97% of civil engineers say if you drive over this bridge, it will collapse and you'll plunge to your death, while the remaining 3% of engineers say it's just fine, hop in your car with the family and drive on over it. What would you do?
stfu
>>518356974you are right we should let the great purge happen.less people less co2.Get boosted now!
examine the bridge myselfprobably choose a different route since there is so much commotionabout some shitty bridge that might/might not collapseyeah, im taking a different route
>>518356974>engineers>climate "scientists"These are not in the same ballpark.
>>518356974It takes at least 4 years to become a civil engineer. Anyone can become a climate astrologer, however. There's no required knowledge. >>518357493Exactly
>>518356974What about if people have been driving on it and the 97% have been saying it for literally 50 years? What if those same 97% use they bridge to go to their yearly conference where afterwards they call for increasing tolls on the bridge rather than closing it? What if some of that toll money goes directly to them?
>>51835697430 years later the bridge is still up and functional, would you still believe the (((expert)))?
>>518356974>What would you do?I would walk across the bridge then implode it from the other side so the rest of you fags/kikes/jeets/troons couldn't follow me.
half of the engineers get a kickback when a new bridge is built, and the other half just repeat what the first half says to avoid causing trouble.
>>518356974>when 97% of astronomers say sun the goes around earth then it's time to listen
>>518356974If the bridge is perfectly stable and supports millions of cars year after year without issue, then yes, I'm going to start ignoring the 97% of "experts" who have been insisting for the last century that it's going to collapse any minute now unless we give them all our money
>>518356974
it's 99.9% now and the stuff they thought wouldn't happen for 50 years is happening now. we're fucked and it's too late to make the right decision.
>>518356974>climate scientists
>>518358075>I gambled.... and lost
>>518356974>le experts agree argumentOh how I miss those times.
>>518356974>Consensus is truth Stopped working for me long before COVID and consensus rewrote the whole script about immune systems and how viruses work
>>518356974If 97% of engineers have been saying the bridge will collapse for the last 70 years and it's still standing, then clearly we're handing out too many engineering degrees.
>>51835697497% of climate scientists earn a living from climate change
>>51835697497% also said the clotshot was safe and effectiveMuh climate bullshit is just the pathway to>Own nothing and be very unhappy
>>518358182If the driver was going 1kmh faster he'd make it to the other side.
I would use my own judgment, look for another bridge and wait for the Military to hang all the climate change experts! They will have to, it's Civilization or them, and even the retarded Military complex needs Civilization more than the expert retards. Win win.
I'd just pay the "scientists" enough money untill their opinion was "perfectly safe to drive" and drive over it.Money solves everything
They keep saying its 10 years away from collapsing, and they have been saying it for 40 years. At what point do you wonder if they are just wrong?
>>518356974The 97% are 100% gender studies, fagology and feminist name dance therapy scientists. No one else responded to that shit.
>>518358075Truck treaking
>>518356974The 9x% of scientists agree thing is always fake and gay.If it's remotely legitimate, it's a voluntary questionnaire that only a single digit percentage of "scientists" even respond to.
>>518356974Are the 97% of engineers Jewish or dependent on funding from Jews?
>>518356974notice climate change as a subject doesn't matter anymore to any of the politicians because globalism has broken down so it's not a useful play to control the oil market anymore
97% of those experts are jews or corrupt losers who dont want to lose their job so they can pay their loans
>>518356974> 97%LONG DEBUNKED.This number was based on fraudulent statistics of by the corrupt Australian John Cook from 2013:http://www.debunkingclimate.com/97percen_%20of_scientists.html> Cook took out the “Don’t Knows”(66% of the samples), and in essence counted all of the remainder that did not reject the hypotheses that humans are causing global warming as endorsing the “consensus”.> Had he included the “Don’t Knows”, it would be: “32% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.”> Had he included ONLY explicit endorsement, it would be: “8% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.”
>>518356974Yeah….it wasn't really 97% of scientists was it op? Well, you probably don't really know, do you, that 97% number can from some survey of a hundred or so people at a conference in the late 90’s. The guy who distributed the survey only got less than 100 responses. However, I firmly believe that 97% of scientists agree with those thst fund them.
