotch transparent one

>>4311718
>>4311719
>>4311720
thanks, so then ill use anything i have lying around except duct tape

>>4311706
funnily enough, this only happened because I accidentally used the incident meter instead of the spot meter on my phone light meter app. only after I shot off a few shots did I realize I should've thought more logically and critically about the exposure

>>4311708
I may just have it developed for -1 because I really liked those cow pics, but that'd result in the rest of the roll being a stop underexposed... wondering how green/muddy that might make everything else

File: 20240508_111511.jpg (980 KB, 1681x2251)

980 KB JPG

XX at 800, rodinal stand dev. Additional contrast will be added.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:08 11:15:11
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	10.3 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

Where can I get Negative Lab Pro?

I don't want to pay
a 100 USD just for a plugin

>>4311732
last i checked rutracker and i think 1337x has it

>>4311732
just use NEGAdoctor on darktable

File: Castles in Spain.jpg (34 KB, 750x545)

34 KB JPG

GIWTWM

File: raid0.png (635 KB, 1362x665)

635 KB PNG

>>4311659
Post pics

File: 20240508_121119.jpg (1.11 MB, 1800x2271)

1.11 MB JPG

Lovely. I think I'm going to try dodging the chest area some, or maybe lower the contrast by about a half.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:08 12:11:20
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	10.4 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4311748
are you developing in a shed in your backyard or something?

File: 20240508_124040.jpg (264 KB, 763x1313)

264 KB JPG

>>4311750
I will be doing that eventually, but for now I have everything crammed in this ilford pop up darkroom. B&h had them on sale for 200 bucks like a month or two ago.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:08 12:40:41
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	1.0 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	200
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4311752
based

>>4311689
no one said shit about Cinestill, moron
literally everyone told you to use Kodak Double-X
would you buy "Abibas" sneakers and then complain that Adidas sucks too?
you can't search look up by yourself the filmstock used, you can't comprehend basic text
just give up already

File: 20240508_132733.jpg (1.53 MB, 2760x1800)

1.53 MB JPG

Horizontal crop next if I can fit everything in the frame. I printed both to see which pose I liked better.

THANK YOU CANON AND YOUR 1V AI SERVO MODE!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:08 13:27:33
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	6.9 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	23/5000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

File: 20240508_134743.jpg (1.27 MB, 2182x1800)

1.27 MB JPG

Which do you prefer?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:08 13:47:43
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	7.0 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	41/10000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4311627
>>4311617
maybe they took you for a hippie or a communist. in any case, sorry you had to interact with cops at all
also i think it's now normal for people to not understand film. i snapped a zoomer the other night and he asked to see the pics and i said it was film; analog and i'd need like a week to finish the roll and develop it. he just gave me a confused look

>>4311712
If you wish to watch one of his movies for refrence, watch The French Dispatch. Gives you a good sense of his style in both b/w and color.

>>4311617
you should sue those zog golems for harassment and for being retards, and ideally you would also stop being a little gay boy as well

>>4311689
>CineStill
nobody brought up jewStill, you dumbass. They're a bunch of greedy fucks btw
>>4311758
>would you buy "Abibas" sneakers and then complain that Adidas sucks too?
kek
>>4311718
what's the benefit of it?
>>4311748
based printer
>>4311752
I wish I'd known about that sale

dynamic range aside, is there a physical way to emulate film? color-wise, grain-wise, bloom-wise... like a combination of filter rings or something?

File: 20240508_150755.jpg (1.29 MB, 2561x1800)

1.29 MB JPG

So I found these, apparently superb lenses, for a great deal on ebay, but the picture had nothing for me to understand the scale of them. The 900mm f16 is truly absurd. Apparently it has a large enough projection for 20x24 negatives.
I WILL be using it with my 4x5 sinar once I drill a plate for it. Stay tuned for more absurdity.

