what am i in for /p/[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>4311734Take photo and show us.
The kit lens is crap. Try to get the best lens you can afford. You will see the difference.
>APS-C
>>4311734Diversity, equity and inclusion.
>>4311777based Sony
>>4311777>lol sony callin matthew on his shitOPie youre in for walking around carrying a block of uncomfortable controls positioned stupidly and endlessly fucking around in the badly designed menu mess just to take the next goddamn picture until you get to tye pount where its just not worth it anymore, just like we all did eventually. Sony has yet to learn that engineers make poor designers.
>>4311734either nos or you were scammed real bad
>>4311903i needed one fast thats why
>>4311734you paid 320USD for that? I see them come up for like 150 all the time and I still wouldnt pay that much
>>4312913i think it really depends on where you live and how used they are i have not seen any below 275 and thoose are really used
>>4312986would have just gotten an nx500 desu, unless you plan on doing a lot of video it's just objectively better
honestly a good start body wise, the kit lens isnt great with its shit motors that get stuck every now and then though. get some new glass when you can.
>>4311764it's fun when paired with the auto lens cap
>>4311734If you can find the sigma 30mm 2.8 at around 100$ go for it.Nice lens to learn many things and expecially to demystify shallow depth of field. At some point you will find yourself stepping it downs and then you will reach enlightening. Same for the crappy sony 55-210mm. It's relativelly bad, but it have stabilization so you can practice many things ranging from portrait, birding and tele landscape in daylight.Pic related is the sony teleThe 6400 is a nice improvement if you wanna[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6400Camera SoftwareILCE-6400 v2.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)213 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:05:04 17:27:10Exposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating400Brightness5.7 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeOtherLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length142.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1616Image Height1080RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalGPS StatusUnknownGPS Differential CorrectionNo Correction
>>4314363The 6400 is a nice improvement if you wanna use a small camera and keep working on aps-c but it's not a tremendous improvement. 6600 and 6700 are definitely better, but are also more expensive, bigger and heavier, so unless you really prefer smaller lenses or apc-c for reasons, going FF could be better. But to learn the 6000 is perfect. I sugest you to take your time before thinking to new cameras unless you somehow win the lottery. Don't let other put you down on the topic.
>>4311734>what am i in fordust collecting