>>518356974They claim that carbon dioxide rising from .02% to .04% since the start of the industrial revolution is what caused the Earth to get warmer. I don't buy it.The trapped heat theory makes more sense, that running so many hot engines all the time is what's causing heat to get trapped in the atmosphere. That would be a more realistic greenhouse effect. Carbon dioxide doesn't make a greenhouse hotter, it's a gas that can exist at any temperature...
>>518356974Climate scientist shave been saying new York will be under water in 10 years since 1970. If a group of people is consistently wrong about something for half a century, why should you suddenly start believing them now?
>>518356974I know you posted this as some "got ya!" thing about global warming. but I'm bothered by how no one repairs shit anymore. you can make things last forever by fixing and cleaning things, but no one does it or knows how to. people would rather wait for something to break and buy something new.
>>51835697497% of experts said it would collapse 20 years ago and it's not a bridge it's rocks in a line nobody put there.... And your solution is salt in the sky so why don't you fuck off.
>>518356974You would have to look at data that shows the bridge being tested for it's structural integrity. Practically speaking you could observe the car on the bridge and the bridge not collapsing; thus you could form a hypothesis that the bridge will not collapse and run the experiment yourself. 100% can agree that the bridge will immediately collapse, and that has nothing to do with whether it will or not. Bandwagon fallacy and argument from authority fallacy. Many such cases.
>we're all gonna die cause of climate change>No we can't make China and India stop polluting and adding carbon and chemicals to the atmosphere constantly>No we can't stop the imperial wars that require massive amounts of fuel and produce nonstop pollution>No politicians will not stop using jets to meet up and jerk each other off >You need to get a shitty electric vehicle, never eat meat, and live in a concrete pod to save the world! Israel was right to rape Greta in her little downie asshole.
Only go over it if you have to and drive slowly with your windows open so you can swim out.
>>518356974Imagine this.> 97% of experts said what they were told in order to keep their funding> 3% of experts said the truthWhich expert would you believe?
>>518358075Hope it was a jeet that cant swim
>>518356974>if most people say the earth is flat then it's flat guys!
>>518356974>97% of climate scientistsI remember when climatards first published that bullshit, even claimed it was a "scientific study" . It was such an outrageous lie. Still is. What they did was a simple stupid text through about 2000 climate research papers for anthropogenic or humand made climate change. Every paper that did not explicitly say climate change is not human made or is from natural causes they counted as agreeing with the human made claim. Funny thing is that included papers that never intended to even talk about that. Don't even argue with these cheats, lying cunts the whole lot.
>>518356974Midwit slop. If the subject of the bridge were as politicized and strategically important as the climate issue, I wouldn't trust muh experts either
>>518356974I look at the details and realize that overwhelming majority of the experts are actually saying> the bridge will eventually collapse someday if it isn't maintainedAnd that some kike is using leading questions and taking statements out of context to try to sell me a new bridge.
>>51835697497% was never an accurate statistic, and the way the question was asked did not differentiate between man-made or natural.
>>518356974By 'climate change' they mean the coming natural disasters that are part of the apocalypse. They are confessing ahead what is coming to offset the bad karma. And climate change alarmism content in the media serves as a reality programming by public consciousness, so that the minds of billiona of cattle create this 'climate change' climate catastrophe thereby fulfilling some ancient prophecies that the 'elites' want to ride if they cannot stop it.
>>518357854>cosmology was completely wrong>opponents killed by the state and church/thread
>>518356974Each democrat voter that is violently murdered is one less race traitor.
Can someone explain to me how the greenhouse effect is supposed to work? A real greenhouse works by trapping hot air in with a physical barrier, but what’s stopping hot air from rising into the upper atmosphere before cooling down again? Isn’t that process responsible for creating storms?
>>518356974Climate science is backed on the idea that the earth is billions of years old. The reason they have to push these ideas so hard is because if their predictions keep being wrong. The model they pull the data from will be thrown into question. It is a money laundering operation, but it is also a propaganda operation. They need to spread the lie that the earth is billions of years old.