>>4311795
Still going on. The tent has a few flaws and annoyances, but it's good enough for what you pay, all things considered. I wouldn't pay the normal 350 for it...
Lots of room for wetplate printing, but if you're using an enlarger I wouldn't plan on doing anything more than 35mm/contact printing with one of those tiny enlargers. My Leitz v35 enlarger with a 16x20 easel barely fits, and I have to keep the chemistry on the shelf beneath the enlarger. It works, but it is cramped. A custom L shaped table would be nice for it.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1684626-REG/ilford_1181926_pop_up_darkroom.html

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	13 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:08 15:07:55
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	333/10000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/2.2
ISO Speed Rating	500
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	2.20 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

File: IMG_4948.jpg (2.27 MB, 1488x1912)

2.27 MB JPG

>>4311796
Yea you go buy film and shoot it faggot. Stop trying to imitate something with the real thing is easily accessible

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Image Width	1488
Image Height	1912

File: composition_medres.jpg (4.91 MB, 1681x6610)

4.91 MB JPG

>>4311767
>maybe they took you for a hippie or a communist
are you americans really this retarded?
>that guy is taking photos
>he's probably plotting to organize the working class and take the means of production
stop being such a paranoid illiterate faggot
anyway
>i think it's now normal for people to not understand film
yes, more than once I've taken pictures of 20-something yo people, so I thought they'd be familiar with film photography
I'm in my late 20's and I remember taking rolls to develop with my father until I was like 12 or something. But I guess people just forget stuff, we just know about it because we shoot film
>allegedly
'cause I ain't seeing much photos
>>4311796
you can shoot digital and then edit a lot, use presets, add texture for grain etc.
it'll never be the same, though
because it's not
but like... why not just shoot film?
and if not shooting film, why try to emulate it? just as a gimmick? that's kinda pointless

I am going to take photos of the house where they killed Trotsky using my Kiev 4 and Svemacolor, surely that will organize the working class.

>>4311806
thanks, not sure if I'll end up buying it anyway though. I'd still need everything else. It is tempting

How would I go about getting real crunchy pics? High ISO, half-frame? Can I just push any 400-speed film to 3200? It's been a while since I've shot film and I've never really gotten into black and white, but I've got an idea for a project

>>4311836
Rodinal

>>4311836
I'd shoot Ilford Delta 3200 at 6400 in a half-frame camera (but with sharp lenses so that it doesn't suck ass, like a Pen F) and develop in Rodinal
look up Daidō Moriyama so that you have good references instead of aiming for shit like >>4311612

File: 20240508_190329.jpg (831 KB, 2315x1738)

831 KB JPG

A rare self portrait for all of you.

6x9 format, but this is only an image of a contact print.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:08 19:03:29
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	7.3 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	9/2500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

File: Velvia 50 Astro-1.jpg (2.05 MB, 2547x1963)

2.05 MB JPG

>>4311657
>>4311647

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3 Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	154 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:09 14:26:45
Exposure Time	3 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>4311863
Cool. Was it an experiment? Might be cool to do a double exposure portrait or landscape with something like that.

>>4311863
neat!

>>4311865
Yeah I wanna try it with 100 and get a few plate shots with more light at different lengths, maybe a big 4 hour one for lots of movement. It's tricky to do a double cause my 6x7 doesn't have the switch so I'm not sure how I'd go about it

File: [0] Kodak Gold 200 - 120-(...).jpg (3.57 MB, 6808x5581)

3.57 MB JPG

>>4311863
cool as fuck, man
good job

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:07 22:49:47
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: Screenshot_20240508-194616-786.jpg (145 KB, 1080x1722)

145 KB JPG

>>4311863
Best photo in /fgt/ in a long time. Congrats!
Are you sure the brightness dip wasn't just clouds? If someone blocked the entire setup then there would be completely empty gaps, no?
A little surprised there are no plane and satellite streaks at all, maybe they were to faint for iso 50.
And I wonder what are those?

