[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: pic.jpg (32 KB, 956x360)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
What's your favorite 35mm roll?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
>>
fuji superia 1600
>>
File: IMG_2094.jpg (919 KB, 3024x4032)
919 KB
919 KB JPG
>>4324109
For me, it’s the old black label ilfords.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3024
Image Height4032
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
t-the one i have with me..
>>
File: 1216x806x2.jpg (721 KB, 2432x1612)
721 KB
721 KB JPG
>>4324109
The Earl Grey by Lomography (pic rel).

It's just so classy and crisp while still being very affordable.

Never been disappointed of the results, even when I fuck up my camera parameters
>>
File: GIVEAWAY547.jpg (843 KB, 1667x1027)
843 KB
843 KB JPG
>>4324109
for me, its Lomochrome Purple

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2023:08:28 13:14:41
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: the-3-pack.jpg (78 KB, 500x500)
78 KB
78 KB JPG
>>4324109
The cheapest decent color roll I can reasonably find.
In the current year that's Fujigold 200.
>>
>>4324109
XX, BABY! Embrace the grain, and reject the pixel peeping. It looks fantastic when you make silver gelatine prints all the way up to 800 iso.
>>
Oh I thought op meant like which canister design, not which stock. We talk about films stocks all the time that’s a gay boring question, join me in my error and post your favorite film cans. Would make a more interesting thread than “muh portra muh trip” version 101919191
>>
File: COCK.png (294 KB, 684x589)
294 KB
294 KB PNG
>>4324164
Not even a question
>>
File: IMG_2097.jpg (59 KB, 706x1000)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>4324167
>>4324164
Gimme that “No-name” dharma initiative aesthetic like picrel

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width706
Image Height1000
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: olympic_gold.jpg (59 KB, 750x533)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
Kodak "olympic gold" they made for 100 year anniversary with athletes on them... printed on the canister and the roll itself.
>>
File: DSC_9045-positive.jpg (692 KB, 1013x1488)
692 KB
692 KB JPG
>>4324109
ilford delta 400
fuji across 100
velvia 100
>>4324136
literally foma 100

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareNegative Lab Pro v2.2.0
PhotographerSHARONOV
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern704
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2022:09:13 08:33:34
Light SourceUnknown
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
this'un
>>
>>4324439
happy pride anon
>>
>>4324441
>he likes something I don't like
>must be gay
>>
>>4324445
It was because of the color bands, you massive sperg
>>
>>4324451
It's clearly a romanian flag
>>
>>4324451
What does those 3 colors have to do with pride you mongrel?
>>
>>4324491
Its coincidentally an upside down pansexual flag.
>>
>>4324494
So sick and fucking tired of the millions of flags representing mental illnesses
>>
>>4324109
That's not how film loads into the camera.
>>
>>4324520
Thats how your mom loads film into a camera.
>>
>>4324109
>What's your favorite 35mm roll?
One that was exposed to light bouncing off some booba.. if you know what I mean.
>>
File: o467248121.1.jpg (137 KB, 1200x1200)
137 KB
137 KB JPG
Legendary
Kodak tri-x 320
Kodak Technical Pan

Daily use
Ilford fp4+
Fomapan 100
Kodak Tmax 400

CN
Agfaultra 50 / 100
Fuji Superia 200
Fuji Natura 1600

Slide
Fuji Provia 100F
Fuji Provia 400X
>>
>>4324522
She loads it upside down then
>My mom thinks my passion for film is stupid because she was alive when it was all there was.
>>
>>4324109
Generic kodak roll aesthetics

Makes me proud to be an American
Where at least I know I'm free
And I won't forget the men who died
Who gave that right to me
And I'd gladly stand up next to you
And defend Her still today
'Cause there ain't no doubt
I love this land
God Bless the U.S.A.
>>
My favorite 35mm roll was the Studio 35 200iso film. It was sharper than all the name brands. It hasn’t existed for ten years. Never tried it just because it was a store brand? Too bad. Even the Walgreens 400iso disposable camera was sharp. Studio 35 200-800iso film was all sharp, and sharper than name brand.
>if it was so sharp why don’t you post examples?
Because this faggot ass board will never allow high resolution photos even though it’s the photography board.
>>
File: neopan.jpg (17 KB, 400x398)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>
>>4324978
Upload it to catbox.moe and post link.
>>
>>4325016
You never even check out my pictures when I post them on /hr/, so why should I?
>>
>>4325035
I don't browse /hr/. I'm sorry. :(
>>
>>4324109
i really liked dubblefilm daily color. i suspect it is rebranded kodak but i don't know which. it's not gold for sure.
>>
i like streetpan 400
>>
>>4324439
It's the fake Ilford fyi.
>>
>>4326403
What do you mean?
>>
Unironically, the one I have with me :)
>>
>>4324978
why are boomers obsessed with sharpness? No matter how sharp that film is, it's not going to be as sharp as even an 8 year old digital camera. If your so obsessed with it, just go buy digital. Having sharp photos isn't impressive, it's boring and gay (just like you)
>>
>F3+Rollei 80
>0 results
Yeah, keep on plebbin, fags.
>>
>>4329176
>Digital
>sharp
Blocky isn't sharp. Edge contrast isn't sharp. You don't know what sharpness looks like.