>>518358313How full are that guys pants?
>>518359751>Climate scientist shave been saying new York will be under water in 10 years since 1970. If a group of people is consistently wrong about something for half a century, why should you suddenly start believing them now?The mainstream media is wrong on a day to day basis but the majority believes them again the next day.
>>518356974I believe them, I just don't care because there will be no white people in 2100 so I burn my trash.
>>518356974We dont decide science on consensus. We decide it on demonstrating consistent reproducible results from experiments. Which you morons havent done
>>518358075Man, the remake of Sorcerer really cut back on the explosions.
>>518357259“Or who enclosed the sea with doorsWhen, bursting forth, it went out from the womb;When I made a cloud its garmentAnd thick darkness its swaddling band,And I placed boundaries on itAnd set a bolt and doors,And I said, ‘Thus far you shall come, but no farther;And here shall your proud waves stop’?Satan and his minions always have to lie about facts that are supported by scripture.
>>518361280New York will be under water for real. Leave it. Now. For good. Just get a remote job.
>>518361632Along other details Am amazed how simply it was to bully them with mexican hellReally makes you think what this whole we hate mexicans ICE shit is all about
>>518356974the 97% of climate scientist say that man contributed to climate change, not man made. the level of how much man contributed and if we can even influence it or not is highly disputed within those 97%. also you can go in history that scientist going against the norm often get outcasted for thinking outside the norm. Ignaz Semmelweis basically found out that you have to wash hand and sterallize medical tools before using it. he did this practise and the number of death reduced. science said his claim were nonesense and the reduced death rate is the result of the new air ventilator system. only later, when Semmelweis ended in the psychiatry, Koch proven him right with the discovery of bakteria. so even if 97% are wrong, we have a lot of exampels in human history proven 3% to be right. so 97% does mean nothing, especially if they are monetarily insensitive e.g. more money for reseach
>>518356974>97% of engineers have said this bridge would collapse for the past 70 years but the bridge is still standing. Would you cross it?Ftfy.
>>518358272I fucking love MATLAB so much it’s unreal bros
>>518361070The accumulation of specific gasses in the upper atmosphere acts like a barrier containing a higher percentage of the normally reflected energy... Just vent it you say. Exactly. That's why you're not allowed to go to Antarctica. They are building a smokestack to space and they don't want all the green fags to find out and lose their shit that now we are polluting space as well.
>>518356974Drive over the bridge which won't collapse because of obvious statics and tell the 97% they are retarded subhumans much like OP the nigger.
>>518356974>97% of civil engineers say if you drive over this bridge, it will collapse and you'll plunge to your death, while the remaining 3% of engineers say it's just fine, hop in your car with the family and drive on over it. What would you do?But in reality the river bed is dry, its only a small little slope and you don't need to cross the bridge at all
>>5183596539/10 bait
>97% of civil engineers have been saying this bridge is going to collapse imminently for 200 years (since at least Malthus)Would cross
>>518360277>>No we can't make China and India stop polluting and adding carbon and chemicals to the atmosphere constantlyChina is transitioning towards renewables faster than the USA is, despite being poorer.
>>518358075How could they slap?
>>518356974100% of people who were vaxxed and exposed to covid still got "covid-19"
>>518356974Yeah but the real equal would by they said the bridge was going to collapse and its been 30 years. The 3% are vindicated. Glaciers didn't melt they had to remove the signs for glacier national park that said the glaciers would melt by 2020. The real environmental disaster is places like India.
>>518356974If these fags could come up with a solution other than raising everyone's taxes, people would take them seriously.
>OH MY SCIENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>518356974depends, the bridge experts dont want my money... climate "experts" want me to pay more taxes. A LOT MORE
>>518356974The "experts" are retarded.
