only an idiot would think that what Charlie Kirk was doing was politics. in fact the whole function of Kirk was to draw in naive students into thinking that these are the "issues" they must concern themselves with. he was the personification of the spectacle of politics. >The spectacle presents itself as a vast inaccessible reality that can never be questioned. Its sole message is: “What appears is good; what is good appears.” The passive acceptance it demands is already effectively imposed by its monopoly of appearances, its manner of appearing without allowing any reply. you couldn't win him at the debate because he already won the moment you engaged him on his terms. and his terms were monopoly the guy they charged with the murder of Kirk couldn't be the killer of Charlie Kirk because Charlie Kirk is not so much a human being as he is an apparatus. if the court wants to charge him with destroying the disciplinary apparatus of "debate" that's fair enough but no murder was committed. you cant murder a machine or a trap
Israel murdered Charlie Kirk in order to stop discussion about the Epstein files, and send a message to other pundits not to rock the boat on zionism. We were on the verge of victory, but this was the plan jews thought up to put us back under their boots.
>>515835637>Kike logicFor once I agree with you, but don't be fooled: I see the tricks you pulled.
The left and right needs to unite against israel. Kirk was actually getting close. Sure, his status as toilet paper usa wouldve been ruined but he wouldve gone on to actually make people consider the right has good interests.This edgelord retard couldnt see that, and chances are hes pro palestine himself!
