Spring has sprung editionPrevious: >>4499929
Snapshit from a concert.Has anyone had the opportunity to bring their gear to a professional venue? I’m wondering how hard it is to be push freelance media coverage for an average sized venue. This one didn’t seem to have any other than the band’s photographer.
embrace the spiral
Fartin around
>>4501719come on man, at least focus properly
>>4501892
How would you crop this image? I like that brown spot in the corner but because it was shot from a car at speed it's messed up
>>4501946I'd probably crop off the bottom a little and try to keep the horizon as the top third of the image instead of cropping too high and making it start at the middle.
I'm struggling to find anything interesting anymore and struggling to even try. It feels like I'm uninspired and have been for months, and I have no idea how I can change it.
>>4501948>must... follow... rule of thir-ACK
>>4501959If I wanted to be really boring I'd say he should put the horizon in the middle. Either have the horizon really high or have it really low, middle is boring trash for a landscape photo.
>>4501967
>>4501968
>>4501969
>>4501948
>>4501889>>4501890Love these anon, great job. What film stock are these?
>>4501964hi david, i thought you died
>>4501719>>4501765>>4501889>>4501890I like theseand this>>4501933
>>4502017
>>4502018>>4502017>$5000 oversized sensor consumerist blob to take these boring pov snapshit photos of some hos deformed designer dog with back issuescant even be constructive because the entire premise and execution is the kinda shit i take on my phone and text my mom if she asks me how im doing on vacation
>>4502020I always enjoy the seething my dog brings you guysWhich photos itt were yours again?
So nice to see someone else is getting bullied and not me, even though my slops here are not any better
>>4502017>>4502018>>4502020I've heard it is easy to make this kind of pictures, like "happy Corgi is happy".And it is NOT easy to make something really special like pic rel. And by special I meant something unusual, not something exactly like pic rel.
>>4502028The problem is nobody wants to see some dysgenic excuse for a “dog” and frame such a stinking mutants deformed face and dangling balls, so the quirk chungus ugly dog photo market is oversaturated already (one guy did that, it was funny and unique, dont do it again), and nearly every aesthetically pleasing and wholesomely humorous sort of dog photo has been done ten thousand times and made the header for ten thousand blog posts about dogs and spammed all over instagram ad naseum. Much like cat pictures. Because these animals are in 24/7 contact with over two hundred million people in one country alone. Dog photography is simply not worth over sharing beyond your immediate social circle. Nobody cares about your fat husky, smelly german shepherd, or inbred corgi. Maybe one or two pictures, fine. But over and over again, as obviously all someone shoots… stop already. Photography is wasted on people like that. >OH BOY ANOTHER MEDIOCRE CENTER FRAMED BOKEH DOG ON A WALK/IN YOUR HOUSE/BACKYARD>i can do that too>google image search: your dog breed here shot on dslr
>>4502034PS:At least cat pictures are universally entertaining. The demeanor of the d*g is cold and distant, reserved, especially around their owner and their incessant snapshitting. Always looking away, wanting to do something else. Or maybe begging for a treat. Cats infantile faces, irrational behaviors and more flexible bodies are more immediately humorous and easy to project fanciful scenarios onto so cats being silly beats a german shepherd glancing at a treat but actually wanting to fuck off and sniff grass every single time. Cat photos > dog photosDog photos are just a waste. Waste. All that gear for that????
>>4502034this>omg guys>look at my dog>with bokeh>x100we get it you like your dog. but your dog isnt a fuckin show winner striking an epic pose so its just a dog sitting there being boring. >>4502035true. when people actually want to see pics of an animal just being there its usually pics of cats. caturday not doggerday. i notice on /p/ dog “photography” is an excuse for owning a camera to be a gearfag with and taking test shots
>>4502028>And it is NOT easy to make something really special like pic rel.Apparently it's too hard for yourself to make something like that either, so you're in good company>>4502034Did you forget to let me know which photos you share? I love opportunities to learn and love seeing inspo.
>>4502039https://www.google.com/?q=corgi+shot+on+dslr&udm=2
>>4502041>I can't even read, let alone take a picture Sad
>>4502020corgis are a working breed bro
>border collie>shot on film>black & whitenow THIS is a kinografique dog photo
>>4502047>concept behind the photo (overdone but at least its something)>not a tech test>isnt an uggo karen meme breed like a shitsky or corgcuck6/10
>>4502046Their job is being more inbred than british royalty
Not technically perfect but I like it.
>>4502035Based knower
>>4501998I think CineStill 800T and Amber D400. I went to Hong Kong earlier this month and went through 15 rolls of 35mm in 2 weeks.
>>4502039No need to be angry, I'm just you can shot the same object in different ways. I've heard in some photo schools they have a test for studends called "One subject, multiple images" like "make 50 different images of one glass of water "
>>4501889Strange picture, good colors
>>4501946should go back and add a person or a thing to this one
>>4502096Kino. The pitch black but well lit structures in combination with black and white makes it feel like it's on the moon or something.
>>4502092Well if you've seen the dog, you'd know I've taken hundreds of different kinds of shots already, forgive me for posting two instead of all of them in an rpt
>>4502096I love it.Not that recent, but I haven't done any photography in a while.>Oneplus 12 (f2.6, 1/1142 ss, 13.30mm, iso 50)
>>4502083>I think CineStill 800T and Amber D400Thank you anon.>I went to Hong Kong earlier this month and went through 15 rolls of 35mm in 2 weeks.Cant think of a better place to shoot that much film.
>>4502154
>>4502155
>>4502156
In honor of our Lord and Savior Ken
>>4502164turtle?
>>4502179Caiman
>>4502181>Caimanfuggin neat8/10 would try
How can I tell if my pictures are good enough to be posted?
>>4502211What are the consequences of posting bad pictures on 4chan?
>>4502211If you cropped off that grey part of the wall on the right and just had that side of the image start in the shadow, this would be slightly better.
>>4502213I thought pictures need LAYERS OF DEPTHCan you crop it the way you like it?
>>4502212If they're bad for 4chan, they're also bad for other platforms
>>4502215The tunnel itself is the depth man, that's what frames the image and draws you into the subject (with the subject being the palm in this case).