>I establish My covenant with you; and all flesh shall never again be cut off by the water of the flood, neither shall there again be a flood to destroy the earth.” God said, “This is the sign of the covenant which I am making between Me and you and every living creature that is with you, for all successive generations; I set My bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a sign of a covenant between Me and the earth. It shall come about, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow will be seen in the cloud, and I will remember My covenant, which is between Me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and never again shall the water become a flood to destroy all flesh. When the bow is in the cloud, then I will look upon it, to remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is on the earth.”They want to make people afraid of the Earth flooding. It won't happen again. It might've been caused by the water above the sky falling to Earth. Maybe there is no more water up there to fall anymore.>Then God said, “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.” God made the expanse, and separated the waters which were below the expanse from the waters which were above the expanse; and it was so. God called the expanse heaven.>But a mist used to rise from the earth and water the whole surface of the ground.After the Flood, people no longer lived for hundreds of years, and something about the atmosphere changed to where rainbows became visible under certain circumstances. Maybe a protective layer of water was removed from the atmosphere. The scientists should look into that.
>>518362127They have been saying that for three years now yet for the past three years the chinks emissions from ghg has only increased.
>>518362495It's called the "canopy theory" but most people think it's impossible due to the heat loss the earth would experience through the evaporation of the flood water. The theory makes perfect sense if you abandon their dating system and move the ice age to being directly after the flood.
>>518358075What does that road sign say? 3 tons? That truck driver jerk took the wrong route and was too lazy to go around..
>>518356974>97% of civil engineersif 97% of civil engineers are corrupt and just want a new bridge to get money I would not worry, you faggot.
>>518362683interesting
>>518357259Nice pictures of tides you got there.
>>518358096It's actually 208% and the stuff they thought wouldn't happen for 4 billion years is literally happening. The sun is swallowing the earth.
>>518358313Bro is thrilled to be alive. Top tier dad story fs
>>518356974What are the genders, races and political ideologies of the engineers who say it will collapse? Like them, I'm just a data guy gathering all the facts.
>>518358313Just throw it in reverse, idiot
>>518358096Like what? Nothing has happened or been happening that is out of the ordinary!
>>518362127china having more renewables doesn't help when they build even more coal-reactors. in the end they may have more renewable but emit even more co2 then they did 10years ago due the the need of more electricity
>>518363516>all three axles hanging in mid air>throw it in reversethe idiot is you
>>518356974I mean, if I found out that 97% of scientists where paid by bridge builders to say that people needed new bridges, I'd probably keep on driving.
>>518356974You can tell the difference between the scientific method and Science™ based on which one uses appeals to authority and manufactured consensus. 97% of "experts" agreed the bridge would collapse because a small ideologically motivated group used their reputation to push papers past peer review. However, every few years the group revises their deficient structural models because they fail to predict anything in the real world. In the end it turned out that group just wanted the bridge torn down because they dislike how many people were coming across.
>>518356974First of everyone knows what you are trying to do, but it is a false analogy.The thing you refering to is a meta study that became the basis for a multi billion if not trillion dollar scam.Climate science cannot accurately predict weather 2 weeks into the future, yet the same people claim they can do it accurately for several years into the future.They make claims like there will never be another snow day in Germany (early 2000) yet no one calls them out for this obvious falsehood.They make claims like this is the hottest day on earth ever every year, yet fail to ignore life was flourishing on earth when there wasn't even ice on the pole caps.They ignore that you already have a hiring bias as the IPCC only accepts people that people in massive man made climate change.They ignore the scientific fact that water vapor is far more important than CO2 and that there is limits to what CO2 can do as it is only able to interact with a small part of the light spectrum.Also science is not a census and never will be.
>>518357573ThisAlso OP a faggot that gives the mudslimes that fuck Greta on a daily basis rimjobs.
>>518356974Structural engineering is a completely different type of science than made up graphs lol.A better analogy would be you are blindfolded and put behind the wheel of a car. 97% of scientists tell you "just keep driving straight, goy! The bridge is definitely real and in front of you, goy!" The other 3% tell you to stop because the bridge is a complete lie. The safe bet is to just stop
>>518359653>They claim that carbon dioxide rising from .02% to .04% since the start of the industrial revolution is what caused the Earth to get warmer. I don't buy it.It is from 0.03% to 0.04% actually.0.02% is the plant Life threshold, at that point plant life can flourish, below that plant life will start dying and decaying the world.That is why laugh when they say shit like wanting zero carbon dioxide.
