What's your favorite 35mm roll?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpi
fuji superia 1600
>>4324109For me, it’s the old black label ilfords.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3024Image Height4032Scene Capture TypeStandard
t-the one i have with me..
>>4324109The Earl Grey by Lomography (pic rel). It's just so classy and crisp while still being very affordable. Never been disappointed of the results, even when I fuck up my camera parameters
>>4324109for me, its Lomochrome Purple[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:08:28 13:14:41Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4324109The cheapest decent color roll I can reasonably find. In the current year that's Fujigold 200.
>>4324109XX, BABY! Embrace the grain, and reject the pixel peeping. It looks fantastic when you make silver gelatine prints all the way up to 800 iso.
Oh I thought op meant like which canister design, not which stock. We talk about films stocks all the time that’s a gay boring question, join me in my error and post your favorite film cans. Would make a more interesting thread than “muh portra muh trip” version 101919191
>>4324164Not even a question
>>4324167>>4324164Gimme that “No-name” dharma initiative aesthetic like picrel[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width706Image Height1000Scene Capture TypeStandard
Kodak "olympic gold" they made for 100 year anniversary with athletes on them... printed on the canister and the roll itself.
>>4324109ilford delta 400fuji across 100velvia 100>>4324136literally foma 100[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareNegative Lab Pro v2.2.0PhotographerSHARONOVMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern704Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:09:13 08:33:34Light SourceUnknownColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
this'un
>>4324439happy pride anon
>>4324441>he likes something I don't like>must be gay
>>4324445It was because of the color bands, you massive sperg
>>4324451It's clearly a romanian flag
>>4324451What does those 3 colors have to do with pride you mongrel?
>>4324491Its coincidentally an upside down pansexual flag.
>>4324494So sick and fucking tired of the millions of flags representing mental illnesses
>>4324109That's not how film loads into the camera.
>>4324520Thats how your mom loads film into a camera.
>>4324109>What's your favorite 35mm roll?One that was exposed to light bouncing off some booba.. if you know what I mean.
LegendaryKodak tri-x 320 Kodak Technical PanDaily useIlford fp4+Fomapan 100Kodak Tmax 400CNAgfaultra 50 / 100Fuji Superia 200Fuji Natura 1600SlideFuji Provia 100FFuji Provia 400X
>>4324522She loads it upside down then>My mom thinks my passion for film is stupid because she was alive when it was all there was.
>>4324109Generic kodak roll aestheticsMakes me proud to be an AmericanWhere at least I know I'm freeAnd I won't forget the men who diedWho gave that right to meAnd I'd gladly stand up next to youAnd defend Her still today'Cause there ain't no doubtI love this landGod Bless the U.S.A.
My favorite 35mm roll was the Studio 35 200iso film. It was sharper than all the name brands. It hasn’t existed for ten years. Never tried it just because it was a store brand? Too bad. Even the Walgreens 400iso disposable camera was sharp. Studio 35 200-800iso film was all sharp, and sharper than name brand.>if it was so sharp why don’t you post examples?Because this faggot ass board will never allow high resolution photos even though it’s the photography board.
>>4324978Upload it to catbox.moe and post link.
>>4325016You never even check out my pictures when I post them on /hr/, so why should I?
>>4325035I don't browse /hr/. I'm sorry. :(
>>4324109i really liked dubblefilm daily color. i suspect it is rebranded kodak but i don't know which. it's not gold for sure.
i like streetpan 400
>>4324439It's the fake Ilford fyi.
>>4326403What do you mean?
Unironically, the one I have with me :)
>>4324978why are boomers obsessed with sharpness? No matter how sharp that film is, it's not going to be as sharp as even an 8 year old digital camera. If your so obsessed with it, just go buy digital. Having sharp photos isn't impressive, it's boring and gay (just like you)
>F3+Rollei 80>0 resultsYeah, keep on plebbin, fags.
>>4329176>Digital>sharpBlocky isn't sharp. Edge contrast isn't sharp. You don't know what sharpness looks like.Go to an optometrist and spend a day away from screens, out in nature. You will find out what sharp really is.
>>4324978oh hey I just found a roll of that in my mom's old camera. it only had a couple of shots on it so I finished it up myself[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakemotorolaCamera Modelmotorola edge 5G UW (2021)Sensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)16 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.2Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1691Image Height1581Image Created2024:06:24 14:33:14Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating100Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramF-Numberf/2.2Exposure Time295081/250000000 secFocal Length1.66 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryLight SourceD65Metering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias0 EVImage Height1836White BalanceAutoBrightness6.1 EVImage Width3264Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/2.2Color Space InformationsRGB
>>4329169he means its not the same ilford that makes the black n white film, its the sister company that has the rights to make and sell colour film under the ilford brand.its some bullshit like the kodak/kodak alaris deal, or agfa-gevaert/agfaphoto, just dont worry about it and shoot what you like the most shit doesnt matter anyway[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJICOLOR EUROPECamera ModelAGFA d-scanCamera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2018:08:08 22:31:53Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1800Image Height1200
5222wish there would be a good equivalent thats made in the eu though
1976 Npan21 of course
>>4324587I don't like that soulless light fontthe old Ektar branding looked WAY better
>>4329281Scan it in high resolution, post ‘em on /hr/, then link to them here.
>>4329176We could only afford amateur film and that shit was blunt back then. Also, 800 iso film was always recommended back then, exacerbating the situation; there was no internet to warn us about that. However, my uncle preferred Kodachrome 200 and most prints I’ve seen in his albums are crappy.
Am I retarded for buying 10 rolls of kodak gold? I'm just learning film and wanted a color film that was semi affordable but learned afterwards it has a ton of "character" that can't really be ignored.
>>4329770the lab does the scanning but I can post a few here, it'll probably be ready some time next week.>>4329773ammo is ammo m8, you learn by taking the shots
>>4329773I would've gone for half that amount. Even if it's a more affordable film stock, I bet that added up real quick. Good news is that it's considered pretty solid overall.
>>4329790Here in the clown colony of Canada, homie just dropped 150 bucks on practice film. It’s not that much but at the same time it also feels like a lot.
>>4324110man of culture
>>4329770got my scans sooner than expected, but only 21/24 frames. I'll need to wait till monday to pick up the negatives and see what might have happened[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4329998this one and several others have that black bar on the left, not sure what's up with that[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4330000[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4330000Fucked scan, they stuck it on auto mode and didnt check if anything actually lined up.Also the fact the bar is the same sickly orange as the rest of the image means auto mode boosted the shadows probably due to underexposure.a rescan or a home scan would make these pics look so much better.
>>4329773Push it one stop and enjoy.
Fujifilm velvia
>>4324172Based
Fomapan 400.The best and the cheapest, literally $4.50 per roll. Massive grain though, so it's not for everyone.