[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Edit][Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
4chan
/p/ - Photography
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
19 / 2 / ?
[Update] []
Anonymous
01/21/25(Tue)16:11:54 No.4400910
File: pentax_645n_system.jpg (850 KB, 2500x1704)
850 KB
850 KB JPG
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)21:11:54 No.4400910▶
Anyone here stick a 105mm f/2.4 pentax 67 lens on a pentax 645 body and was it worth it?
>>
Anonymous
01/21/25(Tue)16:17:53 No.4400915
>>4400910 (OP)
No way, I can't justify spending $3 a frame just to shoot with the equivalent of a 36mp DSLR and an f1.2 lens. No one here can except people who are shooting large format or digital medium format anyways.

Shooting MF film is a very personal and emotional thing because it makes 0 sense now that a $350 used nikon outdoes 645. Just do what you think is cool.
>>
Anonymous
01/21/25(Tue)16:20:09 No.4400917
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)21:20:09 No.4400917▶
>>4400915
Can you post examples? Sounds like you may have fallen for a bit of meme.
>>
Anonymous
01/21/25(Tue)16:20:45 No.4400918
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)21:20:45 No.4400918▶
>>4400915
digishit looks like ass compared to film
>>
Anonymous
01/21/25(Tue)17:12:53 No.4400941
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)22:12:53 No.4400941▶
>>4400915
>now that a $350 used nikon outdoes 645.
But Anon, it doesn't?
>>
Anonymous
01/22/25(Wed)01:32:22 No.4401040
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)06:32:22 No.4401040▶
>>4400915
>a $350 used nikon outdoes 645
Seeing as a 2000 dollar nikon doesnt even outdo MFT I find this hard to believe. There is a reason why they don't sell many cameras, you know.
>>
Anonymous
01/22/25(Wed)01:33:21 No.4401041
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)06:33:21 No.4401041▶
>>4401040
Proof?
>>
Anonymous
01/22/25(Wed)01:42:53 No.4401043
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)06:42:53 No.4401043▶
File: file.png (106 KB, 1240x906)
106 KB
106 KB PNG
>>4401041
Ok
>>
Anonymous
01/22/25(Wed)01:49:35 No.4401045
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)06:49:35 No.4401045▶
>>4401040
Are you saying micro four thirds outdoes a presumably full frame nikon IQ-wise? I may be misunderstanding something.
>>
Anonymous
01/22/25(Wed)02:15:11 No.4401053
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)07:15:11 No.4401053▶
>>4401043
These charts are irrelevant unless broken down into ILCs only, preferably FF ILCs only for the big 3 brands.

People who post BCN data are even more retarded
>japanese retailer sales numbers matter!
No they do not.
>>
Anonymous
01/22/25(Wed)02:53:30 No.4401059
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)07:53:30 No.4401059▶
File: despair.png (1.37 MB, 821x1550)
1.37 MB
1.37 MB PNG
>>
Anonymous
01/22/25(Wed)03:03:29 No.4401062
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)08:03:29 No.4401062▶
>>4400915
>$3 a frame
That's the price of 35mm Kodak Gold...
>>
sage
01/23/25(Thu)04:31:18 No.4401284
sage 01/23/25(Thu)09:31:18 No.4401284▶
>>4400915
>outdoes
go count pixels some more
>>
Anonymous
01/23/25(Thu)05:25:26 No.4401286
Anonymous 01/23/25(Thu)10:25:26 No.4401286▶
>>4401284
This.
>>
Anonymous
01/23/25(Thu)12:51:48 No.4401330
Anonymous 01/23/25(Thu)17:51:48 No.4401330▶
OP here. in looking at photos online of this set up idk if only retards shoot it but the bokeh looks way too panicky and it annoys me
>>
Anonymous
01/23/25(Thu)13:35:20 No.4401348
Anonymous 01/23/25(Thu)18:35:20 No.4401348▶
>>4401284
>Triggered by the truth
There is no rational reason to shoot film
>its LE ARTISTIC AND UNREAL!
learn to constrain the color palette and dynamic range of a photo and add a grain sim instead of paying kodak to do it for you
>>
Anonymous
01/23/25(Thu)15:22:40 No.4401362
Anonymous 01/23/25(Thu)20:22:40 No.4401362▶
>>4401348
Insane cope.
>>
Anonymous
01/25/25(Sat)07:55:28 No.4401598
Anonymous 01/25/25(Sat)12:55:28 No.4401598▶
>>4401348
>add grain sim
look at what the digicucks need to do to mimic our power
>>
Anonymous
02/02/25(Sun)12:13:52 No.4403135
Anonymous 02/02/25(Sun)17:13:52 No.4403135▶
>>4401348
you will never understand
just let it go
>>
Anonymous
02/15/25(Sat)21:18:38 No.4406593
Anonymous 02/16/25(Sun)02:18:38 No.4406593▶
>>4400910 (OP)
i want a blue camera...
[Post a Reply]
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
19 / 2 / ?
[Update] []
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Edit][Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.