>>518356974>picSaid experts are likely Indians, so well-known scammers wanting you to buy their more expensive and over projected solution. This is a great analogy of modern world: it even accounts that people believe: "if everyone agrees, then it must be true". Those would be the first ones to ask the head of real scientists on a plate back then.>>518357259Perfect. Fags even pretend this was debunked.
>>518362961
>>518365329lel saved
>>518356974Faggots on pol will defend denialist claims like they personally own an oil refinery lol.Like seriously why do you guys care so much about big oil getting taxed? Its not like your gas has gotten any cheaper with all the oil subsidies we gave them. Oilfags getting taxed to undo the damage they caused is literally not your problem.
>>518364099It was a poor attempt at humor. I know how trucks work.
>>518365492>LET US MAKE YOU ENERGY POOR SO WE CAN STARVE YOU TO DEATH
>>518365492>why do you guys care so much about big oil getting taxed?jesus christ how are people this retarded?
>>518357259Climate alarmists btfo also fpbp>>518357573Exacta
>>518365492So like are these scientist like the COVID scientists? They were all full of shit and lying for money.How is this any different at all?
>>518365492Please do explain how giving more money to our corrupt governments will make the world a better place.
>>518356974>97% of climate scientists agree>97% of some scientists agree>97% of ideologically biased scientists who wrote to us agree>97% of ideologically biased people who wrote to us agreeThat last one is the truth of the matter. IIRC the "97% of climate scientists" was just 97% of the respondants to a question, most of which were not only not climate scientists but weren't even scientists.
>>518366247
>>518356974So why don't those experts build a better bridge?
>>518356974>the bridge is going to collapseSure, on a long enough timeline all bridges collapse.
>>51835697497% of civil engineers agree that its a bridge, that would be a much more accurate analogy, im assuming its about retarded climate change.
>>518367521>Sure, on a long enough timeline all bridges collapse.based Fight Club quoter.
>>518356974Did they use what looks like a perfectly normal bridge in that image on purpose?
>>518356974That’s not how engineering works. The 3% saying it’s ok, are probably the correct ones. The 97% are probably just erroring on the side of caution instead of analyzing the bridge.
>>518356974Depends, do those 97% scientists work for a bridge building company that would get the contract to build the new bridge to replace it?
I ask them how we fix the bridge, and they call me a sexist, nazi incel racist bigot chud, and have me thrown in jail for asking questions. So no, I'm sorry, but I don't trust 97% of experts.
>>518366247Also all scientists who disagree with the climate cult are defunded and attacked. That's why they have 97% of the academia.
>>518356974Safer than driving over a bridge in Pittsburgh when Biden is in town to talk about infrastructure bills.
>>518356974That's a misquoted statistic. It was actually from a study of published papers. So 97% of published papers said human activity was a major contributing factor of climate change. However, only around 20% of the papers made claims that it was going to be a disaster. The majority of papers did not make a claim either way.
>>518368624You ask them how we fix the bridge and they say give a few billion to the engineering firm they just set up last week.>>518369436If they thought it was an existential crisis they'd support war with China and India since those are the two biggest producers of this shit.
>>518357259Didn't you hear chud, new research shows that the sea bed is sinking to compensate for all the new water weight but that doesn't mean the ice caps aren't melting! You have to trust science!
>>518357259Why wpuld you think water levels are the relevant factor for judging this? If you ever thought the amount of ice we harbor on land would be enough to change the water level significantly, then you are the retard. If you thought melting ice in the water would do it, you are even more retarded than previously thought. However if you think 8 billion humans, majority of which a niggers who throw their garbage and shit directly into the oceans doesnt have a negative ecological effects, then you are by far and away a level of retardation i never imagined possible. However you already knew that, didnt you moshi. You are strawmanning against the real outcomes that would have your fellow kikes paying for single use plastics rather than pretending we can recycle it away and the ownus is on consumers.
>>518362961Oh so youre saying that there is a time of day when the statue of liberty is under water???