Go to an optometrist and spend a day away from screens, out in nature. You will find out what sharp really is.
>>
File: 1695586611058728.jpg (408 KB, 1691x1581)
408 KB
408 KB JPG
>>4324978
oh hey I just found a roll of that in my mom's old camera. it only had a couple of shots on it so I finished it up myself

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makemotorola
Camera Modelmotorola edge 5G UW (2021)
Sensing MethodNot Defined
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)16 mm
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1691
Image Height1581
Image Created2024:06:24 14:33:14
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
ISO Speed Rating100
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure Time295081/250000000 sec
Focal Length1.66 mm
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Light SourceD65
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure Bias0 EV
Image Height1836
White BalanceAuto
Brightness6.1 EV
Image Width3264
Exposure ModeAuto
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: 028_25A.jpg (632 KB, 1800x1200)
632 KB
632 KB JPG
>>4329169
he means its not the same ilford that makes the black n white film, its the sister company that has the rights to make and sell colour film under the ilford brand.

its some bullshit like the kodak/kodak alaris deal, or agfa-gevaert/agfaphoto, just dont worry about it and shoot what you like the most shit doesnt matter anyway

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJICOLOR EUROPE
Camera ModelAGFA d-scan
Camera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationLeft-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2018:08:08 22:31:53
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1800
Image Height1200
>>
5222
wish there would be a good equivalent thats made in the eu though
>>
1976 Npan21 of course
>>
File: file.png (975 KB, 639x541)
975 KB
975 KB PNG
>>4324587
I don't like that soulless light font
the old Ektar branding looked WAY better
>>
>>4329281
Scan it in high resolution, post ‘em on /hr/, then link to them here.
>>
>>4329176
We could only afford amateur film and that shit was blunt back then. Also, 800 iso film was always recommended back then, exacerbating the situation; there was no internet to warn us about that. However, my uncle preferred Kodachrome 200 and most prints I’ve seen in his albums are crappy.
>>
Am I retarded for buying 10 rolls of kodak gold? I'm just learning film and wanted a color film that was semi affordable but learned afterwards it has a ton of "character" that can't really be ignored.
>>
>>4329770
the lab does the scanning but I can post a few here, it'll probably be ready some time next week.

>>4329773
ammo is ammo m8, you learn by taking the shots
>>
>>4329773
I would've gone for half that amount. Even if it's a more affordable film stock, I bet that added up real quick. Good news is that it's considered pretty solid overall.
>>
>>4329790
Here in the clown colony of Canada, homie just dropped 150 bucks on practice film. It’s not that much but at the same time it also feels like a lot.
>>
>>4324110
man of culture
>>
File: 1719481143584134.jpg (3.8 MB, 3130x2075)
3.8 MB
3.8 MB JPG
>>4329770
got my scans sooner than expected, but only 21/24 frames. I'll need to wait till monday to pick up the negatives and see what might have happened

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3130
Image Height2075
>>
File: 1688920844143272.jpg (2.91 MB, 3130x2075)
2.91 MB
2.91 MB JPG
>>4329998
this one and several others have that black bar on the left, not sure what's up with that

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3130
Image Height2075
>>
File: 1710890656469094.jpg (3.22 MB, 3130x2075)
3.22 MB
3.22 MB JPG
>>4330000

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3130
Image Height2075
>>
>>4330000
Fucked scan, they stuck it on auto mode and didnt check if anything actually lined up.
Also the fact the bar is the same sickly orange as the rest of the image means auto mode boosted the shadows probably due to underexposure.

a rescan or a home scan would make these pics look so much better.
>>
>>4329773
Push it one stop and enjoy.
>>
Fujifilm velvia
>>
>>4324172
Based
>>
Fomapan 400.
The best and the cheapest, literally $4.50 per roll. Massive grain though, so it's not for everyone.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.