File: [4] Kodak Gold 200 - 120-(...).jpg (3.53 MB, 6745x5554)

3.53 MB JPG

>>4311871
>And I wonder what are those?
don't trust me because I'm talking out of my ass, but I'd like for someone to explain to me if that makes sense
could it be some sort of color shift caused by refraction of light/internal reflections on the lens or something like that occurred in specific positions?
because they seem to be roughly at the "same spot" in relation to the length of the adjacent streak, and their brightness seem to match those of the adjacent streaks as well
Again: I have no idea if that's even possible, but I'd like someone to explain if I'm right or wrong or somewhere inbetween and why
because that seems to be something interesting

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:07 22:57:11
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4311868
You could just use a flash to expose a portrait first and then quickly set it in the tripod. No need to do a "double" exposure.

>>4311855
Fat fuck
>>4311863
Looks like my washing machine

>>4311875
Oh very true

>>4311871
I think they're geo synch satellites or galaxies maybe, I see them on digital too
No clouds I could see but also it was a moonless night so mughve missed them, especially since they only affect the streaks on one side

>>4311878
>nophoto
>trash talks
plebbiest of plebs

File: 20240508_201044.jpg (669 KB, 1800x3256)

669 KB JPG

>>4311878
:( Rude and wrong! My not baggy clothes look slightly baggy, I guess.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:08 20:10:46
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	1250
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

File: Geosync-B-Sept-12-at-3_23(...).jpg (56 KB, 792x526)

56 KB JPG

>>4311881
>>4311874
I think geosync satellites is the winner, pic related is what I found after a quick search.
Now OP's homework is to ID them kek (shouldn't be super hard desu)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Elements 10.0 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5760
Image Height	3840
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:19 09:17:05
Exposure Time	141.8 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Unknown
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	200.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	792
Image Height	526
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4311886
Lay some cardboard out on those shelves.
It's what saved my photography crap from being ruined.

>>4311886
what do you even search for on ebay for big behemoth glass like that?

bros how do I test the focus on a folding camera (Moskva-5 to be specific) my test roll is focusing behind my subject

you can put matte tape on a piece of glass and tape it to the film window.
alternatively tape directly over the film gate but you might get flatness issues then.
myself i've cut out a piece of an old lcd diffuser that can be taped or held over the gate but not everyone has an old busted monitor laying arouund.

File: Screenshot_20240509_00221(...).jpg (445 KB, 1439x800)

445 KB JPG

>>4311902
500mm+ focal lengths. Old barrel lenses, you can research different ULF lenses, the rodenstock apo ronar is fairly common on ebay up to 900mm...

Look at this incredibly enormous nikkor lens my search algorithm graciously showed me. I'm tempted to buy it for the size alone. I don't think it would even fit on a 140mmx140mm sinar lens plate!

>>4311895
Noted.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/225288480154

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android UP1A.231005.007.G998U1UESAFXD1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1439
Image Height	800

>>4311902
Actually try 360mm+ focal lengths. Seadching for Apo-nikkor comes up with a lot of results for ulf lenses.

>>4311888
Nito

Going out this weekend maybe if the weather clears. Gonna try another 1, a 2, and maaaybe a 4 hour on some velvia 100.

File: ss+(2024-05-09+at+10.47.08).jpg (30 KB, 379x401)

30 KB JPG

>>4311888
Also best guess, I'm in NZ so southern celestial pole or whatever you want to call it

File: Fuji Velvia 50-6.jpg (3.36 MB, 1780x2247)

3.36 MB JPG

>>4311863
Oh and a couple pics from the same roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3 Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	154 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:09 23:47:30
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: Fuji Velvia 50-8.jpg (2.82 MB, 2223x1798)

2.82 MB JPG

>>4311989

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3 Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	154 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:09 23:47:30
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: file.jpg (4.22 MB, 4787x3162)

4.22 MB JPG

first scan wohoo

>>4311808
>but like... why not just shoot film?
because it's tiresome to be scavenging for color film for hours on da internet