>>518369630>Didn't you hear chud, new research shows that the sea bed is sinking to compensate for all the new water weight but that doesn't mean the ice caps aren't melting! You have to trust science!mother Ghia wins againcheckmate chuds!
>>518370096Are you retarded. We're talking millimeters a year and it gets greater the closer to the equator you are.
>>518369964>Why wpuld you think water levels are the relevant factor for judging this?If you chinks keep it up we're going to elect a Neocon who is hostile to Chinkland.
>>518357259Other side of the Atlantic (and a way shorter time span), but in my (anecdotal) experience the North Sea hasn't risen either in the last 30 years, either.Low tide and high tide have remained in pretty much the same spots.Which gives me hope the "97% of experts" may have simply been bought by activists attempting to install a globalist regime to rule mankind.
>>518364137
>>518356974Kill you and the 97% for making this retarded analogy.
>>518356974Fuckers can't even predict the weather properly.
>>518368863ThisAny study doing anything supporting the climate change narrative will see funding from government and organisation like the IPC.Any study that has a neutral stance or an opposed one will not see financial support.
>>518369964>Why wpuld you think water levels are the relevant factor for judging this?But enough about those "scientists" who cried about the alarming sea levels as a result of climate changes. I think they are already pretty shitted on already by that bullshit.Also, no-one here is against the environment. We even support that those who deliberately litter around should pay for their crimes.
>>518370270Take your meds.
>>518356974Except you can see for yourself that the bridge is solid and isn't going to fall.
>>518356974wonder if i’m having a scizophrenic meltdown because i dont have a car, wife, or kids
>>518371508NIIIGAAAA
>>518371048I would drive over it, get a nice view of the city, then plunge to my death
>>51835697497% hahahahaha who makes this shit up? Hahahahahahahaaaa fucking dimwits. This is like fake environmental disaster marketing lmfaoooo
>>51835697497% effective bridge
>>518356974I remember being a kid and my 4th grade teacher told us the Amazon rain forest was burning down, and we had to donate to save the world. We saved the Amazon guys!!!
>>518356974In 100% of cases, 97% of the experts are drooling retards.
>>518356974did the bridge collapse though, or is it still standing?
>>518374478It's still standing, but it's going to collapse someday
>>518356974Are 97% of the engineers paid by the ferry system?
>>518357259fpbpFunny how we haven't needed to raise seaside structures to compensate for rising sea levels at a time when "climate experts" predicted our coastal cities would be flooded.
>>518356974That bridge looks fine to me. I would certainly check it myself before I drove on it. I would also check it 20 years later and see it's still standing strong despite the promises from 97% of paid shill experts screaming otherwise.
>>518356974Are they all receiving a check from the jewish owner of the toll brige next to it ? Would they lose their job if they say they opposite ?
>>51835697497% of any population are absolute retards who I wouldn't ask advice from
>>518356974What a retarded post.Civili engineering is an exact science, Climate science is not.They are not even remotely comprable.I swear the nigger tier IQ coming out of American universities is something to behold.
What are the actual arguments of the 97%? What if the arguments were something like, "because it's made of wood?" Almost like appeals to consensus or authority are both fallacious.
>>518356974What does the HR department say?What say the rabbis?
>>518356974>97% of civil engineers say if you drive over this bridgehmmm i gotta meme for that
>>518356974lol, appeal to authority. most historians too agree on the validity of the holocaust.
>>518356974>97% civic engineerslook closely 90% of these 97% are people who are not civic engineers doing engineering but marketing people who work for companies that are right now trying to get government funds to build new bridge and they never showed you real data but "approximation" and "estimation" of what would happen in 100 years.Meanawhile the 3% who say it will not collapse have made FEA analysis and engineering calculations which you can check yourself and try to find errors in these, showing the bridge will be ok.Who would you listen to?
>>518356974Comparing Engineering to whacko climate models.Holy fuck you're retardedSeriously fucking retardedFound the nigger
>>518356974100% of non-disbarred public health officials and bioengineers said that- covid was a death sentence- cloth masks stop viral particles- mRNA vaccines are safe and do not causs cardiac stress, cancers, or integrate with the genome- covid wasnt engineered in a lab- vaccinated individuals cannot spread covidfuck experts, dont care. there is no legitimacy anymore. and I say this as someone with 4 degrees in STEM. there are charlatans everywhere
environmentalism has been like 80% climate change for the past 15 years and has completely overshadowed actually important shiti dont even need bug spray anymore because they are all dead
>>518376221Better yet. There's a tsunami coming and the only way to survive is to cross the bridge.Mainstream media tells you to find another way because 97% of climate scientists say it'll collapseEvil misinformation interwebs 'non-experts' tell you that the 3% of engineers say it'll be safe to cross to survive.Retards don't cross, die.Non-retards do cross, live.
>>518356974If environmentalists really believed what they say is going to happen they wouldn't be calling for taxes and regulations. They would be killing industrialists and bombing factories.
>>518376221same with the 3% representing the actual civil engineers who on record stated that the twin towers fell in controlled detonation and not from structural failure due to melting beams.the 97% here are the same women engineers who couldnt even build a pedestrian bridge in florida without it collapsing and killing people.
>>518376546and they would be building nuclear reactors everywhere, not resisting them.
>>518356974>97% say the bridge will collapse in the next 500 years>will it collapse if I drive over it today?>No, you can safely drive over it as your vehicle is less than the maximum tonnageKill all climatefags.
>>518356974Aa if I'm going to listen to 100 people to get over a fucking bridge. I'll determine if it's safe and drive. Fuck other idiots opinions.
>>518362961You can see the high water mark
>give us your money to make the weather more gooder
>>518358075>3 ton limit>obviously a 10-15 ton truckIllegal jeet driver with a California CDL
"Experts" are simply jackoffs who agreed with other less intelligent jackoffs.
>You have to pay me to cross this bridge, otherwise you die.Sounds like all of the "climate" people are bandits that are too gay to actually just commit armed robbery.
>>518377101
>>518377067>>518376653kek same wavelength, fren
All bridges eventually collapse.
>>518356974Who's paying the 97% of experts?
>>518356974The bridge is fine. 97% of scientists are being paid by a bridge construction company to say it’s going to collapse so they can get hired to build another.
>>518356974I've got good news for all you climate change deniers out there. It's way too late to do anything about it anyway and we're all totally fucked. Hooray!
>>518377231>>518356974random dudes who have bills to pay & dont want to lose their jobs ofc.
>>518356974Depends on how likely it is they are paid off - and what the alternatives are.Your comparison is wrong too as you try to switch around axtion and inaction - You're the one trying to sell us this "totally 97% safe" bridge.Well do i have a bridge to sell you.
>>518369964Did you even have a point in this incoherent ramble?
>>518356974>be me>find out that 97% of engineers are being paid by a company that builds bridges>realize they are only telling people the bridge is going to collapse because their master just want to sell me a new bridge>tell them to fuck off>tell their jewish boss to fuck off>he gets mad>he burns down the bridge>SEE?!?!?!?!>WE TOLD YOU THE BRIDGE WOULD COLLAPSEThis is how your shitty analogy actually plays out.
>>518370270It gets higher the more money some fucking government kike puts in your dirty greasy fucking pocket, scumshit.
>>518377147I'm glad someone else mentioned it. Yes it's all "expertise" and everything is done by the book, especially when you never want to be accountable for the atrocities that come of it and never want to reconcile the correct answer because it would show how wrong you were.
>>518377313>the carbon dioxide that was already in the atmosphere…..The carbon dioxide that allows plants to grow with less water usage?>yesThose same plants that if they can grow more easily, and there’s more water and more CO2 to help them grow, will create more plants to use up this otherwise wasted resource?>yesOk go on>…when released back into the atmosphere will destroy teh wurld!
>>518356974can I see the research papers of those 3% please?
>>518357259fpbp
>>518357259In much of the western tropical Pacific, sea level has risen approximately 10–15 cm (4–6 in), close to or nearly twice the global rate measured since 1993. In the central tropical Pacific, sea level has risen approximately 5–10 cm (2–4 in), according to the State of the Climate in the South-West Pacific 2023 Report. In annual terms, the mean rate of sea-level rise between January 1993 and May 2023 is about 4.52 mm per year in the ocean around and east of the Maritime Continent and about 4.13 mm per year in the ocean around New Zealand. Map showing sea level trends from 1993 to 2023. It highlights areas with rising and falling sea levels in the Pacific and Indian Oceans with a color scale indicating rates of change in mm/yr.Sea level trend from 1993-2023 captured from sea level gridded data.Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). DOI: 10.24381/cds.4c328c78This compares with average global mean sea level rise of about 3.4 mm per year during that period. Rising sea levels have resulted in dramatic increases in the frequency of coastal flooding since 1980. According to the Pacific Islands Climate Change Monitor 2021, notable increases include Guam from 2 to 22 times a year; Penrhyn, Cook Islands from 5 to 43 times a year; Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands from 2 to 20 times a year; Papeete, French Polynesia from 5 to 34 times a year; and Pago Pago, American Samoa from 0 to 102 times a year.
>>518356974The 97% was formed by mailing any scientist.And 97% are the scientist with to much time to answering a non profit asking them stupid highly politicized questions by letter.
>>518356974ACCELERATE
>>518357259OOf, OP BTFO.
>>518379409
>>518379409>>518379409
>>518356974why do 97% of scientists suck kike dick to push bullshit carbon tax
>>518356974Man made climate change = geo engineering chemtrails and harpp/nexrad ionosphere charging/manipulation
>>518356974>What would you do?
>>518356974That depends. Are the 97% being paid to say that by owners of a competing toll bridge? Is the bridge the only way off an island that I am otherwise imprisoned for life on?Maybe I'd ask both for the structural analysis, learn the math, and then verify myself.
>>518356974Holy shit, this is why Astolf Kekler has demolished 6000000 bridges! He was an anti-bridgemite! Total bridge death! Gas them all!
>>518356974>climate change is real >and the people who cause it say they need more of your money or they say they'll keep causing it
>>518356974If 97% of experts say it's unsafe and 3% of engineers say it's safe then I'm optimistic it's safe.If there were only experts involved in bridge construction, and no engineers, then it won't be safe even if 100% of experts say it is, as simple as that.
>>518380323>anti-bridgemiteThat's called termite.
>>518356974The 97% are funded by Jewish billionaires in the same way that Charlie Kirk was funded by Jewish billionaires. Look how that turned out.
>>518365492Being an intermodal truck driver takes you to a lot of places. The big companies are still using all the energy and water and dumping waste right into the river while you drink from paper straws and use toilets that can't flush a small turd, separating your garbage and taking flow restricted showers. I've seen the corporate waste and pollution first hand. If anyone bothers to bust them they pay a fine that's a fraction of what they save, if they are ever convicted and don't appeal.
>>518361280pic related
>>518356974You can get experts to say whatever you want, if there’s funding in it
>>518356974>Climate change exists>Bridge will collapse and kill everyone There's a leap in scale there
>>518384459
>>518356974>fabricated scenario proves fabricated scenarionot the win they think this is
>>518358313>CHYNA NUMBA WON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>518376561By that logic we should ban the most popular vehicle sold in the US. Hint it's the Ford F-150
>>518356974they want to keep their jobslike me when I do LGBTazerty- and other globohomo traiing at work.
>>518356974>experts have said for 70 years that this bridge will collapse tomorrow, and it hasn’t collapsed>will you keep driving?Yeah lol
>>518376681Meanwhile, any global warming if happening is being caused by these same WEF types. This is why I couldn't be bothered to care about the global warming psyop in the slightest, even to which degree it might actually be true. The faggots complaining the most about it are the ones that are causing it on every dimension. From actual emissions, to funding unlimited breeding in places like Africa and India, and then finally importing them in droves into western countries with higher per-capita emissions. They clearly don't give a single shit about global warming and to them it's simply a propaganda tool to enable their fucked up policies.
